`
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.,
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY, JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA,
`LLC, and VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CRUISE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`
`CASE IPR: 2014-00280
`Patent 6,324,463
`____________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE THE INTER PARTES REVIEW WITH
`RESPECT TO NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, Patent Owner and
`
`Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”) jointly request termination of Inter Partes
`
`Review Case No. IPR2014-00289 with respect to Nissan.
`
`Patent Owner and Nissan respectfully submit that termination is appropriate
`
`because they have reached an agreement resolving the dispute involving the patent
`
`at issue in the above-captioned Inter Partes Review, it is prior to full briefing on the
`
`issues raised in the above-captioned Inter Partes Review, and the Board has not
`
`issued a final written decision. Further, Nissan represents that it will no longer
`
`participate even if the Board does not terminate its participation in the above-
`
`captioned Inter Partes Review. That means Nissan will file no further papers. It
`
`also will not be participating in any oral argument.
`
`As required under 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72(b), filed herewith
`
`is a true copy of the written Confidential Settlement Agreement resolving the dispute
`
`in the above-captioned Inter Partes Review and the related litigation. See
`
`Confidential Exhibit 2002.
`
`Also attached as Exhibit A to the written Settlement Agreement is a copy of
`
`the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of the action in the United States
`
`District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Exhibit 2003, which is being
`
`filed concurrently with this Joint Motion, includes the executed Stipulated Motion
`
`for Dismissal With Prejudice and the resulting Order.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner and Nissan are concurrently filing a Joint Request that the
`
`Settlement Agreement, Confidential Exhibit 2002, shall be treated as business
`
`confidential information, shall be kept separate from the file of the involved patents,
`
`and shall be made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request,
`
`or to any person on a showing of good cause pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37
`
`C.F.R. §42.74(c).
`
`
`
`Dated: December 23, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /John R. Kasha/
`John R. Kasha
`Reg. No. 53,100
`KASHA LAW LLC
`14532 Dufief Mill Rd.
`North Potomac, MD 20878
`(703) 867-1886, telephone
`(301) 340-3022, facsimile
`Email: john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`By: /Vaibhav P. Kadaba/
`Vaibhav P. Kadaba
`Reg. No. 45,865
`Clay D. Holloway
`Reg. No. 58,011
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`Telephone: 404-815-6500
`Facsimile: 404-541-3258
`Counsel for Nissan North America, Inc.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.550(f), a copy of JOINT MOTION TO
`
`TERMINATE THE INTER PARTES REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO NISSAN
`
`NORTH AMERICA, INC. filed on December 23, 2014 was duly served via
`
`electronic mail upon Toyota-CCT-IPR@sughrue.com – counsel of record for
`
`Petitioner Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Subaru of America, Inc., American
`
`Honda Motor Co., Inc., Nissan North America, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Jaguar
`
`Land Rover North America, LLC, and Volvo Cars of North America, LLC
`
`(collectively “Petitioner”).
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/John R. Kasha/
`Registration No. 53,100
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Kasha Law LLC
`14532 Dufief Mill Rd.
`North Potomac, MD 20878
`(703) 867-1886, telephone
`(301) 340-3022, facsimile
`Email: john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`
`
`1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
