`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX, INC. AND SCIENCE APPLICATION INTERNATIONAL
`CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 8,504,697
`Issued: August 6, 2013
`Filed: December 28, 2011
`Inventors: Victor Larson, et al.
`Title: SYSTEM AND METHOD EMPLOYING AN AGILE NETWORK
`PROTOCOL FOR SECURE COMMUNICATIONS USING SECURE DOMAIN
`NAMES
`____________________
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2014-00238
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER APPLE INC.’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), requiring a separate paper requesting oral
`
`argument and specifying issues to be argued, Petitioner Apple Inc. respectfully
`
`submits this Request for Oral Argument on behalf of Apple. As specified in the
`
`Board’s May 14, 2014 Scheduling Order in IPR2014-00237 and IPR2014-00238,
`
`Oral Argument is scheduled for February 9, 2015.
`
`Given the significant overlap of issues between IPR2014-00237 and
`
`IPR2014-00238, Petitioner requests 90 minutes of cumulative argument time for
`
`those proceedings. In particular, Petitioner proposes that it present argument on
`
`both IPR2014-00237 and IPR2014-00238 as to the issues identified below, that
`
`Patent Owner follow with its response, and that Petitioner use its remaining time
`
`for rebuttal.
`
`• Grounds for which inter partes review was instituted for the ’697
`patent and any issue raised in the Board’s Institution Decisions in
`IPR2014-00237 and IPR2014-00238.
`• Any issue addressed in Petitioner’s papers in IPR2014-00237 and
`IPR2014-00238, including but not limited to the Petitions and
`Petitioner’s Reply Briefs.
`• Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all issues, including the
`issues listed above and any issues raised in Patent Owner’s Responses
`in IPR2014-00237 and IPR2014-00238, or Patent Owner’s Motions to
`Exclude (if any).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner requests permission to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including a projector and screen for Power Point or PDF
`
`slides, as well as a hard copy document projector.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Registration No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`(202) 736-8914 Direct
`(202) 736-8000 Main
`(202) 736-8711 Facsimile
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 5th day of January, 2015, a copy of Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Oral Argument, has been served in their entirety by e-mail on the
`
`following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`January 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
