throbber
Paper No.
`Filed: December 23, 2013
`
`
`Filed on behalf of: VirnetX Inc.
`By:
`Joseph E. Palys
`
`Naveen Modi
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
` Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`Telephone: 571-203-2700
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`E-mail: joseph.palys@finnegan.com
`
` naveen.modi@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`v.
`VIRNETX INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`VirnetX Inc., the Patent Owner, provides the following mandatory notices
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8.
`
`I.
`
`Real Party-in-Interest
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), the real party-in-interest is VirnetX Inc.,
`
`the assignee of record for U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697 (“the ’697 patent”).
`
`II. Related Matters
`Patent Owner identifies the following matters that may be deemed related
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2).
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`A.
`The ’697 patent, which is the subject of this proceeding, is also at issue in
`
`IPR2014-00238.
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving Related Patents
`B.
`Several patents stemming from the same applications that led to the ’697
`
`patent are or were at issue in the following inter partes review and inter partes
`
`reexamination proceedings:
`
`2
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`Case IPR2013-003481
`
`Case IPR2013-003492
`
`Case IPR2013-003753
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`Case IPR2014-00171
`
`Case IPR2014-00172
`
`Control No. 95/001,679
`
`Control No. 95/001,682
`
`Case IPR2013-003544
`
`Case IPR2013-003765
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`Case IPR2014-00173
`
`Control No. 95/001,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,714
`
`
`1 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013.
`2 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013.
`3 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`4 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013.
`5 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`3
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`Case IPR2013-003776
`
`Case IPR2013-003937
`
`Case IPR2013-003948
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504
`
`Case IPR2014-00176
`
`Case IPR2014-00177
`
`Control No. 95/001,788
`
`Control No. 95/001,851
`
`Case IPR2013-003789
`
`Case IPR2013-0039710
`
`Case IPR2013-0039811
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2014-00174
`
`Case IPR2014-00175
`
`Control No. 95/001,789
`
`Control No. 95/001,856
`
`
`6 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`7 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013.
`8 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013.
`9 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`10 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013.
`11 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013.
`
`4
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759
`
`Control No. 95/001,746
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180
`
`Control No. 95/001,792
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181
`
`Control No. 95/001,949
`
`
`C. U.S. Patent Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`The following applications, which stem from the same applications that led
`
`to the ’697 patent, are currently pending before the Office:
`
`11/839,937
`
`13/080,680
`
`13/155,039
`
`13/181,041
`
`13/285,962
`
`13/475,637
`
`13/615,436
`
`13/615,528
`
`13/615,536
`
`13/615,557
`
`13/617,375
`
`13/617,446
`
`13/618,966
`
`13/620,371
`
`13/620,534
`
`13/620,550
`
`13/890,206
`
`13/903,788
`
`13/911,792
`
`13/911,813
`
`13/950,877
`
`13/950,897
`
`13/950,919
`
`--
`
`
`D. Litigations Involving the Patent-at-Issue and/or Related Patents
`The ’697 patent and/or other patents that stem from the same applications
`
`that led to the ’697 patent are at issue in the following cases:
`
`5
`
`

`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Aastra USA, Inc.,
`
`Aastra Technologies Ltd., NEC Corp., and NEC Corp.
`
`of America, No. 6:10-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex.)12
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00855 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:11-cv-00563 (E.D.
`
`Tex.; consolidated with case No. 6:12-cv-00855)
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:13-cv-00211 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Microsoft Corp., No. 6:13-cv-00351 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`
`
`12 NEC and Aastra have entered into a license agreement with VirnetX and
`
`have been dismissed from this case. The only remaining defendants in this case
`
`are Apple and Cisco. The district court entered judgment in favor of VirnetX
`
`against Apple, and Apple has appealed that judgment to the Federal Circuit. The
`
`Cisco portion of the case remains pending at the district court, which is considering
`
`post-trial issues.
`
`6
`
`

`
`III. Lead and Back-Up Counsel and Service Information
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3) and (b)(4), Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`Patent 8,504,697
`
`
`identifies the following lead and back-up counsel and service information:
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`
`Joseph E. Palys (Reg. No. 46,508)
`
`Naveen Modi (Reg. No. 46,224)
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
` Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`
` Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`11955 Freedom Drive
`
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`
`Phone: (571) 203-2700
`
`Telephone: 202-408-4065
`
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`
`E-mail: joseph.palys@finnegan.com
`
`E-mail: naveen.modi@finnegan.com
`
`Dated: December 23, 2013
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`
`Certificate of Service
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105(a), I certify that I caused to be
`
`served on the counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 by Federal Express on
`
`December 23, 2013 at the following address of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 23, 2013
`
`
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Joseph A. Micallef
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket