throbber
EXHIBIT 2013
`
`EXHIBIT 201 3
`
`

`
`Martin Colloms
`
`sixth edition
`
`@?)WILEY
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 1
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`High Performance
`Loudspeakers
`
`Sixth Edition
`
`Martin Colloms and Paul Darlington
`
`Col/oms Electmtlcoustics, UK
`Apple Dynamics, UK
`
`John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 2
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`Copyright © 1005
`
`John Wrlcy & Son' L!tl, The Atri um . Solllhe rn Gate. Chic hester.
`We~t Sussex POI <J RSQ, England
`
`Tele phone ( + -W ) 1243 779777
`
`Emai l (fo r orde rs ancl c usto me r wrvtcc c nqui ric>): C•·books@ wi ley.co.uk
`Visit o ur ll omc Page o n www.wi ley.co m
`
`All Riglm Reserved. No pa n o f this pu blication rnay be reproduced, sto red in a retrieval system or tran~miued in
`any fomt or by a ny means, electronic. mechan ical. ph01ocopyi ng. record ing, scanning or o therwise, e xcept under the
`te nns of the Copy right. Desig ns nnd Pa te nts Ac t 1988 or unde r the tenns of a licence issued by the Copyrig ht
`Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Touc nham Court Rond, London WIT 4 LP, UK , without the pe rmi ssion in wri ting o f the
`Puhlishcr. Requests to the Publi sher should be :uldn:.<secl to the Penniss io ns Dc partrnem. John Wi ley & Sons l, td,
`Titc Atrium . Southern Gmc. Chichc., tcr. West S u,scx POI 9 SSQ. Eng land, o r e mailcd to pcmtreq@wiley.co.uk, o r
`faxed to ( +44) 12-13 770620.
`
`This publi catiou is des ig ned to (li'Ovid c accunuc ami a utho ritlll ive infonnati cm in regard to the subject maller
`cove red. It is so ld o n the understa nding lhat the Publishe r is not e ngaged in rende ring profession~! services. If
`professional ad vice o r o ther ex pe n a.~sistance is requi red. the services of a compete nt professional shou ld be sought.
`
`Other ll'iley Editorial O.Oices
`
`Jo hn Wiley & Son~ Inc .. Ill Ri ve r S tree t. Hoboken. NJ 0 7030, USA
`
`Jossey- Bnss. 989 Mnrke t Street. Sa n Francisco, Ci\ 94 103- 174 1. USA
`
`Wi lcy-VCII Verlag Gmb ll. Boschw . 12, D-69,169 Wcinheim, Gc nnany
`
`Jo hn Wiley & So ns 1\nstra.lia Ltd, 42 1\lcDougn ll Street. Mi lto n, Queensland 4064, Australi n
`
`John Wi ley & Sons (As ia) Pte Ltd, 2 C lc memi Loop 1102-0 1, Jin Xing Distripark . Singapore 129809
`
`Jo hn Wiley & So ns Canada Ltd, 22 Worcester Road. Etobicokc. Ontario. Canada 1\19\V ILl
`
`Wiley :llso publishes its books in a va riety o f electronic fo nn ats. Some conte nt that a ppears
`in print may not be available in electronic boo ks.
`
`Library of Congress Cntaloging-in-l'ublicnrion /Jnta:
`
`Collo ms, Martin.
`Hi gh perfomt ancc lo udspeakers I Mani n Co ll oms and Paul Dnrlington.
`-6th cd.
`p. em.
`Includes bibliog rnphical refere nces a nd index.
`IS (l N 0-470-09430-3 (a lk. paper)
`I. Darlingto n, Pa ul.
`I. Lo udspeakers.
`TK5983.C6-l 2005
`62 1.382'8-l - dc22
`
`II. Title.
`
`2005024427
`
`British Ubrary Cntalo~:uing in Publica/inn Data
`
`A catalogue record for this book is availa ble fro m the British Lihrury
`
`IS BN- 13: 9 78-0-4700 94-30 -3
`ISBN- 10: 0-470094-30-3
`
`Typeset in I0/12pt 1i mcs by La,erwords Pri vate l. imi tcd. Ch~nnai, Ind ia
`Pri nted ;md bound in Great llrilili n by Amony Rowe Ltd, Chippcnh:un. Wiltshire
`This hook is prin ted on ~cid-fn:c p:•pc r respo nsibly manu factured from sustainable forestry
`in which a t least two trees arc plant ed for each one '"eel for p:•per production.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 3
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`184
`
`High Performance L oudspeakers
`
`aluminium foil to aid hem conduction. The dome itself. depending on the metal or alloy
`chosen, may be drawn from foil of 30 to 100 ttm thickness. and wi ll require careful
`handling.
`
`Tolemncing
`The control of sensiti vity is vital for prcctston loudspeakers. Without this control a
`designer' s good intentions count for liulc as quite large changes in sound quaJity occur
`with relatively smaJI changes in relative driver level. In one test example. a stereo pair
`was found to have poor focus, where the image was pulled laterally, depending on the
`frequency reproduced, and one channel sounded louder than the other. When individually
`measured the two speakers fell within the tolerance defined for the overall specification
`namely ±3 dB, 100 Tlz to 15 k ll z. Close examination showed errors of as liule as I <lEi
`for each driver relative to a design centre defined for the system. llowevcr a careful com(cid:173)
`parison of the systems showed that a worse case error scenario pertained. For one channel
`the tweeter was I dB high, the woofer I dB low; f(>r the other the tweeter was l dB low,
`the woofer 1 dB high. Using the criterion that for a consistent sound 0.5 dB tolerancing
`is worthwhile, for the treble level relative to the mid-range, this pair of speakers was
`delivering an unacceptable 2 dB error- one 2 dB too 'bri ght', the other 2 dB too 'dim'.
`Production procedures arc advisable which can trnp such errors and provide data on the
`causes of these variations, thus facilitating tighter quality control.
`In the above example. swapping over the dri ver combinations would result in two
`tonally balanced speakers, though with one measuring a noticeable. but not so damaging,
`2 dB greater than the other.
`Where variations occur, pre-checking driver sensitivity in a simple test fix ture is really
`useful. For critical applications they may be sorted into colour-coded groups and matched
`with other drivers of equivalent sensitivity. Good sample and pair matching docs result
`in a significant performance gain, which may not always be specifically detectable by an
`observer. Cont rolled subjective testing docs show n link between close tolerance matching
`and bcuer sound quality overall.
`Virtually every component of a driver can affect performance and sensitivity. Key
`factors arc the cone or diaphragm mass, the number of turns and the exact gauge of wire
`in the voice coil, coil centration, the gap tolerance and the build quality of the magnet
`system. Small errors c;m accumulate, resulting in serious I or 2 dB changes in loudness,
`and these must be controlled. For driver quality control. tbere is also no substitute for
`a flux probe which can read directly the field strength auained by sample production
`assemblies and methods.
`
`Effer.Js of Pam111e1er \!arimio11. l'articlllarly Cli111a/e
`ln a number of the references. sensitivity analysis has been applied to l!xaminc how the
`target responses are affected by variations in the parameters. It would appear that more
`complex the alignment order, the more sensiti ve it becomes to such variations.
`Consider a system designed for a worldwide market where air cond itioning and tem(cid:173)
`perature control cannot be assumed in the place of usc. llumidi ty can vary from almost
`0 to I 00%. 1\ significant change in mov ing mass ca n result with pulp cones clue to the
`hygroscopic nature of nwny diaphragms including. though to a lesser ex tent. the synthetic
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 4
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`185
`. S ,, tern Analysis: Room Environment\ and 2rr Theory
`. frctJtlcncY ·.:.:>~~-__:..-----------------------
`~
`·~d aterials such as polyamide: Ambient temperature can vary from 15 °C to
`11yton-bi~St; ?~1!c as a general mean, but a speaker system with its back to a sunlit window
`.10 °C wrtl~ - - e an overa ll temperawre rise of 10 oc or so above ambient, making a total
`c~n cxr~r!~~\hese arc serious eff~cts since the ~nr:round of many modem lo.w colo~rnllion
`nsc to 4.
`11, 10y synthetic matcnals such as n11nlc rubber whose mcchantcal resistance
`11111ts en
`.
`.
` nee vary strongl y With temperature 111 the range concerned. As an example, a
`bass
`d cornp "1
`·u a 110111inal 25 Hz resonance may have a 17 liz resonance at 27 C. but alter-
`a
`'
`'
`.111
`1 ·v·r wr 1 •
`< n .'", 35 Hi'. at 10 °C. With the surround frequently the dominant driver compliance.
`nauvcll~ ·be worth considaing LF alignments exhibiting reduced sensitivity to such vari(cid:173)
`~~ ."'~.uovcr the specific range cited, .a rcOex dcsi~n migh.t misbehave .in such a mar~ncr
`'11:
`reflex loading which may be a n sk that a destg,ner nught not cons1der worth tak1ng.
`th
`regards other factors, almost any driver parameter can and will vary due to pro-
`A~on tolernnce. probably the greatest of these bt.:ing tlte IJI factor. Appearing ' squared·
`clucll

`I .
`. .
`. I
`I
`fi
`I
`.
`I
`I
`I • LF analysis relat1ons ups II IS ccrtam y t 1c 1rst c 101ce to to erancc c osely. both
`111 tiC
`.
`.
`.
`. producrjon !>pread and 1ts effect on the result1ng system ahgnment (sec Chapter 3.
`~~.:tion 3.9). The use or smurated magnetic parts and good coil cent ration arc key factors.
`
`1.
`
`4.7 Transmission-line E nclosures
`In theory a transmission line or labyrinth is capable of being extended to infinity, providing
`,1 perfectly resistive termination to the driver by absorbing all the rear directed energy.
`llcncc in tl1is respect it may be regarded as a special case of a very large scaled box.
`which is itself the practical realization of an ' infinite barne·.
`Physically the line resembles an acoustic pipe which, in its folded form, is also known
`,,, a labyrinth. The cross-section must be sufficiently large in order that the rear directed
`~ncrgy is not impeded. and yet it must also be long enough to tcrrninate the energy
`dm•m to the lowest desired frequencies. Si nce the path length must be comparable to the
`''""\!length absorbed, if genuine low-frequency operation is the aim, ideal transmission
`lines quickly become over-large, even when folded. For a given closed line, the absorption
`reduces as the cut-off frequency is approached. This menns that the energy is beginning
`to be rcnected back to the driver and the system will then approximate to a sealed box
`of the same totHI volume. For example, a filled, non-resonnnt absorptive line, intended
`10 oper~te effecti vely clown to 35 Hz, must be at least 8 m long. I f a cross-section of
`900 em
`is adopted (roughly equivalent to that of a 36 em diameter bass driver) then the
`~nclosurc volume will be inordinately large at 720 litres.
`Pra~tical lines nre of necessity smaller in cross-section 10 reduce the total volume.
`and Pipe resonances and reflections at higher frcquencie may become a problem unless
`a~s,orption.is very carefully arranged. It was discovered by Bailey that a filling composed
`~ ong-h:urcd sheep's wool at a density of 8 kg m 3 possessed better acoustic properties
`~~~arcd _with other materials, such as glass fibre. More specifically, at low frequencies
`1m 60 I I~) the speed or sound in the line appears to be reduced by 50%. which has
`por~ant tmplicntions [4R-5 1] .
`,, ~~hllc, in theory, a damped line is a perfect absorber and the termi nation at the far end
`lnvarin~l~onsequcnce: that is, it may be closed or open. in practice, commercial designs
`_a ) ) leave the lrne open. Energy propagated hdow the line's cut-off frequency will
`
`.
`.
`• E\cn \Ill. lwc ·r. d
`c ct nme, 111:1y vary wuh hmmdlly.
`
`II igh Performance 1
`~dspea~cr.
`~
`:pending on the 111 , • et,tl or 1
`a to,
`ness, and will req .
`tllrc ca f ·
`rc Ul
`
`akers. Without this
`.
`· control .
`I
`a
`langes lfl sound qualit
`•ne test example a st y OCcur
`crco n •
`,.lur
`ed laterally, dependinn
`o on the
`I
`n t tc other. When indiv'd
`d for the overall spcc'tfit u:lll}

`C.1hon
`wed errors of as little as 1 dU
`
`'
`
`I
`
`stem. However a careful
`com.
`.
`.
`trro pertamcd. For one channel
`her the tweeter was 1 dB 10,,
`:tent s~und .0.5 dB tolerancin~
`tge. thts patr of speakers \\ '"
`dll'. the other 2 dB too 'dim'
`!rrors and provide data 011 the
`:ontrol.
`>inmions would result in two
`ticeable, but not so damaging.
`
`n a simple test fixture is rcull)
`Jur-coded groups and matched
`and pair matching does result
`e spccificnlly detectable b)' .111
`ween close tolerance matching
`
`orrnance and sensitivity. Kt.:)
`IS and the exact gauge of wrr~
`e build quality of the magnet
`or 2 dB changes in loudncs'l.
`there is also no substitute for
`ttained by sample production
`
`n applied to examine hoW the

`that mor~
`rs. It would appe.Jr
`s 10 such variations.
`d ICIO"
`.
`· ·

`ere air condruo111ng an
`1 ·1hl10SI
`I.
`Jmidiry can vary ron '
`•
`1
`. d e to t it.:
`11
`It with (1trlp cones
`•
`nthCllC
`0 a lesser ex tent, the sy
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 5
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`186
`
`High Pcrfonnancc Loudspeakers
`
`emerge from the aperture and, depending on its phase, will augment or cancel the main
`contribu tion from the front of the driver. Over a limi ted range of frequencies such an
`enclosure will behave as a reflex, the propagation delay down the line providing the
`required phase inversion. This is where the wool filling comes into its own since, for a
`given length of line, the delay is effectively doubled, thus lowering the cut-off frequency
`of the system as a whole (Fig. 4.42)
`It has been suggested that the mechanism of this increased delay is at least partially due
`to the air velocity in the line reducing al low frequencies, due to the movement of the wool
`mass. As such, the lallcr represents a non-linear inertial component in the energy path
`down the line, and the impulse response may be irregular and poor subjecti ve rhythm.
`A funher effect is produced at low frequencies by the air mass in the line moving with
`the driver, added to the driver's own moving mass. Whereas in conventional boxes the
`
`Figure -t..t2 A four-way, Boor standing ~ystcm with separate transmission-line loading at mid and
`low frequencies. The larger line is folded and a thick foam lining helps absorb highcr-order pipe
`modes (courtesy TDL)
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 6
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`mancc Loudspeakers
`
`or cancel the main
`cq ucncies such an
`line providing the
`s own since. for a
`: cut-off frequency
`
`least partia lly due
`'emcnt of the wool
`n the energy path
`bjective rhythm.
`: line moving witJ1
`~111 ionaJ boxes IJ1c
`
`loading at mid and
`higher-order pipe
`
`(.,ow-frequency System Analysis: Room Environments and 2rr Theory
`
`187
`
`nir mass is quite tow, often less thnn 20% of the driver, in an open transmission line, the
`mass addition may be equal to that of the driver itself, thus reducing the Iauer's loaded
`resonant frequency by a factor of J2.
`Resonant modes are common in this conve111ional type of open pipe, occurring at odd
`(as opposed 10 even) mulliples of the quarter wavelength . Taking the example of a 2 m
`fi lled pipe with moderate absorption (packing density below 5 kg/m 3) the quarter-wave
`mis-termination occurs at about 30 Hz. If the pipe is over-damped, too much energy
`will be absorbed, and the sound output will possess a gradual roll-off from as high as
`70 liz. Tn commercia ll y viable systems. i.e. those of reasonable size, it may be difficult to
`find a satisfactory compromise between a uniformly extended LF response and an upper
`bass/lower mid-performance with minimal, colouration~ inducing line resonances.
`
`Quarter-wave 'Line' Loading
`II is worth keepi ng in mind that for a useful I 00 dB s.p. l. al a mid-bass frequency of
`50 Hz c even a 2 10 mm frame (8 in) bass unit needs to move ±7.5 mm under scaled-box
`loading.
`Considering the drive for a column of sufficient length, e.g. 1.5 m, intending 'quarter(cid:173)
`wave' operation, the system behaves as an infinite baffle above I 00 Hz, but by 50 Hz
`the open-ended column is imparting a mass load on the driver, the larger radiating area
`maintaining the overall acoustic output, while diaphragm excursion in this example is
`reduced to just ±2.5 mm at 50 Hz (as of course does reflex loading). The total moving
`mass is typically increased four-fold at low frequencies, reducing the f s of a 50 Hz driver
`1025 Hz.
`The one-quarter wavelength constitutes the low-frequency limit; 30 Hz has a 12 m
`wavelength, so the required column will be 3 n1.
`While in theory columns differ from transmission lines, they also suffer from harmonic
`modes, and since damping is discouraged on the grounds of maintaining efficiency, the
`unwanted higher modes are often troublesome. The most severe is the third harmonic, and
`this may be controlled by mounting the drive unit nt the upper third of the column length,
`on the node. In practice, further steps such as tapering the duct (which also is usuaJly
`folded within the enclosure) and judicious placement of sections of fibre absorbent arc
`required to control colouration due to these secondary resonances.
`In one example of a quarter-wave system the ' mouth ' of the column was allerccl (suc(cid:173)
`cessfully) 10 a quasi -reflex type by adding n slotted port c which tuned 111e volume to
`30 Hz-the system cut-off. In this instance a mix of the two types resulted wh ich was
`subjectively clean sounding.
`
`Pipes and Lines Oven,iew
`
`1\ugsperger succinctly rev iewed transmiSSion lines under the title ' Damped Pipes'.
`1\ugsperger, a specialist in reponing acoustic patents, reminds us of the early US patent
`of 1936 by Olney, for an 'Acoustic Labyrimh' fitted with an absorptive lining.
`One primary question concerns the fibre stuffing, whether it moves and adds to mass
`and clamping, or whether it is largely stationary, thus amenable to fluid flow consideration ,
`for example using an analysis method based on Locanthi · s horn analog.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 7
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`188
`
`I ligh Performance Loudspeaker!i
`
`Low
`
`A plain pipe resonates at odd multiples of its fundamental quarter-wave resonance and
`these arc strongly coupled to both the cone, and thus its output, and to the pipe exit.
`Even worse, the cone and pipe outputs move in and out of phase at even multiples of the
`fundamental modes, and n most uneven nnd coloured output results.
`It is shown that quite high levels of stuffing are required for a satisfactory ±I dB of
`pass-band ripple, this averaging I 0 grams per litre for system Q values of around 0.5.
`The weight of stuffing varies greatly with the grade; for example, a 1.22 m line with
`7 1 Hz natural fp required 17.5 g/1 of polyester wadding, 9.5 g/1 of fibreglass and just
`7.5 g when using 'micro fibre' {vadding.
`Specified for a greater but perhaps acceptable ripple, the analysis indicates that a well(cid:173)
`designed line can provide. the simjlar pass-band efficiency of a dosed box of lhe same
`volume, but with 2-3 dB more output at the low-frequency limil. This output could
`be traded for reduced cone excursion and would allow for a little hi gher overall power
`handling and acoustic output for the same investment. (Sec Figure 4.43(a-c).)
`Augspergcr also considers some variations on the line theme, for example, tapered lines,
`offset driver placerncnL and use of an upper coupling chamber. The possible directivity
`effccls of separated low-frequency sources arc noted while the investigalion indicates that
`usc of sufficient stuffing is essential to suppress tllC strong resonant behaviour of what
`is acouslically still a pipe. When so satisfaclorily clamped (not shown), a simple line or
`pipe then has typically half the efficiency of an equi valently sized closed box and the
`pipe output is actually so low as not to figure significantly in the output.
`
`Figw
`(af1e1
`
`a
`1:
`
`' •
`
`Figm
`drivel
`
`ID
`-o
`a. (/)
`
`110.00
`
`105.00
`
`100.00
`
`95.00
`
`90.00
`
`85.00
`
`80.00
`
`75.00
`
`70.00
`
`65.00
`
`60.00
`10
`
`100
`Frequency (Hz)
`
`1000
`
`(a) Total (~olid). driver (doued), pipe (dashed). for a medium damped, driven line/pipe
`Figure 4.43
`(after Augspergcr)
`
`~ v .... .... .....
`.
`~
`:,/ .. .. ·······
`~ .. ·
`--
`-- ~
`-....
`v.
`T,. ~··
`. •
`.... ~--~---
`.....
`~·
`Cone ··
`h:>Jpe
`
`r--..
`
`/
`
`....
`
`....
`
`'t--
`
`I;
`
`....
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2013 Page 8
`IPR2014-00235

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket