throbber
EXHIBIT 2010
`
`EXHIBIT 20 1 O
`
`

`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 1
`IPR2014-00235
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 1
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 2
`IPR2014-00235
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 2
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 3
`IPR2014-00235
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 3
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`l2Z
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
`
`absorbing material. Longitudinal isolation of the walls of the duct shou-kl
`be provided to prevent longitudinal transmission of sound by the walls 01'.
`the duct. This can be accomplished by the use of rubber connectors zit’
`regular intervals. The walls of the duct should be rigid so that air—b0rnie'
`sounds are not
`transmitted through the walls. Very high attenuatioii , _
`can be obtained in ducts of this type.
`'
`.
`The attenuation, in decibels per foot, in a square or rectangular conduit"-.,
`lined with absorbing material may be obtained from the following empirical:
`formula,“
`
`,
`
`.|.'
`__
`
`;
`
`ACOUSTICAL ELEM:
`
`'
`
`'
`
`ELECTRICAL cmculr
`
`VM5i~iEs
`Qt
`
`'
`
`5.113 ,. '.
`
`ii? : 12.6(x1'4 5'
`ft
`A
`where P = perimeter, in inches,
`A = cross-sectional area in square inches, and
`a — absorption coefficient of the material used for lining the duct.
`Equation 5.113 holds for square ducts and rectangular ducts in which -
`the ratio between the two sides is not greater than two.
`-
`The general subject47v48 of tubes lined with absorbing material, with ’
`both rigid and vibratile walls, has been considered theoretically and experi
`mentally.
`5.38. Response of a Vibrating System of One Degree of Freedom.—
`Consider the electrical circuit, consisting of inductance, electrical resistance,
`and electrical capacitance and a voltage connected in series, as shown in .
`Fig. 5.20. The resonant frequency, in cycles per second, is given by
`
`I I:
`
`RESPONSE
`
`i
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`:
`
`.
`
`"'
`
`.
`
`‘L-.fr
`
`500
`. \\
`L '
`"2 "3 "4 "5 "6 "7"B"9 2°
`
`5.114-i -
`
`'
`
`_
`
`" .
`‘
`.
`5
`
`'
`
`FIG. 5.20. The current response c iaracteristics of a simple series
`circuit as a function of the ratio f + f,, where f, = the resonant
`frequency, and f = the frequency under consideration. The
`numbers of the characteristics refer to the value of Q,, Q, :
`2nf,L/75. The above characteristics are applicable to acoustical
`and mechanical systems by the substitution of the elements and
`quantities which are analogous to the electrical system.
`
`1
`
`jwcfi.
`
`)
`
`5.11
`
`'
`
`_'
`
`-'1 ',
`'
`
`The curient response characteristics as function of the ratio f + fr for
`
`_
`
`various values of Q, are shown in Fig. 5.20.
`- The above characteristics are applicable to acoustical and mechanical
`' systems by the substitution of the elements and quantities which are analo-
`~_ gous to the electrical system (see Chapter IV).
`3'.
`
`1
`27-: \/LCE
`
`fr 2
`.
`.
`,
`Where L = Inductance: In henrles: and
`CE = electrical Capacitance, in fal-ads_
`_
`_
`’
`_
`_
`The Current m the Clrcult 13 gwcn by
`1':
`
`8
`
`n.~ +¢(wL +
`where 73 = electrical resistance, in ohms,
`e = driving voltage, in volts, and
`1' = current, in amperes.
`The quantity Q, is given by
`
`Q»
`
`w,L
`75'
`
`where w, = Zn-f,.
`45 Sabine, H. J., jour, Auous. Soc. Amzr., Vol. 12, N0. 1, p. 53, 1940.
`47 Sivian, L. ]., jam’. Anous. Soc. Amen, Vol. 9, N0. 2, p. 135, 1937.
`43 M0lloy_ C. T_, _/0'L£1_ Acous. Soc. Amer, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 31, 194-4.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 4
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`6
`
`DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDS PEAKE RS
`
`is an electroacoustic transducer
`6.1. Intr0duction.1 A loudspeaker
`designed to radiate acoustical energy into a room or open air. There
`are two general types of loudspeakers in use today, namely:
`the direct
`radiator and the horn type loudspeaker. The diaphragm of the direct
`radiator loudspeaker is coupled directly to the air. The diaphragm of the
`horn loudspeaker is coupled to the air by means of a horn. The direct
`radiator loudspeaker will be considered in this chapter and the horn loud-
`speaker will be considered in the following chapter.
`The almost universal use of the direct radiator loudspeaker is due to
`the simplicity of construction, small space requirements, and the relatively
`uniform response characteristic. Uniform response over a moderate fre-I
`quency band may be obtained with any simple, direct radiator dynamic
`loudspeaker. However,
`reproduction over a wide frequency range is
`restricted by practical limitations. The two extreme ends of the audio-
`frequency band are the most difficult to reproduce with efliciency comparable
`to that of the midnaudiovfrequency range.
`Inefficiency at the low frequencies
`is primarily due to the small radiation mechanical resistance. There are a
`number of means available for increasing the radiation mechanical resistance
`at the low frequencies. A large radiation mechanical resistance may be
`' obtained by using a large cone. A phase inverter consisting of a completely
`enclosed cabinet with ports provides a means for extending the low~frequency
`range. A horn may be used for presenting a large radiation mechanical
`resistance to a diaphragm at the low frequencies. The efficiency of a direct
`radiator loudspeaker at the high frequencies is limited by the mechanical
`mass reactance of the vibrating system. There are a number of arrange-
`ments suitable for reducing the mass of the vibrating system at the high
`frequencies. Two or more separate loudspeaker mechanisms may be used,
`each designed to reproduce a certain portion of the range. Multiple cones
`driven by a single voice coil may be arranged so that the mass of the system
`decreases at the high frequencies. The voice coil may be sectionalized to
`decrease the mass and inductance at the high frequencies and thereby
`increase the high-frequency range. Multiple coils and multiple cones
`1 Mawardi, Osman K., jowr. Acnus. Soc. Amer, Vol. 26, No. 1, p. 1, 1954.
`
`DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDSPEAKERS
`
`I25
`
`combined into a single mechanism may be designed to yield uniform response
`to the upper limit of audibility.
`.
`_
`.
`It is the purpose of this chapter to outline the factors which influence
`the performance of the conventional, direct radiator loudspeaker, to illustrate
`systems for controlling the response with respect to frequency and to describe
`several means for decreasing the effective mass of the vibrating systems at the
`high frequencies and for improving the efficiency at the low frequencies.
`6.2. Single-Coil, Single-Cone Loudspeakei‘.—The sirpqle ilytpamic
`loudspeaker consists of a paper cone’ driven by a voice coi
`oca e
`H1 3
`magnetic field. A cross—sectional view,
`the voice coil_ circuit and the
`mechanical circuit of a dynamic loudspeaker are shown in Fig. 6.1. The
`
`m C
`
`CV5 FMS
`
`mA
`
`IMA
`
`FIELD
`STRUCTURE
`_/
`
`_
`
`CROSS-SECTIONAL
`VIEW
`
`¢ou_
`
`ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT
`
`MECHANICAL
`or
`THE
`MECHANICAL
`
`CIRCUIT
`
`SYSTEM
`
`FIG. 6.1. Cross—sectional view of a single—coil, Single-CODE. dire“ T§diat°F»
`d namic loudspeaker mechanism mounted in a baffle.
`In the V0166: 0011
`-
`—
`i:
`‘
`.
`.
`q
`.
`_
`V
`d
`_
`.
`iicuit oi
`the internal voltave of the generator. mm = the internal electrical
`resistance of the generator. up and L —‘ the electricallresistagics ind
`Sale
`tance of the voice coil.
`:51»: = the m0t10“a1 electflca lffpeca °_'the COm_
`mechanical circiiit, 7410 = the mass of the cone and voice coi .
`.i_1s -
`_
`-
`=
`‘h
`'
`pliance of the suspension system.
`has = the mechamcal Teslstance of mi
`suspension system._
`7544 = the mass of the air lo:-:1: {ma mt1t1}'ieII::*3O'~iC:‘::1l‘)33
`resistance of the air load.
`fa, 2 the meChaI10m0 Vev OTC?
`_
`‘
`3,“; = the mechanical impedance due to the electrical circuit.
`f)10 = the
`meclianomotive force of the mechanical generator.
`
`total mechanical impedance in mechanical ohms, of the vibrating system
`at the voice coil is
`
`7
`.
`.
`ZMT : 7’MS ‘i’ 7’MA ‘l'.7‘”W‘C +]wmA _ LUCMS
`
`where rMS = mechanical resistance of the suspension system, in mefihanlcal
`ohms,
`
`1/MA = mechanical resistance of the air load, in mechanical Ohms,
`m0 = mass of the cone and the voice coil, in grams,
`mA = mass of the air load, in grams. and
`CMS .: compliance of the suspension system, in centimeters per dyne.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 5
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`l26
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINE:
`
`Equation 6.1 may be written as follows
`
`ZMT = 7’MS -.- VMA -i-jxivrc + _7-xll/IA *7'%Ms
`where rM,g mechanical resistance of the suspension system, in in
`ohms,
`731,1 : mechanical resistance of the air load, in mechanical 0
`25310 : wmc = mechanical reactance of the voice coil and co
`mechanical ohms,
`
`-.
`
`xMA = oumA = mechanical reactance of the air load,
`ohms, and
`1
`= mechanical reactance of the suspension sys
`wCMs
`mechanical ohms.
`
`xM5 =
`
`in me'_"
`
`The mechanical resistance and mechanical reactance of the air lo
`be obtained from Sec. 5.10 and Fig. 5.2.
`'
`The motional electrical impedance? in abohms, of the mechanical
`is
`
`23.4 =
`I
`
`(B02
`ZMT
`
`where B = flux density in air gap, in gausses,
`Z = length of the conductor in the voice coil, in centimeter
`21.” 2 total mechanical
`impedance of
`the mechanical
`sysu
`mechanical ohms.
`'
`
`The efficiency of the loudspeaker is the ratio of the sound powe
`to the electrical power input. The efficiency, in per cent, may be‘E'_;
`from the voice coil circuit of Fig. 6.1 and expressed as follows,
`'
`7.83
`= —————--~
`1'50 + VEM X
`
`100
`
`H
`
`where 753
`
`component of the motional electrical resistance due,-
`radiation of sound, in abohms,
`rEM = total motional electrical resistance, in abohms, and
`750 = damped electrical resistance of the voice coil, in abohn'i_
`
`L.‘-
`127
`Iig DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDSPEAKERS
`ifyiihe-discussion assume that the mechanical reactance and
`eisiétaiice of the suspension svstem are zero. The mechanical
`characteristics of the mechanical system’ are shown in Fig. 6.2.
`lsfgmall, compared to xMA and xMc, equation 6.3 becomes
`
`x 100
`
`(Bl)27'_rL[A
`_
`M — rEc(xMA + «‘¢Mc)2
`
`
`“STE” %DIAMETER INCHES | ‘
`
`ss or CONE GRAMS mi-.'1_
`MASS or VOICE coxL.c-RAMS
`to Lima: susezusuon BIND’
`MECH. RES.
`5usi5ENsIoN
`2°°
`voi
`COIL MATERWA
`AIR GAP rcux GAL-ssts
`ioooo
`
`Ioooa
`
`6.6
`
`-IMPEDANCE
`MECHANICAL
`
`EFFICIENCV
`
`IMPEDANCE
`MECHANICAL
`
`C?»
`
`EFFIOENCY
`
`The components 733 and r1,-M may be obtained from equations
`6.3.
`
`'
`
`,RCWENCY
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`'
`
`I
`'
`F REQUENCY
`
`From equations 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4, the efficiency, in per cent, of the
`speaker is
`
`2
`
`(B1)2”MA
`(31) 2(7’MS + 7’MA) + 1’Ec[(1’Mc + 7MA)2 + (xMA + xMC —xMs) 2]
`
`X .1
`4
`
`'u
`
`2Olson, “Dynamical Analogies,” D. Van Nostrand Company, Princetol
`1943.
`'-5
`
`ifha mechanical impedance rec uencv c aaracteristics of three direct radiator
`gr’: having 1-inch, 4-inch, and 16-inch diameter cones.
`x_-,,g = the mechanical
`e-dire" to the cone and coil.
`xMS : the mechanical reactance due to the suspen-
`'1-‘[55 x,“ = the mechanical
`reactance due to the air
`load.
`11:” = the
`a "resistance due to the air load. The efficiency characteristics shown are for
`wits as shown in the table and the graphs of the mechanical impedances.
`In
`en_cy characteristics,
`ii; = the etficiency for his equal *0 Z31’0-
`#2 = the
`ey,ior :1“ as indicated by the graph.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 6
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`l2 8
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
`
`DIRECT RADlATOR.LOUDSPEAKERS
`
`o
`
`.IN'nEcn3EL$Ni
`
`‘Lossda
`EFFICIE-NC.‘-’
`
`The efficiency loss in a direct radiator loudspeaker as 8-
`I ' Fig 6 3
`.1”; where m1 —= the mass of the voice
`{motion of the ratio
`mo + mi’
`.
`-31 m1, = the mass of the diaphragm, "74 = the ‘T1353 0f the 3”
`‘s.
`‘ cad
`The maximum efficiency is arbitrarily depicted as 0 db.
`
`s3a4 it is not practical to make the
`_ al, in commercial loudspeaker
`As a matter of fact‘, the cone mass
`equal to the voice-coil mass.
`A consideration of equation
`v several times the voice-C011 mass‘
`d by the use of a llght-Welght
`that the efficiency can be increase
`
`9 a
`
`n
`
`‘
`
`
`
`OUTPUTINDB 0:
`
`ow
`
`25
`2.0
`l,5
`RELATIVE com-: MASS
`
`FIG. 6.4-. Output of a. typical direct radiator
`loudspeaker as a function of the mass of the
`cone.
`
`-
`
`loudspeaker as a
`‘
`'
`'
`7
`-
`.
`I
`1
`th
`5 reiatwe output of a ‘t; pical direct radiator
`ffhe weight of the cone is shown in Fig. 6.4.
`In this exam}? 5:
`9
`-
`th
`‘the permanent magnet was kept constant. However,
`e mass
`ecoil and the air gap were selected to obtain maximum output.
`
`--Lvimnampsww
`-
`-
`f(:téIf:C::d)}€I:€711l:;:'7::gA“;)-
`Eng. Soc» Vol- 2: Ne 4- P- 219: 1954-
`
`In terms of the resistivity and density of the voice coil, equa
`becomes
`-
`'
`
`_
`“ r
`
`BZTMAWL1
`
`X 1°“
`
`p
`
`K,
`
`mass of the voice coil, in grams,
`density of the voice coil conductor, in grams per cubi
`‘ meter, and
`'
`resistivity of the voice coil conductor, in microhms :v. '.
`meter cube.
`f
`
`The density, resistivity, and density-resistivity product of Va"-
`ments are shown in Table 6.1.
`3- 'i_
`
`TABLE 6.1, DENSITY p, in GRAMS PER CUBIC CENTIMETER; RESISTIVITY K,, IN 2.
`PER CENTIMETER CUBE AND DE.\'sii'Y—REs1s'r1vri'Y pnonucr PK, or VARIOUS
`J
`TEMPERATURE, 20° C.
`
`'
`
`Element
`
`N
`
`Sodium
`Lithium
`Potassium
`Calcium
`Aluminum
`Magnesium .
`Titanium
`Copper
`.
`Silver
`Chromium
`Beryllium .
`Barium
`Manganese
`Caesium
`Zinc
`.
`Gold
`Molybdenum
`Cadmium
`Nickel
`.
`Iron
`Cobalt
`.
`Tin
`Tungsten
`lridiurn
`Platinum
`Lead
`Antimony
`Bismuth
`Mercury
`
`.
`
`E:oloLn'oo-.nL;'\ib.eoInioL»\.DC>UI\!U)\)
`
`
`
`Ul\lO\CDbJ-¥>©L-)'\l.\D.O0.0\E\)'L».)I.-.;;Dl.\)4:v1.
`
`£:xLimE:nmoxI_-ZnoxwereN
`
`
`
`xxoxiooou-u.uu\xoooo—>\i:xox~.>'ooeI—E3xV'''
`
`>——K
`
`~o-era»—-toU1V-‘N~oO\Un—~o\o\l~JUIt\)U1>—Au|\c>c3M>—-HL.).p:q.p\1.c.;s
`
`»—-
`
`.—\.—ua\DU\>—I>—\Id\O\I00\l0OOOOxo~J>-\\]L»~>»-O\OO<>-¥>>—*l\3>—~._-._-Nm»—«
`
`
`
`The relation between the efficiency and the ratio of the mass of‘
`coil to the mass of the cone and the air load may be obtained from"
`6.7 and is depicted in Fig. 6.3. The maximum efficiency occursgw
`mass of the voice coil is equal to the mass of the cone and air load‘
`‘-
`
`.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 7
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`130
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
`
`There is a limit to the extent to which the reduction in mass of the cone can
`be carried because, as the cone mass is reduced, the strength of the cone;
`reduced and as a consequence the nonlinear distortion is increased due 'r_
`overload of the material of the cone. High sensitivity and low distortio
`are not compatible.
`In order to obtain low nonlinear distortion, a relative
`heavy cone must be used. The subject of nonlinear distortion and con_
`weight will be discussed in Sec. 626.
`.
`The mechanical impedance and corresponding efficiency characteristi
`assuming the mechanical reactance due to the suspension to be zero a 5
`shown in Fig. 6.2. The air load mechanical resistance and mechanic
`reactance are assumed to be the same as those on two sides of a vibratin
`piston with the diameter equal to the cone diameter (see Sec. 5.8). The
`weights of the cones and voice coils are typical of loudspeakers ‘in actua
`use today.
`It will be seen that the efficiencies of all three systems at
`practically the same. Of course, the power-handling capacity of the smalle
`cones is very small at the lower frequencies.
`‘
`In the preceding considerations the mechanical reactance due to th‘
`suspension system was assumed to be zero. The efficiency in which all
`the elements of the vibrating system are included may be obtained from
`equation 6.5. The mechanical, resistance 7M0, due to the suspension syste
`is also a factor in the efficiency in the region of resonance. Typical Valu
`of mm for 16-, 4~, and 1—inch cones are shown in Fig. 6.2. The efficient"
`'=
`characteristics under these conditions are shown in Fig. 6.2.
`It will
`u
`noted that
`the efficiency is high at
`the resonant frequency. Howeve -
`when coupled to a vacuum tube driving system the motional electrica
`impedance is also increased which reduces the power input to the Voi
`'
`coil. For this reason the response is not accentuated to the degree depict
`by the peak in the efficiency characteristic.
`It will be seen that t‘
`efficiency decreases very rapidly below the resonant frequency. Th
`fore, in a direct radiator loudspeaker the limit at the low—frequency e .-.
`of the frequency range is determined by the resonant frequency of th
`system.
`'
`The motional electrical impedance of a dynamic loudspeaker is give
`by equation 6.3. The normal electrical impedance, in abohms, of voi 1'
`coil is given by
`:
`6;
`
`ZEN = ZEM + ZED
`
`_
`
`where zEM motional electrical impedance, in abohms, and
`253 — electrical impedance of the voice coil in the absence of motio
`that is blocked, in abohms.
`
`impedance are shown i
`the motional electrical
`The components of
`Fig. 6.5. At the resonant frequency the motional electrical impedance fs
`large because the mechanical impedance is small. The current in the voice‘
`coil circuit may be determined from the voice coil electrical circuit,
`the
`driving voltage and the electrical resistance of the generator.
`
`_ _l3l
`DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDSPEAKBRS
`J he mecharnotive force or driving force,5 in dynes, applied to the mechan-
`system is
`_
`fM = Bh
`
`"'i ere B = flux density in the air gap, in gausses,
`I
`Z — length of the conductor, in centimeters, and
`1' = current in the voice coil circuit, in abamperes.
`
`‘,i_is is the driving force, fM, applied to the mechanical system as shown in
`:a_ 6.1.
`
`- ZEN: Z:n+Zan
`
`OHM5
`IN
`
`IMPEDANCE
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`"he electrical impedance characteristics of the voice coil in a direct
`FIG. 6.5.
`.' _mdiato1— loudspeaker. 3“, = the normal
`electrical
`impedance. 2“, = the
`‘I damped
`electrical
`impedance.
`.7”, = the motional
`electrical
`impedance.
`-7“, = the resistive component of the motional electrical
`impedance.
`xm, -—-
`the reactive component of the motional electrical impedance.
`
`'
`
`"" The mechanical impedance,5 in mechanical ohms, due to the electrical
`._ icuit is
`.
`
`6.10
`
`F. 3 re ZET = 730 + jwl + 7120,
`I ma 2 damped electrical resistance of the voice coil, in abohms,
`L = damped inductance of the voice coil in abhenries, and
`ma = electrical resistance of the generator, in abohms.
`
`his mechanical impedance appears in the mechanical system as shown in
`ig. 6.1.
`In calculating the steady state performance the driving force,
`‘
`',, applied to the mechanical system is used and the mechanical impedance
`to the electrical system need not be considered. However, in comput-
`_'g the transient response of the system, the damping constant, etc., the
`'5 Olson, "Dynamical Analogies," D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton, NJ»
`‘I
`§43.
`L 5 Ibid.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 8
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`132
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
`
`mechanical impedance due to the electrical circuit must be included. T
`driving force of the generator in the mechanical system which will prod
`a force, fM, across the mechanical system is
`_/IMZME
`fMo = fM + ZMT
`
`The increase of electrical impedance of the voice coil, with frequency, i 3_
`combination with the existing vacuum tube driving system,
`is anot
`-
`factor which reduces the response of a dynamic loudspeaker at the higli
`frequencies. The electrical impedance characteristics of the vacuum tub
`power amplifiers are generally designed so that the voltage across the lou
`_
`speaker, for constant voltage applied to the input of the power stage
`independent of the frequency. Therefore,
`the current in the voice co"i
`decreases with frequency as the electrical impedance increases with fr‘
`quency. The electrical
`impedance frequency characteristics of severa
`voice coils are shown in Fig. 6.6.
`In the case of a large, heavy Voice coil"
`
`1
`
`DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDSPEAKERS
`
`-
`
`l33
`
`-the directional becomes sharper with increase in frequency. However,
`‘piston directional pattern cannot be used because there is considerable
`iation from piston action in a cone loudspeaker. Measured directional
`L0
`’
`‘
`facteristics of direct radiator loudspeakers, having thf constants given
`
`ndki
`soon rv
`
`°°
`
`8 3
`
`0
`
`ill
`
`#'iii'
`
`FREQUENCY IN CYCLES PER SECOND
`
`'
`
`in
`Er0
`no
`Eo.4A.
`.<
`‘_’c:r-uu.1....
`
`E_
`
`Zi
`
`FIG. 6.6. The electrical impedance characteristics of ‘lé-inch diameter voice coils of 140,‘-
`70, and 18 turns and all having 10 ohms d—c resistance.
`
`impedance at the higher frequencies:
`the rapid increase of the electrical
`causes a corresponding reduction in the driving force. To maintain the ,'
`driving force at the higher frequencies requires a relatively low ratio of the'_ '
`inductive electrical reactance to the electrical resistance which for 3. con=
`stant value of the electrical resistance is equivalent to a reduction in the
`mass of the voice coil.
`_——,
`The response of a loudspeaker is a measure of the sound pressure produce
`at a designated position in the medium withthe electrical input, frequency‘ .
`and acoustic conditions specified.
`In general, the response is obtained on the-
`axis of the cone.
`If the loudspeaker were nondirectional, the efficienc _
`characteristic would also be the response frequency characteristic. The‘
`system is not nondirectional but is similar to that of a vibrating piston, in’,
`
`. 6.8. Directional characteristics of a dynamic, direct radiator loudspeaker with a.
`-. 0° cone 16 inches in diameter, mounted in a large baffle.
`
`-
`
`’Fig. 6.2, are shown in Figs. 6.? and 6.8. Employing the mechanical
`g uit and the electrical circuit of Fig. 6.1 and the data of Fig. 6.2, the total
`tput of the loudspeaker may be determined as outlined in this section.
`s quite obvious that the response on the axis will be accentuated at
`the
`_-li gh frequencies. due to the sharpening of the directional pattern.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 9
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`134
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
`
`DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDSPEAKERS
`
`135
`
`The power output of a loudspeaker may be obtained from the direc-
`tional pattern and the response frequency characteristic by considering the
`sound flow through a spherical surface in which the loudspeaker is located
`at the center (see Sec. 10.3D1). The surface is divided into incremental
`areas and the power transmitted through each area is determined from the
`sound pressure. The total power is equal
`to the summation of the in-
`cremental areas and may be expressed as
`
`P = Ejafpids
`pC
`- total power, in watts,
`density of the medium, in grams per cubic centimeter,
`p
`Velocity of sound in the medium, in centimeters per second,
`5
`15 = root mean square sound pressure over the element of area db‘,
`in dynes per square centimeter, and
`d5 = element of area on the spherical surface, in square centimeters.
`
`6.12
`
`In the case under consideration the power output, P, as a function of
`the frequency may be determined from equation 6.5 and the electrical
`input. The directional patterns for the cones having diameters of 4 and
`16 inches are shown in Figs. 6.7 and 6.8. From these data, the pressure
`on the axis may be determined from equation 6.12. The computed re-
`sponse frequency characteristics of the loudspeakers of Fig. 6.2 are shown
`in Fig. 6.9. These characteristics are quite similar to the actual response
`frequency characteristics.
`Another factor of interest in a direct radiator is the power handling
`capacity. The sound power output, in watts, is given by
`
`6.13
`P : (rMAa&2)1O‘7
`where 7;,” mechanical resistance,
`in mechanical ohms, obtained from
`Sec. 5.8, and
`root—mean-square velocity of the piston,
`second.
`
`in centimeters per
`
`Equation 6.13 may be used to compute the power output of a direct
`radiator loudspeaker in the region were all parts of the cone move in phase.
`In general, the output is limited by the permissible amplitude. The greatest
`amplitude occurs at the low frequencies where the action is essentially that
`of a piston. Therefore, piston action may be assumed.
`The peak amplitude characteristics of a 16-inch, a 4-inch, and a 1-inch
`piston mounted in an infinite baffle for 1 watt of sound output are shown
`in Fig. 6.10. These characteristics show that
`for practical amplitudes
`a relatively large piston is required to deliver adequate power at the low
`frequencies.
`The directional pattern of a vibrating paper cone depends on three
`principal factors:
`the cone diameter, the cone angle, and the frequency.
`
`the corrugations,
`the processing,
`Other factors, such as the paper pulp,
`the voice coil diameter, and the suspension also influence the directional
`pattern, but in a lesser degree. The directional patterns for various fre-
`quencies of 110° cones having diameters of 4- and 16 inches are shown in
`A
`B
`
`mo
`Ao
`L.
`
`RESPONSEDB vu
`.5 /y
`
`°__sz
`
`.
`
`A
`aro‘2
`
`‘
`
`no‘:
`
`A
`“I032
`raeou: NCY
`
`u.
`>
`
`..0
`
`.._°
`
`(.4
`No
`8
`
`RESPONSEDB
`
`RESPONSEDB
`
`A
`
`B
`
`2
`
`we
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`.
`.1
`B
`to‘
`
`2
`
`4
`
`1
`2
`
`l
`4
`
`8
`
`so’
`rnrquzncr
`
`FIG. 6.9. Pressure response frequency characteristics of the loudspeakers of Fig. 6.2
`having cone ciarneters of 1 inch, 4 inches, anc 16 inches.
`.,_
`_a...
`7"“.
`i|_-
`
`CHES5:
`
`
`
` '1anyAMPLITUDEININ
`
`
`
`505'tn2
`
`2
`
`3
`
`2
`A sansslos
`3
`2
`4 ss7'e"$'lo2
`FREQUENCY IN CYCLES PER SECOND
`
`3
`
`l
`|
`l
`-
`.
`4 56'Hi9'OA
`
`FIG. 6.10. The amplitude frequency characteristics of vibrating pistons
`of various diameters, mounted in an infinite wall, for l~watt output on
`one side.
`
`the directional pattern becomes
`It will be see that
`Figs. 6.7 and 6.8.
`sharper with increase in frequency. However, the pattern is broader than
`that of a vibrating piston of the same diameter due to the relatively low
`velocity of propagation of sound in the paper cone. The directional patterns
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 10
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`136
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
`
`DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDSPEAKERS
`
`137
`
`It
`of 130° and 100° cones -1 inches in diameter are shown in Fig. 6.11.
`will be seen that the directional pattern at the high frequencies becomes-
`broader as the cone angle is increased. This is to be expected because the,
`velocity of propagation of sound in the paper cone is about two times"
`the velocity of sound in air. Under these conditions the delay between the
`sound emitted from the outside and the center of the cone will increase as
`the angle of the cone is increased. As a result the directional pattern will.’ :_
`be broadest for the cone with the widest angle. The preceding observations - .
`
`' cycles) requires a relatively large diameter, heavy diaphragm, and large
`E coil at the lower frequencies, and a relatively light diaphragm and coil to
`I obtain good efficiencies at the higher frequencies. There are a number of
`_ direct radiator loudspeaker systems which may be built to satisfy these
`, conditions.
`It is the purpose of the sections which follow to consider a
`' number of these systems.
`Sing1e—Coil Loudspeaker.—Several
`6.3. Multiple
`Sing1e—Cone,
`' arrangements for obtaining uniform response, broad directional pattern,
`adequate power handling capacity, and tolerable efliciency are shown in
`Fig. 6.12.
`The systems of Fig. 6.12A, C, and D consist of a large diameter heavy
`cone driven by large voice coil for the low—frequency range and a small
`
`Pro. 6.11. Directional characteristics of dynamic direct radiator loudspeakers with
`cones 4 inches in diameter for two different cone angles. Row A. 130° cone. Row B.- _'
`100° cone.
`
`K
`
`with regard to cone type vibrators may be substantiated by theoretical
`considerations as outlined in Sec. 2.21.
`The characteristics of Figs. 6.2 and 6.9 show that the low—frequency"'.
`efficiency may be maintained to the higher frequency ranges by employing .
`a small and relatively light weight cone and voice coil. On the other hand,-..
`_
`to obtain adequate power handling capacity at the low frequencies With- -
`tolerable excursions of the vibrating system requires a cone of relatively'--- '
`large area. To insure operation below the elastic limits of the materials, -
`a cone of large area must be of sturdy construction. Equation 6.7 and Fig_.;._
`-
`6.3 show that a large heavy cone also requires a relatively large voice coil '
`in order to maintain a tolerable efficiency. The efficiency of this system _
`is low in the high-frequency range. Furthermore, the directional pattern.
`'
`of a large cone becomes quite narrow in the high-frequency range. Vi/here; '
`the frequency range is confined within the limits of from 80 cycles to *'
`4000 cycles, satisfactory efficiency, response, and directional characteristics;
`can be obtained from a sing1e—cone, single—coil loudspeaker. The above"
`discussions show that
`to obtain adequate power handling capacity and —_
`uniform response over a wide frequency range (greater than 80 to 4000
`
`.
`
`L.F. UNIT
`
`H.F, UNIT
`

`
`FIG. 6.12. Multiple single—cone, single-coil, direct radiator, dynamic, loud-
`speaker systems. A, C, and D. Large low-frequency unit, small high-
`frequency unit, and filter system. B. Seven small units connected in parallel.
`
`‘diameter light cone and small voice coil for the high—frequency range and
`. a filter system for allocating the power in the high- and low—frequency ranges
`-'.to the respective low— and high—frequency units. The filter system consists
`of an inductance in series with the low—frequency unit and a condenser in
`series with the high—frequency unit. Due to the large inductance of the
`arge voice coil, as shown in Fig. 6.6, it has been found that for most applica-
`tions the inductance in series with the low-frequency unit may be omitted.
`'
`:.On the other hand, if a more elaborate filter system is required, the circuit
`_‘, of Fig. 7.16 may be used.
`
`THX Ltd. Exhibit 2010 Page 11
`IPR2014-00235
`
`

`
`138
`
`ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
`
`DIRECT RADIATOR LOUDSPEAKERS
`
`139
`
`I
`
`In Fig. 6.12A the low- and high—frequency units are separated by a
`relatively large distance.
`In the overlap frequency region this distance
`may be more than 1 wavelength. The directional patterns of two sources
`shown in Fig. 2.3 are applicable to this system. These characteristics
`show that two separated sources exhibit directional patterns with one or
`more lobes with very low response between the lobes. The result is fre-
`quency discrimination, for points removed from the axis,
`in the overlap
`region.
`This condition is reduced in Fig. 6.12C but
`is not eliminated.
`However, a disadvantage of the system of Fig. 6.l2C is that sound diffracts
`around the high-frequency unit and is reflected from the large cone causing
`a ragged response due to interference between the direct and reflected sound. '
`The objectional features of Fig, 6.12A and C referred to above have v
`-
`In this system7 the large cone is geo-
`been eliminated in Fig. 6.12D.
`Therefore,
`in the overlap 5
`the small cone.
`metrically a continuation of
`:5" DIAMETER CONE
`
`.
`
`lrssponsroa
`
`I200 CVCLES
`
`5000 CVCLES
`
`FIG. 6.13. Directional characteristics of direct radiator loudspeakers with
`cone diameters of 15 inches and 2.5 inches.
`
`In this way phase_
`
`region the two cones vibrate together as a single cone.
`and diffraction effects are eliminated.
`In a two-unit loudspeaker, employing a large cone for the reproduction of ';
`the low—frequency range and a small cone for the reproduction of the high— ,‘
`frequency range, a uniform directivity pattern can'be obtained over the 1‘
`entire audio—frequency range. This has been described in connection with
`Figs. 6.6 and 6.7. This is illustrated further in Fig. 6.13 in which the
`directivity patterns of 15-inch and 2%-inch cone loudspeakers are compared ‘'
`for a six to one ratio of frequency, that is, for a constant ratio of diameter
`to wavelength.
`Fig. 6.13 shows that the directivity pattern of a 15-inch
`loudspeaker at 200 to 1000 cycles corresponds to that of a 2§—inch
`7 Olson and Preston, RCA Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, p. 155, 1946.
`
`These relationships were used in
`loudspeaker at 1200 and 6000 cycles.
`designing the two units of the system shown in Fig. 6.121).
`In the loudspeaker3>9 shown in Fig. 6.l2D, small cones may be attached
`to the large cone to reduce the velocity of wave propagation in the large
`cone.
`Fig. 6.14. This broadens the directivity pattern of the low—frequency
`cone.
`In the high-frequency range,
`the conical domes attached to the
`surface of the low-frequency cone improve the performance in three ways:
`by decreasing the angle into which.the high-frequency cone feeds, thereby
`increasing the output of
`the high-
`, frequency cone; by diffusely reflecting
`‘_ some of the sound emitted by the high-
`frequency cone,
`thereby eliminating
`,- discrete reflections; and by diffracting
`'3 some of the sound emitted by the high-
`"
`frequency cone, thereby broadening the
`' directivity pattern.
`The angles
`into which the high-
`frequency cone feeds, without and with
`‘
`,-J the conical domes applied to the low-
`. frequency cone of
`6.14, are desig-
`l mated as (£31 and gig in Fig‘. 6.l5A and
`Fig. 6.15B.
`Since z,-lag is smaller than «#1,
`the acoustic radiation load upon the
`" cone is greater with the conical domes
`‘
`‘ than without them. When the acoustic
`' radiation load upon a direct radiator
`loudspeaker
`is
`increased,
`the sound
`power output is increased. Thus, it will
`be seen that the conical domes increase
`the high-frequency sound radiated by
`the high'frequency Cone"
`In other
`W0fd5, the hlgh’frequenCy efficiency is
`improved.
`the sound emitted by the
`Some of
`high—frequency cone is diffusely reflected by the conical domes, as shown in
`; 5‘ Fig. 6.16. Without the domes, there would be many similar reflections
`2
`-
`I, which would lead to reinforcements and cancellations with the direct radia-
`i_-J ' tion. The result would be corresponding peaks and

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket