throbber
May 23, 1981: At its annual convention, in New Orieans, PATCO set a Jan 21 deadline for reaching
`agreement on a new contract with FAA. PATCO President Robert Poii said if agreement was not
`reached by that date the union would poll its members for a strike vote. Newspapers quoted Poli as vowing
`that the "the skies will be silent" if FAA's negotiators did not "come to their senses." (See Apr 28, 1981,
`and Jun 18, 1981.)
`
`May 26, 1981: FAA banned any new long—haul airiine flights to or from Washington National
`Airport pending issuance by the Department of Transportation of a new Metropolitan Washington Airports
`Policy. The ban preserved a policy, begun in 1966 and condoned voluntarily, under which nonstop flights
`to and from National were limited to a perimeter with a 650-mile radius, with certain exceptions. FAA
`acted to preserve Nat.ionai's traditional role as a short-haul airport in the face of a decision by three carriers-
`-American, Pan Am, and Braniffwto inaugurate nonstop flights into National from Houston and Dallas,
`each of which would have exceeded 1,000 miles. (See Sep 1, 1966, and Dec 6, £981.)
`
`May 28. 1981: At a meeting on this date. Adrnirustrator Helms directed a change in policy on acquisition
`of space for the planned Automated Flight Service Stations, known as AFSSS (see Apr 2, 1980).
`In
`addition to building and owning the facilities, FAA would also lease space at airports from municipalities,
`airport operators, private parties, or government agencies at the state or Federal level. FAA would seek
`competitive bids to obtain the most favorable rates.
`(See Oct 2, 1981, and Nov I982.)
`
`Inn 12, 1981: FAA announced a planned regionai consolidation, to be effective Jul 1, that would reduce
`the number of regional headquarters from eleven to six (see Apr 2, 1971). The headquarters at New York,
`Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, and Honolulu would be phased out, and their functions merged with the
`remaining sites. Boston would take over the functions of New York, and Kansas City would assume those
`of Chicago. Seattle would take over the functions of Denver, Los Angeles, and Honolulu. The regional
`offices at Anchorage, Atlanta, and Fort Worth would remain essentially unchanged. The plan aroused
`political opposition, and FAA agreed to review the decision. (See Sep 4, 1981.]
`
`Jun 17, 1981: PATCO rejected a Reagan Administration contract propose} as inadequate and broke
`off informal talks with representatives of FAA. The informal talks, conducted irregularly since the break in
`formal talks on Apr 28, were heid under the aegis of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. (See
`Jun 18, 1981, and Jun 22, 1981.)
`
`Jun 18, 1981: The U.S. District Court rejected a PATCO motion to vacate the injunction restraining
`the anion from engaging in illegal job actions or strikes (see Jun 21, 1978). PATCO moved to have the
`injunction lifted on the grounds that it had been superceded by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978,
`which gave the Federal Labor Relations Authority original jurisdiction in Federal
`iabor-management
`disputes. (See May 23, 1981, and Jun 17, 1981.)
`
`Jun 22, 1981: Department of Transportation and PATCO representatives reached agreement on a
`tentative new contract after a marathon bargaining session, thus averting a threatened nationwide strike by
`PATCO-affiliated controllers that had been scheduled to begin at 7 a.rn., Monday, Jun 22.
`Secretary of Transportation Drew Lewis and PATCO President Robert Poli had gone back to
`the bargaining table Friday evening, Jun 19, at the behest of Representative James J. Howard (D-N.J.),
`chairman of the House Public Works Committee. The resumption of talks may also have been prompted
`by a letter to Poli from 36 U.S. Senators, stating that a strike by PATCO "will do nothing to further your
`goals of increased pay and changes in working conditions." The bargaining sessions, which took place at
`the offices of the Federai Mediation and Conciliation Service and were joined in by Federal mediator
`Kenneth Moffett, lasted more than 25 hours, with the last session running past 3 a.rn., Monday.
`The agreement contained four key provisions, which the Reagan Administration agreed to
`recommend to Congress:
`* A "responsibility" differential that would give controllers 42 hours pay for each normal 40-
`hour week worked.
`
`* An increase in the night differential from 10 to 15 percent of base pay.
`* The exclusion of overtime, night differential, and Sunday and holiday pay from the
`limitations of the Federal pay cap.
`* A retraining allowance equivalent to 14 weeks of base pay for controllers who became
`rnedicaliy disqualified after five consecutive years of service at the journeyman level or
`above and who were ineligible for retirrnent or disability compensation.
`
`MPCS|NV00O6186
`
`

`
`The first-year cost of the total package, which included a cost-of-living raise of 4.8 percent
`clue Federal civil service employees in October, came to approximately $40 million or, on the average,
`$4.000 per controller per year. PATCO had been seeking a package that would have cost the goverrunent.
`initially, in excess of $700 million peryear. (See Jun 17, 1981, and Jul 2, 1981.)
`
`Jun 23, 1981: Administrator Helms announced FAA‘s decision to adopt the Threat Alert and Collision
`Avoidance System, soon renamed the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS). The
`TCAS system was an evolutionary improvement of the Beacon Collision Avoidance System (BCAS) that
`the agency had been developing (see Mar 1976). Like BCAS, TCAS would work in conjunction with the
`Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS) transponder already in wide use.
`It would also be
`compatible with the next-generation transponder, originally designated the Discrete Address Beacon
`System (DABS) and later known as Mode S (see Dec 27, l978, and Oct 5, 1984).
`Two types of the new collision avoidance system were planned. TCAS I, intended for general
`aviation use, would in its basic form simply alert the pilot to the proximity of another aircraft carrying
`TCAS I or a conventional ATCRBS transponder. More expensive TCAS I versions would have some
`ability to provide certain data on the altitude and/or "o'clock" position of threat aircraft. TCAS It would
`provide more sophisticated advisories,
`including data on range and bearing of transponder-equipped
`aircraft. When the transponder aboard the threat aircraft had altitude-reporting capability, TCAS II‘s
`advisories would also include altitude data In the case of two aircraft equipped with TCAS II, coordinated
`advisories would be provided. TCAS H would suggest vertical escape manuevers. If feasible, the system
`might be enhanced to include both vertical and horizontal escape manuevers, a version later designated
`TCAS III. TCAS was expected to overcome a fundamental limitation of BCAS by its ability to operate
`cfiectively even in the highest air traffic densities. This modified the need for a new ground-based
`collision avoidance system, and led to discontinuance of the Automatic Traffic Advisory and
`Resolution System (ATARS) project, originally known as Intermittent Positive Control (see Mar 4,
`1976).
`
`On Nov 13, 1981, FAA announced a contract with Bendix Corporation to provide two TCAS
`II engineering models to be tested and then enhanced to advise pilots of horizontal escape rnanuevers. (See
`Mar 18, 1987.)
`
`Jul 2, 1981: PATCO's nine-member executive board recommended unanimously that the union's
`members reject the tentative contract agreed to on Jun 22 by PATCO President Robert Poli and
`Secretary of Transportation Drew Lewis. Poli also voted to reject the contract, although he had stated that
`he was pleased with the settlement at the time of its negotiation, On Jul 29, PATCO announced that its
`members rejected the tentative contract by a vote of 13,495 to 616. Two days later, on Jul 31, PATCO
`President Robert Poli announced at a press conference in Washington that his union would go on a
`nationwide strike beginning on Monday, Aug 3, unless the government met PATCO's demands.
`(See Jun
`22. 1981, and Aug 3, 1981.)
`
`
`In San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
`Jul 30, 1981:
`Circuit struck down an attempt by the State of California to impose more stringent noise rules at Lindbergh
`Field than those imposed by Lindbergh‘s proprietor. The court's decision included a rationale for the
`"Burbank exception" (see May 14, E973). Noting that the US. Supreme Court had held in Griggs v.
`A]legl_tenv that airport proprietors can be held liable for the noise produced by aircraft using their facilities
`(see Mar 5, 1962), the Court observed that "faimess dictates that they must also have power to insulate
`themselves from that liability." At the same time,
`the Court set forth criteria that determine airport
`proprietorship, including "ownership, operation, promotion, and the ability to acquire necessary approach
`easements."
`If a local or state entity possessed these characteristics, then it also possessed power to
`regulate noise.
`In the case of Lindbergh Field, however, the State of California did not possess these
`characteristics, having entrusted them to the San Diego Unified Port District.
`On Sep 23, 1981, in Santa Monica Air_-mrt Association v. ggity of Santa Monica, the same
`Court reaffirmed the "Burbank exception" by upholding aircraft-noise abatement ordinances and a night
`curfew on ta.keofi‘s and landings imposed by the City of Santa Monica, which owned and operated t.he local
`airport. In reaching this decision, the Court again emphasized that "municipal airport owners needed some
`means of limiting their liability under Griggs." The Court did strike down, however, a categorical ban on
`all jet aircraft as violating the Commerce and Equal Protection clauses of the Constitution.
`(See Aug 24,
`1983)
`
`Aug 1, 1981: Michael J. Fencllo became FAA's Deputy Administrator, succeeding Quentin S. Taylor
`(see May 4, l977). A native of Rochester, N.Y., Fenello was a graduate of Buffalo State Teachers College
`
`MPCS|NV0006187
`
`

`
`and held a Master's degree in Administration and Supervision from New York University. He was a junior
`high school teacher before starting a 38-year career with Eastern Air Lines in Jan 1943. Fenello began as a
`capital, rose to captain, and later served as a flight
`instructor and supervisor of flying before being
`promoted in 1963 to Assistant Operations Manager in New York. The following year, he was named
`Director of Administration for Flight Operations, with headquarters in Miami.
`In 1968, Fenello became
`Assistant to the Vice President, Operations Group, and in 1972 was promoted to Vice President, Operations
`Control. From 1976 until his retirement from Eastern in Feb 1981, he served as Vice President for System
`Operations and Safety. Fenello was FAA’s Deputy Administrator for two years and 9 months, resigning
`effective May 1, 1984. (See Dec 23. 1983, and Dec I3, 1934.)
`
`Aug 3, 1981: Nearly 12,300 members of the £5,000-member Professional Air Traffic Controllers
`Organization (PATCO) went on strike, beginning at 7 a.m., EST, grounding approximately 35 percent of
`the nation's 14,200 daily commercial flights. The controllers struck after the failure of eleventh hour
`negotiations, which began 2 p.m. Sunday, Aug 2, and continued, with one break, past 2 am. Monday, Aug
`3. Shortly before 11 am. on Aug 3, at an impromptu news conference, President Reagan issued the
`strikers a finn ultimatum: return to work within 48 hours or face permanent dismissal. The government
`moved swiftly on three fronts -— civil, criminal, and adnrirtistraiive -- to bring the full force of the law to
`bear on the strikers. In a series of legal steps, Federal ofiicials:
`to decertify PATCO as the
`* Asked the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA)
`bargaining agent for the 17,200 controllers and controller staff members.
`* Moved to impound the union's $3.5 million strike fund.
`* Filed criminal complaints in Federal courts in eleven cities against twenty—two PATCO
`officials.
`
`* Sought restraining orders against the strikers in thirty-three courts.
`Even before the 7 am. walkout, a U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia signed an
`order directing the controllers to return to work. Late in the evening on Aug 3, another judge of the same
`court found the union in contempt for failing to obey the first order and imposed an accelerating schedule
`of fines totaling $4.7 million if the controllers failed to report to work ($250,000 for Tuesday, August 4;
`$500,000 for Wednesday; $1 million a day for the next four days). That judge also fined PATCO President
`Robert Poli $1,000 a day for each day the strike continued, through Sunday, Aug 9. Approximately 875
`controllers returned to work during the 48 hour grace period granted. After expiration of the grace period,
`about 11,400 controllers were dismissed. Most of those fired appeaied the action, and 440 were eventually
`reinstated as a resuit of their appeals.
`The strike and dismissals drastically curtailed FAA’s controller workforce. According to
`DOT’s FY1982 annual report, the firings reduced the number of controllers at the full performance or
`developmental level from about l6,375 to about 4,200. To keep the airways open, approximately 3,000
`ATC supervisory personnel worked at controlling traffic.
`FAA assigned assistants to support
`the
`controllers, and accelerated the hiring and training of new air traffic personnel. Military controllers arrived
`at FAA facilities soon after the strike began, and about 800 were ultimately assigned to the agency. The
`combined force was sufficiently large to handle traffic without activating the National Air Traffic Control
`Contingency Plan, which called for FAA itself to establish rigid, severely curtailed airline schedules and to
`prescribe routes and altitudes.
`The day the strike began, FAA adopted Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 44,
`establishing provisions for inrplernenting an interim air traffic control operations plan (see Feb 18,
`1982). That plan allowed FAA, among others things, to limit the number of aircraft in the national airspace
`system. Hence, on Aug 5, the agency implemented a plan dubbed "Flow Control 50," whereby air carriers
`were required to cancel approximately 50 percent of their scheduled peak-hour flights at 22 major airports.
`FAA maintained an en route horizontal spacing between aircraft under instrument flight rules of up to 30
`miles. Aircraft were kept on the ground, as necessary, to maintain this spacing. FAA gave priority to
`medical emergency flights, Presidential flights, flights transporting critical FAA employees, and flights
`dictated by military necessity. General aviation flights operated under the severest restrictions. Aircraft
`with a gross takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less were prohibited from flying under instrument flight
`rules; moreover, aircraft flying under visual flight nrles were prohibited from entering terminal controi
`areas. Other general aviation aircraft were served, as conditons permitted, on a first-corne~first—served
`basis. (See Jul 2, 1981, and Sep 4, 1981.)
`
`Aug 6, 1981: The Civil Aeronautics Board approved acquisition of Continental Airlines by Texas
`Intenrationai, a subsidiary of Frank Lorenzo's holding company, Texas Air‘.
`The transaction was
`consumated in Oct 1981. A year later, Lorenzo merged Texas intemationa1's operations into those of
`the much larger Continental. (See Sep 24, 1983)
`
`MPCS|NV0006188
`
`

`
`Aug 13, 1981: President Reagan signed the Fiscal Year 1981 Airport Development Authorization Act
`(Title XI of PL. 97-35) which briefly renewed the Airport Development Aid Program. The iaw
`authorized S450 miliion in grants from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund for airport development,
`planning, and noise compatibility projects during fiscal 1981.
`It also specified that at least $25 million be
`used for noise compatibility grants, and forbade future authorization in excess of $600 million for fiscal
`1982.
`
`FAA had only until the end of Sep 30, 1981, to allocate the $450 million, plus another $9
`million resulting from adjustments to prior year's grants. The agency approved 622 new grants and 181
`amendments to previous grants, for a total of $450.4 million. FAA was unable to allocate the whole
`amount because one airport sponsor did not use all the money specifically set aside for it in the legislation.
`(See Sep 3, 1982).
`
`Sep 4, 1981: FAA announced a revised regional consolidation plan under which the number of regions
`would be reduced from eieven to nine. The original plan would have resulted in only six regions (see Jun
`12, 1931), but FAA stated that this had been modified due to the more pressing need to rebuild the air
`Lrnffic control system in the wake of the PATCO controllers strike (see Aug 3, 1981). The consolidation
`was detailed in a notice issued on Sep 29. Under the new pian, FAA combined the existing Pacific«Asia
`and Western Regions into a new Western-Pacific Region with headquarters in Los Angeles, and closed the
`Honolulu regional office. The agency also combined the existing Rocky Mountain and Northwest Regions
`into a new Northwest Mountain Region with lteadquarters in Seattle, and closed the Denver regional office.
`It also reassigned the states of North and South Dakota from the Rocky Mountain to the Great Lakes
`Region. Operations under the new concept began on Oct 1, and all physical relocation was scheduled for
`completion by the end of Aug 1982.
`
`Sep 4, 1981: FAA announced it would hire approximately 1,500 temporary employees, inciutiing
`furloughed airline pilots, to assist in replacing air traffic controllers fired for striking. The temporary
`employees would not control traffic, but would perform duties related to flight strip disu-ibution and other
`controller support functions.
`(See Aug 3, 1981, and Oct 2, 1981.)
`
`Sep 11, 1981: Federal Aviation Regulation Part 108, a new nrle on airline security, went into effect. The
`regulation levied airline security requirements according to the perceived threat facing different types of
`operations and sizes of aircraft, and established security safeguards appropriate to the various types of
`comrnercial passenger operations. Also on this date, FAA approved a new concept allowing airport
`operators to position law enforcement officers farther from passenger screening checkpoints provided
`certain conditions were fulfilled (see Mar 29, 1979).
`
`Sep 26, 1981: The twin—engine Boeing 767 made its first flight. On Jul 30, 1982, FAA certificated the
`aircraft. the first entirely new U.S. commercial transport design in more than a decade. The 767 began its
`first revenue service on Sep 8 of that year with United Air Lines. On Jul 14, 1978, United Airlines had
`placed the largest order to date for a single commercial airplane, when it made a $1.2 billion order for the
`airliner.
`
`Sep 30, 1981: During fiscal year 1981, which ended on this date, FAA added two major new capabilities
`to the en route air traffic control system: minimum safe altitude warning (MSAW), already a feature
`of the ARTS III terminal system (see Oct 28, 1977); and arrival metering, a function that provided the
`controller with computer advisories to help in managing the flow of traffic into congested terminal areas.
`
`Oct 2, 1981: FAA announced the award of two contracts to E-Systems for computer systems for 61
`automated flight service stations (AFSS). The agency planned that the existing network of over 300
`stations would eventually be consolidated into the 61 automated facilities. The equipment to be produced
`by E-Systems would provide flight service specialists with rapid retrieval of data needed to brief pilots,
`presenting the information on television-like displays. Production was to be in two stages. Model 1, with
`capability of displaying weather and aeronautical alphanumeric data, would be implemented at 41 sites.
`Later, all 61 sites would get Model 2, which would add a second display for weather radar, charts, and
`other graphics. Model 2 would also include the capability for demonstrating direct access by pilots to the
`computer data base from remote computer terminals. The computers for both models were to be installed
`at air route traffic control centers and connected by leased telephone lines to the flight service stations.
`(See May 28, 1981, and Nov 1982.)
`
`MPCSlNVODD6189
`
`

`
`Oct 2, 1981: FAA announced a $10 million contract with the University of Oklahoma to help train new
`air traffic controllers to replace those fired for participating in the illegal strike. The University would
`provide FAA-certificated instructors as supplemental staffing for the FAA Academy. The agreement
`proved to be the first in a series of controller training contracts with the University.
`(See Sep 4, 1981, and
`Oct22,198lJ
`
`Oct 6, 1981: Blanche W. Noyes died. One of the nation's early female pilots, she was probabiy the first
`woman pilot to have a career in the U.S. government. Noyes was known for her work in the air marking
`program during 35 years with FAA and its predecessors. She participated in many aviation events and
`races, winning the 1936 Bendix Air Race, was a founder of the Ninety—Niiies, Inc, an organization
`established to encourage women in aviation. Her many awards included the Department of Commerce's
`gold medal for exceptional service in 1956, and induction into the Aviation Halt of Fame in 1970.
`
`Oct 19, 1981: FAA placed a Genera} Aviation Reservation (GAR) plan in effect, because the number of
`private aircraft flying in the syteni increased substantially after the controllers’ strike. General aviation
`pilots who wished to fly under air traffic control were required to make reservations under a quota based on
`the percentage of flights that aircraft in their category had "flown prior to the PATCO strike of Aug 3, 1981
`(see that date). The restriction became necessary as non-airline pilots, some of whom had refrained from
`using the air traffic control system at the strike's beginning, began to increase operations. After two weeks
`under the GAR plan, FAA announced that the number of private aircraft flying in the system had been
`reduced to approximately the pre-strike level, and that the plan had helped to cut delays for both airline and
`private flights.
`(See Dec 31, 1983.)
`
`The Federal Labor Relations Authority dcccrtified the Professional Air Traffic
`Oct 22, 1981:
`Controllers Association, depriving the union of the right to represent its members. Following a temporary
`stay by a Federal Appeals Court, the deceztification became effective on Oct 27. (See Oct 2, 1981, and Dec
`3i. 1981.)
`
`Nov l, 1981: Effective this date, Administrator Helms designated four aircraft certification directorntcs.
`The directorates assumed the certification responsibilities previously assigned to the lead and certtficating
`regions tinder the lead region concept (see Jan 1, 1980}. They also received additional respornibilities to
`strengthen and streamline the certification process. The directorates were managed by the directors of the
`following regions: Central (for aircraft under 12,500 lbs.); Northwest Mountain (for transport aircraft);
`Southwest (for rotorcraft); and New England (for engines and propellers). The authority of the directorates
`extended beyond regional boundaries. For example, aircraft certification offices in the Central, Southern,
`and Great Lakes regions reported directly to the Small Airplane Certification Directorate at the Central
`Region headquarters. FAA formaliy established the directorates by an order dated Feb 1, 1982, and on Mar
`9 issued a news release stating that the directorate system had become operational.
`
`Nov 2, 1981: Effective this date, FAA reestaiiiished 12 inches as the required height for registration
`marks (N-numbers) on fixed-wing aircraft. This size requirement had originally been established by a rule
`published on Jan 6, 1961.
`In 1977, however, the size of the N—nurnbe-rs was reduced to 3 inches for small
`airplanes with speeds not greater than 180 knots. The agency permitted this reduction in response to the
`Experimental Aircraft Association's concern to improve the aesthetic appearance of small aircraft. FAA
`reestablished the 12 inch height after complaints from citizens, law enforcement agencies, and the Defense
`Department demonstrated that timely and positive visual identification was compromised by the smalier
`iuarkings.
`To avoid undue cost, however, FAA allowed owners of existing and certain newly-
`manufactured aircraft to dispiay the smaller N—numbers until the aircraft was repainted or its marks were
`restored, repainted, or changed. The new requirement for 12 inch numbers did not affect existing rules on
`special marking procedures for certain aircraft that were amateur-built, unusualiy configured, over 30 years
`old, or operated for exliibition.
`
`Nov 9-12, 1981: Ben L. Abruzo, Larry Newman, Ron Clark, and Rocky Aoki made the first balloon
`crossing of the Pacific, a trip from Nagashirna, Japan, to near Covelo, Calif, in Double Eagel V.
`
`Nov 20, 1981: Effective this date, FAA permitted biind airiine passengers to use certain approved
`methods of storing their canes at their seats. The agency had declined to permit this in an earlier rule
`(see May 16, 1977), deciding instead that the long utility canes should be handed over to flight attendants
`to be secured during takeoff and landing. This policy amused considerable opposition, particularly from
`the National Federation of the Blind (NFB). The NFB petitioned FAA on the issue, and filed suit when the
`
`MPCS|NVDOO619O
`
`

`
`petition was denied. Meanwhile, more than 100 blind persons and their supporters picketed FAA°s national
`headquarters on Jul 5, 1978, to protest the cane policy. In Jan 1979, a U.S. court granted FAA’s request for
`time to reconsider the issue. After testing by the agency’s Civil Aeromeclical Institute {CAMI)_. FAA in
`Nov 1980 proposed a rule permitting accesibte storage of the canes. The agency announced the final nile
`on Jul 24, 1981.
`
`Nov 30, 1981: FAA "decornbined" the last domestic combined stationftower (CS/T). Located at Valdez,
`Alaska, the CS/1" had been the final survivor of a program begun by the Civil Aeronautics Administration
`under which air traffic control
`towers were consolidated with airway communication stations,
`the
`forerunners of flight service stations (see Aug 8, 1950). The number of CS/T's had been declining since
`1958.
`
`In the making since
`Dec 6, 1981: A new Metropolitan Washington Airports Policy became effective.
`1978 (see Mar 23, 1978), the new policy differed only in a few respects with the policy proposed by the
`Carter Administration in 1980. The overall objectives of both the Caner and Reagan policies were to
`reduce the noise impact of operations at Washington National, maintain National's longstanding status as a
`short-haul airport, and promote better utilization of Dulles. The policy placed no restrictions on Dulles,
`while putting the following limitations on National:
`* A [6 million cap on the number of passengers enplaning and deplaning per year (compared
`to 17 million under the Carter plan).
`* A ntaxinuun of 60 landing slots per hour distributed as follows: Part 121 air carriers, 37;
`Part 135 corruuuter air carriers and air taxis, 11;. general aviation, 12.
`(Compared to the
`Carter plan, this gave Part 121 operators one more slot and Part 135 operators one less.)
`* Extension of the nonstop service perimeter rule from a radius of 650 to 1,000 miles (see
`Oct 30, 1986).
`Whereas the Caner plan would have lifted the ban on 2- and 3-engine widebody jets at
`National, the Reagan plan retained the ban. Moreover, the new adrninistration eliminated the Caner plan's
`restrictions on night-time arrivals and departures; instead, it limited operations at National between 10:00
`p.rn. and 7:00 a.rn. to aircraft that generated no more noise than 73 dBA on takeoti‘ and 85 dBA on
`approach. The noise limitations, which become effective on Mar 1, 1982, initially had the efifect of
`excluding jet operations at the airport during the specified hours. (See Aug 31, 1983.)
`
`Dec 9, 1981: President Reagan rescinded a three—year prohibition of any Federal employment of
`controllers dismissed for participation in the PATCO strike (see Aug 3, 1981); however, the fired
`controllers were still barred from employment with FAA.
`
`Dec 29, 1981: President Reagan suspended the U.S. landing rights of the Soviet airline Aeroflot as
`part of sanctions enacted in response to repression in Poland. The action came soon after a temporary one-
`week suspension of Aeroflofs US. operations imposed during November because of violations of the
`prescribed routes.
`(See .lun 19, 1973, and Apr 29, 1986)
`
`The Federal Labor Relations Authority certified the Professional Airway Systems
`Dec 31:, 1981
`Specialists (PASS) as the exclusive representative of FAA's electronics technicians.
`In a July election,
`PASS had defeated the Federal Aviation Science and Technological Association, known as FASTA (see
`Oct 5, 1976); however, PASS's certification was delayed by objections filed by FASTA. FAA and PASS
`concluded a national labor agreement during fiscal 1984. (See May 1, 1991.)
`
`Dec 3 1, 198i: Robert E. Poli resigned as president of PATCO. (See Oct 22, 1981, and Jul 2, 1982.)
`
`Dec 31, 1981: The end of this day mariced the completion of the second consecutive calendar year with
`no fatal airplane crashes by scheduled air carriers operating under Federal Aviation Regulations
`Part 121--an unprecedented two-year record. Despite the absence of fatal crashes, however, Part 121
`operations involved four varied mishaps in and around aircraft that each claimed one life in 1981. (See Dec
`31, 1980, and Dec 31, 1993.)
`
`Jan 13, 1982: A Boeing 737 operated by Air Florida crashed near Washington National Airport
`shortly after taking off during snowfall. The aircraft hit a bridge, killing 4 persons in vehicles, and plunged
`
`*1982
`
`MPCSWV0006191
`
`

`
`into the icy Potomac River. Of the 79 persons aboard the jet, only four passengers and one flight attendant
`survived. The National Transportation Safety Board determined that the probable cause of the crash was
`the crew's failure to use the engine anti-icing system during ground operation and takeoff, their decision to
`take off with snowfice on the airfoil surfaces, and the captain's failure to abort takeoff when his attention
`was called to anoloinoos engine instrument readings. Contributing to the accident were: prolonged delay
`between deicing by ground crew and takeoff, during which the aircraft was exposed to continual snowfall;
`the known piteliup cliaracteristics of the 737 when the leading edge was contaminated by even small
`amounts of snow or ice; and the crew’s limited experience in jet transport winter operations. As a result of
`the accident, FAA and the aviation industry took a number of actions to increase awareness of cold weather
`hazards and the proper response to them.
`(See Dec 12, 1985.)
`
`Jan 23, 1982: In a night landing too far down an icy runway at Boston's Logan airport, a World Airways
`DC-10 slid over the edge of a seawail and into shallow harbor water. The nose section separated from
`the fuselage, and two passengers seated at the separation point were later found to be missing and presumed
`drowned.
`In its original report on the accident the National Transportation Safety Board listed pilot error
`as a contributory factor, but found the probable cause to be the pilot's lack of information on the slippery
`runway conditions. The Board blamed this lack on the airport management and on FAA, citing inadequate
`regulation and air traffic controllers‘ failure to relay runway condition reports. After protests from FAA
`and the airport authority, the Board issued a revised finding that placed somewhat more emphasis on pilot
`error.
`
`Jan 28, 1982: FAA released a National Airspace System Plan (NAS Plan or NASP), a comprehensive 20-
`year blueprint for modernizing the nation's air traffic control and air navigation system The 450-page
`document had been printed the previous month and bore the date Dec 1981.
`It spelled out specific
`improvements to be made to facilities and equipment to meet the projected demands of air transportation.
`Key elements of the plan included:
`* Computers: FAA would first replace the IBM 9020 computers at the air route traffic
`control centers with more powerful computers that could use the existing programs or "software packages."
`The agency would then proceed with development of new software as welt as new consoles and displays
`known as "sector suites." (See Aug 30, 1982.)
`* Facility consolidation: air route traffic control centers and terminal radar control rooms
`would be consolidated from approximately 200 into about 60 by the year 2,000 (see Mar 22, 1983). Flight
`service statio

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket