throbber
Page 1
`
`‘ LexisNexis®
`
`Copyright 1997 InfoWorld Media Group
`lnfoWorld
`
`June 23, 1997
`
`SECTION: NETWORKING: Product Reviews; Pg. 64d
`
`LENGTH: 1067 words
`
`HEADLINE: Aventail delivers highly secure, flexible VPN solution
`
`BYLINE: By Lai-I—lan Szeto
`
`BODY:
`For secure remote-access needs, Aventail's MobileVPN 2.0 and AutoSocks
`2.1 comprise a virtual private network (VPN) software solution that lets you
`monitor and maintain access to your central site via application-level
`proxies.
`
`Most VPN products, such as Microsoft's Steelhead technology, Digital‘s
`AltaVista Tunnel, and Data Fellow‘s F-Secure, do not address security issues
`beyond initial log-ins, tending to be server-centric. Aventail has en-
`gineered a solution that is user-centric, taking a more in-depth approach to
`VPN implementation.
`
`Boasting nearly unmatched interoperability with other security protocols,
`MobileVPN and AutoSocks succeed as a VPN solution, but not without drawbacks:
`Unidirectional data flow prohibits broadcasting and remote administration,
`and the system requires third-party products for specific IP—layer features,
`such as IPX encapsulation.
`
`High level of security
`
`Aventail has developed its own connectivity protocol, Socks 5, which
`represents the next step in the evolution of the well-known Socks 4 protocol.
`The addition of security protocols makes Socks 5 a viable VPN tool and a
`contender to Microsoft's Point to Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP). Aventail
`implements the Socks 5 protocol in the Aventail Server, the engine of its VPN
`package. Socks 5 is based on directed architecture, as opposed to the
`tunneled architecture one usually associates with VPN technology.
`
`The server establishes a unidirectional connection with a remote client
`
`(AutoSocks) or second host site. A secured user can read, write, and execute
`to the host Server site according to the user's permission profile, but the
`host cannot likewise carry out transactions on the user's machine. This
`
`Petitioner RPX Corporation - Ex. 1059, p. 1
`
`Petitioner RPX Corporation - Ex. 1059, p. 1
`
`

`

`Aventail delivers highly secure, flexible VPN solution InfoWorld June 23, 1997
`
`Page 2
`
`setup prevents an intruder from accessing both sites.
`
`Unlike IP-based protocols such as IP Security Architecture (IPSec), a
`tunneling protocol currently in the draft stage, Socks 5 compels a user to
`pass permission requirements once that user passes the system perimeter.
`Once users traverse firewalls, Socks 5 limits access to specific parts of
`your host system. The system locks out users from directories and
`applications according to their permission profile.
`
`Socks 5 performs encryption and authentication at the session layer (Layer 5)
`of the IP packet, enabling an interoperability unmatched by most of
`Aventail's competitors.
`
`Aventail products support Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol, Secure
`Sockets Layer, and Remote Access Dial-In User Service authentication.
`In
`addition, Aventail deploys an open architecture to further enhance the
`flexibility of its products. Key management is compliant with Public Key
`Cryptography Standards. Encryption is DES and triple-DES enabled. Recently,
`Aventail announced Socks 5 capability with the lPSec, PPTP, and Layer 2
`Tunneling Protocol security protocols.
`
`Outside authority
`
`I ran my VPN server on
`MobileVPN represents an achievement in usability.
`Windows NT 4.0 and used a Windows 95 client unit running AutoSocks.
`
`MobileVPN carries handy administrative tools such as Proxy Chaining and
`Credential Caching, as well as myriad conventional utilities for alias
`tables, filtering, and session parameters.
`
`AutoSocks acts as the remote-access agent that intercepts application
`requests between the client application itself and the WinSock interface. It
`offers logging and configuration GUIs that resemble a miniature version of
`MobileVPN, minus the high—level host controls.
`
`I installed both pieces with minimal hassle, minus a certificate authority
`component. Aventail has no plans to become a certificate authority vendor,
`leaving the task to third parties, such as VeriSign. Unfortunately, this
`extra service can cost from $290 to as much as $2,000 per year per server.
`
`Add this to Aventail's tiered licensing scheme, and the bottom line becomes a
`little steeper than that of most conventional VPN solutions. Whether it is
`worth the cost depends on the complexity of your security policies.
`
`Fluctuating protocols
`
`Implementing VPNs is not for the faint of heart or pocketbook. Tunneling
`protocols are maturing even as I write. The key to maintaining a foothold in
`the market is flexibility. In general, developers are building modular
`products in anticipation of the Internet Engineering Task Force's final draft
`of IPSec. It is hard to say what will become of Socks 5 (or Socks 6), but
`for now it has found a little-explored niche in secured connectivity.
`
`Petitioner RPX Corporation - Ex. 1059, p. 2
`
`Petitioner RPX Corporation - Ex. 1059, p. 2
`
`

`

`Aventail delivers highly secure, flexible VPN solution InfoWorld June 23, 1997
`
`Page 3
`
`Although MobileVPN and AutoSocks lack bidirectional communication and
`IP-layer features, their open architecture makes them compatible with
`multiple standards and provides a high level of security.
`
`Lai-Han Szeto (laihan_szeto@infoworld.com) is a contract analyst at the
`InfoWorld Test Center.
`
`THE BOTTOM LINE: EXCELLENT
`
`MobileVPN 2.0 and AutoSocks 2.1
`
`This virtual private network (VPN) sofiware combination offers a secure and
`easy-to-manage remote-access solution.
`
`Pros: Excellent proxy-level management; flexible architecture that
`complements other VPN and security products.
`
`Cons: Third-party products required for specific IP-layer features such as
`IPX encapsulation; no broadcasting or remote administration.
`
`Aventail Corp., Seattle; (888) 762-5785 (toll-free), (206) 777-5600; fax:
`(206) 777—5656; http://www.aventail.com.
`
`Price: $4,999 per server for fewer than 25 connections; $66 per client seat
`for fewer than 25 seats. (Tiered pricing available.)
`
`Platforms: MobileVPN: Unix, Windows NT; AutoSocks: Unix, Windows 3.x, Windows
`95, Windows NT.
`
`LOAD-DATE: June 23, 1997
`
`Petitioner RPX Corporation - Ex. 1059, p. 3
`
`Petitioner RPX Corporation - Ex. 1059, p. 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket