`571-272-7822
`
`IPR2014-00136 Paper 31
`IPR2014-00139 Paper 30
`Date Entered: February 11, 2015
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RELOADED GAMES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PARALLEL NETWORKS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00136
`Patent 7,188,145 B2
`Case IPR2013-00139
`Patent 7,730,262 B21
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KRISTEN L. DROESCH, BRIAN J. McNAMARA, and
`HYUN J. JUNG, Administrative Patent Judges
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Revised Trial Hearing Date
`37C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are identical in related cases. Therefore,
`we exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in any
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00136; IPR2014-00139
`Patent 7,188,145 B2; 7,730,262 B2
`
`
`
`On January 6, 2014, we entered an order scheduling a consolidated trial
`hearing in IPR2014-00136 and IPR2014-00139. Due to a medical emergency, lead
`counsel for Parallel Networks LLC (“Patent Owner”) has requested that the
`hearing be delayed until at least February 23, 2015. Reloaded Games, Inc.
`(“Petitioner”) does not object. Therefore, the hearing set for February 12, 2015 is
`being rescheduled.
`Specifically, the hearing will commence at 1:30 PM ET, on February 23,
`2015, and it will be open to the public for in-person attendance, on the ninth floor
`of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In-person
`attendance will be accommodated on a first come first serve basis.
`As we indicated in our previous order, we will conduct a consolidated
`hearing during which each party will have 60 minutes of total argument time. At
`oral hearing Petitioner will proceed first to present its case with regard to the
`challenged claims on which basis we instituted trial. Thereafter, Patent Owner will
`argue its opposition to Petitioner’s case. Petitioner may then use any time
`Petitioner reserved to rebut Patent Owner’s opposition. There are no motions to
`amend or other issues to be argued at the hearing.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. Under 37 C.F.R. §
`42.70(b)The parties have already submitted their demonstrative exhibits. No
`further demonstrative exhibits may be submitted.
`The parties are reminded that questions regarding specific audio-visual
`equipment should be directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for
`audio-visual equipment are to be made 5 days in advance of the hearing
`date. The request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00136; IPR2014-00139
`Patent 7,188,145 B2; 7,730,262 B2
`
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the
`hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the
`oral hearing. However, lead or backup counsel may present the party’s argument.
`If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be attending the oral
`argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with the Board no
`later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`PETITIONER: (via electronic transmission)
`
`Eric Buresh
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`
`Mark Lang
`mark.lang@eriseip.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER: (via electronic transmission)
`
`Darren Collins
`dwcollins@mcguirewoods.com
`
`Robert Hilton
`rhilton@mcguirewoods.com
`
`Aaron Pickell
`apickell@mcguirewoods.com
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
