throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`PATENT TRIAL & APPEAL BOARD
`
`QSC AUDIO PRODUCTS, LLC
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`CREST AUDIO, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2014~00127
`
`US. Patent 6,023,153
`
`Declaration of Jessica King
`
`LEGAL121083590.1
`
`CREST 2002
`
`CREST 2002
`
`

`

`1, Jessica King, declare as follows:
`
`I am a librarian for the Seattle office of Perkins Coie, LLP.
`
`I was asked to purchase a copy of “A Class D Amplifier Using MOSFETS
`
`with Reduced Minority Carrier Lifetime” by Jon Hancock from the Audio
`
`Engineering Society web site.
`
`Shown below is a screen shot of the ABS website with the search results for
`
`the Hancock paper. The screenshot shows that ABS lists the publication date as
`
`September 1, 1990.
`
`,.fi' nudist Engineering Society
`Home E‘ifi'fii s v’lenloprrlaip realizations Cemmuniiy‘ 5e Ctiom‘ Standards Erin
`
`search ti
`
`
`Horne 3 Publications :c» E—Llinrag
`
`AES E--Library search Results
`
`
`A Class D Amplifier Using MOSFETS with Reduced Minority Carrier Lifetime
`
`Design techniques are presented for a 0.5 Mhz Ctass D ampiitier using specially processed MOSFETS with ultra~tast intrinsic
`diode recovery characteristics. Design problems and solutions are presented for the power, filter and modular stages.
`Problems and resuits are discussed using error correction by loop feedback from the output fitter and supply teedvforward
`power factor corrected quasi-resonant switching power supply.
`
`Author: Hancock, Jon
`Affiliation: Siemens Components, Santa Ciara, CA
`AES Convention: 89 (September 1990)
`Paper Number: 2958
`Publication Date: September 1, 1990
`Subject: Signal Processing
`
`Clickto purchase paper or iogin as an AES member. if your company or school subscribes to the E—Library then switch to the
`institutionai version. if you are not an AES member and would tike to subscribe to the E—Ubrary then Join the AES!
`
`lmport into BibTeX
`
`Permalink
`
`This paper costs $20 for non-members, $5 forAES members and is flee for E-Ubraw subscribers.
`
`(5% Start a discussion about this paper!
`
`LEGAL121083590.1
`
`

`

`A copy of the Hancock paper that I downloaded from the ABS website is
`
`attached as Appendix 1 to this declaration.
`I I was also asked to purchase a copy of “The Characteristics of Conventional
`
`and Switching Power Supplies in Analog Signal Processing” by Jay Gordon from
`
`the Audio Engineering Society (“ABS”) web site.
`
`Shown below is a screen shot of the search results for the Gordon paper
`
`showing that AES lists the publication date as November 1, 1994.
`
`We Characteristics of Conventional and Switching Power Supplies in Anaiog Signal
`Processing
`
`The role of the power supply as the interface between the ac line and a dc—powered electronic device is examined. The
`characteristics of conventional and switching power supplies are analyzed, and measurements are taken on a typical
`example. The effect of these characteristics on an audio instaliafion are discussed. It is concluded that switching supplies
`have significant advantages for some applications.
`
`Author: Gordon, Jay
`Affiliation: Factor One Co, Keyport, NJ
`AES Convention: 97 (November 1994)
`Publication Date: November 1, 1994
`Subject: Analog Signal Processing
`
`Paper Number: 3889
`
`Permalink
`
`Import into BihTeX
`
`Click to purchase paper or togin as an AES member. if your company or school subscribes to theE-Library then switch to the
`institutional version. it you are not an AES member and would tike to subscribe to the E—Library then Join the AES!
`
`This paper costs $20 for non—members, $5 for AES members and is free for E—Ubrary subscribers.
`
`(1* Start a discussion about this paper!
`
`I purchased a copy of the paper by clicking the “Click to purchase paper”
`
`link on the web page shown.
`
`A copy of the paper as downloaded is attached as Appendix 2 to this
`
`declaration.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`LEGAL121083590.1
`
`_ 3 _
`
`

`

`and further, that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the results of these proceedings.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`LEGAL121083 590.1
`
`

`

`m-mfiomuméoumom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wmam#uaumoummfiuumghow—.50bicfig39:qu«EBwhammy—a9%:gown—954ananny4
`
`
`
`
`
`.58.»mfigmofimcw0.8310S.83535ufiE9“.
`
`
`
`663a3»*6»km?was.202womanbcwv
`
`$2.33....
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`«6:<05:2085m—.X_DZMn_n_<anemones€08on
`
`M8055nob.
`
`8&33@353.mfi59%30an8$3mac“snugfit
`
`
`3&3:ma”3enaflfiucouS3%«858Ssfibo308.3.engwacnfi
`.2:so...gfimcoqgo:.3wa93‘EREwan
`
`
`
`:nggom83%3%Egg3:&wags5E8.
`
`
`3cm88&8»mfigmfi€51m52mung!new
`
`
`“833msfifim3$2.53an>2:.3:thgbhi
`
`\Eu3actueqMat*0egabfiaut$258»$3.:S\
` :2Ew>:oorEto
`
`
`
`FzEamEE68azimmzfizm.0E472
`
`
`

`

`A CLASS D AMPLIFIER USING MOSFETs WITH
`
`REDUCED MINORITY CARRIER LIFETIME
`
`Jon Hancock, Siemens Components
`
`ABSTRACT
`Design techniques are presented for a 0.5 MHz Class D amplifier using specially processed
`MOSFETs with ultra-fast intrinsic diode recovery characteristics. Design problem and solutions are
`presented for the power, filter and modulator stages. Problems and results are discussed using error
`correction by loop feedback from the output filter and supply feed-forward to the modulator stage. An
`overview is included of power supply issues, including a lightweight power factor corrected quasi-
`resonant switching power supply.
`
`POWER STAGE BASIC TOPOLOGIES
`The topology chosen for this switching amplifier is the "classic" buck PWM switch in a full
`bridge configuration. Alternatives considered included the half bridge, and a faur quadrant Cuk
`converter-[2]. The basic Cuk converter can be thought of as a combination buck/boost converter using
`capacitors as an intermediate energy transfer element.
`If properly designed, it can achieve near zero
`ripple currents, making it relatively easy to achieve low E.M.I. Furthermore, a four quadrant converter
`may be configured with all drive circuits referred to ground. The Cuk converter is not without some
`drawbacks, though. The individual converter blocks have a fairly non-linear gain characteristic, which is
`balanced to a degree in the four quadrant converter. The characteristics of the charge transfer capacitor
`has a significant effect on circuit balance and overall distortionIS]. Additionally, the additional series
`inductors required to meet the "zero output ripple" condition create another pole in the transfer function
`which tends to peak the output response at frequency well below the output corner frequency. This
`may be damped by an RC damper of the Cuk capacitors, but it requires capacitors 2X the value of the
`Cuk capacitors. Output
`impedance is relatively high, rendering the Cuk converter fairly load
`, sensitive.Furthermore, this design requires I’ and N type devices for grounded operation, rendering
`high power converters impractical due to the 3 to 1 resistance handicap of P-channel MOSFETs.
`Basic characteristics of buck PWM converter
`
`The half bridge and full bridge buck converters present their own set of problems, but offers
`some benefits in return. The inherent transfer function is quite linear, and the number of reactive energy
`storage elements is minimized. Achieving low output voltage ripple with a single LC stage is
`problematic at switching frequencies that result in good efficiency. As for all buck converters, input
`current ripple is fairly high, and has a high harmonic content. To achieve low losses at high power, all
`N-channel devices should be used, and this necessitates isolated, "floating"drivers with considerable
`precision and speed. Although some converters in principle allow simple ground referred drive circuits
`with direct connection to analog control circuits, experience and the reports of other researcherslS]
`shows that it is impractical to mix fast digital and drive circuits with "clean" analog circuits on a
`common ground. The author's experience is that analog control and feedback circuits must be isolated
`to the greatest degree possible from the driver and switching power blocks;
`this principle drove a
`number of design decisions. Under these ground rules, the development of a "clean" buck converter is
`not at as much disadvantage as might be thought. Furthermore, its inherently linear transfer function
`and low output impedance are very desirable qualities. The overall topology developed is outlined in
`Fig. 1, which includes the basic control loop, modulator, and output stage signal paths. Note that the
`modulator circuit uses Switched current sourCes to create a high frequency triangle wave. The square
`
`

`

`wave oscillator is derived from the divided output of a crystal ocsilllator at 5 MHz. The triangle
`amplitude is a function of the current source amplitude, which includes a fixed reference component,
`and a component derived from the power supply rail voltage. By this means the modulator stage gain is
`corrected by feedforward so that the variations in output level which would occur because of supply
`voltage variations are suppressed. This includes effects such as variations in power supply voltage
`which occur as a result of high output signal levels.
`
`Bridge Configurations
`Several
`factors were considered when choosing between a half or full bridge switch
`configuration. Component cost and count will at first glance appear lower for the half bridge circuit.
`However, for a given power level, the full bridge allows the use of MOSFETs with 1/2 the VDSIBRR)
`rating. Though the full bridge circuit has two switches in series with the load, the RUSION] of 200V
`MOSFETs is less than 1/2 of 400V types with comparable chip area. As an example, the BU2250 with a
`20 mm2 chip is rated at 250V, 0.24 ohms and 17 A, while a BUZS31, with a 25 mm2 chip is rated at 500V,
`0.8 ohms, and 8.0 A. For the same number of MOSFETs, conduction losses can be lOWer with the full
`bridge. The lower voltage MOSFETS also have considerably lower er, contributing to lower switching
`losses, should the intrinsic diode carry current. Other issues are noise and distortion. For the full bridge
`circuit, even order distortion products will cancel. Furthermore, the high frequency switching loop may
`be confined to the power supply rails, while in the half bridge circuit the power tool) includes the
`ground circuit in the path, not just as a reference point. The opposing current paths in the bridge circuit
`may be used to advantage to reduce the effective inductance in the high frequency current path, by
`overlaying opposing conductor traces [9]. The area of the magnetic field can be confined to a very small
`area, minimizing inductance and radiated energy.
`
`'
`Switching transistors 8i any-parallel diodes
`In a buck switching amplifier the output filter presents an inductive load to the switching stage.
`In some bridge applications, such as motor drives, the inductive load current is handled by anti-parallel
`energy recovery diodes connected between the switch load and the power supply rails. As Atwood
`notedll, 4], switching between active device conduction and recovery diode conduction introduces a
`"crossover notch" step function in the output waveform. His (patented) approach to solving this
`problem uses a tapped inductor to provide a voltage offset for the recovery diode. Additional diode
`clamps are pr0vided for adjustable inductors inserted in series with each switching leg. These are
`necessary to prevent avalanche or dv/dt failures in the MOSFETs, which occur if the parasitic bipolar
`structure (Fig. 2) is turned on [3].
`In combination,
`these efforts reduce distortion and improve
`reliability, but the tapped inductor configuration puts considerable constraints on the inductor design,
`and must be optimized for a specific line voltage.
`The intrinsic diode of conventional power MOSFETs has a carrier lifetime and charge storage
`which is controlled by doping characteristics of the silicon and by the thickness of the n- region. At
`voltage ratings rise, so does the required thickness of the 11- region, and with it the diode recovery time.
`Typical 500 V MOSFETs show recovery times of 500 nsec from 8 A forward current at 100 A/usec
`di/dt. During this recovery phase the peak IDRM may become very high. This makes turn-on of the
`parasitic bipolar likely, particularly at elevated junction temperatures. Near the end of the recovery
`phase occrrrs a critical interval, when high dv/dt is applied (Fig. 3). If the MOSFET parasitic bipolar has
`been turned on, it will fail because of the SOA limitations of the parasitic bipolar device. whose chrsus]
`is approximately 1/ 2 the VDSIBRR] rating of the MOSFET.
`It is essential
`to prevent body diode conduction in conventional MOSFETS, because diode
`recovery losses become a major contributor to switching losses, and because of this dv/dt failure mode.
`This usually requires the use of anti-parallel diodes, schottity diodes in series with the MOSFETs, which
`contribute to increased conduction losses. The only other solution is to improve the MOSFET .
`Carrier lifetime can be affected by processes such as proton irradiation, or heavy metal
`implanting. These processes create minor imperfections in the silicon crystaline lattice which facilitate
`carrier recombination. Siemens has found a platinum implant process to be the most effective, and
`yeilding excellent stability of characteristics with repeated thermal cycling. The BUZZSO is a 250 V Fast
`
`

`

`Recovery Epitaxial Diode Field Effect Transistor (FREDFET) with improved diode characteristics. It
`exhibits a typical recovery time of 85 nsec from 17 A forward diode current (Fig. 3). This compares very
`favorably with ultra-fast diodes, which are typically rated for 50nsec recovery from a forward current of
`1A. As the test current is increased, stored charge and recovery time increase. Furthermore, this new
`MOSFET has very high immunity to bipolar turn-on, giving it high dv/dt capability in this mode. This
`makes it suitable for use in applications where inductive recovery current may flow in the body diode of
`the MOSFET.
`
`Design verification using SPICE Simulations
`Much of the design exploration and initial verification for this switching amplifier was done
`using SPICE simulations of the power and control circuit. A typical problem with this approach is the
`lack of complex device models, including usable power MOSFET models. The built-in models for SPICE
`were developed for simulating IC circuits; in the case of MOSFETS, their is considerable difference in
`device structures and electrical characteristics between lateral MOS transistors used in IC structures,
`and vertical power MOSFE'I‘sI7]. In the case of the lateral MOS transistor, the gate overlays a horizontal
`current path between source and drain. Switching characteristics do not change a great deal with
`variation in V133. The gate to drain capacitance is very non~linear for vertical MOSFETs, as the
`capacitance gate to drain includes a depletion capacitance element. Additionally, there is no provision
`in the SPICE MOS model for the intrinsic diode formed by drain to p-well.
`A SPICE subcircuit model has been developed (Fig. 5) using SPICE MOS, IFET, and DIODE
`- models to form a structure equivalent to the vertical MOSFET [8]. This model uses Polynomial VCVS
`with fixed capacitor to model the non~linear gate to drain capacitance, producing results valid for both
`AC and TRANSIENT simulations.
`it is necessary to use a heirarchal approach to
`Given the finite nature of computing resources,
`preparing simulations of complex circuits[12]. For this reason, a detailed examination of driver circuit
`issues should take' place at a different level than an examination of overall topology issues, or control
`circuits. For this development effort, simulations of varying detail were made at the driver circuit level
`(Fig. 6), at the complete power switch bridge circuit (Fig. 8), analysis of the output filter (Fig. 14), and for
`the complete control loop (Fig. 19).
`Driver Circuits
`the driver circuit simulations required developing macro models of the
`Preparation of
`comparator and driver chips which were under evaluation. The driver simulation was used to predict
`peak gate drive currents and rise and fall times as a function of layout parasitics and component values.
`MOSFETs have very high can at low V135, and hence a long TD off. The driver was designed to swing
`+/- 7 volts, speeding up turn-off considerably when compared with drive circuits which only sink to the
`source potential. Though there is a slight R9510“; penalty from not using 10 volt drive, the overall drive
`power is reduced by 50%, making it a worthwhile trade-off. Since floating driver circuits are required,
`isolated low power auxiliary supplies power the driver le and opto~couplers. A miniature dual bobbin
`EP-lO transformer with 12 pf of inter-winding capacitance is used at 100 KHz for powering each of the,
`driver circuits. The schematic of the driver stage developed is shown in Fig. 7. A "power good"
`comparator (not sh0wn) is also used to gate the drive signals, and provide undervoltage lockout, as well
`as shutdown in the even of driver overloads. High speed, high CMRR opto couplers are used to couple
`the drive signals. The opto couplers have a longer time delay off than on (due to hole carrier
`recombination in the LED). To compensate this delay, an additional opto coupler stage is used at the
`comparator outputs in inverted phase to add a variable delay on, thus preventing cross conduction.
`
`Evaluation oi Bridge switching circuit using MOSFET models
`The complete bridge topology employed is shown in Fig. 8. it is similar to a previously reported
`circuit [9] using MOSFETs directly without schottky blocking diodes. However,
`it uses coupled
`inductors instead of individual di/dt inductors in each half bridge, as in [10], with fast recovery clamp
`diodes directly connected to the opposite rail voltage. A coupled inductor model was developed based
`on E. Graetz‘s non-linear inductor model [17]. The SPICE coupled inductor model has problems in with
`
`

`

`transient simulations in circuits involving recirculating currents. Even using macro models this is a
`relatively complex circuit to simulate, but it can be run in a few hours on a 386 based PC.
`Figures 9 through 12 show simulation results for the final version of the bridge, running for 50
`usec with a 20KI-Iz sine wave "signal" input. Printing interval was set for 25 nsec, and minimum time
`step interval was set for 5 nsec. Fig. 9 shows the 20 KHz signal input, and the 500 KHz triangle wave,
`with both phases of comparator output. Fig. 10 shows gate voltage waveforms and drain voltage rise
`and fall times for one of the switch blocks. Fig. 11 shows the voltage at one of the half bridge outputs,
`and the current through the switch leg monitored by ISRCl. The voltage from the LC filter output is
`shown in Fig. 12.
`Evaluation of this circuit showed that minimizing inductance in the power supply leads and
`diode clamps was critical to developing clean waveforms, and minimizing voltage overshoots on the
`drain circuits of the MOSFETs. Circuit inductance is one of the few areas in which there are choices
`available which can make a key difference in overall behavior. In older high power circuits, with clock
`frequencies in the audible range, conventional bus bar or heavy gauge stranded wire is most commonly
`used for connections. Any interconnect should be considered as an air core inductor, and evaluated as
`such for its effect on circuit performance.
`For the case of inductance where the energy is stored in an "air" gap,
`
`L
`
`=t10N2A/L
`
`where 140 is the permeability of free space, A is the current through N turns enclosed by the magnetic
`path 1, Taken a little further, one can define the inductance of a wire in "free space“ from its length and
`diameter, where
`
`W}
`
`Wd
`u
`
`= Length of conductor in cm
`
`= Diameter of wire in cm
`= Permeability
`
`Then, inductance may be calculated from
`
`E
`4W1
`30'002W110th/E -1+4.
`
`L
`
`For a given length of conductor of a given diameter, it doesn't appear from this equation that
`there is much we can do. Any circuit includes both a send and return current path. As one brings two
`conductors close together carrying opposing currents, the magnetic field becomes concentrated between
`them, reducing the area of the field and the inductance.
`.
`Using a close relative of the previous equation, we can calculate the expected inductance from
`one more parameter, the conductor spacing:
`WP
`= Parallel conductor spacing in cm
`
`L
`
`= 0.004 W1 [log [W3] + {f
`
`2W
`
`W
`
`- J]
`
`This function is plotted in Fig. 13, showing that dramatic reductions in inductance are possible if
`opposing current paths are overlayed in high power high frequency circuits. This principle was applied
`to the full bridge, resulting in a power switch layout with 16 transistors and 8 diodes in a space
`approximately 4" X 4".
`
`

`

`SIGNAL PATH TOPOLOGY
`
`Evaluating the output filter with realistic component models
`The output filter is another design problem where component characteristics and parasitic
`elements have a significant role in affecting the results expected at frequencies of hundreds of kilohertz.
`The small signal model for the power stage and filter is shown in Figure 14. The output filter is a
`combination of LC low pass at 25 KHz, and a resonant bandstop filter at 500 KHz which adds an
`additional low pass element at 100 KHz [9}. The ideal filter is calculated using standard methods, and
`may be analyzed using standard 8 functions or an admittance matrix. The result of a SPICE simulation
`using "ideal" components and a resistive load for the calculated filter circuit is shown in figure 15.
`Predicted attenuation at the clock frequency of 500 KHz is approximately 100 dB.
`If a load having
`inductive and resistive characteristics is substituted, the Q of the filter changes, resulting in some
`peaking at the resonant frequencies (Fig. 16).
`An "ideal" filter will not be possible to build, so it is desirable to explore the characteristics of
`one modeled with the non-ideal resistance and inductance of capacitors. With this modification, the
`filter characteristics can be more realistically assessed, as in Fig. 17, which includes models for fairly
`high quality capacitors. Fig. 18 shows the final filter characteristics with damping resistors for the CLC
`section, and RC networks for impedance stabilization at high frequencies.
`The complete small signal model is shown in Figure '19. A four pole input filter is used with an
`fc of 25 KHz. X37 is a balanced differential feedback amplifier with lead compensation to compensate
`for one of the poles of the output filter; this is necessary to allow closed loop stability around an LC
`filter. This model includes a ripple filter formed by R54, R56, C37, and C35, whose purpose is to reduce
`the spike ripple seen by the error amplifier. Feedback is taken after the first LC filter section, but before
`the additional phase shift of the bandstop filter. The error amplifier uses a pole-zero—pole scheme
`common to switching power supplies to control loop gain. The previously described output filter and
`small signal power stage model completes the loop. Fig. 20 shows the results plotted for open loop gain
`of the feedback and error amplifiers. The phase lead peaks at 100 KHz, where loop crossover is desired.
`Note that to achieve adequate lead compensation at these high frequencies requires using operational
`amplifiers whose bandwidth extends to several megahertz without degradation. Fig. 21 displays the net
`loop gain, showing loop crossover just below 100 KHz, with a phase margin of about 65 degrees. The
`net loop characteristic is quite close to the ideal 6 (18 per octave roll-off. The predicted closed loop
`response is shown in Fig. 22, as well as the error amplifier level vs. frequency with the loop closed. This
`indicates that the input filter characteristic is fairly well matched to the output stage bandwidth, as little
`peaking of error amplifier levels occurs.
`'
`
`OUTPUT WAVEFORMS
`Actual output waveforms are shown in figures 23 through 26, recorded with a Tektronix 7020
`waveform digitizer. The output from one of the half bridge sections is shown in Fig. 23, at
`approximately 150 volts P-P. Correlation with the simulation results is quite good. High level, high
`frequency output is shown open loop in Figure 24, displaying the high degree of basic linearity in the
`power stage. The next graph, Fig. 25, illustrates low level linearity, with 125 KHZ output at 500
`mV/div.. Output noise voltage is shown in Fig. 26, displaying a base band ripple of 50 mV P-P, with
`switching spikes somewhat over 100 mV. Most of the spike ripple can be eliminated by further
`optimization of the filter layout, and an additional Vl-IF filter block, such as might be implemented using
`bulkhead feedthrough capacitors.
`
`OVERVIEW OF HIGH EFFICIENCY POWER FACTOR CORRECTED POWER SUPPLY
`
`Power Factor- the problem with capacitor input power supplies
`The majority of power amplifiers produced use 50/60 Hz transformers and capacitor input filter
`rectification. As power levels rise, so does the weight and expense. Furthermore, though these supplies
`are quite simple electrically, they are not as "clean" on the power line as most of their users would
`
`

`

`expect. Like capacitor input switching power supplies, the input current flows in relatively narrow
`spikes, resulting in high harmonic content, and high peak currents in proportion to the true power
`consumed. This is illustrated in concept in Fig. 27, which shows the AC voltage waveform, the current
`conduction when the AC wave exceeds the filter droop voltage, and the input filter voltage ripple.
`Typical capacitor input circuits exhibit a power factor of 0.7, which in simple terms, means that a circuit
`designed for 1000 watt delivery into a resistive load can only deliver 700 watts into this load.
`In power supply applications such as airborn electronics, power factor has long been a concern
`and specified parameter. Of late it is receiving more attention for industrial and consumer equipment,
`particularly in Europe, where new IEC standards classify non-power factor corrected equipment with
`waveforms like Fig. 27 as Class D equipment, with attendant penalties and restrictions.
`One method gaining in popularity to solve this problem is the use of a switching converter as a
`current pres-regulator to program the current draw to follow the line voltage [18]. Typically a boost or
`flyback converter is used as a lore-regulator to charge a 360 V bus, which powers at secondary converter
`that provides isolation and load regulation. A low value of high frequency ripple, which is easily
`filtered, is superimposed on the 50/60 Hz low frequency current waveform, as shown in Fig. 28. The
`cost of two converters is offset by several factors. Because the secondary regulator sees a relatively
`stabilized voltage, the secondary converter components can be sized more ideally. The ripple currents
`are considerably reduced in the filter capacitors by this technique, saving cost in the capacitors and
`semiconductor switches. Last, but probably not least, this circuit can provide automatic line voltage
`adaptation, working from 90 VAC to 260 VAC without any taps or switches.
`Low Noise ZCS-GRC main converter
`
`For the secondary converter, objectives in an amplifier power supply must include very low
`ripple, inherently good load regulation, and high efficiency. For an amplifier application, high power
`density, or small size, is of secondary importance. Although a conventional switching power supply
`may achieve some of these goals, newer topologies show that improvements can be made, particularly
`in regard to EM] and noise.
`Resonant and Quasi—resonant converters have been developed in many topologies to achieve
`high power density through minimum magnetics volume and very high switching frequencies- often in
`the megahertz range. By using reactive components, including reactive‘parasitics of switching devices or
`transformers, a non-square current or voltage waveform is achieved, decreasing the stress and losses for
`switching transitions, when compared with conventional pulse width modulated "square wave“
`switching power supplies. Whereas early PWM switching power supplies operated at a few 10's of
`kilohertz, resonant supplies have been developed at frequencies as high as 10 's of megahertz [13, l4, l5,
`16]. If high power density is not the goal, lower frequency ranges may be used with transistors such as
`IGBT's [16, 19], to achieve good efficiency and very reasonable di/dt's (and low noise) with switching
`rates in the 100 KHz region. Fig. 29 shows the basic power switch circuit for one type of quasi-resonant
`power supply, a zero current switching parallel quasi resonant converter. This type of supply switches
`the voltage across the transistors at nearly zero current (Fig. 30), resulting in low switching losses, and
`very low switching stress on output components, as the voltage output waveforms are haversines.
`Almost any kind of PWM supply may be built as an equivalent resonant circuit. The parallel quasi-
`resonant circuit is most similar to the buck pwm converter, and like the buck equivalent circuits, has
`low output impedance and inherently good load regulation.
`Although "unconventional" power supplies (ie, not 50/60 Hz transformer isolated, with
`capacitor input filters) are uncommon in audio, the convergence of component, design, and power
`quality issues may change that picture.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`A new power MOSFET has been developed using heavy metal doping which is well suited to
`developing a switching amplifier. A bridge circuit has been developed which supports fast switching
`and good waveform shape at SOOKHz. SPICE modeling is shown to be a useful tool for design
`verification of many aspects of the circuit operation, including the driver circuits, bridge switch, output
`filter, and control loops.
`
`

`

`REFERENCES
`[ll
`Brian E. Attwood, “Very High Fidelity Quartz Controlled PWM (CLASS D) Stereo Amplifiers
`for Consumer and Professional Use", presented at 59th AES Convention, Feb. 1978, Hamburg
`German .
`Slobadai):Cuk and Robert W. Erickson, "A conceptualiy New High-Frequency Switched Mode
`Power Amplifier Technique eliminates Current Ripple", Proceedings of Powercon 5, GS, PCI
`1978.
`
`[2]
`
`[3}
`
`[4]
`
`[5]
`
`[6]
`
`[7]
`
`[8]
`
`[9]
`
`[10}
`
`[l l]
`
`[12}
`
`[13]
`
`[14]
`
`[15]
`
`[16]
`
`[17]
`[18]
`
`[19]
`
`E. Hebenstreidt, "Overcoming the dV/dt problem in Power MOSFET Switching Stages During
`Commutation", PCI 1982 Proceedings, pp. 147 - 153.
`Brian E. Attwood, "A 0.5 MHz Switching DC«AC inverter Topology Provides Low EMI
`Environments for Critical Spacecraft Applications", Proceedings of Powercon 11, 8—3, 1984.
`N. Tsacoumangos, "The Implementation of an REIT. Four Quadrant Cuk Converter",
`Proceedings of Powercon 11, F-3, 1984.
`E. Hebenstrci t, "FREDFET Switching Stage for Clock Frequencies in the Ultrasonic RegiOn",
`Proceedings of PCI 1984, Paris.
`R.A. Minisan, "Power MOSFET Dynamic Large Signal Model", IEEE Proc., VOL. 130, Pt. 1, No.2,
`April 1983, pp. 73 - 79.
`J. M. Hancock, "A MOSFET Simulation Model for Use with Microcomputer SPICE Circuit
`Analysis", Proceedings of SATECH Conference, Long Beach 1987, pp. 289 - 295.
`J. M. Hancock, "Circuit Techniques for a 0.5 MHz Class D Power Conversion System using
`MOSFETs", High Frequency Power Conversion Conference May 1988, pp. 151 - 164.
`C.I<. Patni ~ D. Steed 8: LM. Charreton, "Use of MOSFET Diode in Bridgevlegs for High
`Frequency Applications", PCI Munich June 1988 Proceedings, pp. 65 - 76.
`I. M. Hancock, "Enhanced Techniques for SPICE Modeling of Power MOSPETs", PCI Munich
`June 1988 Proceedings, pp. 268 - 284.
`I. M. Hancock, "Analytical Simulation Techniques for Power Semiconductors in High Frequency
`Converter Circuits", PCI 1989 Proceedings, pp. 484 - 495.
`S. Freeland, "An Introduction to the Principles and Features of Resonant Power Conversion",
`from "Recent Developments in Resonant Power Conversion", edited by K. Kit Sum, lntertec
`Press.
`
`M. F. Schelecht 8: L. F. Casey, "A Comparison of the Square-Wave and Quasi-Resonant
`Topologies", IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference 1987 Record.
`S. Freeland a: R. D. Middiebrook, "A Unified Analysis of Converters with Resonant Switches",
`18813 Power Electronics Specialists Conference 1987 Record.
`R. Rangan, Dan Y. Chen, lean Yang, and John Lee, "Application of Insulated Gate Bipolar
`Transistor to Zero Current Switching Converters", 1987 IEEE Power Specialists Conference.
`E. Graetz, "Modeling of Non-Linear Magnetic Devices with SPICE", PC! 1988 Proceedings.
`Brad I-iall, "Correct Power Factor in Switched Mode Power Supplies", Electronic Design Oct. 27,
`1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket