Dtmnloudcd from SAE International 1)} Maureen Ncmnun. Tucstla}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 A31
`
`INTERNATIONAL,"
`
`Accuracy of Recorded Driver Inputs in Toyota Part 563
`EDR
`
`2014-01-0505
`
`Published 04/01/2014
`
`
`
`Greg Webster, Harold Clyde, Barry Hare, Mark Jakstis, Robert Landis, Lance Lewis,
`and Ryan Buetzer
`Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
`
`CITATION: Webster, G., Clyde, H., Hare, B., Jakstis, M. et al., "Accuracy of Recorded Driver Inputs in Toyota Part 563
`EDR," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0505, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0505.
`Copyright © 2014 SAE International
`
`light vehicles would not be equipped with EDRs. NHTSA
`concluded that the EDR provides valuable information for crash
`investigations and improving vehicle designs. The EDR data
`provides factual information that can help engineers assess the
`overall performance of the vehicle and its safety systems
`during a real-world crash event.
`
`Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) developed new specifications
`for the Toyota EDR, called 12EDR, which meets the new Part
`563 requirements. TMC began installation of 12EDR in
`vehicles beginning in late calendar year 2011. Table 1
`describes the additional pre-crash data captured in the 12EDR
`compared to the previous generation EDR. The 12EDR has a
`pre-crash sample rate that was changed from 1.0 s to 0.5 s. In
`addition to the pre-crash parameters recorded by the prior
`generation EDR, 12EDR incorporates 10 new parameters.
`
`Table 1. EDR Generation Pre-crash Comparison
`
`Previous Generation
`12EDR
`
`
`Abstract
`
`Four Toyota vehicles were tested in 12 test conditions to
`compare the Event Data Recorder (EDR) results with data
`gathered from onboard test instrumentation and the test
`protocol. The four Toyota vehicles tested were 2013 Model
`Year (MY) vehicles with EDRs that meet 49 CFR CH. V Part
`563. While the previous Toyota EDR versions captured four
`pre-crash parameters, this generation Toyota EDR (12EDR)
`includes additional operating parameters and a faster sampling
`rate before the event trigger, including additional parameters
`not required by Part 563.
`
`The main focus of this research was to analyze the recording
`of the following driver inputs: accelerator pedal application,
`brake pedal application, steering wheel angle, and cruise
`control activation. The EDR-recorded inputs were compared
`with the values on the HS-CAN. The test results indicate that
`
`the 12EDR accurately recorded these driver inputs.
`
`Introduction
`
`EDRs are installed on all new Toyota vehicles currently sold in
`the United States and can also be found on many other
`manufacturers' vehicles. In August 2006, in the interest of
`standardizing the data recorded by the EDRs, the National
`Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) established
`specific requirements (Part 563) [1] for EDRs installed on light
`vehicles. Later, Part 563 was revised to set the compliance
`date as September 1, 2012 [2]. Prior to that time, there had
`been no federal regulation relating to EDR, and this regulation
`only established various requirements if a vehicle was
`equipped with an EDR. To comply with this rule, there were
`many specific requirements, including that pre-crash data must
`include specific vehicle parameters and be captured in 0.5
`second intervals. On December 13, 2012, NHTSA published a
`Notice for Proposed Rule-Making (NPRM) [g] requiring EDRs
`to be installed in all light vehicles beginning September 1,
`2014. Absent this NPRM, NHTSA had calculated that 8% of the
`
`
`Vehicle Speed
`Vehicle Speed
`
`Brake Switch Brake Switch
`Accelerator % Full
`Accelerator Voltage
`Engine RPMEngine RPM
`
`Hybrid Motor Speed
`Percentage of Engine Throttle (%)
`Brake Oil Pressure
`Longitudinal Acceleration
`Yaw Rate
`Steering Input
`Shift Position
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sequential Shift Range
`Cruise Control Status
`Drive Mode
`
`OWNER Ex. 2045, page 1
`
`

`

`Dtmnloudcd from SAE lntcrnutionul 1)} Maureen Ncmnun. Tucsda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Toyota EDRs can be read out using the commercially available
`Bosch Crash Data Retrieval (CDR) tool, like many other
`manufacturers' EDRs [41]. The authors published research in
`2012 [Q] on Toyota's EDRs using similar test methods,
`comparing EDR data collected in 11 test conditions in three
`Toyota models. The results for the 2011 Camry, 2010 4Runner
`and 2011 Prius indicated the EDR accurately reported pre-
`crash parameters.
`
`Automotive crash investigations involve studying and analyzing
`the factors that contribute to the cause of the crash. These
`
`factors can generally be divided into three categories: human
`factors, vehicle factors, and environmental factors. The
`analysis of factual driver operation information from the EDR
`pre-crash data can be valuable in understanding how human
`factors in the form of driver inputs may have contributed to the
`crash event. This information provides additional data to help
`analyze crashes and vehicle performance.
`
`This effort focused on driver inputs (human/vehicle
`interactions) as recorded by the 12EDR. The driver inputs
`analyzed for this research were:
`
`Brake application
`
`Accelerator pedal application
`
`Steering input
`- Cruise control activation
`
`Test Methodology
`Test methods from SAE 2012-01-0998 were also used in this
`
`research. During the driving sequence, High Speed Controller
`Area Network (HS-CAN) data was recorded using a data
`logger. After completing a driving sequence, the SRS airbag
`center sensor unit was tapped with a mallet to record an event.
`The EDR was imaged using the Bosch CDR tool Version 10.1
`after each test.
`
`While this paper focuses on brake, accelerator, steering, and
`cruise control inputs that are recorded in the EDR, other
`parameters were also analyzed. These parameters are shown
`in Table 2.
`
`Table 2. Parameters Analyzed
`Parameters
`Values l
`Comparison Method
`Measurement
`Increments
`
`Data Logger
`Off, On
`Cruise Control Status
`-375 to +375 degrees,
`
`3 degree Increments
`Steering Angle
`Data Logger
`Accelerator Pedal
`0 to 100%,
`Data Lo
`er
`A nlication
`0.5% Increments
`gg
`Brake Switch
`Data Logger
`Buckle Switch, Left
`Front
`Buckle Switch, Right
`
`ront
`F
`Buckled, Unbuckled
`Observation
`Shift Position
`P, R, N, D
`Observation
`Seat Position, Driver
`Rean/vard, Fon/vard
`Observation
`
`
`
`
`
`Test Setup
`Center console interior trim panels were removed to gain
`access to the SRS airbag center sensor unit. The attachment
`bolts to the sensor unit were loosened prior to the testing. The
`right rear corner of the sensor unit was impacted with a mallet
`through a long bar to record a side impact event trigger in the
`EDR. A contact switch was attached to the mallet face to
`
`indicate time zero for the test instrumentation. Figure 1 depicts
`an example of the impact trigger setup. The contact switch
`event was used to help correlate the EDR event to the HSCAN
`data.
`
`
`
`Figure 1. Example of impact trigger setup
`
`The driver input data parameters were recorded by the Toyota
`EDR while the HS-CAN data was monitored and recorded by a
`VBox 3i data logger. The HS-CAN data was logged at 100 Hz.
`The four 2013 MY vehicles are shown in Figure 2 and the SRS
`airbag center sensor unit part numbers used for this testing are
`shown in Table 3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 2. Test vehicle photos- Clockwise from top left: Camry, Corolla,
`Tacoma, Prius
`
`OWNER Ex. 2045, page 2
`
`

`

`[)tmnlmitltd from SAE Imurnutimml h} Maureen\L‘mnun.'Tixt-\(!:1}..\pril(ll.Elli-I ItI:2l:22 .\,\I
`
`rounding, contact switch duration, and data logger recording
`rate. Table 5 is a summation ofthe time tolerances and
`resolution.
`
`Table 5. Data Time Tolerances and Resolution
`
`Total Tolerances and Resolution (ms)
`Parameter
`Sum for Pre-Tri
`er Data
`Sum for Tri
`er Data
`Accel, Pedal
`,
`’
`CAN Refresh Rate +
`Brake Swrtch,
`Contact Duration + 10 ms +
`& Steering
`Input
`
`
`
`
`
`CAN RefreshRate +
`Contact Duration + 10 ms
`
`50 ms
`
`In addition to the time tolerances and resolution, the pre—crash
`data values for steering input angle and accelerator pedal
`recorded in the 12EDR were rounded down in the increments
`
`noted in Table 6. Also, Table 6 depicts an example of how the
`data is rounded when recorded. Brake switch status and cruise
`
`control status are updated nearly instantaneously and are
`either ON or OFF.
`
`Table 3. Test vehicles and airbag center sensor unit part numbers
`
`2013 MY Vehicle
`Part Number
`
`89170-06411
`Toyota Camry
`Toyota Corolla
`89170-02D53
`89170-47280
`89170-04291
`
`
`
`
`
`Toyota Prius Toyota Tacoma
`
`Test Matrix
`
`Twelve test conditions were chosen to compare the Toyota
`EDR recording to the vehicle's HS-CAN data. Eleven of these
`tests conditions were used in SAE 2012-01-0998, and a twelfth
`was added to gather steering wheel angle data.
`
`Table 4 describes the 12 test conditions. Tests 1—4 are static
`
`tests (vehicle not moving), and Tests 5-12 are dynamic tests
`(vehicle being driven). For a more complete description of the
`conditions, see Appendix A. These conditions were chosen to
`evaluate the Toyota EDR accuracy in various driving scenarios
`ranging between 0 to 96 km/h, including braking, accelerating,
`coasting, turning, and using cruise control.
`
`Table 4. Test Conditions
`Test #
`Condition
`1 (P8)
`In Park and Stationary
`
`2 (DS)
`In Drive and Stationary
`
`3 (RS)
`In Reverse and Stationary
`
`4 (Dual)
`Full acceleration and hold with brake
`
`5 (Idle)
`Moving slowly at idle speed
`6 (4GB)
`64 kph (40 mph) then Brake to a stop
`
`7 (25B)
`40 kph (25 mph) then Brake to a stop
`8 (LTA)
`Light Acceleration from a stop
`9 (FuIIA)
`Full Acceleration from a stop
`
`10 (60C)
`Coasting from about 96 kph (60 mph)
`11 (CC)
`Cruise Control at about 96 kph (60 mph)
`
`12 (TRN)
`Continuous counterclockwise Turn
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The 12EDR was imaged using the Bosch CDR tool after each
`test. The resulting EDR data fall into three categories: the
`driver input data for the static tests (1—4), the driver input data
`for the dynamic tests (5-12), and the other parameters
`analyzed for all tests (1-12).
`
`Data Resolution and Tolerances
`
`Data resolution and tolerances must be considered to compare
`the HS-CAN to the 12EDR data. The pre-crash data recorded
`by the 12EDR includes data from vehicle systems on the
`HSCAN bus that have different refresh rates. The VBox data
`
`logger recorded at 100 Hz which results in a 10 ms resolution.
`The contact switch duration was defined as the impulse
`duration of the mallet strike with the SRS airbag center sensor
`unit and was individually determined for each test. The average
`contact impulse duration was 130 ms. The entire mallet
`impulse duration was included in the time tolerance, since it
`was not known when the mallet impulse exceeded the trigger
`threshold. The trigger data was the data recorded at t=0, which
`was when the EDR recorded an event. Pre-trigger data are the
`10 data points recorded nominally every 0.5 5 prior to the
`trigger. The pre-trigger data has an additional 50 ms tolerance
`due to the rounding down of the trigger time. For the driver
`input data, data tolerances and resolution were determined for
`the test results based on the parameter refresh rate, data
`
`Table 6. Driver Input Data Paramete s
`
`Driver Input
`Increments
`HS-CAN Value
`Example
`Parameters
`Recorded
`
`Value
`Steering Angle
`3 deg
`7 deg
`6 deg
`Accelerator
`0.5%
`14.8 %
`14.5 %
`
`Pedal
`Brake Switch
`ON/OFF
`ON
`ON
`
`Status
`Cruise Control
`ON/OFF
`ON
`ON
`Status
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tolerance bars representing the time tolerances and resolution
`(X—axis) and parameter data range (Y—axis) shown in Tables 5
`and g were used in the test results to determine the accuracy
`of the driver input data when compared to the HS-CAN data.
`
`Test Results and Analysis
`
`The EDR driver input data was determined to be accurate
`when the HS-CAN data was within the EDR data tolerance
`
`bars applicable to each data metric. Items that did not require
`instrumentation, such as seat position and front seat buckle
`switch status, were determined to be accurate if they agreed
`with the observed test conditions.
`
`Table 7. Camry Driver Input Data Summary - Static Tests
`
`Parameter
`
`Source
`
`Test 1
`(PS)
`
`Test 2
`(DS)
`
`Test 3
`(RS)
`
`EDR
`
`Accelerator
`PedaL
`% Full (%)
`
`Test 4
`(Dual)
`100
`
`
`
`
`Data Logger I..-
`
`Data Logger
`
`OFF
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`The results for the static tests are presented in Tables mpg.
`For the dynamic tests, Appendices B, Q, Q, and E document
`the brake and accelerator input data compared to the HS-CAN
`data. The vehicle speed as recorded by the EDR was also
`shown for reference. Appendix F shows steering angle results
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 3
`
`

`

`[)(mnlmidcd from SAE Inturnutimml h) Maureen \L‘mnzin. Tncxdu}. .\pril Ill. 201-l 10:21:22 .\.\l
`
`from Test 12 for all four vehicles. Appendix G presents the
`other input data parameters analyzed (including cruise control).
`Regardless of the test conditions and the sequence of the
`driver inputs, all recorded driver inputs were within the
`tolerance bars.
`
`Table 8. Corolla Driver Input Data Summary - Static Tests
`Parameter
`Source
`Test 1
`Test 2
`Test 3
`Test 4
`(PS)
`(DS)
`(RS)
`(Dual)*
`0
`0
`0
`N/A
`
`Accelerator
`PedaL
`% Full (%)
`
`Brake Switch
`
`
`
`
`
`EDR
`
`Data Logger
`
`0
`
`Data Logger
`
`OFF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`
`
`EDR
`OFF
`ON
`ON
`N/A
`
`
`* Manual transmission vehicle, test not conducted
`
`References
`
`1. NHTSA 49 CFR Part 563, 10-1-06 Edition
`
`2. NHTSA 49 CFR Part 563, 10-1-11 Edition
`
`3. NHTSA, Notice for Proposed Rulemaking, Docket
`NHTSA-2012-0177, RIN 2127-0177, December 13, 2012
`
`4. Robert Bosch LLC, http://wwwboschdiagnostics.com/
`testeguipment/cdr/Pages/CDRHomeaspx
`
`5. Brown, R., Lewis, L., Hare, B., Jakstis, M. et aI.,
`“Confirmation of Toyota EDR Pre-Crash Data," SAE
`Technical Paper 2012-01-0998, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-
`01-0998.
`
`Contact Information
`
`Greg Webster
`Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
`19001 S. Western Avenue
`
`Torrance, CA 90501
`310 468-1633
`
`greg webster@toyota.com
`
`
`
`100
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0
`
`OFF
`
`OFF
`
`0
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`0
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`100
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`Table 10. Tacoma Driver Input Data Sum nary - Static Tests
`
`Parameter
`Source
`Test 1
`Test 2
`Test 3
`Test 4
`(PS)
`(DS)
`(RS)
`(Dual)
`0
`0
`0
`100
`
`Table 9. Prius Driver Input Data Summary - Static Tests
`
`Parameter
`Source
`Test 1
`Test 2
`Test 3
`Test 4
`(PS)
`(DS)
`(RS)
`(Dual)
`
`Accelerator
`EDR
`0
`0
`0
`100
`PedaL
`% Full (%)
`
`
`
`Brake Switch
`
`
`
`Data Logger
`
`EDR
`
`Data Logger
`
`Accelerator
`PedaL
`% Full (%)
`
`EDR
`
`Data Logger
`
`Brake Switch
`
`EDR
`
`Data Logger
`
`
`
`0
`
`OFF
`
`OFF
`
`0
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`0
`
`ON
`
`ON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Conclusions
`
`A total of 47 tests were performed on four 2013 model year
`Toyota vehicles where EDR data was recorded for comparison
`to the driver inputs during the tests. For the driver input data,
`tolerance bars were determined for the test results based on
`
`the parameter refresh rate, data rounding, contact switch
`duration, and data logger recording rate. The driver inputs
`recorded in the EDR, namely accelerator pedal application,
`brake pedal application, steering input, cruise control
`activation, and other parameters, were accurately recorded
`when compared with the HS-CAN data and observations.
`Based on the testing and analysis performed, the Toyota
`12EDR data provides objective and accurate information
`relating to driver inputs in recorded events, which helps with
`understanding the events surrounding a crash and ultimately
`advances safety research.
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 4
`
`

`

`APPENDIX A - TEST CONDITIONS
`
`APPENDIX
`
`
`DR Belt
`RF Belt
`RF Seat
`Brake
`Accelerator
`Target Conditions
`Unbuckled
`Unbuckled
`Not
`None
`None
`In ‘Park‘, stationary
`
`Occupied
`Unbuckled
`Buckled
`AM50
`Braking
`None
`In ‘Drive‘, stationary
`
`
`Buckled
`
`Unbuckled
`
`AM50
`
`Braking
`
`None
`
`In ‘Reverse’, stationary
`
`Buckled
`Rearward
`Buckled
`Braking
`Full
`In ‘Drive’, stationary
`
`(Dual)
`5
`Buckled
`ReanNard
`Buckled
`None
`None
`In ‘Drive’, moving at idle
`
`(IDLE)
`speed
`~64 kph braking to stop
`
`None—>
`Brake
`
`Light—>None
`
`Buckled
`
`Rearward
`
`Buckled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Time (s)
`
`Buckled
`Rearward
`Buckled
`Light—>None
`~40 kph, braking to stop
`
`
`Buckled
`Rearward
`Buckled
`None—>Light
`Accelerating from O kph
`
`for ~3 seconds
`Accelerating from O kph
`for ~3 seconds
`Coasting from ~96 kph
`
`Buckled
`
`Buckled
`
`ReanNard
`
`Buckled
`
`Rearward
`
`Buckled
`
`None—>Full
`
`Light—>None
`
`11
`Buckled
`Rearward
`Buckled
`AM50
`None
`None
`Cruise Control at ~96 kph
`
`(CC)
`12
`(TRN)
`
`Buckled
`
`ReanNard
`
`Buckled
`
`AM50
`
`None
`
`Light
`
`Continuous counter-
`clockwise turn
`
`U1 O
`
`5 O
`
`Lu 0
`
`N O
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph)
`
`-4.5
`
`-4,0 —3.5 —3,0
`
`-2,5 —2.0 4.5 -1D —0.5
`
`0.0
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`o
`
`VEI‘L Spd‘ EDR
`
`- Accelerator Pedal EUR {96)
`
` —Brake Pedal CAN
`
`—Acce|erat0r Pedal CAN
`
`I Brake Pedal EDR
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 5
`
`

`

`U10
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph) N
`
`
`
`5O
`
`LUO
`
`Dmmloaded from SAE International 1)) Maureen Newman. Tuesda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Braking to a Stop from about 40 kph (258)
`100
`
`o Veh. Spdl EDR
`
`. Accelerator Pedal EDR (%}
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`- Brake Pedal EDR
`— kP IA
`
`BraeedaCN
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`O
`
`-S.5 6.0 4.5 -4.0 3.5 -3.0
`
`~2.5 —2.0 ~15
`
`~1.0
`
`.0_5
`
`0.0
`
`Time (5)
`
`Light Acceleration from a Stop (LTA)
`100
`
`N O
`
`H U1
`
`p.) O
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph)
`
`O
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`o Accelerator Pedal EDR {%]
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`0 Brake Pedal EDR
`
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`
`
`90
`
`80
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`O
`
`—S.5
`
`-S.O -4.5 —4.0
`
`-3.5
`
`340 —2.5
`
`-2.0 ~1.5 —1.U —O.5 00
`
`Time (s)
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 6
`
`

`

`Dmmloaded from SAE International 1)) Maureen Newman. Tuesda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Full Acceleration from a Stop (FullA)
`100
`
`4)O
`
`A.
`
`:fl.
`5'u
`3 30
`J'a‘
`2.:GI
`) N O
`
`2.
`
`Time (s)
`Time (s)
`
`Braking to a Stop from about 64 kph (408)
`100
`
`0
`
`~55
`
`-S.0 ~45
`
`410 -35 -3.0 ~25
`
`-2.0 ~1.5
`
`-1.0 0.5
`
`0.0
`
`APPENDIX C - COROLLA PLOTS
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph)
`
`U10
`
`.5O
`
`LUO
`
`N O
`
`HO
`
`0
`
`-S.5 —5.0 4.5 -4.0 3.5 -3.0
`
`~2.5 —2.0 ~15
`
`v
`~1.0 —0.5
`
`0.0
`
`90
`
`80
`7O
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`go
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`O
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`. Accelerator Pedal EDR {‘36)
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`. Brake Pedal EDR
`
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`o Veh.$pdlEDR
`
`o Accelerator Pedal EDR(%}
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`. Brake Pedal EDR
`
`— kP IA
`BraeedaCN
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 7
`
`

`

`
`
`Lu0
`
`N O
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph) H U1
`
`H O
`
`U10
`
`.5O
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph) N
`
`Downloaded from SAE International by Maureen Newman, Tuesday. April 01, 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Braking to a Stop from about 40 kph (258)
`100
`
`o Veh.$pd4EDR
`
`I Accelerator Pedal EDR (96}
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`- Brake Pedal EDR
`— P
`| A
`
`Brake eda C N
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`O
`
`-S.S
`
`-S.0
`
`-4.S
`
`-4.0
`
`-3.5 3.0 «2.5 —2.0 ~15 4.0 -0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Time (5)
`
`Light Acceleration from a Stop (LTA)
`100
`
`90
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`- Accelerator Pedal EDR [96]
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`. Brake Pedal EDR
`
`Brake Pedal CAN
`
`80
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`—5.5 —5.0
`
`-4.5 —4.0 —3.5 —3.0 —2.5 —2.0 —1.5
`
`41.0 —0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Time (s)
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 8
`
`

`

`Dmmloaded from SAE International 1)) Maureen Newman. Tuesda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Full Acceleration from a Stop (FullA)
`100
`
`3)O
`
`E"D-
`5‘u
`
`3a
`
`. 30
`
`2.
`
`N O
`
`~35
`
`-5.0
`
`41.5
`
`‘4.0
`
`-3.5 —30 —25 ~20 —1.5
`
`-1.0
`
`-0.5 00
`
`2 5>
`
`Time (s)
`Time (s)
`
`Braking to a Stop from about 64 kph (4GB)
`100
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`- Accelerator Pedal EDR {‘36)
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`- Brake Pedal EDR
`
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`90
`
`80
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`90
`
`80
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`. Accelerator Pedal EDR [96]
`
`70 — Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`0 Brake Pedal EDR
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`
`60
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`APPENDIX D - PRIUS PLOTS
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph)
`
`U‘lO
`
`1:.0
`
`WO
`
`N D
`
`H O
`
`0
`
`5.5 -5.0
`
`-4.5
`
`~4.0 —3.5
`
`-3.0
`
`-2.S >20 >15
`
`«1.0
`
`-0.S
`
`0.0
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 9
`
`

`

`U‘D
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph) N
`
`
`
`Dmmloaded from SAE International 1)) Maureen Newman. Tuesda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Braking to a Stop from about 40 kph (258)
`100
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`. Accelerator Pedal EDR (%}
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`. Brake Pedal EDR
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`O
`
`-5.5 6.0 —4.5
`
`-4.0 —3.5 —3.0
`
`-2.5 —2.0 —1,5
`
`~1.0 —0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Time (5)
`
`Light Acceleration from a Stop (LTA)
`100
`
`90
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`- Accelerator Pedal EDR {‘36}
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`. Brake Pedal EDR
`
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`80
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`b0
`
`04O
`
`N O
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph) G
`
`HO
`
`O
`
`~55
`
`-S.O ~4.5
`
`-4.0 <3.5
`
`-3.0
`
`-2.5 —240
`
`«1.5
`
`-1.0
`
`-0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Time (s)
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 10
`
`

`

`Dmmloaded from SAE International 1)) Maureen Newman. Tuesda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Full Acceleration from a Stop (FullA)
`100
`
`3)O
`
`E"D-
`5‘u
`
`3a
`
`. 30
`
`2.
`
`N O
`
`0
`
`5.5 —5.0
`
`41.5 —40
`
`-3.5
`
`«30 —25 ~20 —1.5
`
`-1.0 —0.5 00
`
`2 5>
`
`APPENDIX E - TACOMA PLOTS
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph)
`
`U10
`
`.5O
`
`WO
`
`N O
`
`H O
`
`0
`
`5.5 6.0 4.5 -4.0 3.5 -3.0
`
`‘2.5 —2.0 —1.5 4.0 —0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Time (s)
`Time (s)
`
`Braking to a Stop from about 64 kph (408)
`100
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`- Accelerator Pedal EDR {‘36)
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`- Brake Pedal EDR
`
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`o Veh. Spdl EDR
`
`. Accelerator Pedal EDR (96}
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`- Brake Pedal EDR
`— k P
`| AN
`
`Bra 9 eda C
`
`90
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 11
`
`

`

`U10
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph) N
`
`
`
`Dmmloaded from SAE International 1)) Maureen Newman. Tuesda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Braking to a Stop from about 40 kph (258)
`100
`
`o Veh. Spdl EDR
`
`. Accelerator Pedal EDR (%}
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`
`- Brake Pedal EDR
`— kP IA
`
`BraeedaCN
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`O
`
`-S.5 6.0 4.5 -4.0 3.5 -3.0
`
`~2.5 —2.0 ~15
`
`.
`~1.0
`
`.0_5
`
`0.0
`
`Time (5)
`
`5O
`
`LUO
`
`Light Acceleration from a Stop (LTA)
`100
`
`o Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`o Accelerator Pedal EDR {%]
`
`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`0 Brake Pedal EDR
`
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`
`
`
`
`Pedal('96)
`
`90
`
`80
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`O
`
`N O
`
`I-a U1
`
`1..) O
`
`
`
`VehicleSpeed(kph)
`
`O
`
`—S.5
`
`-S.O -4.5 —4.0
`
`-3.5 3.0 —2.5 —2.0
`
`~1.5 —1.U —O.5 00
`
`Time (s)
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 12
`
`

`

`—Accelerator Pedal CAN
`. Brake Pedal EDR
`
`0.0 100
`
`Dmmloaded from SAE International by Maureen Newman, Tuesda). April 01, 2014 10:21:22 AM
`
`Full Acceleration from a Stop (FullA)
`
`90
`
`e Veh. Spd. EDR
`
`- Accelerator Pedal EDR {‘36)
`
`—Brake Pedal CAN
`
`80
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 13
`
`A.
`
`.bO
`
`cn.
`5'u
`3’:
`$30a
`E.ca
`> N O
`
`0
`
`~55
`
`-S.0
`
`~4.5
`
`4110
`
`-3.5
`
`-3.0
`
`-2.5
`
`«20 ~15
`
`-1.0 —0.5
`
`Time (5)
`
`

`

`[)(mnluzuled from SAE International b) Maureen \emnzun Tnesdu). April 01. 201-1 10:21:221\1\l
`
`APPENDIX F - STEERING ANGLE DATA, TEST 12 (TRN)
`
`Steering Angle (TRN)
`
`400
`
`l—I
`
`l—I
`
`I—I
`
`l—I
`
`l—I
`
`l—I
`
`l—I
`
`I—I
`
`l—I
`
`l—II—I
`
`350
`
`I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I=I—
`
`300
`
`A
`no
`£250
`$0
`E: 200
`2”
`'5
`g 150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`—CANTacoma
`0 EDRTacoma
`—CAN Camry
`
`o EDRCamry
`—CAN Prius
`
`o EDRPrius
`
`
`
`—CAN Corolla
`o EDRCorolla
`
`
`
`Time (sec.)
`
`
`Note: 375 degrees is maximum recordable value for the 12EDR. See Table 2
`
`OWNER Ex. 2045, page 14
`
`

`

`APPENDIX G - OTHER INPUT PARAMETER DATA
`
`2013 Camry
`
`2013 Corolla
`
`2E5
`
`uo_xo:m_
`
`thosm.
`
`vwiozm
`
`3:25
`
`t0
`
`to
`
`AZw—CNF
`
`320%.
`
`um_xo:m_
`
`828m
`
`828m.
`
`to
`
`to
`
`Emzcmwm
`
`Emzcwom
`
`U__m>:_
`
`(\2
`
`Biosm
`umiosm.
`8203..
`8:25
`89:
`
`:O
`
`:0
`
`88v8
`uwiuzm
`umiusm
`8:25
`gleam
`
`to
`
`to
`
`2__EVm
`voiosm
`828m
`umiozm
`828m
`
`t0
`
`to
`
`Uflxozm
`vmiosm
`vwiozm
`$225
`29m
`
`to
`
`to
`
`nmiosm
`vmiosm.
`vmiosm
`820%.
`6van
`
`to
`
`to
`
`828m
`$205
`voiosm
`8203.
`Ame;w
`
`t0
`
`to
`
`Emzcmmm
`Emzzmmm
`“5:25
`vmiozm
`“5225
`twiosm
`GOV:
`U__m>c_
`
`:0
`
`:0
`
`$2
`
`Emzcmmm
`Emzcmwm
`609or
`828m
`voiosm.
`8225
`“6:95
`U__m>c_
`
`t0
`
`to
`
`$2
`
`Emzcmom
`Emzcmom
`01:3“:m
`vmiozm
`8:25
`umiozm
`Dmiozm
`U__m>c_
`
`to
`
`to
`
`$2
`
`Emzcmwm
`Emacmmm
`$205
`8225
`8:25
`noiosm
`2.5Vm
`U__m>c_
`
`to
`
`to
`
`(\2
`
`Emzcmmm
`Emzcmmm
`vmiusm
`8:25
`umEosm
`vwiosm
`Ammwvn
`U__m>:_
`
`to
`
`to
`
`$2
`
`Emzcmwm
`Emacmmm
`umiozm
`8203..
`Uflxosm
`twiosm
`Amovv@
`v__m>c_
`
`to
`
`to
`
`$2
`
`
`
`
`
`EmacmmmEmzcmwmEmzcmmmEmacmmmEmacmmmEmzcmmmEmzcmmmEmacmmmEmzcmwmEmzcmmmEmacmmmE955”.umamwgo525 mom.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`850w
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DDDDDDDDDmDn..53mwnO
`DDDDDDDDDmDn.10m.cOEmon.Ecw
`
`
`8:03.
`vmiosm
`8203.
`“529.5
`agev
`
`t0
`
`to
`
`82032::
`Uwiosncn
`.8203.
`.6295
`a”:m
`t0
`to
`
`8:255
`30203::
`vmiozm
`vwiusm
`69N
`to
`tO
`
`an:r
`
`nmiozncD
`
`mom.
`
`umEosncD
`
`vmawmno
`
`60203::
`
`mom.
`
`umEosncD
`
`thmmno
`
`EmawEmLNR
`
`<50225
`
`“wow:04
`
`.Bmmiosm
`
`68Egg
`
`to
`
`to
`
`$3$30
`
`mow
`
`65:00355
`
`
`
`.3;“mow
`
`umiosm
`320%.
`8:03..
`3208
`as;m
`
`t0
`
`t0
`
`
`
`
`
`
` o_nm__m><“oz_mcm_w
`
`
`
`
`
`
`umEozncj
`32033::
`Emzcmwm
`Emzcmmm
`Dmiosm
`vmiosm
`U__m>c_
`an:N
`$2
`t0
`to
`
`
`
`-<zw.5235:68685:38353Ho:92%.?
`
`
`
`umEosncn
`8:255
`Emzcmwm
`Emacmom
`828m
`8225
`U__m>c_
`Awmvm
`$2
`t0
`to
`
`«62039::
`“62033::
`“52032::
`umEosncD
`E956“.
`.9835“.
`U__m>c_
`an:F
`$2
`to
`to
`
`$9530
`quwmnO
`83¢ng
`83030
`83030
`ooSow
`mom
`mom
`mam.
`10m.
`mow
`
`LOfiOEmme
`
`,5$25
`
`6%c3
`
`,5@225
`
`8%39m
`
`65:00355
`
`
`
`29:81rim
`
`£01«mww
`
`525
`
`Emzcmmm
`Emacmmm
`8:05
`Uo_xo:m_
`828m.
`vwiosm
`3:0:m
`U__m>:_
`$2
`
`to
`
`to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UmfizucooHo:“mm“_m_oEo>co_wm_Emcm:53:52:_o_gm__m>mEmuo:,w_oEm>co_ww_Emcm=63:32,,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 15
`
`
`

`

`2013 Prius
`
`2013 Tacoma
`
`Azmbmr
`
`umyozm
`
`toiosm
`
`Uflxozm
`
`umEosm
`
`to
`
`to
`
`99?.me
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`D
`
`Q
`
`Azm_pmr
`
`voEosm
`
`umEosm
`
`vwigm
`
`umzosm
`
`to
`
`to
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`ESE—mam
`
`D
`
`D
`
`Emzcmom
`Emacmom
`vmiosm.
`.8203.
`vmiosm
`nmiosm
`60V:
`
`co
`
`co
`
`O
`
`D
`D
`D
`co
`co
`
`Aoov_r
`
`.3225
`
`vm_v_o:m_
`
`vaosm
`
`umzosm
`
`Emimom
`
`Emacmwm
`
`€meme
`Emzcmmm
`809or
`vmiuzm
`umiosm
`gleam
`umiusm
`
`to
`
`to
`
`D
`
`D
`D
`D
`to
`to
`
`609or
`
`.8225
`
`.5225
`
`vmiosm
`
`vmiusm
`
`EmEmmm
`
`Emzcmwm
`
`Uhmzcmwm
`Emacmmm
`2:3“:m
`vaoam
`voiozm
`cmEusm
`nogosm
`
`to
`
`to
`
`D
`
`Q
`Q
`Q
`to
`to
`
`A<=zmva
`
`nozosm
`
`umgusm
`
`voiosm
`
`cwgusm
`
`Emzcmom
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`p.NENQW—
`Emzcmmm
`umzozm
`voiozm
`Uflxozm
`nmgozm
`A<._.._vm
`
`to
`
`to
`
`D
`
`D
`Q
`D
`t0
`to
`
`A<F4vw
`
`vwzosm
`
`negosm
`
`Uwigm
`
`umgoam
`
`Emimmm
`
`ESE—mam
`
`Emzcmmm
`Emzcmom
`uwzosm
`umZosm
`umEosm
`umEosm
`Ammmvu
`Ammmvn
`D
`D
`D
`to
`to
`
`Uwiosm
`
`thozm
`
`UoEosm
`
`uwzozm
`
`382:an
`
`Emzcmwm
`
`to
`
`t0
`
`D
`
`Ugmzcmmm
`Emacmom
`vmiozm
`umgosm
`umEozm
`uw20=m
`Amovvo
`
`to
`
`t0
`
`D
`
`D
`D
`D
`t0
`t0
`
`Amovvw
`
`umgosm
`
`umgosm
`
`toiosm
`
`negosm
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`850w
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`83320
`twammno
`83390
`2330
`umammno
`twawmno
`850m
`6:80355
`
`Uhmzcmwm
`Emacmmm
`vmiosm
`toiozm
`«5225
`nogosm
`Agnew
`A06:m
`D
`D
`D
`t0
`t0
`
`vogosm
`
`nmgosm
`
`8:25
`
`umgosm
`
`Emacmom
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`to
`
`to
`
`D
`
`Emzcmwx
`Emzcmmm
`twiosm
`Uflxozm
`«5225
`umEosm
`swan:v
`
`to
`
`to
`
`D
`
`D
`D
`D
`t0
`to
`
`cmsovv
`
`thosm
`
`thosm
`
`8225
`
`umgozm
`
`9555mm
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`cmgosnca
`“52032::
`Emémmm
`ESE—8m
`voiosm
`Um_v_o:m_
`Ammvm
`Amy:m
`m
`m
`m
`m
`t0
`t0
`to
`to
`
`umEosm
`
`“5203m—
`
`“62033::
`
`vmiusncn
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`Emzcmom
`
`30203::
`nogosnca
`Emzcmwm
`Emacmom
`UOEUJm
`cwgusm
`Amovm
`AweN
`D
`D
`G
`D
`t0
`t0
`t0
`to
`
`nozosgca
`
`umgozgca
`
`vwiosm
`
`Uwiusm
`
`Emzcmom
`
`Emzcmmm
`
`an:_.
`
`umzosnca
`
`mam.
`
`Signs:
`
`nmtomno
`
`“520395
`
`mam.
`
`umEosncz
`
`nmammno
`
`LOwOEwLNQ
`
`.Ewwiusm
`
`
`
`#mmwtmj
`
`.Emwiusm
`
`“momgzgm
`
`€955“.
`
`mam.
`
`2955”.
`
`82330
`
`.81Hmww
`
`625
`
`to
`
`to
`
`53$ng
`
`mom
`
`6:80355
`
`n.
`
`n.
`
`mom
`
`cogwom.t;m
`
`“62032::
`
`32%:ch
`
`32032::
`
`umzo:n:3
`
`Awavr
`
`.0835“.
`
`Emzco“.
`
`n.
`
`to
`
`t0
`
`1 8
`
`mom.
`
`mow
`
`«EM
`
`mom
`
`mom
`
`BEE—8mm
`
`{SW@Eosm
`
`6%:3
`
`«mwwficgm
`
`cogmoa.t;m
`
`
`
`Mon.“mom
`
`525
`
`.>>wExozm
`
`OWNER EX. 2045, page 16
`
`

`

`Dmmloudcd from SAE lntcrnutionul 1)) Maureen Xmunun. Tucsda}. April 01. 2014 10:21:22 A31
`
`The Engineering Meetings Board has approved this paper for publication. It has successfully completed SAE’s peer review process under the supervision of the session
`organizer. The process requires a minimum of three (3) reviews by industw experts.
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
`photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE International.
`
`Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE International. The author is solely responsible for the content of the
`papen
`
`ISSN 0148—7191
`
`http://Qapers.sae.org/2014—01-0505
`
`OWNER Ex. 2045, page 17
`
`