throbber
Title:
`Title Abbrev:
`Citation:
`Article:
`Author:
`NLM Unique ID:
`PubMed UI:
`ISSN:
`Fill from:
`Publisher:
`Copyright:
`Authorization:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EFTS Participant
`
`Journal Copy
`DOCLINE:
`Hindustan antibiotics bulletin
`Hindustan Antibiot Bull
`1974 May;16(4):175-84
`Stability studies on hamycin and tetracycline hydrochloride
`Trivedi BM;Rupare!iya MT
`2985097R Verify: PubMed
`4549311
`0018-1935 (Print)
`Any format
`Dr M 3 Thirumalachar, Pimpri :
`Copyright Compliance Guidelines
`JAMIE FRIDAY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This material may be protected by copyright law (TITLE 17,U.S. CODE)
`
`
`
`[ Return ]
`
`

`

` .;
`
`[
`
`110.
`
`ihnol
`
`ows:
`
`Stability Studies on Hamycin and
`Tetracycline Hydrochloride with Selected Diluents
`t-
`Stability Studies on Hamycin and
`i;
`Tetracycline Hydrochloride with Selected Diluents
`BHANOO M. TRIVEDI AND M. T. RUPARELIYA
`l
`
`L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad-380 009
`BHANOO M. TRIVEDI AND M. T. RUPARELIYA
`
`L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad-380 009
`Tetracyclines are one of the widely used
`in patients subjected to intensive tetracy-
`I
`I' broad spectrum antibiotics. An extensive
`cline therapy and has been resulted in death
`in patients subjected to intensive tetracy-
`Tetracyclines are one of the widely used
`i use of tetracyclines has resulted in emer-
`in some cases. Amongst many annoying
`.
`cline therapy and has been resulted in death
`broad spectrum antibiotics. An extensiVe
`I gence of certain problems. Many of the
`symptoms the staphylococcal take-over is
`in some cases. Amongst many annoying
`use of tetracyclines has resulted in emer-
`! side effects are believed to result from an
`perhaps the most serious and number of
`symptoms the staphylococcal
`take-over is
`gence of certain problems. Many of the
`f outgrowth of Candida albicans resulting
`such cases have been terminated fatally.
`perhaps the most serious and number of
`side effects are believed to result from an
`'
`in candidiasis (Stone and Mersheimer, 1956),
`Patients treated with pneumonia with these
`such cases have been terminated fatally.
`outgrowth of Candida albicans
`resulting
`|
`antibiotics have been cured of the primary
`Patients treated with pneumonia with these
`in candidiasis(Stone and Mersheimer, 1956).
`antibiotics have been cured of the primary
`infection, only to die of systemic staphyloco-
`Among the undesirable organisms that
`infection, only to die of systemic staphyioco-
`. proliferate in the intestinal tract during or
`cosis. Death often
`results also
`from
`Among the undesirable organisms that
`cosis. Death often
`results also
`from
`proliferate in the intestinal tract during or
`following extended or shorter treatment,
`superficial necrosis of large area of the
`superficial necrosis of large area of the
`following extended or shorter
`treatment,
`. with tetracyclines are Candida albicans and mucosa of the small intestine which lead to
`mucosa of the small intestine which lead to
`with tetracyclines are Candida albicans and
`i other yeast and fungi ; abnormal coliform,
`profuse watery diarrhoea, dehydration and
`profuse watery diarrhoea, dehydration and
`other yeast and fungi ; abnormal coliform,
`such as species of Proteus, Pseudomonas
`circulatory collapse.
`circulatory collapse.
`such as species of Proteus, Pseudomonas ..
`. and resitant staphylococci. The emergence
`and resitant staphylococd. The emergence
`of these organisms in the mouth and gas­
`of these organisms in the mouth and gas-
`trointestinal
`tract of patients receiving
`trointestinal
`tract of patients
`receiving
`broad spectrum antibiotics has been ascribed
`broad spectrum antibiotics has been ascribed
`to suppression of normal microbial inhabi-
`to suppression of normal microbial inhabi-
`tant that ordinarily overgrow, and prevent
`tant that ordinarily overgrow, and prevent
`rapid proliferation of Candida and of other
`rapid proliferation of Candida and of other
`yeast and fungi
`through their antibiotic
`yeast and fungi through their antibiotic
`action.
`action.
`Another contributing factor may be the
`Another contributing factor may be the
`deprivation of microbially produced nutri-
`deprivation of microbially produced nutri­
`tional
`factor
`to which the host may be
`tional factor to which the host may be
`subjected during tetracyclines
`treatment
`subjected during
`tetracyclines
`treatment
`resulting in
`the weakening of mucous
`resulting
`in
`the weakening of mucous
`membrane and thus becoming susceptible
`portal of entry for pathogenic organisms,
`! membrane and thus becoming susceptible
`normally unable to penetrate intact, healthy
`;
`portal of entry for pathogenic organisms,
`mucosa. Some are of the opinion that
`)
`normally unable to penetrate intact, healthy
`broad spectrum antibiotics may actually
`mucosa. Some are of the opinion that
`stimulate growth of yeast and fungi. These
`broad spectrum antibiotics may actually
`organisms, probably are responsible for
`stimulate growth of yeast and fungi. These
`anal
`itching and cause of pruritis vulvae.
`organisms, probably are responsible for
`anal itching and cause of pruritis vulvae.
`Occasionally saprophytes and semi sapro-
`phytes have emerged as invansive pathogens
`Occasionally saprophytes and semi sapro­
`May. 1974
`phytes have emerged as invansive pathogens
`
`0W3:
`
`
`
`...4;st
`
`\
`
`Various attempts have been made to
`Various attempts have been made to
`tackle this problem, one of which being
`tackle this problem, one of which being
`combining tetracyclines with antifungal anti­
`combining tetracyclines with antifungal anti-
`biotics. Nystatin and amphoterecin-B have
`biotics. Nystatin and amphoterecin-B have
`been already employed for these purpose.
`been already employed for these purpose.
`In case of nystatin though the number of
`In case of nystatin though the number of
`Candida popuiation is reduced during treat-
`Candida population is reduced during treat­
`ment, it increases very rapidly after ceasation
`ment, it increases very rapidly after ceasation
`of the treatment. As regards amphotere-
`of the treatment. As regards amphotere-
`cin—B, the effect of reducing candidial popu-
`cin-B, the effect of reducing candidial popu­
`lation in gastro intestinal tract is of short
`lation in gastro intestinal tract is of short
`duration (0501, et al. 1967).
`duration (Osol, et al. 1967).
`Hamycin, a polyeue antifungai antibiotic
`has been claimed to show in viva, antifungai
`Hamycin, a polyene antifungal antibiotic
`activity on large number of fungi, patho-
`has been claimed to show in vivo, antifungal
`gens,
`saprophytes yeast
`like
`fungi
`and
`activity on large number of fungi, patho­
`Candida
`albr'cans. Hamyein
`has
`been
`gens, saprophytes yeast
`like fungi and
`proved very promising in the treatment of
`Candida albicans. Hamycin has
`been
`candidiasis as compared to nystatin and
`proved very promising in the treatment of
`amphoterecin-B (Vad and Thirumalachar,
`candidiasis as compared to nystatin and
`1968].
`amphoterecin-B (Vad and Thirumalachar,
`1968).
`With this in view, stability studies were
`planned for an oral formulation of tetracy-
`With this in view, stability studies were
`planned for an oral formulation of tetracy-
`
`l I
`
`l 1
`
`:
`;
`'
`i
`
`.
`
`•
`
`'
`
`1 May, 1974
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page 2 of 11
`
`

`

`176
`
`HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS BULLKTIN
`
`the
`cline hydrochloride with hamycin in
`employing log conc. in mcg/ml against
`176
`HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS BULLETIN
`form of capsules. The investigation was
`diameters of zones of inhibition in mm.
`aimed at the stability studies of both anti­
`cline hydrochloride with hamycin in the
`biotics in the presence of another along
`form of capsules.
`The investigation was
`with selected diluents (Rupareliya, 1973).
`aimed at the stability studies of both anti-
`biotics in the presence of another along
`MATERULS AND METHODS
`with selected diluents (Rupareliya, 1973).
`
`employing log cone.
`in meg/ml against
`Microbiological Estimation of Tetracyline
`diameters of zones of inhibition in mm.
`Hydrochloride
`Microbiological Estimation of Tezracyfine
`Medium and test organism used in estima­
`Hydrochloride
`tion were same as mentioned in LP.
`Medium and test organism used in estima.
`Medium (120 ml) was inoculated with
`tion were same as mentioned in LP.
`spore suspension (1.8 ml) of B, pumilus
`which was
`transferred
`in glass plate
`Medium (120 ml) was
`inoculated with
`spore suspension (1.8 ml) of B. pumilus
`(24 x 24 cms). In the solidified medium
`which was
`transferred
`in
`glass
`plate
`cups of 8 mm.
`diameter were bored,
`(24x24 ems).
`In the solidified medium
`which were filled with the selected dilution
`cups of 8 mm.
`diameter were
`bored,
`of tetracycline (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
`which Were filled with the selected dilution
`and 20 mcg/ml). After allowing diffusion
`of tetracycline (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, I4, 16, 18
`of tetracycline hydrochloride in the medium
`and 20 meg/ml). After allowing diffusion
`the plates were incubated at 37° for 24
`of tetracycline hydrochloride in the medium
`hours.
`the plates were incubated
`at 37° for 24
`hours.
`After incubation period zones of inhibi­
`tion were recorded and a standard graph
`After incubatiora period .zones of inhibi-
`tion were recorded and a standard graph
`was plotted employing log conc.
`in meg/
`was plotted employing log cone.
`in 111ch
`ml against diameter of zones of inhibition
`ml against diameter of zones of inhibition '
`in mm.
`in mm.
`
`Preparation of dessicators for exposing the
`Preparation of dessicatars for exposing the
`capsules at varying experimental conditions :
`capsules or varying experimental conditions .'
`
`As shown below the saturated salts solu­
`As shown below the saturated salts solu-
`tions were filled
`in the dessicators to get
`tions were filled in the dessicators to get
`30% and 45% relative humidities at 5°,
`30% and 45% relative humidities at 5°,
`37° and 50°. Capsules were also exposed
`37° and 50°. Capsules were also exposed
`to room temperature.
`to room temperature.
`———-.—_._.__._.__...._..____,________
`
`Materials :
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`All chemicals employed in this investiga­
`Materials :
`tion were of the best available quality.
`All chemicals employed in this invostiga-
`Hamycin was received from Hindustan
`tion were of the best available quality.
`Antibiotics, Pimpri, Poona.
`Hamycin was
`received from Hindustan
`Antibiotics, Pimpri, Poona.
`Tetracycline hydrochloride was received
`from Cyanamid (India) Ltd., Bulsar.
`Tetracycline hydrochloride was received
`from Cyanamid (India) Ltd., Bulsar.
`Glass distilled water was used for prepa­
`ring solutions whenever required. Hard
`Glass distilled water was used for prepa-
`gelatin capsules of No, 0 were employed
`ring solutions whenever
`required. Hard
`gelatin capsules of No. 0 were employed
`for filling
`the antibiotics-diluent mixtures.
`for filling the antibiotics-diluent mixtures.
`Assay Methods ;
`Assay Methods :
`I . Microbiological Estimation of Hamycin
`l. Microbiological Estimation of Hamycin
`Medium—Modified Sabourad's Agar
`Medium—Modified
`Sabourad’s Agar
`adjusted
`to pH 5.5 was sterilized by
`adjusted
`to pH 5.5 was
`sterilized by
`autoclaving.
`autoclaving.
`
`Test organism : Paecelomyces variotm
`Test organism: PaeCelomyces variotm
`spores in sterile normal saline containing
`spores in sterile normal saline containing
`1
`:5000 tween
`80
`and having 30%
`1
`: 5000
`tween 80
`and having 30%
`transmittance constituted the test organism
`transmittance constituted the test organism
`for the assay of Hamycin.
`for the assay of Hamycin.
`Plotting of a standard graph :
`Plotting of a standard graph :
`Modified Sabourad’s agar (120 ml) was
`Modified Sabourad's agar (120 ml) was
`inoculated with spore suspension (2 ml),
`inoculated with spore suspension (2 ml),
`which was
`transferred
`in
`glass plates
`(24 x 24. cms).
`In the solidified medium
`which was
`transferred
`in glass plates
`cups of 8 mm diameter were bored which
`(24 x 24. cms).
`In the solidified medium
`were filled with the selected dilutions of
`cups of 8 mm diameter were bored which
`Hamycin (0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 09,1016,
`were filled with the selected dilutions of
`2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5 and
`Hamycin (0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.5,
`6.0 meg/ml). After allowing diffusion of
`2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5 and
`Hamycin in the medium the plates were
`6 . 0 mcg/ml). After allowing diffusion o f
`incubated at
`37° for
`24 hours. After
`Hamycin in the medium the plates were
`incubation period zones of inhibition Were
`incubated at 37° for 24 hours. After
`recorded and a standard graph was plotted
`incubation period zones of inhibition were
`recorded and a standard graph was plotted
`
`Tempe- Approx.
`Tempe- Appro*,
`rature
`percen-
`rature
`percen-
`in DC)
`tage
`relative
`in 0C
`tage
`humidity
`relative
`——-._.__._.__.____________
`humidity
`l.
`Nacl + KN03 + Na—
`N03
`1. Nad + KNOg -j- Na—
`NOs
`CrOB
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2. CrOa
`Na 1 21-120
`3. Na I 2H2O
`Cro3‘
`
`Saturated solutions of salts
`Saturated solutions of salts
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5"
`
`5°
`
`37°
`
`37°
`
`30%
`5°
`45%
`5*
`30%
`37°
`45%
`
`5.
`
`so‘1
`
`30%
`370
`
`Na I ango
`..
`CrOs
`5. NailHaO
`50°
`6.
`45%
`CrOs
`50°
`'—-“—--——————_..—__________
`6, CrOs
`
`50«
`Vol. 16. No. 4
`
`Vol. 16. No. 4
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page 3 of 11
`
`30%
`
`30%
`45%
`
`30%
`
`•1
`•
`j
`
`I
`
`1
`
`I
`
`i
`
`\
`
`{
`
`)
`
`

`

`STABILITY STUDIES ON HAMYCIN
`
`177
`
`Formulation :
`
` l
`
`i
`
`in capsules
`These mixtures were filled
`177
`STABILITY STUDIES ON HAMYCIN
`which were exposed to 5 ± 1° in polythene
`Each capsule contained antibiotics and
`bags, to study the influence of diluents
`These mixtures were filled in capsules
`diluents in the following proportion by
`themselves on the individual antibiotics.
`Formulation .-
`which were exposed to 5 i 1° in polythene
`weight :
`bags,
`to- study the influence of diluents
`Each capsule contained antibiotics and
`themselves on the individual antibiotics.
`Selection of diluents:
`diluents in the following proportion by
`Quantity
`% of
`Ingredients
`weight :
`ingredient
`__________________...—————-————
`Tetracycline hydrochloride .. 100 mg.
`33.3%
`Ingredients
`Quantity
`3/; of
`ingredient
`4 mg.
`1-33%
`! Hamycin
`Tetracycline hydrochloride .. 100 mg.
`33.3%
`.. 196 mg.
`65.34%
`l Diluent
`4 mg.
`1.33%
`Hamycin
`
`UQtt
`HQ}.
`
`'line
`tinst
`11m.
`
`ma-
`'iine
`
`ma-
`nth
`ilus
`late
`rith
`um
`Hus
`ed,
`late
`tun
`ion
`18
`ion
`:oa
`i8
`am
`ion
`24
`um
`
`24
`
`bi«
`ph
`'g/
`on
`
`he
`
`Q-
`et
`
`•4
`
`65.34%
`.. 196 mg.
`Diluent
`Blending of Antibiotics
`_________,,_______..._._——-—-——-—
`
`i
`
`25.0 gm, of Tetracycline and 1.0 gm. of
`I
`Blending of Antibiotics
`} Hamycin' were thoroughly blended
`by
`25.0 gm. of Tetracycline and 1.0 gm. of
`trituration to have uniform distribution
`)
`Hamycin' were thoroughly
`blended
`by
`in each other. This mixture was employed
`trituration to have uniform distribution
`for mixing with the following diluents in
`in each other. This mixture was employed
`order to study the stability of both antibio­
`for mixing with the following diluents in
`tics in the presence of diluents.
`order to study the stability of both antibio-
`tics in the presence of diluents.
`1. Ascorbic acid
`2. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate
`l. Ascorbic acid
`2. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate
`3. Mannitol
`3. Mannitol
`4. Kaolin
`4. Kaolin
`5. Talc
`Taic
`6. Light magnesium oxide
`Light magnesium oxide
`7. Lactose
`Lactose
`8. Starch
`Starch
`9. Sodium bisulphite.
`Sodium bisulphite.
`
`399°.‘49‘P‘
`
`Mixing of Antibiotics with Diluents :
`Mixing of Antibiotics with Diluems .'
`65. 34% w/w of each diluent was thorou—
`65.34% w/w of each diluent was thorou­
`ghly mixed with 34.66%J w/w mixture of
`ghly mixed with 34.66% w/w mixture of
`tetracycline ”hydrochloride and hamycin.
`tetracycline hydrochloride and hamycin.
`The resultant blended mixture was filled
`The resultant blended mixture was filled
`in capsules using hand operated capsule
`in capsules using hand operated capsule
`filling machine.
`filling machine.
`Blanks .-
`Blanks:
`Hamycin (4.0 mg) with each selected
`diluents 296 mg. constituted hamycin Blank.
`Hamycin (4.0 mg) with each selected
`Similarly
`tetracycline hydrochloride
`100
`diluents 296 mg. constituted hamycin Blank.
`mg with each selected diluents (200 mg)
`Similarly
`tetracycline hydrochloride 100
`constituted
`etracycline
`hydrochloride
`mg with each selected diluents (200 mg)
`Blank.
`etracycline
`hydrochloride
`constituted
`Blank.
`May, 1974
`
`:ke'
`
`May, 1974
`
`ttfci
`
`tetracycline hydrochlo­
`The antibiotics
`Selection of diluents .'
`ride (100 mg) and Hamycin (4 nag) were
`mixed with following diluents (196 mg) to
`The antibiotics
`tetracycline hydrochlo-
`have an uniform blending.
`ride (100 mg) and Hamycin (4 mg) were
`mixed with following diluents (196 mg) to
`have an uniform blending.
`L Ascorbic acid
`2. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate
`Ascorbic acid
`3. Mannitol
`Potassium dihydrogen phosphate
`4. Kaolin
`Mannitol
`5. Talc
`Kaolin
`6. Light Magnesium Oxide
`Talc
`7. Lactose
`Light Magnesium Oxide
`8. Starch
`Lactose
`9. Sodium bisulphite
`Starch
`10. Calcium Carbonate
`Sodium bisulphite
`10. Calcium Carbonate
`11. Stearic acid
`ll. Stearic acid
`12. Magnesium Stearate
`12. Magnesium Stearate
`13. Citric acid
`i3. Citric acid
`14. Methyl Cellulose
`14.
`rMethyl Cellulose
`
`PWFF‘VP‘P’P?
`
`These mixtures were fjlled in capsules
`These mixtures were filled in capsules
`and were exposed to 65 % humidity at 50°
`and were exposed to 65% humidity at 50°
`for a period of 45 days (extreme condition
`for a period of 45 days (extreme condition
`was selected). Observations were made at
`was selected). Observations were made at
`varying intervals and last
`five diluents
`varying intervals and last five
`diluents
`were rejected on the basis of certain reasons.
`were rejected on the basis of certain reasons.
`Remaining nine were employed for
`the
`Remaining nine were employed for the
`investigation.
`investigation.
`
`STABILITY STUDIES ON HAMYCIN
`STABILITY STUDIES ON
`HAMYCIN
`IN COMBINATION WITH TETRACY-
`IN COMBINATION WITH TETRACY­
`CLINE HYDROCHLORIDE WITH SE-
`CLINE HYDROCHLORIDE WITH SE­
`LECTED DILUENTS
`LECTED DILUENTS
`(i) Procedure of
`testing the capsules
`contents for potency. of Hamycin.
`(0 Procedure of testing the capsules
`contents for potency of Hamycin.
`The capsules containing antibiotics and
`diiuents, prepared as described earlier were
`The capsules containing antibiotics and
`exposed to varying temperatures (5°. 37°,
`diluents, prepared as described earlier were
`50°, and room temperature)
`at
`selected
`exposed to varying temperatures (5°, 37°,
`humidities (30% and 45% RH).
`50°, and room
`temperature) at selected
`humidities (30% and 45% RH).
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page 4 of 11
`
`

`

`178
`
`HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS BULLETIN
`
`*
`
`
`
` l'
`
`storage at an interval of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,
`initial content of Hamycin was
`The
`HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS BULLETIN
`I78
`30, 45 and 60 days along with blank.
`estimated raicrobiologically
`immediately
`Standard Graph (Fig. I) was employed
`after preparation of capsules and further
`The
`initial
`content of Harnycin was
`for estimating potency of antibiotic.
`after exposing to selected conditions of
`storage at an interval of 3, 6, 9,
`12,
`15,
`estimated microbiologically
`immediately
`ad
`30. 45 and 60 days along with blank
`after preparation of capsules and further
`Standard Graph (Fig.
`l) was
`employed
`after exposing to selected conditions of
`for estimating potency of antibiotic.
`0.5.
`0.6.
`0.4.
`0-5
`
`0.4
`
`(3.
`ex
`
`(3.
`CK
`
`fo
`in
`gr
`O'
`Fi
`St(
`b>
`
`H
`Pi
`
`2
`c
`K
`2
`u.
`u.
`est
`
`u
`C
`cc
`
`.
`
`i
`
`wem:7prrmrmu
`
`i
`
`I
`1
`
`Fi
`
`• ji
`
`Fi
`
`l g l l I I l l l
`
`(
`
`
`
`1.1.
`
`1.0.
`
`5.9
`10
`
`11
`
`f
`‘14-
`15
`16
`T
`17 18
`T
`.20 .21 2a :25
`.24 25 25 at
`19
`19 Z0 ai $3. £3 24 55 3L6 &
`12 13 14 15 16 17 18
`ZONE 0F INHIBITION IN mm.
`ZONE OF imiBirm IN mm.
`. Standard graph of hamycin capsules with tetracycline He! at
`_
`nd selected diluents. Log Cone. meg/ml
`versus zone of inhibition m min (common for all the diluents).
`Fig. I. Standard graph of hamycin capsules with tetracycline Hcl and selected diluents. Log Cone, incg/nil
`versus zone of mhibition in mm (commoTi for all the diluents).
`Capsules content equivalent to 2 mg. of
`Initial content was considered as 100%
`Hamycin was exactly weighed and was
`Capsules content equivalent to 2 mg. of
`Initial content was considered as 100%
`retention (no initial destruction has been
`dissolved or suspended in sterile distilled
`observed). Percentage retention of Harm-
`Hamycin was exactly weighed and was
`retention (no initial destruction has been
`water of pH 8. Dilutions were filled in
`cin at selected conditions and time intervals
`dissolved or suspended in sterile distilled
`observed). Percentage retention of Hamy­
`triplicate along with their respective blanks
`were ascertained and recorded.
`water of pH 8. Dilutions were filled
`in
`cin at selected conditions and time intervals
`in the cups. After observing the standard
`The procedure for calculating Haif Life Of
`triplicate along with their respective blanks
`were ascertained and recorded.
`conditions of incubations,
`the diameter of
`Hamycin capsules formulations—
`in the cups. After observing the standard
`zone
`inhibition
`for
`each
`dilution was
`The procedure for calculating Half Life of
`Log of percentage retention of hamycin
`measured and recorded.
`conditions of incubations, the diameter of
`Hamycin capsules formulations—
`were plotted against storage time in days
`zone
`inhibition for each dilution was
`Log of percentage retention of hamycin
`measured and recorded.
`were plotted against storage time in days
`
`
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page 5 of 11
`
`999ELL)“
`
`1.06CONS.OFHAMVCINmflgm/mti3SL-SE;E
`
`
`
`
`
`s
`0.2.

`^ O . U
`Z
`^ 0.0,
`‘53.0
`g 1.9.

`5 f.8.
`u.
`0 17.
`1 1.6.
`o
`15.
`^5
`O
`^ 1.4.
`U .
`:e-.-*83“
`1.2
`
`

`

`
`
`STABILITY STUDIES ON HAMYCIN
`
`179
`
`5,
`c.
`d
`
`; |
`
`Mill.“
`
`I
`
`aL
`
`0.693
`
`179
`
`T/2
`
`(3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 45 and 60) at all selected
`smnlu'rv STUDIES ON HAMYCIN
`experimental conditions, viz.
`5±r and 30% relative humidity
`(3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 45 and 60) at all selected
`5± 1° and 45% relative humidity
`experimental conditions, viz.
`Room temperature (R.T.).
`5il° and 30% relative humidity
`37° and 30% relative humidity
`Sil" and 45% relative humidity
`37° and 45% relative humidity
`Room temperature (R.T.).
`50° and 30% relative humidity
`37° and 30% relative humidity
`50° and 45% relative humidity
`37° and 45%1 relative humidity
`50° and 30% relative humidity
`The rate of decomposition of Hamycin
`50° and 45% relative humidity
`followed first
`order reaction which was
`The rate of decomposition of Hamycin
`Only one
`indicated by straight line graphs,
`followed first order
`reaction which was
`graph (Fig.2) of starch as a diluent is given.
`indicated by straight line graphs. Only one
`Other diluents followed the same pattern.
`graph (Fig.2) of starch as a diluent is given.
`From these graphs slope value' for each
`Other diluents followed the same pattern.
`storage condition was calculated, followed
`From these graphs slope value‘ for each
`by K values.
`storage condition was calculated, followed
`(— k = — slope X 2.303)
`by K values.
`Half life in each case was calculated em-
`(4- k : -- slope >< 2.303)
`Half life in each case was calculated em-
`ploying the formula.
`ploying the formula.
`2.0
`
`3.0
`1,9.
`1.9
`
`k
`0.693
`where T/2 = Half life in days. These re­
`T/2 r— —--——
`sults are recorded and compared in Table I.
`k
`STABILITY STUDIES ON TETRACY­
`where 172 = Half life in days. These re-
`sults are recorded and compared in Table I.
`CLINE HYDROCHLORIDE WITH HA­
`MYCIN WITH SELECTED DILUENTS.
`STABILITY STUDIES ON TETRACY-
`CLINE HYDROCHLORIDE WITH HA-
`( / / ) P r o c e d u r e o f t e s t i n g t h e c a p s u l e c o n t e n t
`MYCIN WITH SELECTED DILUENTS.
`for potency of tetracycline hydrochloride.
`(ii) Procedure of testing the capsule content
`Capsules were prepared and exposed to
`for potency of tetracycline hydrochloride.
`earlier mentioned experimental conditions.
`Capsules were prepared and exposed to
`The initial content of tetracycline hydro­
`earlier mentioned experimental conditions.
`chloride was estimated microbiologically
`The initial content of tetracycline hydro-
`immediately after preparation of capsules
`chloride was estimated microbiologically
`and further after exposing to selected condi­
`immediately after preparation of capsules
`tions of storage at an interval of 3, 6, 9, 12,
`and further after exposing to selected condi-
`15, 30, 45 and 60 days along with blank.
`tions of storage at an interval of 3, 6, 9, 12,
`Standard graphs (Fig. 3) were employed
`15, 30, 45 and 60 days along with blank.
`for estimating potency of antibiotic.
`Standard graphs (Fig. 3) were employed
`for estimating potency of antibiotic.
`,— S'ldOlRH
`p» 57502, RH
`-5m/45y.RH
`r
`- 5 745% RH
`
`2; - Room TmpfRt)
`- Roam Temp (RT)-
`-37730% KM
`-37°/30% RH
`1 , 8 .
`1.8
`
`"^-SO'lZQtRH
`~ 507.307. RH
`i
`
`U .
`1.7
`L--3/745 7«/?W
`- 57745 7.1m
`
`l
`
`
`1. 6 .
`1.6
`1.5
`5 1.5.
`5 1.4,
`1.4
`K
`
`UJ
`C* 1.3.
`
`2“- it:
`/.a.
`u. o
`
`
`M.
`— - 507451, av
`
`i“ C)
`-j i . Q .
`-- 50745% RH
`
`{.060FZRETENTION ia
`.0990010:6
`
`0 . 9 .
`
`O.&.
`
`0 . 7 .
`
`
`
`10
`20
`50
`40
`5O
`60
`
`0.6
`TIME IN DAYS
`T
`0
`10
`30
`60
`40
`50
`Fig. 2. Log of percentage retention of hamycin versus time in days in capSules of different conditions of
`storage with tetracycline hydrochlonde and starch as a diluent.
`T I M E J N d A Y S
`Fig. 2. Log of percentage retention of hamycin versus time in days in capsules of different conditions of
`storage with tetracycline hydrochloride and starch as a diluent.
`
`so
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page 6 of 11
`
`

`

`HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS BULLETIN
`
`HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS BULLETIN
`
`1
`
`t
`
`]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`180
`
`180
`
`31
`30.
`29.
`38.
`£ 7 .
`
`£ 2 6 .
`5
`2; 3,5.
`P09»:
`2: o
`S9 23.
`3:
`5 aa.
`LL o a* J
`Uj
`p ao.
`Nl
`
`ZONE0FINHIBITIONINmm.
`
`1 9 .
`
`soc»‘00:):
`must:#01me
`a33:5Pa;323’3::
`
`1 8 .
`1 7 .
`1 6 .
`--L U!.
`1 5 .
`1 4
`r
`1.2, 4.3 4.4
`0.2 05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 as 0.9 {.0 {:1
`r
`i
`i
`f
`i
`t
`1
`T
`0.2. 03 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0-8 0.9 1.0 i:i
`f.& 1.3 14
`LOG COHC. meg I ml Of TETZACYCLINE HCL
`
`14
`
`Fig. 3. Standard graphs of tetracycline capsules with hamycin and selected diluents. Log conc. meg per
`ml Versus zone of inhibition in mm. (1) for potassium dihydrogen phosphate, talc, lactose, sodium
`bisulfite (2) for ascorbic acid, mannitol, kaolin, light magnesium oxide and starch.
`- V01. 16. No 4.
`
`
`
`• Vol. 16. No 4.
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page 7 of 11
`
`1
`
`e
`
`N
`
`

`

`STABILITY STUDIES ON HAMYCIN
`
`181
`
`.
`
`days (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 45 and 60) at all
`Capsule content equivalent to 50 mg. of
`STABILITY STUDIES ON HAMYCIN
`181
`selected conditions.
`tetracycline hydrochloride was exactly
`The rate of decomposition of Tetracy­
`weighed and was dissolved or suspened in
`days (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 30, 4S and 60) at all
`Capsule content equivalent to 50 mg. of
`cline hydrochloride followed first order
`sterile buffer of pH 4.5. Dilutions were
`selected conditions.
`tetracycline
`hydrochloride was
`exactly
`reaction which was indicated by straight
`filled in triplicate along with their respective
`The rate of decomposition of Tetracy-
`weighed and was dissolved or suspened in
`line graphs. Only one graph of Lactose as
`blanks in the cups. After observing the
`cline hydrochloride followed first order
`sterile buffer of pH 4.5. Dilutions were
`diluent (Fig. 4)
`is given. Other diluents
`standard conditions of incubation the dia­
`reaction which was indicated by straight
`filled in triplicate along with their respective
`followed the same pattern.
`meter of zone of inhibition for each dilution
`line graphs. Only one graph of Lactose as
`blanks in the cups. After observing the
`From these graphs, slope value for each
`was measured and recorded.
`diluent
`(Fig. 4)
`is given. Other diluents
`standard conditions of incubation the dia-
`storage condition was calculated, followed
`followed the same pattern.
`meter of zone of inhibition for each dilution
`From these graphs, slope value for each
`The procedure for calculating half life of
`by K values. Finally employing K values
`was measured and recorded.
`storage condition was calculated, followed
`half life of the antibiotic was calculated as
`Tetracycline in capsule formulation.
`by K values.
`Finally employing K values
`The procedure for calculating half life of
`Log of percentage retention of
`tetracy­
`shown in case of Hamycin. The results
`half life of the antibiotic was calculated as
`Tetracycline in capsule formulation.
`cline was plotted against storage time in
`are recorded and compared in Table 11.
`shown in case of Hamycin. The results
`Log of percentage retention of
`tetracy-
`*,0
`are recorded and compared in Table II.
`cline was plotted against storage time in
`
`2,0 .
`
`
`
`‘3‘
`.
`
`l’
`
`t
`i
`
`9‘.
`
`
`[.060F%RETENTION ;
`
`f . 9 .
`1.9
`
`1.8.
`
`o
`K:
`
`Uj
`
`iij -
`
`u. o
`ta o
`
`- - B l a n k
`
`- - 50/ 3 0 % R H
`- - P / 4 5 % R H
`
`--/rr
`- - 577507. RH
`- - 37730% RH
`
`1.7
`1.7.
`
`
`— — 577457, RH
`- - 37e/45% RH
`_ .. 50°/50% RH
`
`50*130% RH
`— — ctr/45% RH
`
`> - - 5 Q ' / 4 5 % R H
`4O
`50
`60
`20
`60 '“
`f0
`T
`t
`?
`0
`60
`10
`HO
`3 0
`4 0
`5 0
`TIME iN DAYS
`TIME IN DAY3
`Fig. 4. Log of percentage retention of tetracycline hydrochloride versus time in days.
`different conditions of storage with Hamycin and lactose as a diluent
`In capsules at
`Fig. 4. Log of percentage retention of tetracycline hydrochloride versus time in days,
`different conditions of storage with Hamycin and lactose as a diluent
`CONCLUSION
`Hamycin,
`in Refrigerator at 30% RH.
`mannitol,
`lactose and starch showed the
`Hamycin, in Refrigerator at 30 % R.H.
`same half-life of 1505 days but at 45 °,{, R.H.
`mannitol, lactose and starch showed the
`mannitol is found best followed by starch
`same half-life of 1505 days but at 45% R.H.
`mannitol is found best followed by starch
`
`1.6
`1.6
`
`0
`
`In capsules at
`
`CONCLUSION
`Perusal at the grading given in Table I for
`each diluent with reference to half life of
`Perusal at the grading given in Table I for
`each diluent with reference to half life of
`May, 1974
`
`May, 1974
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page 8 of 11
`
`

`

`m
`
`3. Mannitol
`
`BS
`
`4. Kaolin
`
`B
`
`5. Talc
`
`“—04.55%nomzoEDonm.
`
`Sr.
`No.
`
`Diluents
`
`T/2 of
`Hamy-
`cinin
`diluents
`after 60
`dziys flt
`50±r
`Blank
`
`only
`
`At 5°
`
`Room Temp. At I T
`
`30% R.H.
`
`45% R.H.
`
`T/2 G
`
`T/2 G
`
`T/2
`
`G
`
`T/2 G
`
`1. Ascorbic Acid
`2. Potassium dihydrogen
`
`phosphate
`
`.. 1777.0 978.1 5
`
`677.2
`
`6
`
`623.00 4
`
`238.5 6
`
`.. 0758.0 256.6
`
`9
`
`144.4 9
`
`84.26
`
`9
`
`39.1 9
`
`1777.0 1505.0 1
`
`1204.0
`
`1
`
`872.8
`
`2
`
`300.9 3
`
`0995.0 967.4 6
`
`871.2 4
`
`406.3
`
`6
`
`270.0
`
`4
`
`.. 0995.0 1053.0 4
`
`862.4
`
`an
`
`6. Light magnesium oxide .. 0995.0 371.1 8
`
`248.3
`
`5
`
`8
`
`571.9 5
`
`270.9
`
`5
`
`139.5
`
`8
`
`106.0 7
`
`TS
`
`7. Lactose
`
`8. Starch
`
`1777.0 1505.0
`
`3
`
`902.0 3
`
`902.8
`
`1
`
`339.8
`
`2
`
`1777.0 1505.0
`
`2
`
`1053.0 2
`
`662.1
`
`3
`
`601.9 1
`
`9. Sodium-bi-su!phite
`
`.. 0995.0
`
`600.6
`
`7
`
`271.0
`
`7
`
`248.3
`
`7
`
`40.61
`
`8
`
`<
`o
`f""
`
`Z
`Q
`
`132
`
`It
`
`s
`
`% R = Percent Retention
`T/2 = Half life in days
`
`G
`RH = Relative Humidity.
`
`= Grade at particular experimental condition
`
`TABLE n—COMPARISON OF HALF LIFE OF TETRACYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE AT
`
`_x...._:.u...,..2
`
`
`
`mN3.2w92.m2.:n3.2w:2m23..m:2938..”285385232235
`
`mm8.2m:3v5.3n«2”nWEn3%a22223%..afl.mo.
`
`
`
`64.71
`
`4
`
`145.8
`
`3
`
`mw3.2v3;;n8.2v22”928¢2.~45a:323%..5.22.v
`
`82.69 3
`
`144.4 4
`
`127.8 5
`
`25.59 6
`
`
`
`21.07 8
`
`22.57 9
`
`
`
`3303s22.2N:22322:8m:3n9.22N2822::22%.mmm3.2222.a33N:2H:8m225m2822R:
`
`
`
`57.18
`
`5
`
`73.9 6
`
`mmRdn:2w2.8mn.8,”Nwas_$.322232SE3:532.m
`
`.NH.m8.2aSean2.3w3mmw8.5w”.5n2.2m2::353.82.2
`
`196.6
`
`2
`
`156.5 1
`
`
`53333wm«.3m2.2m8.5.m2%a3.:a3.:m.:322.5:23982W59:35“...
`
`
`
`129.4 2
`
`270.9 1
`
`if
`
`
`
`o”a.0mi0NP03.0«a..0NF0NF03%.gamma“.
`
`252
`
`18.8 9
`
`33.78 7
`
`9.78
`
`7
`
`3:0
`
`8.52%..
`
`
`
`
`.2:An..32x2..32x3.mdNR.22x3.12N2“Eu
`.353%
`.0DOW”—4.ofim”(a.QEDH.800Ma“u<hoNxvm.353:0.3“
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:EN:
`
`
`
`mmvénfipmm0mzonhn—ZB05315)h<2—65:moEa;NOladder—209'“ah
`
`
`
`....lln|lll]}ll¥lllll|lulll1llllllllllltlli
`
`VARYING CONDITIONS OF STORAGE
`
`-- E^jj-rrf
`
`'•
`
`
`
`Eru<>b4NGESEUOMG>Emzflomugmh.nous3nozagmonI—H35C.
`
`TABLE I—COMPARISON OF HALF LIFE OF H^MCYIN AT VARYING CONDITIONS OF STORAGE
`
`1'ill.
`
`
`
`$235230235MRmy.4
`
`At 50°
`
`
`
`45% R.H.
`
`30% R.H.
`
`45% R.H.
`
`
`
`cchaou5585333332mm2“.3:30HUM.
`
`30% R.H.
`
`£35oh:mamHNE.6.
`
`isW
`
`
`
`5:3quEvoke...“Hd..—XH.
`
`T/2 G
`
`T/2 G
`
`T/2 G
`
`
`
`26.59
`
`7
`
`24.07 8
`
`
`
`na:h2.2a”.2m5.2.F2%h9:...”h068238efiagméénfiom.m
`
`10.03
`
`7.32
`
`5
`
`9
`
`9.27
`
`8
`
`10.27 4
`
`10.03 6
`
`12.04 2
`
`10.98
`
`3
`
`19.55 1
`
`oo
`to
`
`s z
`o
`C 09
`H >
`Z
`>
`z
`H
`CO
`Q
`H
`o 09
`ttJ
`C
`r
`r w
`d
`Z
`
`Apotex Exhibit 1011
`Page90f11
`
`
`
`

`

`agfc.v
`
`•<
`
`£ P3
`
`[83
`
`--J
`4^
`
`Sr.
`No.
`
`Diluents
`
`At 5° ± 1°
`T/2 of Tetra-
`cycline at in
`diluent only
`after 60 days

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket