throbber
NORRED EXHIBIT 2140 - Page 1
`Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc.,
`& Medtronic Corevalve, LLC
`v. Troy R. Norred, M.D.
`Case IPR2014-00111
`
`

`

`the forces which are exerted from the ventricular 111yoc11rdium (Cardiovascular
`Research22 7 1988)(Jour11al of Biomcchanics33(6):653—658 2()0()June)
`111 11 similar fashionas the aortic /
`root this structure allow the valvular apparatur to open with the least amount of sti.ain
`
`The cmonary arteries arise within 01 above theQnus ofv}11salva. The blood flow ofthe heart
`occurs mostly when the ventricle relaxes At this 111116116 cusps of the aortic valve are closed and as
`mentioned the diastolic forces of the blood against the valve are dispersed along the valve 11nd adjacent
`sinus. The opening or ostia of the coronary arteries when located near the apex 11nd middle of the sinuses
`allows for the most laminar flow characteristics. This111 turn promotes the greates>amount of flow with the
`least amount of 1esistance ln disease statcsjwhere these relationships are lost it 1111s been proposed that
`this could lead to increase sticss at the corona1y ostia (The A01tic Valve CRC press).
`These integral relationshipinot only pertain to the gross anatomy of the valvular apparatus but
`alsothe microanatomvshewfihefiegmhmtumfflesemuettwes.JThe amount of elastinIS in a higher
`concentration as shown by staining methods (American Journal of Pathology 445 (7): 193.1). This allows a
`greater amount of dilatation of the structures in this area. Further, scanning electron micrographs have
`shown the unique arrangement of collagen in the valves which permit the unique reversal of curvature
`which is vital in the function of the valve (figure 6)( Anatomic Embryology 172(61): 1985). The fibers are
`unusually small and arranged in sheets with unique distances between each strand. In theory,this would
`give 11 greater amount of tensile strength while allowing continued flexibility. As always, nature 1111s
`selected the most efficient machinery, and we have only to discover the reasons why.
`
`11.
`
`Aortic Valve Dynamics and Physics
`
`The aortic valve is better understood in a dynamic state given it is not a static structure. To fully
`understand this structure it is integral to understand the opening and closing of the valve. the motion of the
`various parts? the design of the valve in vitro 11nd the hydrodynamics of the valve. The valve’s ultimate
`function is to allow fluid transfer from the ventricle to the systemic circulation.
`[11 order to do this
`effic1ently it minimi7cs shear stless resistance to flow and tensile for.ces
`The opening and closing of the aortic valve depends upon differential p1essures flow velocity
`characteristicsand as mentioned earlier Jthe unique anatomic relationship between the valves and the 1112»«1:31J11, 11
`@iirusesof»%1
`v11 One of the most compiehensivc studyeeneompassed a model developed by Bellhouse J
`et al.
`In this model,
`the flow of fluid through the aortic valve was studied by injecting dye within the flow
`of fluid.
`Some of the pertinent observations found within this model were as follows: 1) The valve opens
`rapidly, and as the leaflets move into the sinuses, vortices form between the leaflet and the sinus walls; 2)
`The flow enters the sinus at the sinus ridge, curls back along the sinus wall and leaflet and then back into
`the main stream; .3) During the end of systole the vorticcal motion created during contraction forces the
`valves back toward a closed position. These observations are 1111p01tant to show that absolute p1essure
`differences created between the aorta and ventricle are not the source of initial closure of the aortic valves.
`In fact,
`it would be detriminal to valve stress if these f01ces dictated closure of the aortic valve.
`F01
`example, if two objects are 11 greater distance apart and a set amount of force is applied to each, the greater
`distance would produce greater velocity and the momentum at impact would be greater. Therefore, if the
`leaflets are closed or near closure as contraction is coming to 1111 end then the force used for coaptation
`would be less. Less force per cycle equates to greater longevity of the valve.
`In conclusion, the cusps 11nd
`the relationship of closure for prosthetic valves must incorporate passive closure during systole which
`would logically lengthen the lifespan of any such device.
`To expand these concepts. the theory of laminar flow and 110w the native aortic valve
`accomplishes this must be developed. A laminar flow is predicted by 11 Reynolds number which
`incorporates the laws as described by Pouiselle and Bernoulli.
`111 generaL the lower the
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2140 - Page 2
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2140 - Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket