throbber
NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 1
`Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc.,
`& Medtronic Corevalve, LLC
`v. Troy R. Norred, M.D.
`Case IPR2014-00111
`
`

`

`//-.J
`
`[Wax fad/”flail
`
`119(4 Pt 1):?53-63,
`
`Grande-Allen KJ. Cochran RP. Reinhall PG. Kunzelman KS.
`Institution
`Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
`Cleveland. OH. USA.
`Title
`Re—creation of sinuses is important for sparing the aortic valve: a
`finite element study.
`Source
`Journal of Thoracic 0 Cardiovascular Surgery.
`2000 Apr.
`Local Messages
`Owned by MU HSL
`Abstract
`OBJECTIVE: The treatment of choice for aortic valve insufficiency due
`to root dilatation has become root replacement with aortic valve
`sparing. However, root replacement with a synthetic graft may result in
`altered valve stresses. The purpose of this study was to compare the
`stress/strain patterns in the spared aortic valve in different root
`replacement procedures by means of finite element modeling. METHODS: Our
`finite element model of the normal human root and valve was modified to
`simulate and evaluate three surgical techniques:
`(1) "cylindrical" graft
`sutured below the valve at the anulus,
`(2) "tailored" graft sutured just
`above the valve. and {3} "pseudosinus" graft.
`tailored and sutured below
`the valve at the anulus. Simulated diastolic pressures were applied, and
`stresses and strains were calculated for the valve, root, and graft.
`Leaflet coaptation was also quantified. RESULTS: All three root
`replacement models demonstrated significantly altered leaflet stress
`patter!
`me as compared with normal patterns. The cylindrical model showed the
`greatest increases in stress {16%-l73%} and strain {10%—98%J.
`followed
`by the tailored model [stress +10%-157%, strain +9%—36%}. The
`pseudosinus model showed the smallest increase in stress [9%-28%) and
`'
`strain (Eh-31%), and leaflet coaptation was closest to normal.
`qfififlflfl§:g§) Valve—sparing techniques that allow the potential for sinus
`space fo
`ation (tailored, pseudosinus) result in simulated leaflet
`stresses that are closer to normal than the cylindrical technique.
`Normalized leaflet stresses in the clinical setting may result in
`improved longevity of the spared valve.
`
`,
`
`”
`
`n
`
`\DS/l‘
`
`Citation <9)
`
`I.
`
`PubMed Identifier
`
`Institution
`
`fl/j/Z/ég/
`Unégesgggntifier
`10703772
`AuthorsCacciola G. Peters GW. Schreurs PJ.
`(£4,
`Department of Mechanical Engineering. Eindhoven University of
`Technology. P.0. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven. The Netherlands.
`giovannanfw.wtb.tue.nl
`Title
`A three-dimensional mechanical analysis of a stentless fibre—
`
`//
`
`l
`
`\S\
`’70
`\9
`
`I
`(6/?
`\\\\EE%//
`V
`Q
`
`{
`
`Source
`Journal of Biomechanics.
`
`33(5}:521-30, 2000 May.
`
`Abstract
`Failure of bioprosthetic and synthetic three-leaflet valves has been
`
`~{fi7
`reinforced aortic valve prosthesis.
`(2
`Local Messages
`fat
`MU HSL owns some issues. Check Library Catalog Holdings.
`
`shown to occur as a consequence of high tensile and bending stresses, (gag
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 2
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 2
`
`

`

`4
`
`.«
`
`7/ch 2/ Wdflf“
`
`in the
`Moreover,
`acting on the leaflets during opening and closi
`stented prostheses, whether synthetic or biological,
`the absence of
`
`
`ontraction of the aortic base, due to the rigid stent, ca
` ea ets to be subjected o n on hysiolog ca , which
`
`
`
`an ,
`ica ion. It is s own
`o ca c
`is re
`r ic base and leaflet attachment, and leaflet
`as
`'
`'
`fibre-reinforcement result in reduced stresses in the weaker parts of
`the leaflets in their closed configuration. It is postulated that this
`leads to a decrease of tears and perforations, which may result in a
`improved long-term behaviour. The effect of a flexible leaflet
`attachment and aortic base of a synthetic valve is investigated with a
`finite element model. Different fibre-reinforced structures are analysed
`with respect to!
`the stresses that are likely to contribute to the failure of fibre-
`reinforced prostheses and compared with the results obtained for a
`stented prosthesis. Results show that for the stentless models a
`reduction of stresses up to 75% is obtained with respect to stented
`models with the same type of reinforcement.
`
`Citation <10)
`Unique Identifier
`201é0328
`PubMed Identifier
`106?7158
`Authors
`
`Morsi YS.
`Sakhaeimanesh A. Clayton BR.
`-
`Institution
`Centre for Research and Technology Development, School of Engineering
`and Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria,
`Australia. ymorsi@swin.edu.au
`Title
`
`C:
`x)
`{4/
`
`Hydrodynamic evaluation of three artificial aortic valve chambers.
`Source
`
`Artificial Organs.
`Local Messages
`Owned by MU HSL
`Abstract
`
`24(1):57-63, 2000 Jan.
`
`The effect of chamber geometry on the characteristics of turbulent
`steady flow through a newly designed artificial heart valve, "the
`jellyfish valve," has been investigated for flow rates matching those of
`peak systole. Laser DOPpler Anemometry {LDA} was employed to determine
`the velocity and shear stress distributions at various locations
`downstream of the jellyfish valve. Three geometrically different aortic
`valve chambers have been investigated: namely,
`a chamber with sinuses of
`Valsalva, an ellipsoidal chamber, and a cylindrical chamber. The results
`of this investigation indicated that the aorta with sinuses of Valsalva
`model had the highest turbulent shear stresses whereas the ellipsoidal
`model gave the highest-pressure drops. However,
`for the various flow
`rates examined,
`including the systole peak value of 26 L/min, it appears
`that the ellipsoidal model displays better hydrodynamic characteristics
`in terms of shear stress and uniformity of axial velocity distributions
`
`downstream of the jellyfish valve.
`
`Siggégzgggiéifier
`
`PubMed Identifier
`10509186
`
`Wfl fl /Zfl(d// fl/ .//
`
`
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 3
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`A...
`
`_._.-._—
`
`
`
`Authors
`
`Sung HW. Chang Y. Chiu CT.
`Institution
`
`I.
`
`7/49 )[ W4 wra/
`
`Chen CN.
`
`Liang HC.
`
`Department of Chemical Engineering, National Central University,
`Chung-Li, Taiwan, ROC. hwsungecc.ncu.edu.tw
`Title
`
`Mechanical properties of a porcine aortic valve fixed with a naturally
`occurring crosslinking agent.
`Source
`
`Biomaterials.
`Local Messages
`MU HSL owns some issues. Check Library Catalog holdings.
`Abstract
`
`20(19}:1759—72, 1999 Oct.
`
`ic
`'
`f
`The study investigates the mechanical properties
`valve leaflets fixed with a naturally occurrin crosslinking agent,
`
`fiat distinct pressure heads. Fresh andW ed
`
`coun -
`
`-
`
`the changes
`to fixation,
`arts were used as controls. Subsequent
`in leaflet collagen crimps and its surface morphology were investigated
`by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy {SEM}. Also,
`the
`crosslinking characteristics of each studied group were determined by
`measuring its fixation index and denaturation temperature.
`In the
`mechanical testing,
`tissue strips made from each studied group were
`examined in both the circumferential and radial directions. Histological
`and SEM comparisons between fresh porcine aortic valve leaflet and those
`fixed at medium or high pressure revealed that the following changes may
`occur: elimination of the natural collagen crimping, and extensive loss
`of the endothelial layer. The denaturation temperatures of the
`glutaralde!
`hyde-fixed leaflets were significantly greater than the genipin-fixed
`leaflets; however,
`their fixation indices were comparable. Generally,
`fixation pressure did not affect the crosslinking characteristics of the
`genipin- and glutaraldehyde-fixed leaflets. It was found that fixation
`of porcine aortic valves in genipin or glutaraldehyde did not alter the
`mechanical anisotropy observed in fresh valve leaflets. This indicated
`that the intramolecular and intermolecular crosslinks introduced into
`the collagen fibrils during fixation is of secondary importance to the
`presence of structural and mechanical anisotropy in fresh leaflet.
`Tissue
`ixa ion in genipi
`e y e may pro uce disEIECt
`crosslinking structures. However,
`the difference in crosslinking
`structure between the genipin- and glutaraldehyde-fixed leaflets did not
`seem to cause any significant discrepancies in their mechanical
`properties when compared at the same fixation pressure. Nevertheless,
`regardless of the !
`crosslinking agent used, changes in mechanical properties and ruptured
`patterns were observed when the valve leaflets were fixed at distinct
`pressures.
`
`Siiéfii°ldéiiimr %fl 79 C fl/fl/
`
`99396317
`PubMed Identifier
`10468241
`Authors
`
`a //
`
`gl/
`
`\Zt
`
`LaBorde DV. Yoganathan AP.
`
`Weston MW.
`Institution
`Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, School of Biomedical,
`$n91neering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta 30332-0535, USA.
`'
`~
`'on o
`t e s ear stress -
`the surface of an aortic valve
`leaflet.
`
`'
`/Z;Lz7/?&Z/{$:
`
`" gxdea/zca/ £5 1"”
`395; _?fi / ( d%/)
`3’,:?)2?:j /€7 a???
`
`72/- We:
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 4
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 4
`
`

`

` Authors
`
`"
`
`7&9 )g W4 W/(f’a/
`
`Sung RN. Chang Y. Chiu CT. Chen CN.
`Institution
`
`Liang HC.
`
`Department of Chemical Engineering, National Central University,
`Chung—Li, Taiwan, ROC. hwsung@cc.ncu.edu.tw
`Title
`
`Mechanical properties of a porcine aortic valve fixed with a nature 1
`occurring crosslinking agent.
`Source
`Biomaterials.
`Local Messages
`MU HSL owns some issues. Check Library Catalog Holdings.
`Abstract
`
`-20{19}:l?59-?2, 1999 Oct.
`
`_
`
`L/
`
`L
`
`ic
`‘
`The study investigates the mechanical properties
`valve leaflets fixed with a naturally occurrin crosslinkin agent,
`
`”at distinct pressure heads. Fresh andfilmwmw ed
`
`coun'~ -
`
`the changes
`to fixation,
`arts were used as controls. Subsequent
`in leaflet collagen crimps and its surface morphology were investigated
`by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Also,
`the
`crosslinking characteristics of each studied group were determined by
`measuring its fixation index and denaturation temperature.
`In the
`mechanical testing,
`tissue strips made from each studied group were
`examined in both the circumferential and radial directions. Histological
`and SEM comparisons between fresh porcine aortic valve leaflet and those
`fixed at medium or high pressure revealed that the following changes may
`occur: elimination of the natural collagen crimping, and extensive loss
`of the endothelial layer. The denaturation temperatures of the
`glutaralde!
`hyde-fixed leaflets were significantly greater than the genipin—fixed
`leaflets; however,
`their fixation indices were comparable. Generally,
`fixation pressure did not affect the crosslinking characteristics of the
`genipin- and glutaraldehyde—fixed leaflets. It was found that fixation
`of porcine aortic valves in genipin or glutaraldehyde did not alter the
`mechanical anisotropy observed in fresh valve leaflets. This indicated
`that the intramolecular and intermolecular crosslinks introduced into
`the collagen fibrils during fixation is of secondary importance to the
`pregence of structural and mechanical anisotropy in fresh leaflet.
`Tissue
`ixa ion in genipi
`a
`e y e may pro uce distifict
`crosslinking structures. However,
`the difference in crosslinking
`structure between the genipin— and glutaraldehyde—fixed leaflets did not
`seem to cause any significant discrepancies in their mechanical
`properties when compared at the same fixation pressure. Nevertheless,
`regardless of the E
`crosslinking agent used, changes in mechanical properties and ruptured
`patterns were observed when the valve leaflets were fixed at distinct
`pressures.
`
`Siiéfiildéiiifie %fl 79 C 7/
`
`99396317
`PubHed Identifier
`10468241
`Authors
`
`5/ //
`
`4...-
`
`LaBorde DV. Yoganathan AP.
`
`Heston MW.
`Institution
`Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, School of Biomedical,
`$n9ineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta 30332—0535, USA.
`.
`"
`h-
`'on o
`t e s ear stress .
`the surface of an aortic valve
`leaflet.
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 5
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 5
`
`

`

`2r,”
`
`7729y We:r/m/
`
`2625} and Ionescu-Shiley standard pericardial valves were designed prior
`to 1975, while the Medtronic—Hall tilting disc, St. Jude Medical
`bileaflet, Hancock porcine (model 2501, Hancock II porcine {model 410],
`Carpentier—Edwards porcine (model 2650] and Carpentier-Edwards
`pericardial {model 2900} valves were designed after 1975. The pressure
`dro!
`
`performance indices of 0.30 to 0.45, whereas the valves designed after
`1975 had performance indices of 0.40 to 0.?0. The regurgitant volumes
`were higher for the mechanical designs (5.0 to 11.0 cm3/beat} compared
`to the tissue bioprostheses [1.0 to 5.0 cm3/best). Two—dimensional laser
`Doppler anemometry studies indicated that the valves designed after 1975
`tended to create more centralized flow fields, with reduced levels of
`turbulent shear stresses. However, none of the current valve designs is
`ideal:
`they all create areas of stasis and/or regions of low velocity
`reverse flow; and regions of elevated turbulent shear stresses that are
`capable of causing sub—lethal and/or lethal damage to the formed
`elements of blood.
`
`Citation (63>
`Unique Identifier
`88243853
`PubMed Identifier
`2967827
`Authors
`
`,
`
`”
`
`U‘\
`
`Hasenkam JM. Westphal D. Nygaard H. Reul H. Giersiepen M.
`Stodkilde-Jorgensen H.
`Institution
`Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Aarhus
`Kommunehospital, Denmark.
`Title
`
`‘
`\J/)
`
`J
`
`In vitro stress measurements in the vicinity of six mechanical aortic
`valves using hot-film anemometry in steady flow.
`Source
`
`Journal of Biomechanics.
`Local Messages
`MU HSL owns some issues. Check Library Catalog Holdings.
`Abstract
`
`21(3):235-47, 1988.
`
`Based on hot-film anemometry, point velocity measurements in the total
`cross sectional area 1 and 2 diameters downstream of: Bjork-Shiley
`Standard, Convex-Concave and Monostrut, Hall-Kaster
`(Medtronic-Hall),
`St. Jude Medical and Starr-Edwards Silastic Ball aortic valves were
`made. The spatial distribution of Reynolds Normal Stresses {RNS} was
`visualized three—dimensionally in order to point out where and to what
`extent the highest RNSs were found. The measurements were made in steady
`flowing glycerol mixture at flow rates 10, 20 and 30 l. min-1
`corresponding to mean velocities of 27, 54 and 81 on 5-1. The highest
`maximum RNS values were around 250 Nm-Z and were found downstream of the
`Bjork—Shiley Monostrut and Starr—Edwards Ball valves. The lowest maximum
`RNSs were found downstream of the St. Jude Medical and Hall—Raster
`(Medtronic-Hall) valves [125-140 Nm-2). The Starr—Edwards valve had the
`highest mean ENS {11? Nm-Z)
`followed by the Bjork-Shiley Monostrut
`(B?
`Nm-Z}. These!
`simplified measurements of artificial heart valve performances
`concerning RNS, enhance the interpretation of results in more
`complicated flow models not to say in vivo.
`
`Enigfiioxidzggifier %/ /fl€fl/j/ f L‘///
`
`",7
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 6
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 6
`
`
`

`

`/.. L, fi
`
`77 d/ Wa wrap!
`
`Leeds polyurethane trileaflet heart valve in a simula ed pulsatile flow
`regime using laser Doppler velocimetry. The main difference between the
`two valves studied was the manufacturing method used to create the
`valves. The filmflfabricated valve was constructed from solvent-cast
`sheets of polyurethane,
`thermally formed into the correct leaflet
`geometry. The dip-cast valve used a stainless steel mould which was
`dipped into a polyurethane solution to produce the valve leaflets.
`Significant differences were visible between the fully open leaflet
`shape of each valve. The distribution of mean axial velocity and
`Reynolds normal stress {RNSJ was shown to be dependent on the shape of
`the fully open valve orifice. For the film-fabricated valves,
`flow
`recirculation and high values of RNS were present downstream of the
`frame posts. The maximum value of RNS obtained downstream of the film—
`fabricated valve at peak syst!
`ole was 14? N/mZ. Results for the dip-cast valve showed a more uniform
`distribution of mean axial velocity and RNS resulting from the more
`circular central orifice produced by the dip—cast leaflets. The maximum
`value of ENS obtained downstream of the dip-cast valve at peak systole
`was 109 N/m2. These results demonstrate the effect of the open valve
`geometry on the flow characteristics downstream of trileaflet valves and
`that minor changes to the open leaflet geometry can significantly affect
`the flow characteristics and the possibility of flow-related blood
`damage occurring in vivo.
`
`Citation <28)
`.
`_
`Unggtluleléglgntifier W” zzfl Cflf/ ‘/
`
`PubMed Identifier
`3953434
`Authors
`
`l/jéf;:> {ijij/J
`_/
`.
`
`Hasenkam JM. Nygaard H. Terp K. Riis C. Paulsen PK.
`Institution
`
`-
`
`\L///
`
`Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
`Title
`
`Hemodynamic evaluation of a new bileaflet valve prosthesis: a
`animal experimental study.
`[see comments].
`Comments
`
`a ute
`
`Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skejby Sygehus,
`
`
`Comment in: J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Nov;5(6):5?2-3
`Source
`'
`
`Journal of Heart valve Disease.
`Local Messages
`MU HSL owns some issues. Check Library Catalog Holdings.
`Abstract
`
`5(6}:574-80, 1996 Nov.
`
`BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: A newly developed heart valve
`(Medtronic Parallel} was tested in an acute animal experimental model.
`METHODS: Five prototype valves were implanted in the aortic position in
`seven 90 kg pigs to enable acute evaluation of the hemodynamic
`performance in terms of turbulent stresses and transvalvular pressure
`drop. Turbulent stresses in the ascending aorta were measured using a 10
`MHZ perivascular Doppler echocardiographic transducer designed to
`measure the radical velocity component at 17 different points covering
`the aortic cross—sectional area. RESULTS: The drop in transvalvular peak
`pressure measured with fluid—filled catheters showed a non-linear
`
`relationship with cardiac output and was always < 12 mmHg. The Reynolds
`normal stresses were < 60 N/m2 in systole within 50 ms
`time windows,
`which is insufficient to cause mechanical damage of the formed elements
`of the blood. CONCLUSIONS: From a hemodynamic point of view the
`performance of the Medt!
`
`ronic Parallel aortic valve is fully acceptable and within the range of
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 7
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 7
`
`
`
`

`

`1 --
`
`1’1— -' 7’0/ ”5! fi/MC/
`
`humans.
`
`7(2):180-9, 1998 Mar.
`
`Journal of Heart Valve Disease.
`Local Messages
`MU HSL owns some issues. Check Library Catalog Holdings.
`Abstract
`BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Pericarbon is a new—generation
`bovine pericardial bioprosthesis designed to withstand mechanical wear.
`Following optimal
`in vitro testing and animal experiments, clinical
`trials were initiated in many EurOpean centers and explants sent to our
`department for pathological evaluation. This included gross,
`radiographic, histologic and ultrastructural investigations. METHODS:
`Between 1986 and 1996, 24 bioprostheses (eight aortic,
`ll mitral,
`two
`mitro-aortic, one tricuspid) were collected from 22 patients [10 males
`and 12 females; mean age 57.0 +/— 18.9 years} either at autopsy (nine)
`or reoperation [15}. RESULTS: Ten bioprostheses explanted < 2 months
`after surgery were either normal or failed because of surgical problems
`or non-structural causes. Among the other 14 bioprostheses {mean
`placement 41.9 +/- 23.6 months; range:
`7
`to 90 months}, structural
`deterioration occurred in seven and was due to dystrophic calcification
`with stenosis in five (t!
`hree aortic,
`two mitral}, mixed lesion in one (mitral), and incompetence
`in one by calcium-related commissural tear {mitrél}. At
`the
`ultrastructural level, calcification was detected either on cell debris
`or upon collagen fibers. No bioprosthesis failed because of fibrous
`tissue overgrowth. Of the remaining seven bioprostheses, vegetative
`endocarditis occurred in two,
`thrombosis in one, and aseptic
`paravalvular leak in one: whereas three showed no signs of dysfunction.
`CONCLUSIONS: This pathologic experience with the Pericarbon valve showed
`calcification to be the main cause of late structural failure, causing
`mainly cusp stiffness and bioProsthesis stenosis. Tissue rupture or
`abrupt dysfunction never occurred. Thus, prevention of mineralization
`remains the main challenge.
`
`Citation <25>
`
`9450254
`
`( \/
`
`,-t—a
`kw.)
`
`_
`
`Di Martino E.
`
`Gamba A.
`
`Procopio AM.
`
`Fumero R.
`
`mkqv
`
`~
`
`3
`1;
`
`‘£<£
`
`Unique Identifier
`98111924
`PubHed Identifier
`Authors
`Redaelli A.
`Institution
`Department of Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy. Q0
`redaelliflcebitec.hsr.it
`Title
`Assessment of the influence of the compliant aortic root on aortic
`Medical Engineering 5 Physics.
`19(8}:696-710, 199? Dec.
`
`valve mechanics by means of a geometrical model.
`Source
`
`Abstract
`
`In recent years several researchers have suggested that the changes in
`the geometry and angular dimensions of the aortic root which occur
`during the cardiac cycle are functional to the optimisation of aortic
`valve function, both in terms of diminishing leaflet stresses and of
`
`fluid-dynamic behaviour. The paper presents an analytical parametric
`model of the aortic valve which includes the aortic root movement. The S?
`indexes used to evaluate the valve behaviour are the circumferential
`membrane stress and the stress at the free edge of the leaflet,
`the
`index of bending strain,
`the bending of the leaflet at the line
`attachment in the radial and circumferential directions and the shape of
`
`\ ?
`
`C1%{;
`flak
`
`£7?
`
`-
`
`\
`‘\
`
`0)
`
`Lit
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 8
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 8
`
`
`

`

`// 4,4,3" fl fl/ Mfl/a/LV
`
`98364269
`PubMed Identifier
`9699113
`Authors
`Kolev N.
`Title
`
`Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress and left ventricular
`ejection time revisited. [letter; comment}.
`Comments
`
`Comment on: Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1997 Nov;14(6]:558—65
`Source
`European Journal of Anaesthesiology.
`Local Messages
`Ouned by MU HSL
`
`15(4}:509-11. 1998 Jul.
`
`Citation (20>
`
`Unique Identifier
`
`99281690
`PubMed Identifier
`10355559
`Authors
`Maymir JC. Deutsch S. Meyer RS. Geselowitz 03. Tarbell JM.
`Institution
`The Bioengineering Program, The Pennsylvania State University,
`University Park, USA.
`Title
`Mean velocity and Reynolds stress measurements in the regurgitant jets
`of tilting disk heart valves in an artificial heart environment.
`Source
`
`(h/I/r
`
`Annals of Biomedical Engineering.
`Local Messages
`MU HSL owns some issues. Check Library Catalog Holdings.
`Abstract
`Laser Doppler velocimetry, with a high temporal resolution (1 ms time
`windows), was used to measure the flow field in two regions {major and
`minor orifices] near the aortic and mitral valves (Bjork Shiley
`monostrut Nos. 25 and 27, respectively) of the Penn State artificial
`
`26(1}:146—56, 1998 Jan—Feb.
`
`Maximum Reynolds shear stresses of approximately 20,000 dyn/cmz and
`time-averaged Reynolds shear stresses of approximately 2000 dyn/cmZ were
`observed during the regurgitant
`f10w phase. These elevated Reynolds
`shear stresses suggest that regurgitant jets play a role in the
`
`Citation (21>
`Unique Identifier
`98394326
`PubMed Identifier
`9727343
`Authors
`Krafczyk M. Cerrolaza M.
`Institution
`Lehrstuhl fur Bauinformatik. Civil Engineering Department, Munich.
`Germany. krafteserver.inf.bauwesen.tu-muenchen.de
`
`Schulz M. Rank E.
`
`Wfld 7% Cd//
`
`/7.///
`
`
`
`1
`
`4
`
`.
`
`I
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 9
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 9
`IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllllllIl-ll----————**
`
`

`

`
`
`Borrower: MOUMCO
`
`Lending String:
`
`Patron:m
`
`Journal Title: Journal of blomechanics.
`
`Volume: 33 Issue: 6
`Montleear: 2000 JunPagos: 701-8
`
`Article Author: Grigioni M: Daniele C; D'Avenio
`G; Barbara V;
`
`Call It:
`
`Locallon:
`
`{\FIIEL
`Cfifi‘ifié
`Maxoost: $39310
`
`Shipping Address:
`UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA
`J.OTTO LOTI'ES HEALTH SCIENCES
`LIBRARY—IL
`ONE HOSPITAL DRIVE
`COLUMBIA. MO 65212
`
`Artlcle Title: On the monodimensional approach
`to the estimation
`
`Fax: 1.573.882-5574
`Ariel: 161.130.57.21
`
`Imprint:
`
`ILL Number: 351651.111mm
`IWWWMWMW
`
`
`
`
`
`wasmngtonunlvers1ty5011001OI
`
`:kf‘fl‘l"ITAnn
`1:,uum'niiniiumnmunuu
`
`
`
`‘lfi'l‘l'ln
` Rflarl
`ILLiadTN
`
`
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 10
`- NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 10
`
`

`

`
`DUI. p I TC (Ute ,
`
`Borrower: MOUMCO
`
`Lending String:
`
`Momm-
`
`Journal Title: Joumai oi biomechanics.
`
`__
`Volume: 33 issue: 5
`Monthflear: MIME-Wages: _ 521333;
`
`Article Author: Cacoiola G; Peters GW; Schreurs
`PJ:
`
`Call it:
`
`Location:
`
`ARIEL
`We:
`Maxcost: $30333
`
`Shipping Address:
`UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA
`J.OTI'0 LOTTES HEALTH SCIENCES
`LIBRARY-IL
`ONE HOSPITAL DRIVE
`COLUMBIA. MO 65212
`
`Article Title: A three-dimensional mechanical
`analysis of a stem
`
`Fax: 1.573.882-5574
`Ariel: 161 .130.57.21
`
`Imprint:
`
`
`
`ILL Number:
`
`IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`
`H
`
`. 5...: <1
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 11
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 11
`
`
`
` IIIIIIIIIIII‘IIIIIIIT''
`
`.E
`(I;
`
`
`Thea“-
`
`wasnmgtonUmversuy50:10.0101
`
`
`
`tLLiadTN:.._
`
`w,
`
`c
`
`

`

`wasmngtonumversuybcnomor
`
`':-"%"lll|fll|lll'Illllnfll'‘ 3.4
`
`. ‘l
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'IUI'
`lLLladTN
`
`
`
`Borrower: MOUMCO
`
`Lending String:
`
`9mm
`
`Journal Title: Journal 0! blomechanics.
`
`7
`_
`_.
`Volume: 33 Issue: 5
`MonthNear: Wagner-591130
`
`Article Author: Cacciola G: Peters GW; Schreurs
`PJ;
`
`Call #:
`
`Location:
`
`AfiJ‘IEL
`roam
`Maxcost: 5:30:09
`
`Shlpplng Address:
`UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA
`J.01'l'0 LOTTES HEALTH SCIENCES
`LIBRARY-IL
`ONE HOSPITAL DRIVE
`COLUMBIA, MO 65212
`
`Article Title: A three-dimensional mechanical
`analysls of a stem
`
`Fax: 1.5?3.882—5574
`Ariel: 161 .130.57.21
`
`lmprlnt:
`
`ILL Number:
`
`h
`”
`I||||||lllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`If:-
`
`--.. 131;.
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 12
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 12
`
`

`

`Call #:
`
`Locallon:
`
`ARIEL
`WE
`
`
` Maxcost: I '-
`
`Shlpplng Address:
`UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA
`J.OTTO LOTIES HEALTH SCIENCES
`LIBRARY-IL
`ONE HOSPITAL DRIVE
`COLUMBIA, MO 65212
`
`Fax: 15733826574
`Ariel: 161.130.57.21
`
`Borrower: MOUMOO
`
`Lending String:
`
`Patron: M
`
`Journal Title: Journal of biomechanics.
`
`Volume: 31 Issue: _2
`Monlhflear: 1998 FebPages: 115-23
`
`Arllcle Author: Vesely I;
`
`Article Tillazx The role of elastin in aortic valve
`mechanics.
`
`Imprint:
`
`IIIILIIIIIIIII‘I‘IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIQIIII
`
`ggEE Eg EEE
`
`
`lLLladTN
`
`:k‘l'fl‘r"fTnan
`
`Tnfan—1
`'lfl'l‘l‘lo
`Rife/1'
`
`
`
`,.-.9904“”
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 13
`I NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 13
`
`
`
`
`
`wasnmgtonUHIVCISIIy5Cfl001OI
`
`
`
`

`

`l-I
`O
`
`
`
`.
`
`Cali #:
`Borrower: MOUMCO
`Location.
`Lending String:
`a '3
`c
`ARIEL
`Pm”m
`8 C
`« .-
`Bfi‘ii‘fég
`Journal Title Journal oi biomechanics
`g ’1
`Maxcost: $3000
`'
`'
`E;-
`I: E
`C E Volume: 31 Issue: 5
`ShippIng Address.
`1. ._
`,
`Fl
`.
`_
`UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA
`a i E ”unmear' 1998 ”WWW" 4" 2‘
`J.OTTO LOTTES HEALTH SCIENCES
`a; r; E
`LIBRARY-IL
`Q
`.
`.
`.
`.
`a II E— arll-lele Author. Lim WL. Chew YT. Chew TC. Low ONE HOSPITAL DRIVE
`3 r- g '
`COLUMBIA, MO 35212
`.
`g
`a ‘1 — Article Title: Steady flow dynamics of prosthetic
`.
`o .E ”35.x"
`aortic heart V3
`Fax. 1.573.852'5574
`
`( 2"".
`“6’0
`Ariel: 161.130.57.21
`
`.-
`Imprint:
`E I:
`ILL Number:332]]
`I;
`ml
`g IIIIIIIIIIIIlIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II
`3
`
`or
`"C
`
`U] g 2
`
`d
`
`:1?
`
`“l":
`
`\.
`
`2:-
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 14
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 14
`
`
`:r
`
`.
`
`

`

`Borrower: MOUNICO
`Lending smug:
`5 :
`
`-m8 c Patron.
`O ‘
`-
`.
`"‘
`I]
`“——
`Journal
`itle Joumaloi biomechanics
`:1" E:=:
`Volume: 31 Issue: 7
`.
`M l
`:
`:
`-
`a 5 °" we" 1998Jmpag°s 629 38
`CD 7;
`> E Arllcle Author: De HanJ;Cacciola G; Sohreurs
`E! g ”Peters ow-
`3 ...—;__—:
`'
`'
`E Article Title: Ammo-dimensional analysis oia
`g F“__
`flb,6_,eimo,ced
`p
`.630
`
`I Imprint:
`E '51:... Q?
`m H ID
`cu ’1 E ILL Number: fl
`1:
`3
`g lllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`||||i
`
`T
`
`:
`
`.
`
`H O
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`08“ if:
`"°°‘“'°"'
`gfil-
`"“3 ti
`..
`Maxcostzliaflgpo
`Shipping Address-
`-
`UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA
`J.OTTO LOTTES HEALTH SCIENCES
`”WARNI-
`ONE HOSPITAL DRIVE
`COLUMBIA. MO 65212
`Fax: 1.573.332-5574
`Al'lfil: 161.130.57.21
`
`----.=--‘
`
`
`
`.-.'
`
`“a;
`
`i‘
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 15
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2132 - Page 15
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket