`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.,
`and MEDTRONIC COREVALVE, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`TROY R. NORRED, M.D.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00110
`Patent 6,482,228
`____________
`
`Attorney Docket No. 058888-0000014
`
`____________
`
`NOTICE OF STIPULATION OF DUE DATES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc., and Medtronic CoreValve, LLC
`
`(collectively “Petitioner”) and Patent Owner, Troy R. Norred, jointly stipulate to
`
`move Due Dates 4 and 5 as follows:
`
`
`Due Date 4
`Due Date 5
`
`Current Date
`December 5, 2014
`December 15, 2014
`
`Stipulated New Date
`December 31, 2014
`January 9, 2015
`
`These due dates were originally set in the Scheduling Order dated April 25,
`
`2014 (Paper 11), were amended by joint stipulation of the partes as reflected in the
`
`Notice of Stipulation of Due Dates dated September 11, 2014 (Paper 22), and were
`
`further amended by the Board’s Order on October 29, 2014 (Paper 28). The
`
`Scheduling Order provides that the parties may stipulate to different dates for Due
`
`Dates 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than Due Date 6); however, in an
`
`email from the Board dated October 31, 2014, the parties were advised to file a
`
`Notice of Stipulation reflecting the change in Due Dates 4 and 5 to December 31,
`
`2014, and January 9, 2015, respectively. In that same email, the Board also author-
`
`ized the parties to file a joint motion to move Due Date 6 from December 22, 2014
`
`to January 19, 2015. Below is the Scheduling Order Due Date Appendix, reflecting
`
`stipulated Due Dates 4 and 5, and proposed Due Date 6.
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL …………………May 28, 2014 at 11 a.m. ET
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 1……………………………………………………… Jul. 17, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2…………………………………………………. …..Oct. 24, 2014
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3………………………………………………… ……..Nov. 24, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4…………………………………………………………Dec. 31, 2014
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5………………………………………………….………..Jan. 9, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6…………………………….Dec. 22, 2014 (Proposed - Jan. 19, 2015)
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7………………………………………………………….Jan. 27, 2015
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`This paper is being filed by Petitioner with the approval of counsel for Pa-
`
`tent Owner.
`
`Date: November 3, 2014
`
`By:
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jack S. Barufka
`Jack S. Barufka (Reg. No. 37,087)
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`1650 Tysons Boulevard
`McLean, Virginia 22102
`Tel. No. 703.770.7712
`Fax No. 703.905.2500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that the foregoing “NOTICE OF STIPULATION OF DUE
`
`DATES” was served electronically through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s
`
`Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) this 3rd day of November, 2014 on the
`
`following counsel for Patent Owner, Troy R. Norred:
`
`David Marcus
`Bartle & Marcus LLC
`1100 Main Street, Suite 2730
`Kansas City, MO 64105
`
`
`James J. Kernell
`Erickson Kernell Derusseau & Kleypas, LLC
`8900 State Line Road, Suite 500
`Leawood, KS 66206
`
`Date: November 3, 2014
`
`By:
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jack S. Barufka
`Jack S. Barufka (Reg. No. 37,087)
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`1650 Tysons Boulevard
`McLean, Virginia 22102
`Tel. No. 703.770.7712
`Fax No. 703.905.2500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
