throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.,
`and MEDTRONIC COREVALVE, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`TROY R. NORRED, M.D.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00110
`Patent 6,482,228
`____________
`
`Attorney Docket No. 058888-0000014
`
`____________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO ADJUST DUE DATE
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc., and Medtronic CoreValve, LLC
`
`(collectively “Petitioner”) and Patent Owner, Troy R. Norred, jointly move the
`
`Board to move Due Date 6, currently set as December 22, 2014, to January 19,
`
`2015.
`
`On October 29, 2014, the Board entered a revised schedule in IPR2014-
`
`00110 (Paper 28), IPR2014-00111 (Paper 28), and IPR2014-00395 (Paper 20) so
`
`that there would be a single oral argument date of January 27, 2015 for all three
`
`proceedings. Given time constraints and witness availability for depositions, the
`
`parties have agreed, subject to Board approval, to revise Due Dates 4, 5 and 6 of
`
`IPR2014-00110 and IPR2014-00111 to coincide with those in IPR2014-00395.
`
`As set forth in the Scheduling Orders for each proceeding, the parties may
`
`stipulate to different dates for Due Dates 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later
`
`than Due Date 6). As such, the parties jointly contacted the Board on October 31,
`
`2014 for guidance on how to align the schedules in the three proceedings such that
`
`Due Dates 4, 5 and 6 in IPR2014-00110 and IPR2014-00111 coincide with those
`
`in IPR2014-00395. In an email dated October 31, 2014, the Board advised that the
`
`parties should file a Notice of Stipulation to reflect the change in Due Dates 4 and
`
`5 to December 31, 2014, and January 9, 2015, respectively. The Board also author-
`
`ized the parties to file a Joint Motion in IPR2014-00110 and IPR2014-00111 to
`
`move Due Date 6 to January 19, 2015.
`
`

`

`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(2), a request for an extension of time must be
`
`supported by a showing of good cause. Here, the parties seek to increase efficiency
`
`and reduce costs by coordinating efforts between the related proceedings. To that
`
`end, the parties have sought to align the shared remaining due dates. The requested
`
`change to Due Date 6 should not negatively impact the Board’s ability to issue a
`
`final determination within the time limits imposed under 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(11),
`
`as the parties have not sought to adjust the oral argument date recently set by the
`
`Board. In view of the foregoing, good cause exists to support the parties’ joint re-
`
`quest to move Due Date 6 in IPR2014-00110 so that it coincides with Due Date 6
`
`in IPR2014-00395.
`
`Below is a Due Date Appendix, reflecting the remaining Due Dates, which
`
`have been updated to reflect stipulated Due Dates 4 and 5, and proposed Due Date
`
`6.
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 3………………………………………………… ……..Nov. 24, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4…………………………………………………………Dec. 31, 2014
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`DUE DATE 5………………………………………………….………..Jan. 9, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6…………………………………………………...……. Jan. 19, 2015
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7………………………………………………………….Jan. 27, 2015
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`In view of the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that the Board grant
`
`the parties’ joint motion, and move Due Date 6 to January 19, 2015.
`
`This paper is being filed by Petitioner with the approval of counsel for Pa-
`
`tent Owner.
`
`Date: November 3, 2014
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jack S. Barufka
`
`Jack S. Barufka (Reg. No. 37,087)
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`1650 Tysons Boulevard
`McLean, Virginia 22102
`Tel. No. 703.770.7712
`Fax No. 703.905.2500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that the foregoing “JOINT MOTION TO ADJUST DUE
`
`DATE” was served electronically through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s Pa-
`
`tent Review Processing System (PRPS) this 3rd day of November, 2014 on the fol-
`
`lowing counsel for Patent Owner, Troy R. Norred:
`
`David Marcus
`Bartle & Marcus LLC
`1100 Main Street, Suite 2730
`Kansas City, MO 64105
`
`
`James J. Kernell
`Erickson Kernell Derusseau & Kleypas, LLC
`8900 State Line Road, Suite 500
`Leawood, KS 66206
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jack S. Barufka
`
`Jack S. Barufka (Reg. No. 37,087)
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`1650 Tysons Boulevard
`McLean, Virginia 22102
`Tel. No. 703.770.7712
`Fax No. 703.905.2500
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`Date: November 3, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket