throbber
United States Patent [191
`Vesely et al.
`
`lIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`US005549665A
`[11] Patent Number:
`5,549,665
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Aug. 27, 1996
`
`[54] BIOPROSTETHIC VALVE
`
`[75] Inventors: Ivan Vesely; Slawomir Krucinski;
`Gordon Campbell; Derek Boughner;
`Mohan Dokainish, all of London,
`Canada
`
`[73] Assignee: London Health Association, London,
`Canada
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 261,983
`_
`Jun. 17, 1994
`[22] F1led:
`[30]
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`,
`_
`Umted Kmgdom ................. .. 9312666
`
`Jun. 18, 1993 [GB]
`
`[56]
`
`[51] Int. Cl.6 ...................................................... .. A61F 2/24
`[52] US. Cl. .......... ..
`.. 623/2; 623/900
`[58] Field of Search ................................. .. 623/2, 66, 900
`.
`References cued
`U_S_ PATENT DOCUMENTS
`.
`.............................. ..
`LlOtta et
`4,725,274
`2/1988 Lane et a1. ..
`623/2
`4,851,000
`7/1989 Gupta . . . . . . . . .
`. . . .. 623/2
`5163 953 11/1992 Vince ........................................ .. 623/2
`5,258,023 11/1993 Regcr _
`5,326,370
`7/1994 Love et al. ................................ .. 623/2
`
`4
`
`8300617 3/1983 WIPO ...................................... .. 623/2
`WO94/01060 1/1994 WIPO .
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`_
`_
`_
`_
`_
`_
`“Numencal S1mulat10n of Lea?et Flexure 1n B1oprosthet1c
`Valves Mounted on Rigid and Expansile Stents,” 28 Dec.
`1992, by 5- Kmcinski, I- Veley, M~ A- Dokainish, and G
`Campbell.
`“Pivoting Stent Posts Reduce Stresses in Pericardial Bio‘
`prosthetic Valves: A Numerical Analysis,” by I. Vesely and
`S. Krucinski.
`
`Primary Examiner—Michael Milano
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Fay, Sharpe, Beall, Pagan, Min
`nich & MCKe6
`_
`
`.
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`Abioprosthetic valve Comprising asuppon n-ng having three
`spaced apart end stops projecting upwardly therefrom, a
`stent post ring having three spaced apait stent posts pivotally
`connected thereto and adapted to engage respective ones of
`the end stops so as to permit outward pivoting of the stent
`posts and to prevent
`pivoting thereof’ a lea?et valve
`h .
`th
`an t .
`1
`l n t d ? .
`t.
`“mg m gen“ y nangua‘ ea es 6 nmgrespec‘ve
`cusps’ the lea?ets being joined a‘ respective commissures’
`and a sewing ring for attaching the lea?et valve to the stent
`P051 ring and support ting.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`220097 3/1987 European Pat. 01f. ................. .. 623/2
`
`21 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 1
`Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc.,
`& Medtronic Corevalve, LLC
`v. Troy R. Norred, M.D.
`Case IPR2014-00110
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 1996
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`5,549,665
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 2
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 1996
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`5,549,665
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 3
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 1996
`
`Sheet3 0f 4
`
`5,549,665 Q
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 4
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 1996
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`v 5,549,665
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 5
`
`

`

`5,549,665
`
`1
`BIOPROSTETHIC VALVE
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates in general to bioprosthetic valves,
`and more particularly to a novel bioprosthetic heart valve
`with pivoting supporting stent posts for holding valve leaf
`lets therebetween.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`When a patient’s own heart valve becomes diseased, it
`can be either repaired or surgically replaced with an arti?cial
`valve. There are two basic types of arti?cial heart valves,
`mechanical valves and tissue valves. Mechanical valves are
`made of metal or hard plastic, whereas tissue valves consist
`of chemically preserved animal tissue, usually extracted
`from pig (porcine) or cow (bovine). The animal tissue valves
`are mounted on a supporting frame or “stent”. The stent
`enables the surgeon to insert and mount the valve into the
`heart with minimal difficulty. The stents themselves are
`constructed from a polymer material and are covered with
`DACRON® cloth that contains a sewing ring. Typically,
`three stent posts project upwardly from the sewing ring and
`hold the three valve lea?ets suspended in the required
`geometry.
`Animal tissue valves have some inherent advantages over
`mechanical valves since they do not require the patient to be
`on chronic anticoagulants. Unfortunately, tissue valves
`eventually suffer from failure in a manner similar to human
`heart valves, and therefore need periodic replacement. Cur
`rently, the survival rate of bioprosthetic tissue valves is
`approximately 95% after ?ve years from surgery, but only
`40% after ?fteen years from surgery.
`The failure of these animal tissue valves results from poor
`mechanical properties. Speci?cally, the supporting stents are
`relatively rigid, and cannot mimic the cyclic expansion and
`contraction of the natural aorta where the valve sits. It is
`believed that mounting of the valves on such non-physi
`ological stents contributes to mechanical damage caused by
`repetitive sharp bending at the stent posts. Much of the
`damage to the valve tissue occurs during valve opening
`because the supporting stents cannot dilate with the recipi
`ent‘s aorta. Such unnatural behaviour induces sharp curva—
`tures within the lea?ets and very high local stresses that
`damage the lea?et material and ultimately cause it to fail
`through ?exural fatigue.
`The inventors have recognized the desirability of provid
`ing a bioprosthetic heart valve with a ?exible or expansive
`supporting stent. In Krucinski S., Yesely I., Dokainish M. A.,
`Campbell G. “Numerical Simulation of Lea?et Flexure in
`Bioprosthetic Valves Mounted on Rigid and Expansile
`Stents”, Journal of Biomechanics (26(8):929—943, 1993),
`the inventors describe a simulated stent with posts that pivot
`about their respective bases for reducing compressive com
`missural stressing in a bioprosthetic heart valve. Also, in
`pivoting stent posts reduce ?exural stresses in perieardial
`bioprosthetic valves: A numerical analysis, presented at the
`1993 conference of ASAIO, New Orleans, May, 1993 the
`concept of pivoting stents was disclosed.
`Another prior art bioprosthetic valve is disclosed in US.
`Pat. No. 5,258,023 (Reger). This valve incorporates a stent
`comprising a frame which is fully covered by a biochemi
`cally inert or physiologically compatible shroud. The frame
`is in the form of a hollow cylinder of rectangular cross
`section which is machined or trimmed to provide a suturing
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`2
`support ring, extended cusp stanchions, and interference free
`blood ?ow to the coronary arteries. The frame is joint free
`but is made slightly deformable to conform to contractile
`changes of the heart. The Reger Patent discloses that such
`deformity and expansion permits the frame to compliantly
`respond to expansion and contraction of the native valve
`ori?ce of the beating heart in which the aortic valve is
`implanted in order to reduce beat-by-beat stress on the aortic
`valve and anchoring sutures, thereby reducing the likelihood
`of eventual valve dehiscence.
`As indicated above, the inventors have realized that while
`outward movement of the stent posts reduces local stresses
`on the lea?et material, it is also extremely important to limit
`the inward movement of the stent posts in order to reduce
`compressive ?exural stresses on the valve lea?ets.
`Accordingly, although the provision of ?exible stent posts
`is known in the prior art, no practical heart valve has yet
`been provided-for allowing limited outward movement of
`the stent posts during systole while also preventing inward
`movement of the stent posts during diastole so as to reduce
`commissural stresses in the valve lea?ets.
`Moreover, the inventors’ mathematical modelling (see J.
`Biomechanics article discussed above) has shown that a
`compliant supporting frame cannot deform sufficiently out
`ward to enable the required amount of expansion to reduce
`stresses, and still provide structural rigidity to prevent col
`lapse of the frame inward during valve closure.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`According to the present invention, a bioprosthetic valve
`is provided with a plurality of pivoting stents for supporting
`the valve lea?ets or cusps. According to the preferred
`embodiment, the bioprosthetic valve of the present invention
`is used as a replacement for the human heart valve, although
`the valve of the present invention may be used to replace
`other valves in the human body with only minor modi?ca
`tions in design and size. In the preferred heart valve embodi
`ment, the tips of the stents are attached to the aortic wall,
`which causes outward pivoting as the aorta expands during
`systole, to facilitate signi?cant reduction of local stresses in
`the valve lea?ets. The valve also includes end stops for
`preventing the stents from moving excessively inward dur
`ing diastole and ensuring a properly functioning valve that
`seals well. A truly, freely pivoting frame with inward acting
`end stops provides both unrestricted outward movement,
`and controlled inward rigidity. Thus, the bioprosthetic heart
`valve according to the present invention provides a more
`natural opening for the valve lea?ets and reduces lea?et
`bending and the associated stresses which are characteristic
`of prior art heart valves.
`
`55
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`A description of the prior art and of the preferred embodi
`ment of the present invention is provided in greater detail
`below with reference to the following drawings, in which:
`FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a prior art bioprosthetic
`heart valve;
`FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective view of the biopros
`thetic heart valve according to the preferred embodiment of
`the present invention;
`FIG. 3 shows connection of a lea?et cusp supporting wire
`frame to individual stent posts of the heart valve shown in
`FIG. 2;
`
`65
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 6
`
`

`

`5,549,665
`
`3
`FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an assembled heart valve
`according to the preferred embodiment;
`FIG. 5 is a detailed cross-sectional view showing pivoting
`of the stent posts in the heart valve of the preferred embodi—
`ment; and
`FIG. 6 is a detail in perspective of an alternative embodi~
`ment of pivoting post and stop member.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION AND PRIOR ART
`
`15
`
`4
`adapted to conform to the correct geometry of the aortic
`root.
`During assembly, as shown best with reference to FIGS.
`3 and 5, the upper distal ends of stent posts 11 are inserted
`through the support ring 7 from beneath and then are moved
`further upwardly through the opening between end stop ?rst
`member 17 and second member 21 until protrusion 14 hooks
`into the hollow internal portion 19 of the ?rst member 17,
`thereby completing the snap-?t engagement of the stent post
`ring 9 to the support ring 7.
`Next, a wire frame 23 is received in a slot 25 disposed in
`the upper distal end of each stent post 11.
`Finally, the animal lea?et valve 27 is placed over the
`support ring 7, stent post ring 9 and wire frame 23. As
`discussed above, the animal tissue lea?et valve 27 typically
`comprises a pig aortic valve or calf pericardium de?ning
`three lea?ets 29, 31 and 33, to which a cloth cover 35 is
`sewn. The cloth cover 35 may be sewn into either or both of
`the lea?et valve 27 or stent posts 11, with the stent posts 11
`being covered both inside and out. As in the prior art, the
`valve lea?ets 29, 31 and 33 meet to de?ne respective cusps
`(such as cusp 34) which open and close during systole and
`diastole, respectively. A soft sewing ring 37 is provided at
`the base of the animal tissue valve 27 by which the animal
`tissue valve 27 may be sewn to the support ring 7, as shown
`best with reference to FIG. 4.
`In the assembled form shown in FIG. 4, the wire frame 23
`(FIGS. 2 and 3) provide support for the lea?et valve 27 on
`the stent post ring 9.
`As shown best with reference to FIG. 5, the bottom
`portion of each stent post 11 is adapted to slide along the
`support ring 7 during pivoting in systole (shown in phantom)
`and to hook inside the hollow internal portion 19 during
`diastole (solid lines). Furthermore, a portion of the main
`body of the stent post 11 abuts the second member 21 above
`the pivot point provided by connecting brace 13 during
`diastole, further limiting the inward movement of the stent
`post 11.
`According to the preferred embodiment, the stent posts 11
`and connecting brace 13 are fabricated as a single unit from
`suitable material in suitable dimensions to limit the pivoting
`of the stent posts 11 about the connecting brace 13 to
`approximately 10° off of vertical, in the preferred embodi
`ment, so as to minimize tensile stresses in the lea?ets 29, 31
`and 33. However, the pivot angle may vary in other embodi
`ments depending on the relationship between the height of
`post 11 above brace 13 and the radial excursion of the top
`post 11. As will be appreciated from the Figures and the
`description above, pivoting of the stent posts 11 occurs as a
`result of twisting or torsional movement of the connecting
`brace 13. Generally, the amount of pivoting is limited by the
`expansion of the aorta. Also, the geometry of the valve
`lea?ets prevents pivoting of the stent posts 11 past a certain
`point (eg 15% expansion of commissural diameter), since
`generated tension limits outward movement of the posts 11.
`It is contemplated that the rigidity of the stent posts and end
`stops can be designed to limit pivoting by varying the shape
`of the cross-section of the stent posts.
`According to the alternative embodiment of FIG. 6, the
`outward protrusion has been eliminated and the shape of the
`stop member 17A has been straightened to eliminate the
`hollow internal portion 19. Also, instead of using a connect
`ing brace, each post 11A is provided with a pair of pivot
`arms 13A which are received within a respective pair of
`holes 22A in the stop member 21A.
`In summary, whereas prior art heart valves having totally
`rigid stent posts experience magnitudes of ?exural stresses
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 7
`
`with reference to FIG. 1, a prior art bioprosthetic valve
`(e.g. pig aortic valve or calf pericardium) is shown mounted
`to a rigid support frame with stent posts 1 projecting
`upwardly from a sewing ring 5, so that the valve lea?ets
`meet to form cusps 3 through which blood is intended to
`?ow. While some prior art frames or stents claim to be
`?exible, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,023
`(Reger), the posts 1 in prior art devices have been found to
`?ex only inward during valve closure. Since the base of each
`stent post 1 has a ?xed diameter the stent posts generally do
`not move outward during systolic valve opening.
`In contrast, the natural aortic root expands considerably
`during valve opening. Medical studies have shown that
`proper functioning of the aortic valve depends on aortic root
`expansion. The natural expansion of the aortic root at the
`onset of systole enables the commissures to move apart, and
`initiate the opening of the aortic valve. When the root is fully
`expanded, the free edge of the lea?et in a natural aortic valve
`is pulled taught between the commissures creating a rough
`triangular shaped ori?ce for the majority of systole. The
`slight tension on the lea?ets in systole eliminates compres
`sive stresses and minimizes circumferential bending.
`Prior art stented bioprosthetic valves such as shown in
`FIG. 1, by virtue of their design, cannot expand in systole.
`The valve opens through central reverse ?exing, and the
`lea?ets often experience sharp bends and very high curva
`tures which eventually lead to valve failure.
`Turning now to the preferred embodiment of the inven
`tion, a bioprosthetic heart valve is shown in FIGS. 2-5. The
`valve comprises 21 preferably rigid support ring 7 into which
`a ?exible stent post ring 9 is inserted for snap-?t engage
`ment. The stent post ring 9 is preferably fabricated from a
`suitable ?exible polymer and includes a plurality of stent
`posts 11 interconnected via a connecting brace 13. Each of
`the stent posts 11 comprises a main body portion which,
`according to the illustrated preferred embodiment, is gen
`erally ?at, although in alternative embodiments may be of
`variable cross—section. The stent post main body portions are
`connected to the connecting brace 13 adjacent a lower end
`of each stent post as shown in detail with reference to FIG.
`5. The lower end of each stent‘post 11 has an outward
`protrusion 14, the purpose of which is discussed in greater
`detail below. Each stent post has an oblong hole 12 extend
`ing therethrough to facilitate attachment of tissue and/or
`cloth covering by suturing.
`The support ring 7 includes three end stops. Each end stop
`comprises a ?rst member 17 projecting upwardly from an
`outer diameter of the support ring and being of generally
`spherical segment shape de?ning a hollow internal portion
`19. Each of the end stops also comprises a second member
`21 projecting from the outer diameter of the support ring
`toward an inner diameter of the support ring in the form of
`an arch. The support ring 7 further includes a scalloped
`extension 22 from the bottom surface thereof which is
`
`35
`
`40
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`

`

`5
`and degrees of bending which are sufficient to produce
`compressive buckling and lea?et tearing, the valve accord
`ing to the present invention is characterized by signi?cantly
`reduced lea?et curvatures and associated stresses. Further
`more, in contrast with prior art bioprosthetic valves in which
`the stent posts ?ex inwardly during diastole, the heart valve
`of the present invention allows for considerable outward
`pivoting during systole but prevents excessive inward piv
`oting during diastole in order to reduce the compressive
`?exural stresses normally associated with the function of 1
`existing pericardial bioprosthesis.
`Modi?cations and alternative embodiments of the inven
`tion are possible. For example, it is contemplated that human
`tissue may be used instead of animal tissue for valve 27.
`Also, the human or animal tissue may be modi?ed in various
`ways to prevent immune reaction.
`Furthermore, as discussed above it is contemplated that
`the bioprosthetic valve of the present invention may be used
`to replace other valves in the human body. For example,
`according to one alternative embodiment, the valve of the
`present invention may be modi?ed for use in the urinary
`tract to replace a defective urinary sphincter muscle in order
`to treat incontinence. Also, the valve may be used in the eye
`or in the brain to reduce ?uid pressure.
`All such modi?cations and embodiments are believed to
`be with in the sphere and scope of the present invention as
`de?ned by the claims appended hereto.
`We claim:
`1. A bioprosthetie heart valve comprising:
`a) a support ring having three spaced apart end stops
`projecting upwardly therefrom;
`b) three spaced apart stent posts adapted to pivot out
`wardly relative to said support ring and to engage
`respective ones of said end stops for preventing inward
`pivoting thereof;
`c) lea?et valve means formed from an aortic root and
`having three generally triangular lea?ets de?ning
`respective cusps which are adapted to open and close
`during heart systole and diastole, respectively, said
`lea?ets being joined at respective commissures adja
`cent said aortic root; and
`d) means for attaching said lea?et valve means to said
`stent posts and said support ring.
`2. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein said
`support ring further incorporates a scalloped extension from
`a bottom surface thereof so as to conform said bottom
`surface to aortic valve geometry.
`3. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, further com
`prising a sewing ring circumscribing said lea?et valve
`means for attaching said lea?et valve means to said support
`ring.
`4. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, further com
`prising a cloth covering sewn onto said lea?et valve means.
`5. The bioprosthetie heart valve of claim 1, further com
`prising a cloth covering sewn onto said stent posts.
`6. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein said
`lea?et valve means consists of one of either animal tissue or
`human tissue.
`7. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 6, wherein said
`animal tissue is chemically treated pig aortic valve.
`8. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 6, wherein said
`animal tissue is chemically treated calf pericardium.
`9. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein each
`of said stent posts has a pair of pivot arms projecting from
`opposite sides thereof, and wherein each of said end stops
`includes a pair of holes for receiving respective ones of said
`
`5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,549,665
`
`6
`pivot arms so as to permit said outward pivoting of said stent
`posts.
`10. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein the
`three generally triangular lea?ets are arranged in a geometry
`which prevents the pivoting of the stent posts beyond a 15%
`expansion of comrnissural diameter.
`11. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein each
`of said end stops further comprises a pair of members
`projecting from said support ring on opposite sides of a
`respective one of said stent posts for preventing said inward
`pivoting thereof.
`12. A bioprosthetic valve comprising:
`a) a support ring having three spaced apart end stops
`projecting upwardly therefrom;
`b) three spaced apart stent posts adapted to pivot out
`wardly relative to said support ring and to engage
`respective ones of said end stops for preventing inward
`pivoting thereof;
`0) lea?et valve means having three generally triangular
`lea?ets de?ning respective cusps which are adapted to
`open and close; and
`d) means for attaching said lea?et valve means to said
`stent posts and said support ring.
`13. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 12, wherein the
`three generally triangular lea?ets are arranged in a geometry
`which prevents the pivoting of the stent posts beyond a 15%
`expansion of cornrnissural diameter.
`14. A bioprosthetic heart valve comprising:
`a) a support ring having three spaced apart end stops
`projecting upwardly therefrom;
`b) three spaced apart stent posts adapted to pivot out
`wardly relative to said support ring and to engage
`respective ones of said end stops for preventing inward
`pivoting thereof;
`-
`c) a stent post ring to which said stent posts are pivotally
`connected for pivoting movement, wherein said stent
`post ring is adapted to limit said outward pivoting of
`said stent posts to approximately 10° from vertical;
`d) lea?et valve means formed from an aortic root and
`having three generally triangular lea?ets de?ning
`respective cusps which are adapted to open and close
`during heart systole and diastole, respectively, said
`lea?ets being joined at respective commissures adja
`cent said aortic root; and
`e) means for attaching said lea?et valve means to said
`stent posts and said support ring.
`15. A bioprosthetic heart valve comprising:
`a) a support ring having three spaced apart end stops
`projecting upwardly therefrom;
`b) three spaced apart stent posts adapted to pivot out
`wardly relative to said support ring and to engage
`respective ones of said end stops for preventing inward
`pivoting thereof;
`c) a stent post ring to which said stent posts are pivotally
`connected for pivoting movement;
`d) lea?et valve means formed from an aortic root and
`having three generally triangular lea?ets de?ning
`respective cusps which are adapted to open and close
`during heart systole and diastole, respectively, said
`lea?ets being joined at respective comrnissures adja
`cent said aortic root; and
`e) means for attaching said lea?et valve means to said
`stent posts and said support ring.
`16. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 15, wherein
`each of said end stops further comprises a ?rst member
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 8
`
`

`

`5,549,665
`
`7
`projecting from an outer diameter of said support ring, said
`?rst member being of generally spherical segment shape
`de?ning a hollow internal portion, and a second member
`projecting from said outer diameter toward an inner diam
`eter of said support ring, said second member extending
`substantially above said ?rst member and being of generally
`arcuate shape.
`17. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 16, wherein
`each of said stent posts further comprises a main body
`portion connected to said stent post ring at a pivot point
`adjacent a lower end of said stent post such that a portion of
`said main body moves inwardly no further than said second
`member above said pivot point during diastole, said lower
`end having an outward protrusion below said pivot point
`adapted to hook into said hollow internal portion of said ?rst
`member during diastole, whereby said stent post is pre
`vented from inward pivoting during diastole while said stent
`post being permitted to pivot outwardly by twisting of said
`stent post ring during systole.
`
`15
`
`8
`18. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 15, further
`comprising a wire frame conforming in shape to said respec
`tive cusps of said lea?et valve means and connected to an
`upper end of each of said stent posts, for supporting said
`lea?et valve means on said stent post ring.
`19. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 18, wherein
`said wire frame is received within cooperatively dimen
`sioned slots disposed in the upper end of each of said stent
`posts.
`20. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 15, wherein
`said stent post ring is fabricated from a ?exible polymer.
`21. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 15, wherein the
`three generally triangular lea?ets are arranged in a geometry
`which prevents the pivoting of the stent posts beyond a 15%
`expansion of commissural diameter.
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2105 - Page 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket