throbber
Herz
`
`© Urban & Vogel 2009
`
`History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve
`Prosthesis
`
`1 Department of Cardiol-
`ogy, Skejby University
`Hospital, Aarhus, Den-
`mark.
`
`Henning Rud Andersen1
`
`Abstract
`This review describes the development of percutane-
`ous transluminal catheter-mounted heart valves for
`permanent implantation. The time period from the
`first surgically implanted valve in 1952, through cathe-
`ter-mounted valves inserted for temporal relief, until
`
`the conception of the percutaneous transcatheter
`heart valve for permanent implantation is summar-
`ized. The process involved in the construction of the
`new valve is detailed in Figure 1, and the future of this
`new treatment modality is discussed.
`
`Geschichte der perkutanen Aortenklappenimplantation
`
`Zusammenfassung
`Diese Übersicht beschreibt die Entwicklung perkuta-
`ner transluminaler kathetermontierter Herzklappen
`zur permanenten Implantation. Der Zeitraum von der
`ersten chirurgisch eingepflanzten Klappe 1952, die
`mittels kathetermontierter Klappen zur temporären
`Entlastung eingesetzt wurde, bis zum Konzept der
`
`perkutanen Transkatheter-Herzklappe zur permanen-
`ten Implantation wird besprochen. Der mit der
`Konstruktion der neuen Klappe verbundene Prozess
`wird in Abbildung 1 detailliert dargestellt, und die Zu-
`kunft dieser neuen Behandlungsmodalität wird dis-
`kutiert.
`
`Key Words:
`Heart valve · Catheter ·
`Percutaneous · Im-
`plantation
`
`Herz 2009;34:343–6
`DOI 10.1007/
`s00059-009-3251-4
`
`Schlüsselwörter:
`Herzklappe · Katheter ·
`Perkutan · Implantation
`
`Introduction
`Implantation of an artificial heart valve as a treatment
`for valvular heart disease dates back to 1952, when
`Hufnagel performed the first implantation in a pa-
`tient with severe aortic insufficiency [1]. The artificial
`heart valve was implanted in the descending thoracic
`aorta, significantly reducing severe left ventricular re-
`gurgitation and improving hemodynamic function [2].
`This technique was used in a small series of opera-
`tions for aortic regurgitation [3, 4], and follow-up re-
`ports 24 years later revealed satisfactory results in
`some of the patients [5]. The development of extra-
`corporeal circulation made it possible for Harken et
`al. to perform the first subcoronary implantation in
`1960 [6]. Since then, implantation of prosthetic heart
`valves has been an open-heart surgical procedure. If,
`however, permanent implantation of heart valves
`could be accomplished without thoracotomy, it would
`be highly attractive, as it would not only significantly
`reduce surgical time and trauma, but the proce-
`dure-associated morbidity of the patient would be
`smaller. In recent years, interventional cardiology has
`introduced percutaneous implantation of many dif-
`ferent cardiac devices, but it was not until recently
`that percutaneous transluminal catheter-mounted
`heart valves were implanted into a human [7].
`
`Herz 34 · 2009 · Nr. 5 © Urban & Vogel
`
`Catheter-Mounted Heart Valves for
`Temporary Treatment
`In 1965, Davies described a catheter-mounted valve for
`temporary relief of aortic insufficiency and tested it in
`dogs [8]. A cone-shaped valve in the form of a parachute
`with wires was mounted on the tip of a 5-F catheter. The
`catheter was inserted via the femoral artery into the de-
`scending aorta and the extending catheter was fixed to
`the skin of the leg. The valve collapsed during antegrade
`blood flow, and, during diastole, it unfolded due to ret-
`rograde blood flow and pressure gradient. The para-
`chute wires prevented the valve from inverting during
`diastole. The catheter-mounted valve was designed for
`temporary relief of symptoms in patients with severe
`aortic insufficiency, and to render the patient fit for de-
`finitive surgery days or weeks later. The catheter was not
`designed for permanent implantation.
`In 1971, Moulopoulos et al. described three dif-
`ferent catheter-mounted aortic valves for insertion in
`the ascending aorta [9]. The devices were tested in vi-
`tro in a mock circulation system, and in vivo in dogs.
`One of the valves had an umbrella design and two
`were based on a balloon system.
`The umbrella-shaped polyurethane valve was
`2–3 cm in length and 1–2 cm in diameter and mounted
`at the tip of a polyethylene catheter. The diameter of
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2088 - Page 1
`Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc.,
`343
`& Medtronic Corevalve, LLC
`v. Troy R. Norred, M.D.
`Case IPR2014-00110
`
`

`
`Andersen HR. History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis
`
`Figure 1. Photograph of
`the Andersen stent
`valve built for percuta-
`neous transluminal
`catheter implantation.
`The stent valve was
`constructed in 1989 and
`consisted of two folded
`metal rings and a por-
`cine aortic valve mount-
`ed inside the stent.
`Abbildung 1. Photogra-
`phie der Andersen-
`Stentklappe zur
`perkutanen translumi-
`nalen Katheterimplan-
`tation. Die Stentklappe
`wurde 1989 konstruiert
`und bestand aus zwei
`gefalteten Metallringen
`und einer Schweineaor-
`tenklappe, die inner-
`halb des Stents ange-
`bracht wurde.
`
`344
`
`the open umbrella was planned to be larger than that
`of the aorta. During systole, the forward flow closed
`the umbrella. During diastole, the backward flow
`opened the umbrella, which touched the aortic wall.
`The umbrella was designed to be long enough so the
`open valve would touch the aortic wall over a large
`area and would not be inverted by the diastolic pres-
`sure gradient. This therefore precluded the need for
`parachute wires to prevent inversion of the valve.
`The two balloon systems were designed with a spher-
`ical balloon 1 cm in diameter made of polyurethane
`and tied at the end of a 40 cm long polyethylene cath-
`eter. The balloons could be inflated during diastole
`and deflated during systole. When inflated, the bal-
`loon occluded the aorta in order to prevent diastolic
`backflow. When deflated, it collapsed in order to al-
`low a free systolic flow. The catheters were connected
`to two different external pump systems which syn-
`chronized inflation and deflation in relation to dias-
`tole and systole. None of these three catheters was
`designed for permanent implantation.
`5 years later, in 1976, Phillips et al. described a
`catheter-tip-mounted aortic valve for temporary
`treatment of aortic insufficiency and tested it in dogs
`[10]. This design employed a mixture of the concepts
`described by Davies [8] and Moulopoulos et al. [9]. It
`was a catheter mounted with a polyurethane cusp de-
`signed to act as a temporarily inserted prosthetic aor-
`tic valve in the ascending aorta. The cusp should col-
`lapse during systole and unfold during diastole. It was
`mounted 1 cm from the end of a polyurethane cathe-
`ter 4 mm in diameter and 60 cm in length. The cusp
`had an umbrella design, but also one parachute wire
`to prevent the valve from inverting during diastole.
`The extending catheter was fixed to the skin.
`In 1977, Boretos & Poirier also described a cath-
`eter for temporary relief of aortic insufficiency [11].
`
`This catheter was also designed for extending out of
`the patient to be fixed against the surface of the body.
`The valve was mounted at the tip of a catheter, shaped
`as a cone with a broad circular basis pointing in the
`direction of the left ventricle, and with the flexible
`valves of the cone extending downstream. It allowed
`central flow through the cone during systole and clo-
`sure of the flexible valves during diastole, which was
`the result of both regurgitated flow and the diastolic
`pressure gradient.
`Several years later, in 1992, Matsubara et al. de-
`scribed a balloon catheter with check valves for ex-
`perimental relief of aortic regurgitation and tested it
`in a dog model [12]. A latex balloon was mounted
`near the end of a catheter and inflated to occlude the
`aorta. Holes on the proximal and distal sides of the
`balloon were connected to each other inside the cath-
`eter, allowing the passage of blood from the two dis-
`tal holes to the two proximal holes during the systolic
`phase. Two latex valves were mounted on the two
`proximal holes of the catheter to prevent regurgita-
`tion during diastole.
`The result of close to 30 years of design and test-
`ing of catheter-mounted valves for short-term inser-
`tion into the aorta designed for temporary relief of
`aortic insufficiency undoubtedly made experimental
`progress. However, despite the technical develop-
`ment these catheters never went into clinical use.
`None of these catheter-mounted valves was applica-
`ble for permanent implantation.
`
`The Conception of a Percutaneous
`Transluminal Catheter-Mounted Heart
`Valve for Permanent Implantation
`In February 1989, the idea of a percutaneous heart
`valve for permanent implantation was conceived by
`Andersen (Figure 1) [13]. The idea behind its concep-
`tion was to develop a new technology and treatment
`to be used by interventional cardiologists in a cardiac
`catheterization laboratory. Andersen defined three
`requirements for the new technology. The implanta-
`tion should be on a closed chest, a beating heart and a
`closed heart. Furthermore, no catheter should be left
`inside the heart or the vessel after implantation of the
`valve. The valve should be for permanent implanta-
`tion. The first valve was implanted on May 1, 1989 in
`the descending thoracic aorta of a pig (Figure 2). The
`first subcoronary implantation was performed in No-
`vember 1989 in a pig.
`
`The New Concept for Implantation
`of Artificial Heart Valves
`The idea was to mount a foldable biological cardiac
`valve inside a balloon-expandable metallic stent.
`
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2088 - Page 2
`Herz 34 · 2009 · Nr. 5 © Urban & Vogel
`
`

`
`Andersen HR. History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis
`
`Implantation of such a device (stent + valve = the stent
`valve) would enable implantation of artificial heart
`valves by the transluminal catheter technique without
`using thoracotomy or extracorporeal circulation. We
`constructed and hand-built the stent valve, sheets and
`catheters. The metal stent was constructed from two
`0.55-mm surgical stainless steel wires of the kind nor-
`mally used to close the sternum after thoracotomy.
`Each wire was folded into 15 loops, 8 mm high each
`(Figure 1). Three of the loops were 14 mm high, de-
`signed for fixation of the commissural points of a por-
`cine aortic valve. Each folded wire was bent into a cir-
`cle (diameter, 22 mm) which was closed end-to-end by
`soldering. The two circles were then stacked upon each
`other and fixed together with sutures. The ability of
`the metal stent to be compressed manually around a
`30-mm balloon was tested. Then, the ability of the bal-
`loon to expand the metal stent to 30 mm diameter,
`with the expanded stent having a sufficient stiffness to
`prevent recoil when it was implanted in vitro in an ex-
`planted pig aorta, was also tested. The choice of
`0.55-mm surgical stainless wires was determined after
`several “trial and error” tests with different wire thick-
`ness, stiffness and number of loops. The foldable valve
`was a porcine aortic valve taken from a pig heart
`bought from a local butcher. The valve was carefully
`dissected and cleaned manually, mounted inside the
`stent and then fixed with sutures (Figure 1). The stent
`valve was neither sterilized nor heparinized, nor was it
`treated with any drug or chemical agent. Thus, the
`stent valve was viable only for short-term use (hours)
`to prove the concept of catheter-based implantation of
`artificial heart valves. The proof of concept was docu-
`mented in pigs and in in vitro models [13, 14].
`
`Progression of Development from 1989
`until First Human Implantation in 2000
`The new technology did not gain much attention for
`several years. It was obvious that much more refine-
`ment and testing were necessary before implantation
`in humans could even be considered. Thus, such de-
`velopment required engineering, research, refine-
`ment and investment which could only be done by a
`company who believed in the concept. The interest,
`however, from industry involved in interventional
`cardiology was minimal. Academic research groups
`around the world continued to investigate the tech-
`nology. New biological valves were tested in animals
`[15–19], and mechanical valves, both cage-ball valves
`and disk valve prostheses, were also developed and
`tested [20, 21]. Then, in 2000, Bonhoeffer et al. per-
`formed the first human implantation in the pulmo-
`nary position [7]. This landmark achievement was
`followed by implantation in the aortic position in
`2002 by Cribier et al. [22]. Afterwards, the interest in
`
`Herz 34 · 2009 · Nr. 5 © Urban & Vogel
`
`Figure 2. The first An-
`dersen stent valve im-
`planted on May 1, 1989.
`Abbildung 2. Die erste
`Andersen-Stentklappe,
`implantiert am
`01.05.1989.
`
`this technology among cardiologists and industry sky-
`rocketed.
`
`The Future of Percutaneous Transluminal
`Catheter-Mounted Heart Valve
`Implantation
`The first pulmonary implantation in 2000 and the first
`aortic implantations in 2002 used a balloon-expand-
`able stent valve similar to the Andersen stent valve
`[13]. Later, self-expandable aortic valves were devel-
`oped [23]. Within the last 2–3 years, implantation of
`both balloon- and self-expandable stent valves has
`become routine treatment in Europe for selected pa-
`tients with aortic stenosis. The new treatment modal-
`ity has already been used in several thousand patients.
`Initially, the implantations were done only from the
`femoral vein or the femoral artery [7, 22, 24]. Recent-
`ly, a new transapical catheter technique for aortic
`valve implantation in humans has been developed
`and is now used very frequently [25, 26]. It allows
`treatment of patients with narrowed femoral arteries
`without the need for atrial septal puncture followed
`by antegrade implantation from the right atrium
`through the left atrium and the left ventricle – a dif-
`ficult and complex procedure. New technical modifi-
`cations of the initial concept are being developed,
`and in 2009 more than 20 companies around the world
`are involved in research and further development of
`the concept [27]. In addition, there have been recent
`mitral valve implantations that have been performed
`in animals (unpublished data). The percutaneous
`transluminal implantation technology is still very
`young and immature, but intense research and devel-
`opment will continue to bring it forward with high
`speed. This new technique has the potential to be the
`new major treatment breakthrough in interventional
`cardiology. Only time will tell.
`
`Disclosure: The autor declares that he has no financial or per-
`sonal relations to other parties whose interests could have af-
`fected the content of this article in any way, either positively or
`negatively.
`
`345
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2088 - Page 3
`
`

`
`Andersen HR. History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis
`
`1.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`7.
`
`References
`Hufnagel CA, Harvey WP. The surgical correction of aortic
`regurgitation. Preliminary report. Bull Georgetown Univ
`Med Center 1953;6:3–6.
`2. Hufnagel CA. Basic concepts in the development of cardio-
`vascular prostheses. Am J Surg 1979;137:285–300.
`Hufnagel CA, Harvey WP, Rabil PJ, et al. Surgical correction
`of aortic insufficience. Surgery 1954;35:673–83.
`Conklin WS, Grismer JT, Aalpoel JA. Hufnagel valve surgery
`for aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Surg 1958;36:238–46.
`5. Hufnagel CA, Gomes MN. Late follow-up of ball-valve pros-
`theses in the descending thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardio-
`vasc Surg 1976;6:900–9.
`6. Harken DE, Soroff HS, Taylor WJ, et al. Partial and complete
`prosthesis in aorta insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
`1960;40:744–62.
`Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Saliba Z, et al. Percutaneous
`replacement of pulmonary valve in a right-ventricular to
`pulmonary-artery prosthetic conduit with valve dysfunc-
`tion. Lancet 2000;356:1403–5.
`8. Davies H. Catheter-mounted valve for temporary relief of
`aortic insufficiency. Lancet 1965;1:250.
`9. Moulopoulos SD, Anthopoulos L, Stamatelopoulos S, et al.
`Catheter-mounted aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1971;11:
`423–30.
`10. Phillips SJ, Ciborski M, Freed PS, et al. A temporary cathe-
`ter-tip aortic valve: hemodynamic effects on experimental
`acute aortic insufficiency. Ann Thorac Surg 1976;21:134–7.
`Boretos JW, Poirier RA. Aortic heart valve catheter. United
`States Patent 1977 (No. 4,056,854).
`12. Matsubara T, Yamazoe M, Tamura Y, et al. Balloon catheter
`with check valves for experimental relief of acute aortic re-
`gurgitation. Am Heart J 1992;124:1002–8.
`13. Andersen HR, Knudsen LL, Hasenkam JM. Transluminal im-
`plantation of artificial heart valves. Description of a new
`expandable aortic valve and initial results with implanta-
`tion by catheter technique in closed chest pigs. Eur Heart J
`1992;13:704–8.
`14. Knudsen LL, Andersen HR, Hasenkam JM. Catheter-im-
`planted prosthetic heart valves. Transluminal catheter im-
`plantation of a new expandable artificial heart valve in the
`
`11.
`
`Address for
`Correspondence
`Henning Rud Andersen,
`MD, PhD
`Associate Professor of
`Cardiology
`Department of Cardiology
`Skejby University Hospital
`8200 Aarhus N
`Denmark
`Phone (+45) 89496111,
`Fax -89496025
`e-mail: henning.rud.
`andersen@dadlnet.dk
`
`19.
`
`21.
`
`descending thoracic aorta in isolated vessels and closed
`chest pigs. Int J Artif Organs 1993;16:253–62.
`15. Moazami N, Bessler M, Argenziano M, et al. Transluminal
`aortic valve placement. A feasibility study with a newly de-
`signed collapsible aortic valve. ASAIO J 1996;42:M381–5.
`16. Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Saliba Z, et al. Transcatheter
`implantation of a bovine valve in pulmonary position: a
`lamb study. Circulation 2000;102:813–6.
`17. Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P. Steps towards percutaneous
`aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2002;105:775–8.
`18. Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P. Percutaneous implantation of
`a valve in the descending aorta in lambs. Eur Heart J 2002;
`23:1045–9.
`Lutter G, Kuklinski D, Berg G, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve
`replacement: an experimental study. I. Studies on implan-
`tation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:768–76.
`20. Pavcnik D, Wright KC, Wallace S. Development and initial
`experimental evaluation of a prosthetic aortic valve for trans-
`catheter placement: work in progress. Radiology 1992;183:
`151–4.
`Sochman J, Peregrin JH, Pavcnik D, et al. Percutaneous trans-
`catheter aortic disc valve prosthesis implantation: a feasibil-
`ity study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000;23:384–8.
`22. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous trans-
`catheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for cal-
`cific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circula-
`tion 2002;106:3006–8.
`23. Grube E, Laborde JC, Zinkmann B, et al. First report on a human
`percutaneous transluminal implantation of a self-expanding
`valve prosthesis for interventional treatment of aortic valve
`stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:465–9.
`24. Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutane-
`ous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral
`artery. Circulation 2006;113:842–50.
`25. Webb JG, Munt B, Makkar R, et al. A percutaneous stent-
`mounted valve for treatment of aortic or pulmonary valve
`disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:89–93.
`26. Lichtenstein SV, Cheung A, Ye J, et al. Transapical transcath-
`eter aortic valve implantation in humans. Initial clinical
`experience. Circulation 2006;114:591–6.
`Falk V, Schwammenthal EE, Kempfert J, et al. New anatomi-
`cally oriented transapical aortic valve implantation. Ann
`Thorac Surg 2009;87:925–6.
`
`27.
`
`346
`
`Herz 34 · 2009 · Nr. 5 © Urban & Vogel
`NORRED EXHIBIT 2088 - Page 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket