throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 36
`
` Entered: September 30, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ENDOTACH, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00100
`Patent 5,593,417
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK,
`and HYUN J. JUNG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FITZPATRICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-00100
`Patent 5,593,417
`
`
`Patent Owner seeks authorization to file an errata sheet for the
`
`transcript of the deposition of its witness, James Silver, Ph.D., which
`
`occurred on August 28, 2014. Patent Owner attached the proposed errata
`
`sheet to a September 29, 2014, email to the Board. Patent Owner’s email
`
`also indicates specific errata that Petitioner opposes.
`
`We have reviewed the errata sheet and agree that each of the opposed
`
`errata appears designed to make the transcript reflect not what was actually
`
`stated by Dr. Silver, but rather to make it reflect something unstated.1 As a
`
`result of these proposed changes, we do not authorize Patent Owner to file
`
`the errata sheet that was attached to its email.
`
`We note that several other errata in the proposed errata sheet appear
`
`designed to correct the transcript so that it does reflect what was actually
`
`stated.2 Thus, Patent Owner may seek authorization to file a modified errata
`
`sheet, consistent with this Order. If it desires such authorization, Patent
`
`Owner should again first confer with Petitioner to see whether Petitioner
`
`opposes.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request to file the proposed errata
`
`sheet is denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 For example, Patent Owner proposes, and Petitioner opposes, adding to
`testimony appearing at page 183 the following: “Answer is incomplete. I
`incorporate by reference my testimony at 182:18–22 and 224:22–226: 16.”
`2 For example, Patent Owner proposes, and Petitioner does not oppose,
`changing testimony appearing at page 180 of the transcript from “radially
`forced” to “a radial force.”
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-00100
`Patent 5,593,417
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jack Barufka
`barufka@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Evan Finkel
`evan.finkel@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Ngai Zhang
`ngai.zhang@pillsburylaw.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Matthew Phillips
`matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com
`
`Brett Pinkus
`pinkus@fsclaw.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket