throbber
Paper 32
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`TWITTER, INC., AND YELP INC.,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Case IPR2014-00086
`Case IPR2014-00812
`Patent 7,010,536
`____________________
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00086 & -00812
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), requiring a separate paper
`
`requesting oral argument and specifying issues to be argued, Petitioner
`
`Apple Inc. respectfully submits this joint Request for Oral Argument on
`
`behalf of Apple and Petitioners Twitter, Inc., and Yelp Inc. As specified in
`
`the Board’s April 25, 2014 Scheduling Order in IPR2014-00086 (Paper 9),
`
`Oral Argument is scheduled for January 6, 2015.
`
`Petitioners request 45 minutes of argument time for themselves and 45
`
`minutes of argument time for Patent Owner to address the following issues:
`
`• Grounds for which inter partes review was instituted as to claims 2-
`12, 14, and 16 of the ’536 patent and any issue raised in the Board’s
`Institution Decision (Paper 8).
`• Any issue addressed in Petitioners’ papers, including but not limited
`to the Petition (Paper 1) and Petitioners’ Reply Brief (Paper 28).
`• Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters, including the
`issues listed above and any issues raised in Patent Owner’s Response
`(Paper 20), Patent Owner’s Motion for Observations on Cross-
`Examination (if any), or Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude (if any).
`
`Petitioners request permission to use audio/visual equipment to
`
`display demonstrative exhibits, including a projector and screen for Power
`
`Point or PDF slides.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00086 & -00812
`
`Dated: December 5, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
` /s/Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Registration No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Attorney for Petitioner Apple
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00086 & -00812
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that on this 5th day of December, 2014, a copy of this
`Petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument has been served in its entirety by
`electronic mail on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner and for
`Petitioners Yelp and Twitter:
`
`Patent Owner:
`Anthony Patek
`Gutride Safier LLP
`835 Douglass Street
`San Francisco, CA 94114
`anthony@gutridesafier.com
`pto@gutridesafier.com
`
`Todd Kennedy
`Gutride Safier LLP
`835 Douglass Street
`San Francisco, CA 94114
`todd@guttridesafier.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Attorney for Petitioner Apple
`
`
`Petitioners Yelp and Twitter
`Vaibhav P. Kadaba
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
`Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
`wkadaba@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Dated: December 5, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket