IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00783-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION;
`SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
`L.P.;
`SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.; and
`SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00791-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00784-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 1
`
`

`

`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`FOURSQUARE LABS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00785-LED
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`GROUPON, INC.,
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00787-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`LIVINGSOCIAL, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`MILLENNIAL MEDIA, INC.,
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00789-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00790-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 2
`
`

`

`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00792-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`YELP, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00794-MHS-CMC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-1 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`Infringement Contentions, and P.R. 3-2 Disclosures
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 3-1, Plaintiff Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC
`
`(“Evolutionary Intelligence”) provides its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`
`Preliminary Infringement Contentions. Evolutionary Intelligence’s statements are based
`
`on publicly available materials regarding the accused infringing products and services
`
`of Defendants. Evolutionary Intelligence has not yet had access to any discovery of
`
`Defendants’ materials, and therefore certain information is not yet available to
`
`Evolutionary Intelligence that is relevant to its infringement claims. Evolutionary
`
`Intelligence reserves the right to supplement and/or modify its disclosures herein based
`
`on additional information obtained through formal discovery or other means
`
`concerning the Defendants’ products or services. Further, the patents’ claims have not
`
`
`
`3
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 3
`
`

`

`yet been construed, and Evolutionary Intelligence’s investigation of claim construction
`
`issues is continuing. Accordingly, Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to
`
`supplement and/or modify its disclosures pursuant to P.R. 3-6.
`
`I. Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-1(a) Disclosures
`
`A. Apple Inc. (“Apple”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Apple directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1–16;
`
`and U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1–11 and 14–23. See Exhibits A and B.
`
`B. Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Facebook directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1–16;
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1–11 and 14–23. See Exhibits C and D.
`
`C. Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Twitter directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1-16;
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1-11, 14-23. See Exhibits E and F.
`
`D. Millennial Media, Inc. (“Millennial”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Millennial directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1–16;
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1, 3–7, 10, 11, and 14–22. See Exhibits G and H.
`
`
`
`4
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 4
`
`

`

`E. Sprint Nextel Corporation, Spring Communications Company, L.P., Sprint
`Spectrum, L.P., and Sprint Solutions, Inc. (collectively, “Sprint”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Sprint directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1-12,
`
`and 14-16; U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1-11, and 14-23. See Exhibits I and J.
`
`F. Groupon, Inc. (“Groupon”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Groupon directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1-5, 7-
`
`16; U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1, 3-7, 10-11, and 14-23. See Exhibits K and L.
`
`G. Livingsocial, Inc. (“Livingsocial”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Livingsocial directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1-4, 7-9,
`
`11-16; U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1, 3-7, 10-11, 14-16, 19, and 21. See
`
`Exhibits M and N.
`
`H. Foursquare Labs, Inc. (“Foursquare”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Foursquare directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1-16;
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1, 3-7, 10-11, and 14-23. See Exhibits O and P.
`
`I. Yelp, Inc. (“Yelp”)
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(a), that Yelp directly, contributorily and/or by
`
`inducement infringes the following claims: U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536, claims 1-9, 11-
`
`
`
`5
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 5
`
`

`

`16; U.S. Patent No. 7,702,682, claims 1, 3–7, 10–11, 15–16, 19, and 21. See Exhibits
`
`Q and R.
`
`II. Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-1(b) Disclosures
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence hereby
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(b), that the asserted patent claims are infringed by the
`
`Defendants’ Accused Instrumentalities as shown in the infringement charts attached as
`
`Exhibits A through R.
`
`III. Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-1(c) Disclosures
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(c), that each element of each infringed claim is found
`
`within each Accused Instrumentality as shown in the infringement charts attached as
`
`Exhibits A through R.
`
`IV. Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-1(d) Disclosures
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence hereby
`
`contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(d), that each element of each asserted claim is literally
`
`present in each Accused Instrumentality as shown in Exhibits A through R.
`
`At this time, Evolutionary Intelligence knows of no specific limitation of the
`
`asserted claims where infringement depends on the doctrine of equivalents. However,
`
`as indicated above, further discovery is required regarding literal infringement by the
`
`Defendants’ Accused Instrumentalities, and the claims of the patents-in-suit have yet to
`
`be construed. Evolutionary Intelligence expressly reserves the right to augment and
`
`supplement its position on whether there is infringement under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents of any elements of any asserted claims after discovery from the Defendants
`
`and/or after the Court has construed the asserted claims.
`
`
`
`6
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 6
`
`

`

`V. Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-1(e) Disclosures
`
`Pursuant to P.R. 3-1(e), Evolutionary Intelligence states that the ’536 patent claims
`
`priority to Provisional Application No. 60/073,209, filed on January 30, 1998, and
`
`that the ’682 patent is a continuation of U.S. Application No. 09/284,113, filed on
`
`April 7, 1999, and claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/073,209, filed on
`
`January 30, 1998 and International Application No. PCT/US99/01988, filed on
`
`January 28, 1999.
`
`VI. Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-1(f) Disclosures
`
`Evolutionary Intelligence hereby discloses, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(f), that
`
`Evolutionary Intelligence does not have any apparatus, product, device, process,
`
`method, act, or other instrumentality that practices the claimed invention.
`
`Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to argue that the claimed invention is
`
`practiced by any apparatus, product, device, process, method, act, or other
`
`instrumentality owned by any third party.
`
`VII. Evolutionary Intelligence’s P.R. 3-2 Disclosures
`
`In accordance with P.R. 3-2, Evolutionary Intelligence makes the following
`
`disclosures:
`
`Pursuant to P.R. 3-2(a), Evolutionary Intelligence identifies the following
`
`documents: EV0004059–4192.
`
`Pursuant to P.R. 3-2(b), Evolutionary Intelligence identifies the following
`
`documents that were created on or before the date of application for the patents-in-
`
`suit and that evidence the conception, reduction to practice, design, and development
`
`of the claimed inventions: EV0003913–59.
`
`There may be other documents relevant to conception, reduction to practice,
`
`design, development, and/or disclosure of the claimed invention pursuant to P.R. 3-2
`
`
`
`7
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 7
`
`

`

`that are protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product
`
`doctrine. A privilege log identifying those documents will be provided to the
`
`Defendants at the appropriate time.
`
`Pursuant to P.R. 3-2(c), the following documents are copies of the file histories for
`
`the patents-in-suit: EV0000097–645, and EV0000646–1287.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 22, 2013
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Todd Kennedy /
`Adam J. Gutride, Esq.
`Seth A. Safier, Esq.
`Todd Kennedy, Esq.
`Anthony J. Patek, Esq.
`Marie McCrary, Esq.
`835 Douglass Street
`San Francisco, California 94114
`Telephone: (415) 789-6390
`Facsimile: (415) 449-6469
`adam@gutridesafier.com
`seth@gutridesafier.com
`todd@gutridesafier.com
`anthony@gutridesafier.com
`marie@gutridesafier.com
`
`Charles Ainsworth
`Parker Bunt & Ainsworth
`100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone: (903) 531-3535
`Facsimile: (903) 533-9687
`charley@pbatyler.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Evolutionary
`Intelligence LLC
`
`8
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 8
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that, on May 22, 2013, the foregoing document was
`
`served via email on all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 22, 2013
`
` /s/ Todd Kennedy /
`Todd Kennedy
`Gutride Safier LLP
`835 Douglass Street
`San Francisco, California 94114
`Telephone: (415) 789-6390
`Facsimile: (415) 449-6469
`todd@gutridesafier.com
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 9
`
`

`

`1
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`infringed claim is found within each accused instrumentality as shown below:
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence contends, pursuant to P.R. 3-1(c), that each element of each
`
`similar that repeating the relevant discussion and evidence would be unnecessarily cumbersome and redundant.
`
`claim elements have the same claim scope. Rather, such incorporation by reference is used when two or more claim elements are sufficiently
`
`reference discussion and evidence pertaining to other claim elements. Such incorporation by reference to shall not be read to imply that any two
`
`The discussion in the claim chart below with respect to some of the claim elements occasionally refers to and/or incorporates by
`
`offered by Apple, and to identify additional accused instrumentalities based on that discovery and further investigation.
`
`has not yet had any discovery from Apple. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to seek discovery regarding other products and services
`
`Evolutionary Intelligence’s identification of these accused instrumentalities is based on publicly available information. Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`include at least the iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, and Apple TV. The accused instrumentalities shall also encompass the software
`
`1. All Apple devices compatible with the iOS mobile operating system (collectively, the “iOS-Compatible Devices”). These devices
`
`applications designed to run on these Apple devices.
`
`Subject to ongoing discovery and investigation, Evolutionary Intelligence identifies the following accused instrumentalities of Apple Inc.:
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536 by Apple Inc.
`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 10
`
`

`

`
`
`2
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`a computer system. (See the claim elements below.)
`Each iOS-Compatible device is an apparatus for transmitting, receiving and manipulating information on
`
`
`
`data enclosure.
`Each iOS-Compatible Device includes a plurality of containers, each container being a logically defined
`function, in substantially the same way, to reach substantially the same result.
`instrumentality are insubstantial and the accused instrumentality preforms substantially the same
`the doctrine of equivalents because any differences between this claim element and any accused
`instrumentality. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to contend that this element is satisfied under
`Evolutionary Intelligence presently contends that this element is literally present in the accused
`
`Examples of containers are “Event,” “Reminder,” and “Alarm” containers:
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`comprising:
`enclosure and
`logically defined data
`each container being a
`a plurality of containers,
`
`1B
`
`apparatus including
`computer system, the
`information on a
`and manipulating
`transmitting, receiving
`1. An apparatus for
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`1A
`
`Element
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 11
`
`

`

`“CLLocationCoordinate2D,” “CLLocationManager,” “CLPlacemark,” and “CLRegion” containers:
`Additional examples of containers are location containers such as the “CLLocation,”
`
`
`
`3
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001420.)
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001416.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`(EV0001412.)
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`(EV0001527.)
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001512.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 13
`
`

`

`supplement and/or modify this claim chart after obtaining discovery of this source code.
`of the iOS operating system, which is not publicly available. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to
`It is believed that the structure and operation of the containers are more fully set forth in the source code
`
`Each container of each iOS-Compatible Device comprises an information element having information.
`function, in substantially the same way, to reach substantially the same result.
`instrumentality are insubstantial and the accused instrumentality preforms substantially the same
`the doctrine of equivalents because any differences between this claim element and any accused
`instrumentality. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to contend that this element is satisfied under
`Evolutionary Intelligence presently contends that this element is literally present in the accused
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
` an information
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1C
`
`Other examples are described in the Apple iOS Developer Library documentation.
`the iOS-Compatible Devices. The containers corresponding to the above evidence are only examples.
`Publicly available information indicates that containers are used throughout the iOS operating system of
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001686.)
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001661.)
`
`
`
`(EV0001625.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 14
`
`

`

`6
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`following properties of “Event” containers:
`For example, information elements with information regarding events are associated with at least the
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`information;
`element having
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 15
`
`

`

`7
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 16
`
`

`

`8
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 17
`
`

`

`9
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 18
`
`

`

`10
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`least the following properties of “Reminder” containers:
`In another example, information elements with information regarding reminders are associated with at
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001424-26.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 19
`
`

`

`11
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 20
`
`

`

`12
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 21
`
`

`

`13
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`the following properties of “Alarm” containers:
`In another example, information elements with information regarding alarms are associated with at least
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001431-33.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 22
`
`

`

`14
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 23
`
`

`

`15
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`least the following properties of the “CLLocation” containers:
`In another example, information elements with information regarding location are associated with at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001418-20.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 24
`
`

`

`16
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`least the following properties of the “CLLocationManager” containers:
`In another example, information elements with information regarding location are associated with at
`
`
`
`(EV0001513.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 25
`
`

`

`17
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 26
`
`

`

`18
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 27
`
`

`

`19
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 28
`
`

`

`20
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 29
`
`

`

`21
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 30
`
`

`

`22
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 31
`
`

`

`23
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 32
`
`

`

`24
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`least the following properties of the “CLPlacemark” containers:
`In another example, information elements with information regarding location are associated with at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001632-38.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 33
`
`

`

`25
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`least the following properties of the “CLRegion” containers:
`In another example, information elements with information regarding location are associated with at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001662-63.)
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 34
`
`

`

`26
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 35
`
`

`

`27
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`least the following properties of the “CLHeading” containers:
`In another example, information elements with information regarding location are associated with at
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001688.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 36
`
`

`

`28
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 37
`
`

`

`29
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 38
`
`

`

`30
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 39
`
`

`

`31
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 40
`
`

`

`32
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`are only examples. Other examples are described in the Apple iOS Developer Library documentation.
`system of the iOS-Compatible Devices. The information elements corresponding to the above evidence
`Publicly available information indicates that information elements are used throughout the iOS operating
`
`
`
`
`
`the doctrine of equivalents because any differences between this claim element and any accused
`instrumentality. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to contend that this element is satisfied under
`Evolutionary Intelligence presently contends that this element is literally present in the accused
`
`
`
`code.
`reserves its right to supplement and/or modify this claim chart after obtaining discovery of this source
`source code of the iOS operating system, which is not publicly available. Evolutionary Intelligence
`It is believed that the structure and operation of the information elements are more fully set forth in the
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 41
`
`

`

`33
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`forming part of the container.
`Each container of each iOS-Compatible Device comprises a plurality of registers, the plurality of registers
`function, in substantially the same way, to reach substantially the same result.
`instrumentality are insubstantial and the accused instrumentality preforms substantially the same
`
`
`
`“status”.
`“birthdayPersonID”, “endDate”, “eventIdentifier”, “isDetached”, “organizer”, “startDate”, and
`Exemplar registers of the “Event” containers include at least “allDay”, “availability”,
`
`including
`the container and
`registers forming part of
`registers, the plurality of
`
` a plurality of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`
`
`“dueDateComponent”, and “startDateComponents”.
`Exemplar registers of the “Reminder” containers include at least “completed”, “completionDate”,
`
`
`
`“relativeOffset”, and “structuredLocation”.
`Exemplar registers of the “Alarm” containers include at least “absoluteDate”, “proximity”,
`
`
`
`“horizontalAccuracy”, “speed”, and “verticalAccuracy.”
`Exemplar registers of the “CLLocation” containers include at least “altitude”, “coordinate”, “course”,
`
`“areasOfInterest”.
`“locality”, “subLocality”, “thoroughfare”, “subThoroughfare”, “region”, “inlandWater”, “ocean”, and
`“ISOcountryCode”, “country”, “postalCode”, “administrativeArea”, “subAdministrativeArea”,
`Exemplar registers of the “CLPlacemark” containers include at least “name”, “addressDictionary”,
`
`Publicly available information indicates that registers are used throughout the iOS operating system of
`
`
`
`(See claim element 1C for a more detailed discussion regarding the above registers.)
`
`
`
`trueHeading”, “y”, and “z”.
`Exemplar registers of the “CLHeading” containers include “headingAccuracy”, “magneticHeading”,
`
`
`
`Exemplar registers of the “CLRegion” containers include “center”, “identifier”, and “radius”.
`
`
`
`
`
`“pausesLocationUpdatesAutomatically”.
`“maximumRegionMonitoringDistance”, “monitoredRegions”, and
`“desiredAccuracy”, “distanceFilter”, “heading”, “headingFilter”, “headingOrientation”, “location”,
`Exemplar registers of the “CLLocationManager” containers include at least “activityType”, “delegate”,
`
`
`
`1D
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 42
`
`

`

`34
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`“Event” containers:
`For example, the “eventIdentifier” registers store the unique container identification value of each of the
`
`
`
`(EV0001881.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supplement and/or modify this claim chart after obtaining discovery of this source code.
`the iOS operating system, which is not publicly available. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to
`It is believed that the structure and operation of the registers are more fully set forth in the source code of
`
`examples are described in the Apple iOS Developer Library documentation.
`the iOS-Compatible Devices. The registers corresponding to the above evidence are only examples. Other
`
`
`
`The plurality of registers includes a first register for storing a unique container identification value.
`function, in substantially the same way, to reach substantially the same result.
`instrumentality are insubstantial and the accused instrumentality preforms substantially the same
`the doctrine of equivalents because any differences between this claim element and any accused
`instrumentality. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to contend that this element is satisfied under
`Evolutionary Intelligence presently contends that this element is literally present in the accused
`
`container identification value:
`On information and belief, all containers in each iOS device have first registers for storing a unique
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` a first register for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`value,
`container identification
`storing a unique
`
`1E
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 43
`
`

`

`35
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`(EV0001416.)
`
`
`
`
`
`In another example, “Reminder” containers also have unique identifiers:
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001425.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 44
`
`

`

`In addition, on information and belief, “Alarm” containers also have registers with unique identifiers.
`
`
`
`36
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001463.)
`
`
`
`(EV0001463.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 45
`
`

`

`37
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`examples. Other examples are described in the Apple iOS Developer Library documentation.
`of the iOS-Compatible Devices. The first registers corresponding to the above evidence are only
`Publicly available information indicates that first registers are used throughout the iOS operating system
`
`code of the iOS operating system, which is not publicly available. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its
`It is believed that the structure and operation of the first registers are more fully set forth in the source
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001687-88.)
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001549.)
`
`
`
`
`
`In another example, unique identifiers are associated with “Region” conainers:
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 46
`
`

`

`38
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`
`
`. . . .
`
`. . . .
`
`information in the information element relative to an external-to-the-apparatus event time.
`governing interactions of the container with other containers, systems or processes according to utility of
`The plurality of registers includes a second register having a representation designating time and
`function, in substantially the same way, to reach substantially the same result.
`instrumentality are insubstantial and the accused instrumentality preforms substantially the same
`the doctrine of equivalents because any differences between this claim element and any accused
`instrumentality. Evolutionary Intelligence reserves its right to contend that this element is satisfied under
`Evolutionary Intelligence presently contends that this element is literally present in the accused
`
`right to supplement and/or modify this claim chart after obtaining discovery of this source code.
`
`
`
`time:
`For example, the “allDay”, “endDate”, and “startDate” registers of the “Event” containers designate
`
`
`
`
`
`time,
`to-the-apparatus event
`relative to an external-
`information element
`information in the
`according to utility of
`systems or processes
`other containers,
`of the container with
`governing interactions
`designating time and
`having a representation
` a second register
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1F
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 47
`
`

`

`39
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`. . . .
`
`registers of the “Reminders” containers designate time:
`In another example, the “completionDate”, “dueDateComponents”, and “startDateComponents”
`
`
`
`(EV0001425-26.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 48
`
`

`

`40
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 49
`
`

`

`41
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`designate time:
`In another example, the “absoluteDate” and “relativeOffset” registers of the “Alarms” containers
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001432-33.)
`
`
`
`
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 50
`
`

`

`42
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`taken.
`determine whether the last measured location is outdated and whether a new measurement should be
`EV0001435-59. Further, timestamps associated with location containers are used, for example, to
`database, and providing interfaces for events). These and other aspects are discussed in more detail at
`reminders, configuring alarms, creating recurring events, observing external changes to the calendar
`and Alarms features (including, for example, reading and writing calendar events, reading and writing
`information described above is used to govern many, if not most, aspects of the iOS Events, Reminders,
`processes according to utility of the time information relative to real-world time. In particular, the time
`Further, the second register governs interactions of the container with other containers, systems or
`
`Publicly available information indicates that second registers are used throughout the iOS operating
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(EV0001419.)
`
`
`
`
`
`. . . .
`
`iOS-Compatible Devices
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,010,536
`
`Element
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1007, p. 51
`
`

`

`43
`
`Ex. A: Apple ’536 Infringement Chart
`
`
`
`. . . .
`
`examples. Other examples are described in the Apple iOS Developer Library documentation.
`system of the iOS-Compatible Devices. The second registers correspo