throbber
[19]
`United States Patent
`[11]
`4,445,938
`[45] ‘ May 1,1984
`Verwaerde et al.
`
`
`
`[54] HYDROGENATED STARCH
`HYDROLYSATE
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Francoise Verwaerde, Lambersart;
`Serge Gosset, Lestrem; Michel
`Huchette, Merville, all of France
`
`[73] Assignee: Roquette Freres, Lestrem, France
`
`[21] App]. No.: 340,222
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Jan. 18, 1982
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`[63]
`
`Continuation of Ser. No. 109,066, Jan. 2, 1980, aban-
`doned.
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`[30]
`Jan. 8, 1979 [FR]
`France ................................ 79 00370
`
`[51]
`
`Int. Cl.3 ....................... .. C13K 1/06; C07G 3/00;
`C08B 31/00; C12N 9/28
`[52] U.S. Cl. ...................................... .. 127/29; 127/38;
`435/42; 435/96; 435/99; 536/ 1.1; 568/863
`[58] Field of Search .................... .. 127/29, 38; 435/42,
`435/96, 99; 568/863; 536/1.1
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,285,776 11/1966 Scallet ............................... 435/96 X
`3,535,123 10/1970 Heady .
`3,804,716 4/1974 Langlois .
`3,838,006 9/1974 Hijiyd ............................... 435/96X
`3,897,305
`7/1975 Hurst ... ... .
`. ... .. .... 435/96
`3,922,196 11/1975 Leach ......
`. 127/29 X
`3,922,198 11/ 1975 Kuske . .. ...
`..... .. . .. 435/96
`
`
`
`3,922,200 ll/1975 Walon ................................. .. 435/96
`
`4,113,509
`9/1978 Leach
`........... 435/96X
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2/1961 United Kingdom .
`861195
`1037254 7/1966 United Kingdom .
`1426997
`3/1976 United Kingdom .
`1470325 4/1977 United Kingdom .
`1477587 6/1977 United ‘Kingdom .
`2001075
`1/1979 United Kingdom .
`
`Primary Examiner—Sidney Marantz
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Larson and Taylor
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACI‘
`
`This invention relates to a starch hydrolysate which can
`be optionally hydrogenated as well as the process for
`preparing said hydrolysate and uses thereof.
`Its glucidic spectrum corresponds to:
`a content of monosaccharides (DP= 1) less than 14%,
`a content of disaccharides (DP=2) less than 35%, pref-
`erably less than 20%, '
`a content of oligosaccharides of DP 4 to DP 10 ranging
`from 42% to 70%, preferably from 42 to 60%, the
`oligosaccharides of DP 5 to DP 7 representing by
`themselves a proportion preferably higher than 25%
`and more preferably higher than 30%,
`a content of polysaccharides of DP higher than 10, less
`than 32%, and preferably less than 25%.
`
`The hydrolysate is useful in the preparation notably of
`human foodstuff.
`
`14 Claims, 2 Drawing Figures
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 1, 1984
`
`4,445,938
`
`../0
`
`Fig.1.
`
`20
`
`12345678910"-‘>20 DP
`
`°/o
`
`Fig.2.
`
`--4-———>
`12345678910~>20DP
`
`

`
`1
`
`4,445,938
`
`HYDROGENATED STARCH HYDROLYSATE
`
`This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 109,066,
`filed Jan. 2, 1980, now abandoned.
`The invention relates to a starch hydrolysate, possi-
`bly hydrogenated.
`It also relates to the process for preparing this hydrol-
`ysate as well as the uses thereon.
`It is a particular object of the invention to providing
`a hydrolysate which is not too viscous, which is stable
`in solution, which has good nutrient and physiological
`qualities, good physical properties, good anticrystalliz-
`ing power, and which, if necessary, is not cariogenic.
`Now, applicant has found that hydrolysates respond-
`ing to this group of properties had to be neither too rich
`in polysaccharides of high molecular weight, nor too
`rich in saccharides of low molecular weight, the glucid
`spectrum having, on the contrary, to show a relatively
`high content of ‘oligosaccharides, it being understood
`that the saccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccha-
`rides concerned are present possibly in the form of the
`corresponding hydrogenated products.
`Consequently, the starch hydrolysates, possibly hy-
`drogenated, which are the subject matter of the inven-
`tion, have from a very general point of view, a rela-
`tively high content of oligosaccharides simultaneously
`with a comparatively low content of saccharides and of
`polysaccharides, and they comprise linear or branched
`chains.
`
`Thus, the above-said optionally hydrogenated hydro-
`lysates have a relatively high content of oligosaccha-
`rides of DP 4 to DP 10, preferably from DP 5 to DP 7
`(DP=degreeVof polymerisation) and a comparatively
`low amount of mono- and di-saccharides as well as of
`polysaccharides with a DP higher than 10, those of
`these hydrolysates which are non-cariogenic being in
`hydrogenated form and having a very low content of
`polyols of DP higher than 20, this content being advan-
`tageously less than 3% and, preferably, less than 1.5%.
`The optionally hydrogenated hydrolysates according
`to the invention are characterized by a glucid spectrum
`corresponding to:
`a content of monosaccharrides (DP= 1) less than 14%.
`a content of disaccharides (DP=2) less than 35%, pref-
`erably less than 20%,
`a content of oligosaccharides of DP 4 to DP 10 ranging
`from 42% to 70%, the oligosaccharides of DP 5 to
`DP 7 representing by themselves a proportion prefer-
`ably higher than 25%, and more preferably higher
`than 30%.
`i
`
`a content of polysaccharides of DP higher than 10 less
`than 32%, preferably less than 25%.
`The hydrogenated hydrolysates corresponding to the
`above-said glucid spectrum and which, in addition, are
`devoid of cariogenic character, have, besides, a content
`below 3%, preferably below 1.5%, of polyols of DP
`higher than 20.
`.
`The percentages whichyhave just been discussed are
`percentages by weight, expressed on the dry matter of
`hydrolysates.

`The hydrolysates according to the invention with a
`particularly advantageous glucid spectrum will be de-'
`scribed below.
`
`FIGS. l and 2 are graphs showing the glucidic distri-
`bution of respectivelythe hydrolysates given in Exam-
`ple 2, table II and Example 3, table VI.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`Applicant hasifound that, for numerous applications,
`both in the industrial field and in the food field, dietetics '
`or pharmaceutical field, there was obvious interest in
`having available a starch hydrolysate with a well de-
`fined composition, and in particular with a relatively
`high content of oligosaccharides of DP 4 to DP 10. Too
`large an amount of saccharides with low molecular
`weight or of polysaccharides can in fact show, for very
`precise applications, a good many drawbacks.
`Applicant has observed that an increase in the pro-
`portion of high molecular weight polysaccharides (DP
`higher than 10) accounts for an increase in the viscosity
`of the hydrolysates and especially in a lack of stability in
`solution (retrogradation) of the latter.
`Thus, it has observed more particularly that syneresis
`phenomena, appearing on storage for long periods (sev-
`eral weeks) of the mixtures used for the preparation of
`foundry moulds
`and cores
`(silicates +borax+hy-
`drogenated glucose syrups) and which are manifested
`by heterogeneities within the mixture, were due espe-
`cially to the presence of polyols of high DP.
`These same phenomena occur on storage of the syr-
`ups alone, whether or not hydrogenated, which pres-
`ents drawbacks for certain applications such as the use
`of the hydrolysates concerned in foodstuff for patients.
`In this application, besides the absence of retrograda-
`tion on storage, a quick absorption of carbon hydrates is
`sought, and thus the content of high molecular prod-
`ucts, considered as being slowly assimilated, is to be
`limited.
`
`Applicant hasalso shown that the very high molecu-
`lar weight products (DP higher than 20) which are
`present in hydrogenated syrups are essentially responsi-
`ble for the acidification which is produced by the bac-
`teria of the mouth, which acidification causes attack on
`the dental enamel. Such hydrogenated hydrolysate used
`in confectionery, and,
`in particular,
`in hard candies
`must not contain polyols with a DP higher than 20, or
`at the most, an amount less than 3% to preserve the
`non-cariogenic character.
`The low molecular weight saccharides constitute
`products which are more easily assimilable, from the
`nutritional point of view, but they possess a high sweet-
`ening power, a strong osmolality and can account for
`certain intestinal disorders. Their presence in too large
`an amount is consequently not wanted, in some prod-
`ucts intended for patient foodstuff, where a light sweet
`taste, a weaker osmolality and a good physiological
`tolerance of products is sought. In some applications,
`such as the manufacture of foundry moulds or cores, the
`presence of mono- and di-saccharides in too large an
`amount reduces the physiological qualities aimed at
`(compressive strength). Thus, a hydrogenated glucose
`syrup used in foundry, as a breakdown agent, must
`contain a quantity of sorbitol (DP 1), sufficient to ensure
`the control of the water content of the medium in which
`the syrup is used, without this amount reaching the
`values liable to cause a reduction in the physical proper-
`ties; for example, too much sorbitol and/or also too
`much maltitol (DP 2) would cause too sudden a change
`in the mixture silicate-syrup on casting (breakage of the
`mould or core).
`In confectionery, in the preparation of hard candies,
`the starch hydrolysates with a high content of products
`of DP 1 and DP 2 are difficult to handle. The hard
`candies are not stable on storage, because of too high a
`hygroscopy.
`
`

`
`4,445,938
`
`3
`Taking the foregoing into account, the uses accord-
`ing to the invention, of the above-said hydrolysates are
`situated in various fields according to the glucid spec-
`trum.
`
`These uses comprise:
`preparation of binders for foundry moulds and cores;
`human feeding notably manufacture of jams, choco-
`lates, sausages,
`ice-creams, chewing-gums and hard
`candies, the food concerned being not cariogenic when
`these hydrolysates are hydrogenated and when their
`content of product of DP higher than 20 is less than 3%;
`infant dietetics and feeding of patients;
`preparation of polyurethanes and
`constitution of blood plasma substitutes.
`The process according to the invention for preparing
`hydrolysates, according to the invention, whose con-
`tent of products of DP 4 to DP 10 is from 42% to about
`55% and whose content of products of DP 1 is less than
`about 5% comprises the action on a previously gelati-
`nized or liquefied starch, preferably by enzymatic ac-
`tion (DE less than 20) of at-amylase, this enzyme being
`applied in the proportion of 3000 to 20000 I.U./kg d.m.
`for 8 to 48 hours.
`The process according to the invention for preparing
`hydrolysates, according to the invention, with a content
`of products of DP 4 to DP 10 ranging from 42% to
`about 50% and with a relatively high content of about
`5 to 14% of products of DP 1, in which process a-amy-
`lase and 1,4-amyloglucosidase are made to act simulta-
`neously, is characterized by the fact that said a-amylase
`and 1,4-amyloglucosidase are applied to a starch previ-
`ously liquefied by the acid or enzymatic route to a D.E.
`of 25 at the most,
`in the proportion of 500 to 4000
`I.U./kg d.m. as regards the first and in the proportion of
`30 to 500 I.U./kg d.m. as regards the second, the action
`being continued for 10 to 48 hours until the production
`of a D.E. of 30 to 40.
`The process according to the invention for preparing
`hydrolysates with a content of oligosaccharides of DP 4
`to 10 higher than about 55% and with a content less
`than 1.5% of products of DP higher than 20 and/or
`with a content as low as desired, of products of DP less
`than 4, is characterized by the fact that a hydrolysate of
`D.E. ‘close to 30 obtained by acid or enzymatic liquefac-
`tion of a starch is fractionated by molecular sieving, for
`instance by elution on a cationic resin, the first fractions
`which contain the products of high DP and/or the last
`fractions containing the products of DP less than 4,
`being eliminated.
`To obtain the corresponding hydrogenated products,
`the hydrolysates obtained at the end of the above-
`defined process are subjected to conventional hydroge-
`nation, notably by the Raney nickel method.
`It is possible to transform these hydrolysates into
`powder form by resorting to conventional methods
`such as spraying.
`It is possible to use as a raw material for the manufac-
`ture of the above-said hydrolysates, modified or unmod-
`ified starches from any source such as root starches,
`corn starches, waxy-maize, starches from wheat, from
`manioc and the like.
`The foregoing considerations are illustrated by the
`examples which relate to preferred embodiments.
`EXAMPLE I
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`A suspension of starch with 35% of dry matter and
`with pH 6 is liquefied conventionally by means of a
`thermoresistant a-amylase of the type Bacillus Licheni-
`
`4
`formis, by passage at 106° C. for 3 minutes, then is main-
`tained at 95° C. until a D.E. of 16 is obtained. The en-
`zyme is then inhibited by a quick passage at a tempera-
`ture of 160° C. It is cooled to 60° C. and 100 liters of this
`hydrolysate is incubated for 30 hours with 8000 I.U. of
`a.-amylase of the Bacillus Subtilis type. The D.E. which
`is obtained is then 28.0.
`The glucidic distribution of the thus obtained hydrol-
`ysate is summarized_in Table I.
`TABLE I
`
`
`
`% by weight
`Products of
`2.0
`DP 1
`8.0
`DP 2
`12.0
`DP 3
`6.8
`DP 4
`11.6
`DP 5
`20.2
`DP 6
`5.2
`DP 7
`1.8
`DP 8
`2.1
`DP 9
`2.3
`DP 10
`9.0
`between DP 10 and DP 20
`
`DP higher than 20 19.0
`
`The hydrolysate is purified by successive passages
`over activated charcoal, anionic and cationic resin.
`After a concentration of 62,5% (weight/volume), the
`solution is stabilized by addition of 0,l% of sorbic acid.
`The osmolality of this product is 450 millios mole/kg.
`Different samples of the solution were done and
`placed respectively at 4° C. and 50° C. for a period of
`four weeks.
`’
`
`No turbidity is observed on any of the samples. This
`hydrolysate was administered orally to several patients.
`Their impression was judged as being very in favour of
`the product, both as regards its taste and tolerance,
`secondary effects such as nausea and diarrhoea being
`absent. Other tests were carried out, by perfusion of the
`hydrosylate into the jejunum.
`It was proved that the hydrolysate releases glucose in
`the blood at speed as high as the glucose itself.
`At the same time, these experiments have proven that
`the luminal concentration of glucose released by the
`hydrolysate remained low, thus limiting the risk of diar-
`rhoea.
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`A suspension of starch is liquefied by means of hydro-
`chloric acid conventionally to a D.E. of 19.0. After
`adjustment of the dry matter content to 35% and of the
`pH to 5.2, to 1001 of the syrup is added at the same time
`1900 I.U. of on-amylase and 75 I.U. of amylo 1-4 glucosi-
`dase per kg of dry starch. It is incubated at 60° C. The
`enzymatic reaction is stopped by bringing the substrate
`rapidly to a high temperature as soon as the D.E.
`reaches 34, that is to say after 20 hours.
`The glucid distribution of this syrup is summarized in
`Table II.
`
`TABLE II
`
`Products of
`DP 1
`DP 2
`DP 3
`DP 4
`DP 5
`DP 6
`DP 7
`DP 8
`DP 9
`
`% by weight
`12.2
`9.8
`15.4
`9.0
`11.0
`11.7
`7.0
`3.4
`3.0
`
`

`
`5
`
`4,445,938
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`
`
`TABLE II-continued
`% by weight
`Products of
`2.0
`DP 10
`between DP 10 and DP 20
`5.3
`
`DP higher than 20
`10.2
`
`This glucid distribution is shown in FIG. 1.
`The preponderance according to the invention of
`products of DP 4 to DP 10 is clearly apparent therein.
`After filtration and purification, the syrup is hydroge-
`nated.
`,
`
`The preparation of three mixtures called products A,
`B and C and constituted in the following manner was
`then undertaken:
`.
`
`a pre-mixture containing 1000 grams of‘ a syrup of
`hydrogenated glucose (identified below and different
`for each of the products A, B and C) brought previously
`to 71% of dry matter, 67 grams of anhydrous borax and
`90 grams of water, was made up. This pre-mix was then
`added in the proportion of 20% by weight to a sodium
`silicate used currently in the foundry industry, of SiO2
`modulus equal to 2.4 and having a dry matter content
`Na20 of about 55%.
`A
`As regards product A,
`the hydrogenated glucose
`syrup is constituted by the above-said product of the
`invention and has a D.E. before hydrogenation of 34.
`As regards product B, the glucose syrup is consti-
`tuted by a hydrogenated glucose syrup of the prior art
`having a D.E. before hydrogenation of 33 and contain-
`ing 25% of maltitol.
`As regards product C, the glucose syrup is ‘consti-
`tuted from a hydrogenated glucose syrup of the prior
`art having a basic D.E.‘of 55 and containing 50% of
`maltitol.
`
`The hydrogenated hydrolysates which enter into the
`composition of the three products A, B and C which
`will be used in the foundry tests have the glucid distri-
`butions which are reported in Table III.
`TABLE III
`Product
`Product
`Product
`. C
`B
`A
`Products of
`7.5
`5.2
`12.2
`DP 1
`52.0
`24.0
`9.8
`DP 2
`17.5
`17.1
`15.4
`DP 3
`15.5
`30.0
`47.1
`DP 4 to DP 10
`7.4
`11.5
`29.7
`DP 5 to DP 7
`6.5
`4.5
`5.3
`between DP 10 and DP 20
`
`DP higher than 20 1.0 10.2 19.2
`
`
`
`
`
`The preparations A, B and C obtained are kept on a
`water-bath at 40° C. for 24 hours; this constitutes an
`accelerated ageing test.
`.
`The viscosity was then measured and it was verified
`whether syneresis existed. The results were:
`
`Product A
`Product B
`Product c
`
`Viscosity
`Syneresis
`
`1780
`no
`
`2300 '
`yes ~
`
`1200 cp
`no
`
`the hydrolysate of the invention,
`It appears that
`whilst having a low basic D.E., does not give rise to
`prejudicial syneresis, whilst having a lower viscosity
`more suitable for use in the field of preparing foundry
`moulds and cores.
`The products A, B and C were then used for the
`fabrication of specimens i.e. test-pieces using a sand for
`foundry works. The sand and the various products were
`
`6
`in the
`mixed on a planetary Hobart type apparatus,
`proportion of 3.5% of product with respect to the sand.
`On a GF raming apparatus (type SPRA of the
`STOKVIS Company) samples of 163 g, of 50.8 mm
`height and a 50 mm diameter, were formed.
`Six sets of three specimens were prepared respec-
`tively from products A, B and C. A controlled flow of
`carbon dioxide gas was passed through the mass of
`these specimens (25° C.—-5.5 1/mn at a pressure of 350
`g/cm2). The blowing times tested were 5, 10, 20, 30, 60
`and 120 seconds.
`
`"
`
`When the blowing was finished, a shearing force was
`applied on an INSTRON apparatus (an apparatus mar-
`keted by INSTRON limited Co., of England) machine
`1122.
`The results of the measurements are assembled in
`Table IV.
`
`‘
`
`TABLE IV
`Shearing force
`1
`Specimens based
`in g-cmz after various blowing times
`
` on 55 10s 20s 30s 60s 120s
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`8800
`7500
`6400
`5800
`3900
`2400
`Product A
`Product B
`1500
`3750
`5200
`6100
`7600
`8500
`Product C
`1300
`2750 4500
`5500
`7000
`7600
`
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`On examining these results, it is observed that due to
`the use of the hydrolysate according to'the invention
`(Product A) the physical characteristics of the corre-
`sponding test-piece are higher than the physical charac-
`teristics of the test-pieces comprising the hydrolysates
`of the prior art (Products B and C).
`Another series of test specimens was subjected to.a
`carbon dioxide blow for 5 seconds under the previously
`defined conditions. They were then stored (temperature
`of 20: 1° C. and relative humidity of 65%) for varying
`times and subjected to shearing forces on the GF appa-
`ratus.
`The results of the measurements are collected in
`Table V.
`
`TABLE V
`Shearing force
`in g—cm2 after various storage times
`Test specimens
`Zht
`6h
`24h
`lh
`basedon
`6800
`8800
`15000 .
`6100
`Product A
`6600
`8300
`15600
`6100
`Product B
`
`
`
`2600 S050 7000Product C 12800
`
`
`,
`
`These measurements confirmed the preceding series.
`Without syneresis, the product A preserves a perfor-
`mance level equalto that of the product B.
`EXAMPLE III
`
`A suspension of potato starch with 35% of dry matter
`is liquefied conventionally by a-amylase to a DE of
`27.0.
`
`This hydrolysate is passed over a column containing
`400 cubic centimeters of LEVATIT Ca 9220 brand
`resin (cationic type resin) placed in the calcium form
`and this in the proportion of 150 cm3/hour and at 80° C.
`The first eluted fractionscontain the polysaccharides
`of very high molecular weight. They are separated
`from the syrup and represent about 30% by weight of
`the starting syrup. The hydrolysate no longer contain-
`ing higher polysaccharides has the composition indi-
`cated in Table VI.
`
`

`
`4,445,938
`
`8
`1. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate characterized by
`a glucid spectrum corresponding to:
`a content of monosaccharides (DP: 1) less than 14%,
`a content of disaccharides (DP=2) less than 35%,
`a content of oligosaccharides of DP 4 to DP 10 rang-
`ing from 42% to 70%,
`a content of polysaccharides of DP higher than 10
`less than 32%, and
`a content less than 3% of polyols of DP higher than
`20.
`2. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the content in products of DP 4 to DP
`10 ranges from 42% to about 55% and the content in
`products ‘of DP1 is less than about 5%.
`3. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the content in products of DP 4 to DP
`10 ranges from 42 to about 50% and the content in
`products of DP 1 is about 5% to 14%.
`4. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the content in products of DP 4 to DP
`10 ranges from 55% to 70%.
`5. Pulverulent hydrogenated starch hydrolysate pro-
`duced by spraying a hydrolysate according to claim 1.
`6. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the content of disaccharides is less than
`20%.
`7. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the oligosaccharides of DP 5 to DP 7
`represent by themselves a proportion higher than 25%.
`8. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the oligosaccharides of DP 5 to DP 7
`represent by themselves a proportion higher than 30%.
`9. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the content of polysaccharides of DP
`higher than 10 is less than 25%.
`10. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the content of polyols of DP higher
`than 20 is less than 1.5%.
`11. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein:
`the content of monosaccharides (DP: 1) is less than
`14%,
`the content of disaccharides (DP=2) is less than
`20%,
`the content of oligosaccharides of DP 4 to DP 10
`ranges from 42% to 60%, the oligosaccharides of
`DP 5 to DP 7 representing by themselves a propor-
`tion higher than 30%,
`the content of polysaccharides of DP higher than 10
`is less than 25%, and
`the content of polyols of DP higher than 2 is less than
`1.5%.
`12. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 1, wherein the content of oligosaccharides of DP
`4 to DP 10 ranges from 42% to 60%.
`13. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 12, wherein the oligosaccharides of DP 5 to DP 7
`represent by themselves a proportion higher than 25%.
`14. Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate according to
`claim 12, wherein the oligosaccharides of DP 5 to DP 7
`represent by themselves a proportion higher than 30%.
`*
`II
`it
`*
`1!
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
` 7
`
`% by weight
`Products of
`5.0
`DP 1
`12.0
`DP 2
`14.0
`DP 3
`10.0
`DP 4
`14.7
`DP 5
`23.0
`DP 6
`7.5
`DP 7
`3.5
`DP 8
`2.6
`DP 9
`2.7
`DP 10
`
`DP higher than 10 nil
`
`TABLE VI
`
`This glucidic distribution is represented by the graph
`of FIG. 2. The preponderance according to the inven-
`tion of the product of DP 4 to DP 10 is clearly apparent.
`After concentration to 50% of dry matter, this hy-
`drolysate is hydrogenated. The syrup obtained can be
`perfectly suitable for the manufacture of sweets. In
`order to do this, 1% of citric acid and 0.25% (on dry
`matter) of saccharin are added to the syrup and the
`mixture is preheated to 95% before it is passed in a
`continuous vacuum cooker of the Hamac Hansella type.
`The product is allowed to cool on a refrigerated surface
`at 80° C.
`
`The plastic mass thus obtained is placed in a rolling
`mill shaped into a ribbon, moulded and cut up. The
`sweets thus obtained are wrapped immediately after
`cooling They are hard brittle and have an excellent
`taste. In addition, they have the advantage of being
`non-cariogenic due to the absence of polyols of DP
`higher than 20 and the syrup.
`The above said hydrogenated syrup has been used for
`the manufacture of chewing-gum as a constituant of a
`liquid phase.
`In order to do so, 20 parts by weight of basic gum
`(such as the marketed under the name “Firm Paloja” by
`L. A. Dreyfus Company) softened to 75° C., are
`kneaded with 15 parts by weight of hydrogenated syrup
`to 75% of dry matter, the sweetening power of which
`was increased by addition of 0.15% on dry matter of
`saccharin. The solid phase constituted by 52% of pow-
`der of sorbitol and 8% of powder maltitol is progres-
`-sively added and the kneading is carried on for 30 min-
`utes. The chewing-gum thus obtained is non-cariogenic,
`did not have recrystallization at the surface, they are
`not sensitive to variations in hygrometry and in temper-
`ature of the atmosphere in which they were stored and
`have an excellent taste.
`As result of which and whatever the embodiments
`adopted, there is thus provided by the invention a starch
`hydrolysate whose characteristics emerge clearly from
`the foregoing.
`As is self evident and as emerges from the foregoing,
`the invention is in no way limited to those of its types of
`application and embodiments which have been more
`particularly described; it encompasses, on the contrary,
`all modifications.
`We claim:

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket