`
`EXHIBIT 2005
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BIOGRAPHY OF TODD KENNEDY
`
`Todd Kennedy has successfully litigated some of the world’s largest patent cases,
`for both plaintiffs and defendants. He helped achieve complete defense jury
`verdicts for Google in the company’s first two patent trials—both of which were in
`the Eastern District of Texas, the favored venue for plaintiffs.
`
`On the plaintiffs’ side, Mr. Kennedy successfully represented Sony Electronics in
`enforcing ten digital television patents in a series of lawsuits spanning five
`jurisdictions.
`
`Todd clerked for one year on the U.S. Court of Appeals, and two years on the U.S.
`District Court.
`
`Representative Clients and Jurisdictions:
`
`
`
`• Google (E.D. Tex. and International Trade Commission)
`
`• IBM (W.D. Wash.)
`
`• HTC (International Trade Commission)
`
`• Bally Gaming (D. Nev. and Federal Circuit)
`
`• Sony (C.D. Cal., S.D. Cal., D.Wisc., D.N.J., and International Trade
`
`Commission)
`
`Representative Cases:
`
`• Bright Response v. Google Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex.) – Achieved complete jury
`
`verdicts of invalidity and non-infringement for defendant Google.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex.) – Achieved
`
`complete jury verdicts of invalidity and non-infringement for defendant
`
`Google against a plaintiff represented by Susman Godfrey, one of the top
`
`trial law firms in the United States.
`
`• In the Matter of Certain Personal Data and Mobile Communications
`
`Devices and Related Software (U.S. International Trade Commission) –
`
`Represented HTC in defending against Apple’s claims of infringement of
`
`ten patents.
`
`• In the Matter of Certain Display Devices (U.S. International Trade
`
`Commission) – Successfully represented Sony Electronics in asserting
`
`claims of infringement of ten patents against Chimei Innolux Corporation.
`
`• IGT v. Alliance Gaming Corp. (D. Nev.) – Achieved judgments of
`
`invalidity and non-infringement for defendant Alliance Gaming. These
`
`judgments were affirmed by the Federal Circuit on appeal.
`
`• Sony Corp. v. Vizio (C.D. Cal.) / Vizio, Inc. v. Sony Corp. et al. (C.D. Cal.
`
`2009) – Successfully represented Sony in these cases, which involved 14
`
`patents covering a broad range of digital television technology.
`
`• Sony Corp. v. Westinghouse Digital Electronics, LLC (C.D. Cal.) –
`
`Successfully represented Sony in this 10-patent infringement lawsuit against
`
`Westinghouse.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Prior Associations:
`
`• Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP (2006-2011)
`
`• United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Judicial clerk for the
`
`Hon. Duane Benton (2005-2006)
`
`• United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Judicial
`
`clerk for the Hon. Nanette Laughrey (2003-2005)
`
`Technical Experience:
`
`Mr. Kennedy has extensive experience with a wide range of technology. Cases he
`has litigated in the last five years involved the following technology:
`
`• Artificial intelligence
`
`• Internet advertising
`
`• Mobile telephones
`
`• Digital television
`
`• Casino gaming machines
`
`• Location-based advertising
`
`• Touchscreens
`
`• Digital video and audio distribution
`
`• Object-oriented programming
`
`• Encryption and software verification
`
`• Duplication of digital data
`
`Mr. Kennedy has regularly programmed in various languages for twenty years, and
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`has developed a number of web-based applications, including an application
`selected by eBay for demonstration at an industry trade show.
`
`Education:
`
`Yale Law School, J.D. (2003)
`University of Missouri, B.A., Philosophy, summa cum laude (2000)
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`