`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 136 (IPR2014-00041)
`Paper 115 (IPR2014-00043)
`Paper 114 (IPR2014-00051)
`Paper 135 (IPR2014-00054)
`Paper 107 (IPR2014-00055)
`Entered: December 23, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GEA PROCESS ENGINEERING, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`STEUBEN FOODS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases1
`IPR2014-00041 (Patent 6,945,013 B2)
`IPR2014-00043 (Patent 6,475,435 B1)
`IPR2014-00051 (Patent 6,209,591 B1)
`IPR2014-00054 (Patent 6,481,468 B1)
`IPR2014-00055 (Patent 6,536,188 B1)
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, RAMA G. ELLURU, and
`BEVERLY M. BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ELLURU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.14
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues raised in all five cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties, however,
`are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00041 (Patent 6,945,013 B2)
`IPR2014-00043 (Patent 6,475,435 B1)
`IPR2014-00051 (Patent 6,209,591 B1)
`IPR2014-00054 (Patent 6,481,468 B1)
`IPR2014-00055 (Patent 6,536,188 B1)
`
`
`
`Concurrent with this Order, we issued a decision terminating the inter
`
`partes reviews in IPR2014-00041 (Paper 135); IPR2014-0043 (Paper 114);
`
`IPR2014-00051 (Paper 113); IPR2014-00054 (Paper 134); and IPR2014-
`
`00055 (Paper 106). The decision was filed “For Board and Parties Only”
`
`because it cites to papers and exhibits that have previously been sealed. The
`
`parties are ordered to jointly file a proposed redacted version of the decision
`
`by January 16, 2016.
`
`We refer the parties to the guidance previously provided in an order
`
`sealing various papers. See IPR2014-00041, Paper 134. There is a strong
`
`public policy for making all information filed in a quasi-judicial
`
`administrative proceeding open to the public. See Garmin International. v.
`
`Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, Case IPR2012-00001, slip op. at 1-2
`
`(PTAB March 14, 2013) (Paper 34); 37 C.F.R. § 42.14. Furthermore, in
`
`light of the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable
`
`file history, there is an expectation that confidential information relied upon
`
`in a subsequent decision will be made public. See Office Trial Practice
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760–61 (Aug. 14, 2012). The parties’
`
`proposed redactions to the termination decision identified above shall be
`
`informed by this guidance. We will not be bound by the parties’ proposed
`
`redactions. The parties may request a conference call with the panel if
`
`further guidance is necessary.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00041 (Patent 6,945,013 B2)
`IPR2014-00043 (Patent 6,475,435 B1)
`IPR2014-00051 (Patent 6,209,591 B1)
`IPR2014-00054 (Patent 6,481,468 B1)
`IPR2014-00055 (Patent 6,536,188 B1)
`
`
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is:
`
`ORDERED that parties are ordered to jointly file a proposed redacted
`
`version of the decision terminating the inter partes reviews in IPR2014-
`
`00041 (Paper 135); IPR2014-0043 (Paper 114); IPR2014-00051 (Paper
`
`113); IPR2014-00054 (Paper 134); and IPR2014-00055 (Paper 106) by
`
`January 16, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00041 (Patent 6,945,013 B2)
`IPR2014-00043 (Patent 6,475,435 B1)
`IPR2014-00051 (Patent 6,209,591 B1)
`IPR2014-00054 (Patent 6,481,468 B1)
`IPR2014-00055 (Patent 6,536,188 B1)
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`William P. Atkins
`Benjamin Kiersz
`PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
`william.atkins@pillsburylaw.com
`benjamin.kiersz@pillsburylaw.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Greg H. Gardella
`Kevin B. Laurence
`Michael Kiklis
`Ruby Natnithithadha
`OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P.
`CPDocketGardella@oblon.com
`CPDocketLaurence@oblon.com
`CPdocketKiklis@oblon.com
`cpdocketrjn@oblon.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
