From: webmaster@nywd.uscourts.gov [mailto:webmaster@nywd.uscourts.gov]
`Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:14 PM
`To: Courtmail@nywd.uscourts.gov
`Subject: Activity in Case 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-JJM Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Oystar USA, Inc. Terminate
`Hearings
`
`
`This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT
`RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
`***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States
`policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to
`receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required
`by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later
`charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the
`referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
`
`Notice of Electronic Filing
`
`The following transaction was entered on 6/10/2014 at 1:13 PM EDT and filed on 6/10/2014
`Case Name:
`Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Oystar USA, Inc.
`Case Number:
`1:10-cv-00780-WMS-JJM
`Filer:
`Document Number: 115(No document attached)
`
`Docket Text:
`TEXT ORDER : All further proceedings in these actions (10-cv-00780; 10-cv-00781;
`12-cv-00211; 12-cv-00904; 13-cv-00892; and 13-cv-01118) will be stayed pending
`the earlier of the conclusion of IPR proceedings or March 10, 2015. In return for
`the stay, defendants GEA Process Engineering and GEA Procomac will be bound
`by the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2), and all other defendants will be
`estopped from asserting any invalidity contention that was actually raised and
`finally adjudicated in the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00041, -00043, -00051, - 00054 and -00055, without
`prejudice to Steuben's right to argue, upon conclusion of the stay, that the
`broader statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2) should apply to one or more of
`these defendants. A written decision regarding the stay will be issued in due
`course, and the parties' deadline for objecting will run from the issuance of that
`decision. The June 25, 2014 status conference and subsequent monthly status
`conferences scheduled in my April 16, 2014 Text Order are cancelled, and will be
`rescheduled, if necessary, at the conclusion of the stay. SO ORDERED. Issued by
`Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/10/14. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-
`JJM et al.(DAZ)
`
`Page 1
`
`GEA Process Engineering, Inc. Exhibit 1060
`GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.
` IPR2014-00041, -43, -51, -54, -55
`
`
`Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:14 PM
`To: Courtmail@nywd.uscourts.gov
`Subject: Activity in Case 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-JJM Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Oystar USA, Inc. Terminate
`Hearings
`
`
`This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT
`RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
`***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States
`policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to
`receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required
`by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later
`charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the
`referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
`
`Notice of Electronic Filing
`
`The following transaction was entered on 6/10/2014 at 1:13 PM EDT and filed on 6/10/2014
`Case Name:
`Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Oystar USA, Inc.
`Case Number:
`1:10-cv-00780-WMS-JJM
`Filer:
`Document Number: 115(No document attached)
`
`Docket Text:
`TEXT ORDER : All further proceedings in these actions (10-cv-00780; 10-cv-00781;
`12-cv-00211; 12-cv-00904; 13-cv-00892; and 13-cv-01118) will be stayed pending
`the earlier of the conclusion of IPR proceedings or March 10, 2015. In return for
`the stay, defendants GEA Process Engineering and GEA Procomac will be bound
`by the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2), and all other defendants will be
`estopped from asserting any invalidity contention that was actually raised and
`finally adjudicated in the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00041, -00043, -00051, - 00054 and -00055, without
`prejudice to Steuben's right to argue, upon conclusion of the stay, that the
`broader statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2) should apply to one or more of
`these defendants. A written decision regarding the stay will be issued in due
`course, and the parties' deadline for objecting will run from the issuance of that
`decision. The June 25, 2014 status conference and subsequent monthly status
`conferences scheduled in my April 16, 2014 Text Order are cancelled, and will be
`rescheduled, if necessary, at the conclusion of the stay. SO ORDERED. Issued by
`Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/10/14. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-
`JJM et al.(DAZ)
`
`Page 1
`
`GEA Process Engineering, Inc. Exhibit 1060
`GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.
` IPR2014-00041, -43, -51, -54, -55
`
`
`
`Case Name:
`Case Number:
`Filer:
`Document Number: 43(No document attached)
`
`Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Nestle, U.S.A.
`1:13-cv-00892-WMS-JJM
`
`Docket Text:
`TEXT ORDER : All further proceedings in these actions (10-cv-00780; 10-cv-00781;
`12-cv-00211; 12-cv-00904; 13-cv-00892; and 13-cv-01118) will be stayed pending
`the earlier of the conclusion of IPR proceedings or March 10, 2015. In return for
`the stay, defendants GEA Process Engineering and GEA Procomac will be bound
`by the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2), and all other defendants will be
`estopped from asserting any invalidity contention that was actually raised and
`finally adjudicated in the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00041, -00043, -00051, - 00054 and -00055, without
`prejudice to Steuben's right to argue, upon conclusion of the stay, that the
`broader statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2) should apply to one or more of
`these defendants. A written decision regarding the stay will be issued in due
`course, and the parties' deadline for objecting will run from the issuance of that
`decision. The June 25, 2014 status conference and subsequent monthly status
`conferences scheduled in my April 16, 2014 Text Order are cancelled, and will be
`rescheduled, if necessary, at the conclusion of the stay. SO ORDERED. Issued by
`Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/10/14. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-
`JJM et al.(DAZ)
`
`Case Name:
`Case Number:
`Filer:
`Document Number: 139(No document attached)
`
`Steuben Foods, Inc. v. GEA Process Engineering,Inc. et al
`1:12-cv-00904-WMS-JJM
`
`Docket Text:
`TEXT ORDER : All further proceedings in these actions (10-cv-00780; 10-cv-00781;
`12-cv-00211; 12-cv-00904; 13-cv-00892; and 13-cv-01118) will be stayed pending
`the earlier of the conclusion of IPR proceedings or March 10, 2015. In return for
`the stay, defendants GEA Process Engineering and GEA Procomac will be bound
`by the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2), and all other defendants will be
`estopped from asserting any invalidity contention that was actually raised and
`finally adjudicated in the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00041, -00043, -00051, - 00054 and -00055, without
`prejudice to Steuben's right to argue, upon conclusion of the stay, that the
`broader statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2) should apply to one or more of
`these defendants. A written decision regarding the stay will be issued in due
`course, and the parties' deadline for objecting will run from the issuance of that
`decision. The June 25, 2014 status conference and subsequent monthly status
`conferences scheduled in my April 16, 2014 Text Order are cancelled, and will be
`rescheduled, if necessary, at the conclusion of the stay. SO ORDERED. Issued by
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/10/14. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-
`JJM et al.(DAZ)
`
`Case Name:
`Case Number:
`Filer:
`Document Number: 35(No document attached)
`
`Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Jasper Products, LLC
`1:13-cv-01118-WMS-JJM
`
`Docket Text:
`TEXT ORDER : All further proceedings in these actions (10-cv-00780; 10-cv-00781;
`12-cv-00211; 12-cv-00904; 13-cv-00892; and 13-cv-01118) will be stayed pending
`the earlier of the conclusion of IPR proceedings or March 10, 2015. In return for
`the stay, defendants GEA Process Engineering and GEA Procomac will be bound
`by the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2), and all other defendants will be
`estopped from asserting any invalidity contention that was actually raised and
`finally adjudicated in the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00041, -00043, -00051, - 00054 and -00055, without
`prejudice to Steuben's right to argue, upon conclusion of the stay, that the
`broader statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2) should apply to one or more of
`these defendants. A written decision regarding the stay will be issued in due
`course, and the parties' deadline for objecting will run from the issuance of that
`decision. The June 25, 2014 status conference and subsequent monthly status
`conferences scheduled in my April 16, 2014 Text Order are cancelled, and will be
`rescheduled, if necessary, at the conclusion of the stay. SO ORDERED. Issued by
`Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/10/14. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-
`JJM et al.(DAZ)
`
`Case Name:
`Case Number:
`Filer:
`Document Number: 120(No document attached)
`
`Steuben Foods, Inc. v. HP Hood LLC
`1:12-cv-00211-WMS-JJM
`
`Docket Text:
`TEXT ORDER : All further proceedings in these actions (10-cv-00780; 10-cv-00781;
`12-cv-00211; 12-cv-00904; 13-cv-00892; and 13-cv-01118) will be stayed pending
`the earlier of the conclusion of IPR proceedings or March 10, 2015. In return for
`the stay, defendants GEA Process Engineering and GEA Procomac will be bound
`by the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2), and all other defendants will be
`estopped from asserting any invalidity contention that was actually raised and
`finally adjudicated in the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00041, -00043, -00051, - 00054 and -00055, without
`prejudice to Steuben's right to argue, upon conclusion of the stay, that the
`broader statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2) should apply to one or more of
`these defendants. A written decision regarding the stay will be issued in due
`course, and the parties' deadline for objecting will run from the issuance of that
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`decision. The June 25, 2014 status conference and subsequent monthly status
`conferences scheduled in my April 16, 2014 Text Order are cancelled, and will be
`rescheduled, if necessary, at the conclusion of the stay. SO ORDERED. Issued by
`Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/10/14. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-
`JJM et al.(DAZ)
`
`Case Name:
`Case Number:
`Filer:
`Document Number: 156(No document attached)
`
`Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppmann Corporation
`1:10-cv-00781-WMS-JJM
`
`Docket Text:
`TEXT ORDER : All further proceedings in these actions (10-cv-00780; 10-cv-00781;
`12-cv-00211; 12-cv-00904; 13-cv-00892; and 13-cv-01118) will be stayed pending
`the earlier of the conclusion of IPR proceedings or March 10, 2015. In return for
`the stay, defendants GEA Process Engineering and GEA Procomac will be bound
`by the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2), and all other defendants will be
`estopped from asserting any invalidity contention that was actually raised and
`finally adjudicated in the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board in Case Nos. IPR2014-00041, -00043, -00051, - 00054 and -00055, without
`prejudice to Steuben's right to argue, upon conclusion of the stay, that the
`broader statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(2) should apply to one or more of
`these defendants. A written decision regarding the stay will be issued in due
`course, and the parties' deadline for objecting will run from the issuance of that
`decision. The June 25, 2014 status conference and subsequent monthly status
`conferences scheduled in my April 16, 2014 Text Order are cancelled, and will be
`rescheduled, if necessary, at the conclusion of the stay. SO ORDERED. Issued by
`Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/10/14. Associated Cases: 1:10-cv-00780-WMS-
`JJM et al.(DAZ)
`
`
`1:10-cv-00780-WMS-JJM Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Thomas B. Cronmiller tcronmiller@hiscockbarclay.com, npenn@hiscockbarclay.com
`
`Joseph L. Stanganelli jstanganelli@hblaw.com, docketing@hblaw.com,
`mpeterman@hblaw.com, nduong@hblaw.com
`
`Christopher E. Blank cblank@hiscockbarclay.com, dmartelle@hblaw.com
`
`Mark R. Schlegel mschlegel@mackenziehughes.com
`
`Gregory F. Ahrens (Terminated) gahrens@whepatent.com, tyoung@whepatent.com
`
`Ken M. Peterson kpeterson@morrislaing.com, aludwa@morrislaing.com,
`lwohlford@morrislaing.com, rlowe@morrislaing.com
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`Will B. Wohlford wwohlford@morrislaing.com
`
`Mark Eric Galvez mgalvez@hblaw.com
`
`Lucas C. Wohlford lwohlford@morrislaing.com
`
`Thomas J. Fisher tfisher@oblon.com
`
`1:10-cv-00780-WMS-JJM Notice has been delivered by other means to:
`
`1:13-cv-00892-WMS-JJM Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Christopher J. Belter cbelter@goldbergsegalla.com, dmoar@goldbergsegalla.com,
`jhaefner@goldbergsegalla.com
`
`Joseph L. Stanganelli jstanganelli@hblaw.com, docketing@hblaw.com,
`mpeterman@hblaw.com, nduong@hblaw.com
`
`Daniel Barrie Moar dmoar@goldbergsegalla.com, jhaefner@goldbergsegalla.com,
`jweintraub@goldbergsegalla.com
`
`Mark Eric Galvez mgalvez@hblaw.com
`
`Thomas J. Fisher tfisher@oblon.com, caskey@oblon.com
`
`Virginia L. Carron virginia.carron@finnegan.com
`
`Gerald F. Ivey gerald.ivey@finnegan.com
`
`Thomas H. Jenkins tom.jenkins@finnegan.com
`
`Donald R. Dunner don.dunner@finnegan.com
`
`1:13-cv-00892-WMS-JJM Notice has been delivered by other means to:
`
`1:12-cv-00904-WMS-JJM Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Michael A. Brady mbrady@hagerty-brady.com, hblaw@hagerty-brady.com
`
`Thomas B. Cronmiller tcronmiller@hiscockbarclay.com, npenn@hiscockbarclay.com
`
`Joseph L. Stanganelli jstanganelli@hblaw.com, docketing@hblaw.com,
`mpeterman@hblaw.com, nduong@hblaw.com
`
`Christopher E. Blank cblank@hiscockbarclay.com, dmartelle@hblaw.com
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`
`William P. Atkins william.atkins@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Benjamin L. Kiersz benjamin.kiersz@pillsburylaw.com, martha.gregory@pillsburylaw.com
`
`Mark Eric Galvez mgalvez@hblaw.com
`
`Thomas J. Fisher tfisher@oblon.com
`
`1:12-cv-00904-WMS-JJM Notice has been delivered by other means to:
`
`1:13-cv-01118-WMS-JJM Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Michael A. Brady mbrady@hagerty-brady.com, hblaw@hagerty-brady.com
`
`Thomas B. Cronmiller tcronmiller@hiscockbarclay.com, npenn@hiscockbarclay.com
`
`Joseph L. Stanganelli jstanganelli@hblaw.com, docketing@hblaw.com,
`mpeterman@hblaw.com, nduong@hblaw.com
`
`Mark Eric Galvez mgalvez@hblaw.com
`
`Thomas J. Fisher tfisher@oblon.com, caskey@oblon.com
`
`Michael B. Hurd mbh@hoveywilliams.com
`
`Matthew B. Walters mbw@hoveywilliams.com
`
`1:13-cv-01118-WMS-JJM Notice has been delivered by other means to:
`
`1:12-cv-00211-WMS-JJM Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Thomas B. Cronmiller tcronmiller@hiscockbarclay.com, npenn@hiscockbarclay.com
`
`William D. Christ wchrist@phillipslytle.com, crowland@phillipslytle.com,
`ecfphillips@phillipslytle.com
`
`Joseph L. Stanganelli jstanganelli@hblaw.com, docketing@hblaw.com,
`mpeterman@hblaw.com, nduong@hblaw.com
`
`Christopher E. Blank cblank@hiscockbarclay.com, dmartelle@hblaw.com
`
`Robert L. Lash rlash@herzfeld-rubin.com
`
`Amanda L. Lowe alowe@phillipslytle.com, lvaughn@phillipslytle.com,
`shoover@phillipslytle.com
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`John Christopher Rozendaal jrozendaal@khhte.com, rkaiser@khhte.com
`
`Christopher C. Funk cfunk@khhte.com, mallaun@khhte.com, tduncan@khhte.com
`
`Melanie L. Bostwick mbostwick@khhte.com, dkasparek@khhte.com, mmacminn@khhte.com
`
`Richard L. Stroup richard.stroup@finnegan.com
`
`Scott T. Peloza speloza@phillipslytle.com, dgessner@phillipslytle.com
`
`John M. Williamson john.williamson@finnegan.com
`
`Michael E. Joffre mjoffre@khhte.com
`
`Mark Eric Galvez mgalvez@hblaw.com
`
`Thomas J. Fisher tfisher@oblon.com, caskey@oblon.com
`
`1:12-cv-00211-WMS-JJM Notice has been delivered by other means to:
`
`1:10-cv-00781-WMS-JJM Notice has been electronically mailed to:
`
`Thomas B. Cronmiller tcronmiller@hiscockbarclay.com, npenn@hiscockbarclay.com
`
`William D. Christ wchrist@phillipslytle.com, crowland@phillipslytle.com,
`ecfphillips@phillipslytle.com
`
`Joseph L. Stanganelli jstanganelli@hblaw.com, docketing@hblaw.com,
`mpeterman@hblaw.com, nduong@hblaw.com
`
`Christopher E. Blank cblank@hiscockbarclay.com, dmartelle@hblaw.com
`
`John Christopher Rozendaal jrozendaal@khhte.com, rkaiser@khhte.com
`
`Christopher C. Funk cfunk@khhte.com, tduncan@khhte.com
`
`Melanie L. Bostwick mbostwick@khhte.com, dkasparek@khhte.com, mmacminn@khhte.com
`
`Scott T. Peloza speloza@phillipslytle.com, dgessner@phillipslytle.com
`
`Michael E. Joffre mjoffre@khhte.com
`
`Mark Eric Galvez mgalvez@hblaw.com
`
`Thomas J. Fisher tfisher@oblon.com, caskey@oblon.com
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`
`1:10-cv-00781-WMS-JJM Notice has been delivered by other means to:
`
`
`
`Page 8
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
