`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
`Patent Owner
`___________
`
`Case IPR2014-00040
`Patent 6,771,290 B1
`___________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and
`LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PETTIGREW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.’S DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Google, Microsoft, 
`Sony, Samsung 
`v.
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`IPR2014‐00029, IPR2014‐00031,
`IPR2014‐00033, IPR2014‐00040, IPR2014‐00044
`Consolidated For Hearing
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 1
`
`

`

`Proposed Grounds of Unpatentability
`
`Anticipation of Claims 1‐3 by :
`International Publication No. WO 
`97/09682 (“Kikinis”) 
`
`* Microsoft is the only party challenging Claim 1
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 2
`
`

`

`Proposed Grounds of Unpatentability
`
`Obviousness of Claims 2‐3 over:
`U.S. Patent No. 5,706,502 (“Foley”)
`
`*Google is the only party alleging obviousness 
`over Foley.
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 6,771,290
`
`US. Patent No. 6,771,290
`
`{12} UIlitEd States Patent
`Heyle
`
`[11!] Patent Ne.:
`i453 llute of Patent:
`
`US 6,771,290 Bl
`Aug. 3, 2004
`
`{54-}
`
`(If. illl’ll'l‘ER lN'l‘l-ILRIHAEH Ml-C'I'HUI} ANll
`mummres WITH PORTABLE sst‘weus
`nurmstmi‘ms sasTsM as]: ThRGl-ZTEI'J
`ADVERTISING
`
`(l'l'lll-LR I’lJRlIL'TJ'Cl'It'lINS
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`_
`HmWH- M - ”We Humps?“ 1‘- z‘r'PssHtl MW“ ”’9“- P-
`4“, 11-3. 53. 53, 55, 55'. {:3 (:4, 94 [119.
`
`{7'5}
`
`Irtvuntrlr:
`
`h-[Hr‘lln “In-dd llrtyle. Mulairte, [.J't
`{U‘il
`
`f’r'irrtrrn' fi-A'm’l'r-"L’FAHH-U [nil-Will] SEWER _
`[Tl-’1} :ltrm'm’}: Agent, or J'ri'm—Reistrig. bllitrigttlri. Barnes.
`Kisselle. PIT.
`
`{7'3} Assignee:
`_
`_
`l R l Entire:
`
`l N“ _
`{71} A:
`_
`tP-
`"
`{22}
`l-‘tTl' t-iled:
`
`3123. 'l'eeltntllngy, LLC. Hay Fire. MI
`_
`_
`_
`_
`_
`5mm“. 1'5 an]: dLselzttrner, 11'” term [31-th5
`1mm!” '5 Extflfldflfl m" ElflI'll-[Ml UT'lCl-L‘rl' 3-5
`U31:- lfi‘i'll’l 113' [l ‘133'5-
`INF-“144 [131
`'
`'
`h
`Jul. [6, 1999
`
`{til-ll
`
`Ill-i" I‘LL:
`§3'I-‘1 {elll},
`{2}, [4]. Date:
`
`PC] w hSl'SlHfilSS
`
`flpr- [1, 20“]
`
`{3?}
`
`PUI‘ PUl‘J- Nfl-i “rfllhllfl'l'fl‘l-
`PETI' Pull. Date: Jan. 2?. leflll
`
`ABSTRACT
`[5?]
`n ntethed and apparatus l'nr providing an automatically
`upgradeable stiltwuru applicatitin includes lalrgelerl arlvertis-
`ing liasetl upurl alernugraphius and user irileraclinrl with Ihe
`eerrtptller.
`'l'he sttftwa re applieatien ineludes a display
`regien used fur banner advertising that is dewnleaded ever
`a Iielwerk sueh as the [nterlteL 'lhe staftware applicatinn is
`aeeessihle Trent a server Via the netwnrlr and clelnegrapltie
`inl'ern1a1ien en the user is aequired by the server and used
`fer determining what atIVertising will he sent re tlte user. The
`snl'tware appliearlnu t‘urttier targets the advertiser-nutter in
`resputtse le henna] user interaelien with the eutrtptlter. Data
`asswiated With eaeh advertisement is used [13' the sel'tware
`appliestinn in determining Iwhen a particular advertisement
`is te be displayed. This includes the speeitleatien ttt'eertain
`[migrants Itial 1hu user may have sn 1hzlt1 when the user runs
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 4
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claims 2‐3
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 5
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 6
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`• The server stores a user profile and user 
`library.
`• The user library contains one or more files.
`• The user profile contains at least one user 
`link.
`• The link in the profile provides a link to one 
`of the files in the user library.
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 7
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Reference
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 8
`
`

`

`How The Elements Are Allegedly 
`Shown by the Kikinis Reference
`
`Element
`
`Institution Decisions
`
`User Profile
`
`Home Page 73
`
`User‐Selectable Item For 
`User Links
`User Library
`
`Links or Buttons That Can 
`Be Selected By The User
`User‐Specific Database for 
`E‐mail, Fax, Voicemail, or 
`Electronic Documents
`
`File
`
`Electronic Document, E‐
`mail, Fax, or Voicemail
`
`Institution Decisions at 15
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 9
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent, cont’d
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 10
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`“the file associated with the 
`selected user link”
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 11
`
`

`

`“The” Not “A” 
`
`The Petitioners rephrase the key language in reply.
`
`Google Reply at 6
`
`Microsoft Reply at 6
`
`Samsung Reply at 7
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 12
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 3:6‐10
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 13
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 7:18‐20
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 14
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 8:1‐10
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 15
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 10:3‐12
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 16
`
`

`

`Kikinis Figure 2
`
`Kikinis Fig. 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 17
`
`

`

`Claim 1 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claim 1
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 18
`
`

`

`Microsoft Did Not Construe “Regions”
`
`“[T]he petition must set forth: (3) [h]ow the 
`challenged claim is to be construed.” 37 C.F.R. §
`42.104(b)(3).
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 19
`
`

`

`The ’290 Patent and “Regions”
`
`Hoyle at 13:41‐58
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 20
`
`

`

`The ’290 Patent at Col. 13:40‐58 
`Provides Meaning To Region
`
`Hoyle at FIG. 5
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 21
`
`

`

`B.E.’s Construction of Region As 
`Applied To The Kikinis Home Page
`
`Patent Owner’s Response at 25
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 22
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Argument About The 
`Regions Of The Kikinis Home Page
`
`Microsoft Reply at 12
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 23
`
`

`

`The Foley Reference
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 24
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 25
`
`

`

`Foley
`
`Foley FIG. 5
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 26
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`It is certified that copies of B.E. Technology, L.L.C.’s Demonstratives have
`
`been served on Petitioner as provided in 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) via electronic mail
`
`transmission addressed to the persons at the address below:
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Scott M. Border
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jkushan@sidley.com
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`Date: December 9, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/Jason S. Angell
`Jason S. Angell
`Reg. No. 51408
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`