throbber
IPR2014-00039
`
`Paper No. 37
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION and GOOGLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2014-00391
`Patent 6,628,314 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER MICROSOFT CORPORATION’S
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`1 Case IPR2014-00738 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00039
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner Microsoft
`
`Corporation respectfully requests the opportunity to present oral argument. As
`
`specified in the Board’s April 9, 2014 Order (Paper No. 14), Oral Argument is
`
`scheduled for December 10, 2014.
`
`Petitioner requests at least 1 hour of argument time for Petitioner to address
`
`the following issues:
`
`1.
`
`Grounds for which inter partes review was instituted as to claims 11-
`
`22 of the ’314 patent in IPR2014-00039, Paper 13 (Institution Decision).
`
`2.
`
`Any issues properly raised by Patent Owner, including Patent
`
`Owner’s Response (Paper 30), Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to Amend
`
`(Paper 31), and Patent Owner’s Reply to the Opposition to the Motion to Amend
`
`(Paper 36).
`
`3.
`
`Any issues addressed by Petitioner, including Microsoft’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review (Paper No. 1), Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner Response
`
`(Paper 33), and Petitioner’s Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend
`
`(Paper 34).
`
`4.
`
`Response to Patent Owner’s arguments regarding the claim
`
`construction standard to be used in these proceedings, and relevance if any to the
`
`patentability issues raised by the original and/or amended claims.
`
`5.
`
`Issues related to all exhibits filed in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00039
`
`
`6.
`
`Rebuttal to issues raised by the Patent Owner.
`
`Petitioner requests permission to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including a projector and screen for PowerPoint or PDF
`
`slides.
`
`Dated: October 31, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Registration No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00039
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 31st day of October, 2014, a copy of this
`
`PETITIONER MICROSOFT CORPORATION’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT has been served in its entirety by e-mail on the following counsel of
`
`record for Patent Owner:
`
`Jason S. Angell
`Robert E. Freitas
`Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP
`jangell@ftklaw.com
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`October 31, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket