throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
`Patent Owner
`___________
`
`Case IPR2014-00033
`Patent 6,771,290 B1
`___________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and
`LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PETTIGREW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.’S DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Google, Microsoft, 
`Sony, Samsung 
`v.
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`IPR2014‐00029, IPR2014‐00031,
`IPR2014‐00033, IPR2014‐00040, IPR2014‐00044
`Consolidated For Hearing
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 1
`
`

`

`Proposed Grounds of Unpatentability
`
`Anticipation of Claims 1‐3 by :
`International Publication No. WO 
`97/09682 (“Kikinis”) 
`
`* Microsoft is the only party challenging Claim 1
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 2
`
`

`

`Proposed Grounds of Unpatentability
`
`Obviousness of Claims 2‐3 over:
`U.S. Patent No. 5,706,502 (“Foley”)
`
`*Google is the only party alleging obviousness 
`over Foley.
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 6,771,290
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,771,290
`
`as United States Patent
`Hoyle
`
`{into Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,771,290 B1
`Aug. 3, ZIHM
`
`CCIHFUTER INTERFACE Ii-[ETHDD AND
`APPARATUS ‘WITH PORTABLE NETWORK
`DRGANIEATIDN SYSI'EI'~'[ AND TARGETED
`AITWE RTISING
`
`OTHER FUBLJCAIIIUNS
`
`Brown, 1"t-'[., Using Netscape” 3, Special Edition 19915:, p.
`40, 43, 51, 53, SE, 59, 61-64, 94-109.
`
`Inventor: Martin David Hoyle. Metaitie. LA
`{U3}
`
`P.I"iI|'ttt:I.I'j.? ExamI.eer—Cao {Kevin} tfguyen _
`{T-1] Atromey, Agertt, or F£rm—Retsing, Etltmgtort. Barnes,
`Kisselle, EC.
`
`Assign-oer
`
`lEI.E. Technology, LLC, Bay City, MI
`{US}
`
`(5?)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term oftlzris
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U512. 154th} h_v I) da1.rs.
`
`App]. NR1:
`
`MN445033
`
`PCT Filed:
`
`PCT No.:
`
`Jul. 16, 1999
`
`PCT.I'lTS99'.I’l-E13»5
`
`§ 3?1 [ex 1],
`{l}, {4} Date:
`
`Ll, 2.1101
`
`PCT Pub. No.: WWM4
`
`PCT Pub. Date: Jan. 11', 21!!!!
`
`A methotzl and apparatus for providing an automatically
`upgradeable software application includes targeted advertisr
`ing based upon demographies and user interaction with the
`oomputor. The software application includes a display
`region used for hanner advertishztg that is downloaded over
`a network such as the Internet. The software application is
`aoeessihle from a server via the networlr and demographic
`information on the user is
`by the server and used
`for determining what advertising willhe sent to the user. The
`software application further targets the advertiseruts in
`response to normal user interaction with the computer. Data
`associated with each advertisement is used by the software
`app]i.eaIion in determining when a particular advertisement
`is to be displayed. This irtcludes the specification of -certain
`programs that the user may have so that. when the user runs
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 4
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claims 2‐3
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 5
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 6
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`• The server stores a user profile and user 
`library.
`• The user library contains one or more files.
`• The user profile contains at least one user 
`link.
`• The link in the profile provides a link to one 
`of the files in the user library.
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 7
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Reference
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 8
`
`

`

`How The Elements Are Allegedly 
`Shown by the Kikinis Reference
`
`Element
`
`Institution Decisions
`
`User Profile
`
`Home Page 73
`
`User‐Selectable Item For 
`User Links
`User Library
`
`Links or Buttons That Can 
`Be Selected By The User
`User‐Specific Database for 
`E‐mail, Fax, Voicemail, or 
`Electronic Documents
`
`File
`
`Electronic Document, E‐
`mail, Fax, or Voicemail
`
`Institution Decisions at 15
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 9
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent, cont’d
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 10
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`“the file associated with the 
`selected user link”
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 11
`
`

`

`“The” Not “A” 
`
`The Petitioners rephrase the key language in reply.
`
`Google Reply at 6
`
`Microsoft Reply at 6
`
`Samsung Reply at 7
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 12
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 3:6‐10
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 13
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 7:18‐20
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 14
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 8:1‐10
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 15
`
`

`

`The Kikinis Link Is Associated With The 
`Database Not The File
`
`Kikinis at 10:3‐12
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 16
`
`

`

`Kikinis Figure 2
`
`Kikinis Fig. 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 17
`
`

`

`Claim 1 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claim 1
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 18
`
`

`

`Microsoft Did Not Construe “Regions”
`
`“[T]he petition must set forth: (3) [h]ow the 
`challenged claim is to be construed.” 37 C.F.R. §
`42.104(b)(3).
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 19
`
`

`

`The ’290 Patent and “Regions”
`
`Hoyle at 13:41‐58
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 20
`
`

`

`The ’290 Patent at Col. 13:40‐58 
`Provides Meaning To Region
`
`Hoyle at FIG. 5
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 21
`
`

`

`B.E.’s Construction of Region As 
`Applied To The Kikinis Home Page
`
`Patent Owner’s Response at 25
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 22
`
`

`

`Microsoft’s Argument About The 
`Regions Of The Kikinis Home Page
`
`Microsoft Reply at 12
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 23
`
`

`

`The Foley Reference
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 24
`
`

`

`Claim 2 of the ’290 Patent
`
`Hoyle Claim 2
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 25
`
`

`

`Foley
`
`Foley FIG. 5
`
`B.E. Technology, L.L.C., Ex. 2005, p. 26
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`It is certified that copies of B.E. Technology, L.L.C.’s Demonstratives have
`
`been served on Petitioner as provided in 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) via electronic mail
`
`transmission addressed to the persons at the address below:
`
`Clinton H. Brannon
`Brian A. Rosenthal
`MAYER BROWN, LLP
`cbrannon@mayerbrown.com
`brosenthal@mayerbrown.com
`WDC-Client-IPR-Filings@mayerbrown.com
`
`Date: December 9, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/Jason S. Angell
`Jason S. Angell
`Reg. No. 51408
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`

`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket