`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 14
`Entered: April 15, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`VEHICLE INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00014
`Patent 6,842,677 B2
`____________
`
`Before FRANCISCO C. PRATS, JOSIAH C. COCKS, and
`CARL M. DEFRANCO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00014
`Patent 6,842,677 B2
`
`
`
`On April 9, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate this
`
`proceeding. Paper 11 (“Joint Motion to Terminate”); see 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.72. The parties filed a copy of their written settlement agreement
`
`(Exhibit 2003), dated April 9, 2014, as well as a request (Paper 12) to treat the
`
`settlement agreement as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The parties stated in their motion that they
`
`“have settled their dispute, and have reached agreement to terminate this inter
`
`partes review.” Paper 11, 1.
`
`
`
`The parties are reminded that the Board is not a party to the settlement, and
`
`may identify independently any question of patentability. 37 C.F.R § 42.74(a).
`
`Generally, however, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the
`
`filing of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77
`
`Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14, 2012). This proceeding is still in the
`
`preliminary stages. The Board has not instituted a trial. Petitioner indicates that it
`
`will no longer participate in this inter partes review proceeding even if the Board
`
`does not terminate the proceeding. Paper 11, 4. Under the circumstances, the
`
`Board determines that it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding without
`
`rendering either a decision to institute or a final written decision. See 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.72.
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement agreement
`
`(Exhibit 2003) be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is GRANTED; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the proceeding is
`
`GRANTED and this proceeding is terminated.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00014
`Patent 6,842,677 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Edgar H. Haug
`Eugene LeDonne
`David V. Rossi
`FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP
`pcna.vit.ipr@flhlaw.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`FAHMI, SELLERS, EMBERT & DAVITZ
`tarek.fahmi@fseip.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`