throbber
EPA/EPA eluted first at a retention time of approximately 2.5 min, and PC-
`
`
`
`DHA/DHA eluted at approximately 2.8 min.
`
`
`
`Figure 38. Positive ion electrospray mass spectra of the phosphatidyl choline
`
`standards PC-DHA/DHA and PC-EPA/EPA. Protonated molecules of each
`
`phospholipid were detected as the base peaks of each spectrum at m/z 878 and m/z
`
`826, respectively.
`
`
`- 101 -
`
`
`
`00000101
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 39. Positive ion electrospray product ion tandem mass spectra of PC-
`
`DHA/DHA and PC-EPA/EPA. The protonated molecules of m/z 878 and m/z 826
`
`correspoding to PC-DHA/DHA and PC-EPA/EPA, respectively, were used as
`
`precursor ions. Based on these tandem mass spectra, the abundant product ion of
`
`m/z 184 was used for subsequent measurements of these phospholipids during
`
`
`- 102 -
`
`SRM.
`
`
`
`
`
`00000102
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 40. UHPLC-MS-MS chromatogram of a mixture of PC-EPA/EPA and PC-
`
`DHA/DHA standards obtained using positive ion electrospray and SRM of the
`
`transition m/z 826 to m/z 184 for PC-EPA/EPA and SRM of the transition m/z 878
`
`to m/z 184 for PC-DHA/DHA. The retention times of PC-EPA/EPA and PC-
`
`DHA/DHA were ∼2.5 min and ∼2.8 min, respectively.
`
`
`
`96. UHPLC-MS-MS was used to measure the 18 krill oil samples (Table
`
`1), which included 9 samples from E. pacifica and 9 samples from E. superba that
`
`had been heated to 60 °C, 70 °C or 125 °C, or not heated at all. Solvent blanks
`
`were injected and analyzed between UHPLC-MS-MS analyses of each krill oil
`
`sample. PC-EPA/EPA and PC-DHA/DHA were detected in all 18 krill oil samples.
`
`PC-DHA/EPA was also detected in all 18 krill oil samples and eluted between PC-
`
`
`- 103 -
`
`00000103
`
`

`
`
`
`DHA/DHA and PC-EPA/EPA during UHPLC-MS-MS. No phospholipid peaks
`
`were detected in any of the solvent blank analyses, which proved that there was no
`
`sample carry over between analyses. The UHPLC-MS-MS chromatograms
`
`showing the detection of all three phospholipids in the 18 krill oil samples are
`
`shown in Figures 41 through 58.
`
`
`- 104 -
`
`
`
`00000104
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 41. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`acetone fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had been not been heat treated.
`
`Note that PC-EPA/EPA was detected at a retention time of ∼2.5 min, PC-
`
`DHA/DHA was detected eluting at ∼2.8 min, and PC-DHA/EPA eluted in between
`
`the other phospholipids at a retention time of ∼2.7 min.
`
`
`
`
`- 105 -
`
`00000105
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 42. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`acetone fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had been heated at 60 °C. Note
`
`that PC-EPA/EPA was detected at a retention time of ∼2.5 min, PC-DHA/DHA
`
`was detected eluting at ∼2.8 min, and PC-DHA/EPA eluted in between the other
`
`phospholipids at a retention time of ∼2.7 min.
`
`
`
`
`- 106 -
`
`00000106
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 43. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`acetone fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had been heated at 125 °C. Note
`
`the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 107 -
`
`00000107
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 44. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethanol fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that was not heat treated. Note the
`
`detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 108 -
`
`00000108
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 45. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethanol fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had been heated at 70 °C. Note the
`
`detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 109 -
`
`00000109
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 46. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethanol fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had been heated at 125 °C. Note
`
`the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`- 110 -
`
`
`
`
`
`00000110
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 47. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethyl acetate fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had not been heat treated.
`
`Note the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and
`
`PC-DHA/EPA.
`
`
`- 111 -
`
`
`
`00000111
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 48. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethyl acetate fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had been heated at 70 °C.
`
`Note the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and
`
`PC-DHA/EPA.
`
`
`- 112 -
`
`00000112
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 49. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethyl acetate fraction of krill oil from E. pacifica that had been heated at 125 °C.
`
`Note the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and
`
`PC-DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 113 -
`
`00000113
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 50. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`acetone fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had not been heated. Note the
`
`detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 114 -
`
`00000114
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 51. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`acetone fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had been heated at 60 °C. Note the
`
`detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`- 115 -
`
`00000115
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 52. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`acetone fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had been heated at 125 °C. Note
`
`the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 116 -
`
`00000116
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 53. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethanol fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had not been heated. Note the
`
`detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 117 -
`
`00000117
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 54. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethanol fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had been heated at 70 °C. Note the
`
`detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 118 -
`
`00000118
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 55. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethanol fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had been heated at 125 °C. Note
`
`the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`- 119 -
`
`
`
`00000119
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 56. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethyl acetate fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had not been heated. Note the
`
`detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 120 -
`
`00000120
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 57. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethyl acetate fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had been heated at 70 °C.
`
`Note the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and
`
`PC-DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 121 -
`
`00000121
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 58. Positive ion electrospray UHPLC-MS-MS with SRM analysis of an
`
`ethyl acetate fraction of krill oil from E. superba that had been heated at 125 °C.
`
`Note the detection of peaks corresponding to PC-EPA/EPA, PC-DHA/DHA and
`
`PC-DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 122 -
`
`00000122
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`97. PC-EPA/EPA and PC-DHA/DHA standards were spiked into some of
`
`the krill oil samples, which were then reanalyzed. The PC-EPA/EPA and PC-
`
`DHA/DHA standards coeluted with the krill oil phospholipid peaks at ∼2.5 and
`
`∼2.8 min, respectively, instead of eluting as separate peaks. Based on coelution
`
`with standards during UHPLC, the formation of protonated molecules of identical
`
`masses, and the formation of identical fragment ions of m/z 184 during tandem
`
`mass spectrometry, the phospholipids eluting at ∼2.5 and ∼2.8 min during UHPLC-
`
`MS-MS analysis of the krill oil samples were identified as PC-EPA/EPA and PC-
`
`DHA/DHA, respectively. For example, UHPLC-MS-MS chromatograms for the
`
`analysis of spiked krill oil from an ethyl acetate fraction of E. pacifica that had
`
`been heated at 70 °C is shown in Figure 59, and UHPLC-MS-MS chromatograms
`
`for the analysis of spiked krill oil from an ethanol fraction of E. superba that had
`
`been heated at 125 °C are shown in Figure 60.
`
`
`- 123 -
`
`
`
`00000123
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 59. UHPLC-MS-MS chromatograms for the analysis of spiked krill oil from
`
`an ethyl acetate fraction of E. pacifica that had been heated at 70 °C. The krill oil
`
`sample was spiked with 0.5 µl of a 5 µM solution of PC-DHA/DHA and PC-
`
`EPA/EPA. Note that the peaks eluting at ∼2.5 min and ∼2.8 min increased in
`
`height but not the peak at ∼2.7 min corresponding to PC-DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 124 -
`
`00000124
`
`

`
`
`
`Figure 60. UHPLC-MS-MS chromatograms of krill oil from an ethanol fraction of
`
`E. superba that had been heated at 125 °C and spiked with 1.0 µl of 5 µM PC-
`
`DHA/DHA and PC-EPA/EPA. Note that the peaks eluting at ∼2.5 min and ∼2.8
`
`min increased in height but not the peak at ∼2.7 min, which corresponded to PC-
`
`DHA/EPA.
`
`
`
`
`- 125 -
`
`00000125
`
`

`
`
`
`98.
`
`In conclusion, the phospholipids PC-DHA/DHA, PC-EPA/EPA and
`
`PC-DHA/EPA were detected and identified using UHPLC-MS-MS in all 18 krill
`
`oil samples tested regardless of species, extraction solvent or heat treatment.
`
`Identification of these phospholipids in the krill oil samples was based on
`
`molecular mass, tandem mass spectrometric fragmentation and chromatographic
`
`coelution with standards.
`
`99. Based on my analyses above, I conclude that the prior art Fujita
`
`Reference inherently discloses to one of ordinary skill in the art at least at the time
`
`of the alleged invention a krill extract comprising the Claimed Phospholipid as
`
`required by each of the claims of the ‘351 patent. Each of the Fujita-hexane, Fujita-
`
`hexane-ethanol, and Fujita-once-through extraction methods disclosed in Fujita
`
`necessarily results in extracts containing multiple Claimed Phospholipids.
`
`100. Based on my analyses above, I conclude that the prior art Rogozhin
`
`reference also inherently discloses to one of ordinary skill in the art at least at the
`
`time of the alleged invention a krill extract comprising the Claimed Phospholipid
`
`as required by each of the claims of the ‘351 patent. The lipid extraction method in
`
`Example 1 of that patent necessarily results in extracts containing multiple
`
`Claimed Phospholipids.
`
`101. I am personally aware of how the Fujita-hexane, Fujita-hexane-
`
`ethanol, Fujita-once-through, and Rogozhin patent extracts were made. At least
`
`
`- 126 -
`
`00000126
`
`

`
`
`
`each of these prior art extracts necessarily is suitable for human consumption. The
`
`Rogozhin extract was made with nothing other than krill and water as the solvent
`
`and therefore is unquestionably fit for human use and eating. Moreover, as
`
`described in Fujita itself, krill is a food product and hexane is a solvent used for
`
`food preparation including extraction of vegetable oils. Ethanol too is fit for
`
`eating; it is the alcohol commonly found in liquors and beers. Moreover, as
`
`discussed above, the solvents used in the Fujita Reference were evaporated. There
`
`is nothing in these extracts that makes them unfit for human use or eating by
`
`humans.
`
`102. Based on my analyses above, I conclude that the prior art Fujita
`
`Reference anticipates and therefore invalidates at least claim 1 of the ‘351 Patent.
`
`103. Based on my analyses above, I conclude that the prior art Rogozhin
`
`patent anticipates and therefore invalidates at least claim 1 of the ‘351 Patent.
`
`104. I note that the named inventor of ‘351 patent represented to the
`
`USPTO during the reexamination of the ‘348 Patent that her allegedly inventive
`
`extract was distinguishable from the prior art because it “uniquely contained
`
`substantial amounts of phosphoplipids bearing omega-3 fatty acids (such as EPA
`
`and DHA) and was suitable for human consumption.” I see that Neptune made
`
`
`- 127 -
`
`00000127
`
`

`
`
`
`similar statements throughout prosecution and reexamination of the ‘351 patent
`
`and the ‘348 Patent.2 My analysis shows that this line of arguments is not correct.
`
`105. At the Respondents’ request, the extracts I created were distributed
`
`into test tubes and labeled. At Respondents’ request, I sent the following samples
`
`to Avanti Polar Lipids and Chemir Analytical Services:
`
`Sample Name Extraction Method
`
`to
`
`Shipped
`
`VB2 8/8/13 FH
`
`Fujita Hexane
`
`VB8 8/9/13 FHE Fujita Hexane
`
`Ethanol
`
`VB 1 8/8/13 FH Fujita Hexane
`
`VB 7 8/9/13
`
`Fujita Hexane
`
`FHE
`
`Ethanol
`
`Chemir
`
`Chemir
`
`Avanti
`
`Avanti
`
`
`
`106. I understand that the ’351 patent purports to claim priority to
`
`Provisional Application No. 60/307,842 (the Provisional Application; Ex. 1062)
`
`The Provisional Application (filed on July 27, 2001) is the earliest application to
`
`2
`(April 2, 2012 Response to Office Action, ‘351 patent (Ex. 1061, p. 34) (“Thus, as the
`extraction process of Beaudoin does not produce extracts comprising PLs of Formula I, as
`instantly claimed in the present application in any relevant amount, Beaudoin cannot
`anticipate the claimed extract.”)).
`
`
`- 128 -
`
`00000128
`
`

`
`
`
`which the Asserted Patents claim priority. I further understand that a patent may
`
`claim priority to a provisional application only if, among other requirements, the
`
`provisional application provides an adequate written description of the invention. I
`
`conclude that the Provisional Application does not provide an adequate written
`
`description for the Claimed Phospholipid for any of the Asserted Claims, and thus
`
`the Asserted Claims are not entitled to the benefit of the Provisional Application
`
`filing date.
`
`107. The Provisional Application contains no drawing of any phospholipid
`
`molecule. The Provisional Application also does not include any discussion of any
`
`two fatty acids being attached to any particular phospholipid molecule.
`
`108. The Provisional Application does not contain Example 1 of the ‘351
`
`patent or any discussion of Sample #804.3 Tables 2, 8, 9, and 10 of the ‘351
`
`
`3 The ‘351 patent specification contains three Examples. The patents state that Example 1
`“illustrates the isolation and molecular characterization of the phospholipids from the extract.”
`(‘351 patent, col.22 ll.36-37.) In this Example, a Sample referred to as “#804” was analyzed.
`Sample #804 is described as containing “large amounts of phospholipids, mainly: PC (438.48
`mg/g lipid) and PE (183.15 mg/g lipid).” (Id., col.22 ll. 39-42.) The ‘351 patent does not
`identify what method was used to quantify the recited phospholipids. Example 1 next describes a
`series of steps taken to analyze phospholipids in Sample #804. These steps can be generally
`summarized as follows. First, Example 1 reports that “[t]o obtain large quantities of PC and PE,
`separation was done by Thin Layer Chromatography.” (Id., col.22 ll. 46-49.) Example 1 reports
`that PC and PE were separated into separate bands on a TLC plate. Merely separating
`compounds into bands on a TLC plate, however, does not identify the compounds. The
`Example reports no use of any control or standard during this TLC experiment.
`
`
`
`- 129 -
`
`00000129
`
`

`
`
`
`patent are also absent from the Provisional Application. Figures 1-3 of the ‘351
`
`patent also are not in the Provisional Application.
`
`109. The Provisional Application includes a Table 5 that does not appear in
`
`the ‘351 patent:
`
`
`
`110. Table 5 of the Provisional Application identifies fatty acids in the
`
`“phospholipid mixture” of the claimed extract. This table does not show what
`
`particular fatty acids are attached to any particular phospholipid molecule and thus
`
`does not show the presence of the Claimed Phospholipid. This table noticeably
`
`identifies no DHA in the phosphatidyl ethanolamine fraction of the extract, and no
`
`DHA or EPA in the phosphatidyl inositol fraction of the extract. One of skill
`
`reading this table would understand it to affirmatively indicate there are no
`
`detected amounts of the following Claimed Phospholipids in the extract:
`
`
`- 130 -
`
`00000130
`
`

`
`
`
`Sn1: DHA
`
`Sn2: EPA
`
`Sn1: EPA
`
`Sn2: DHA
`
`Sn1: EPA
`
`Sn2: EPA
`
`Sn1: DHA
`
`Sn2: DHA
`
`Sn1: DHA
`
`Sn2: EPA
`
`Sn1: EPA
`
`Sn2: DHA
`
`Sn1: DHA
`
`Sn2: DHA
`
`
`
`(Phosphatidylinositol or “PI”)
`
`
`
`—CH2CH2NH3
`
`(Phosphatidylethanolamine or “PE”)
`
`
`
`111. The Provisional Application also includes Figures 2 and 3A through
`
`3K that are not included in the ‘351 patent. Figure 2 is nearly illegible. It is
`
`described as follows: “an HPLC profile of the flavonoid fraction of the
`
`- 131 -
`
`00000131
`
`

`
`
`
`composition of the present invention eluted with methanol. The HPLC shows
`
`aglycone [sic] peak and two or more glucosides.” (Provisional Application, Figure
`
`2) Figure 2 does not show the presence of a phospholipid molecule having any
`
`particular structure, much less any of the Claimed Phospholipids.
`
`112. Figures 3A to 3K are also nearly illegible. They are identified in the
`
`‘351 patent as “mass spectra (molecular analysis) of fatty acids attached to
`
`phospholipids in the composition of the present invention.” (Id., Figure 3A-3K)
`
`Figures 3A to 3K do appear to be mass spectra. However, they do not show any
`
`particular fatty acids attached to any particular phospholipid molecules. They also
`
`do not show any combination of fatty acids attached to any molecule. Instead,
`
`these spectra appear to be mass spectra of free fatty acid derivatives that are
`
`unbound to any molecule.
`
`113. The Provisional Application also does not discuss any “novel
`
`phospholipid.”
`
`114. At least the following portions of the ’351 Patent are also not included
`
`in the Provisional Application: col.1 ll.43-col.3 l.65, col.4 ll.6-14, 16-35; col.5 l.1-
`
`33; col.6 l.33-col.13 l.2; col.16 l.1-45; col. 17 l.31-39; col. 18 l. 25-30; col.19
`
`l.l.10-67; col.20 ll.34-41; col.20 l.65-col.22 l.21; col.22 l.34-col.24 l.45; col.25
`
`l.50-col.40 l.38.
`
`
`- 132 -
`
`00000132
`
`

`
`
`
`115. The ’351 patent purports to claim priority to the application for the
`
`’348 patent and the PCT Application under 35 U.S.C. §§ 120 and 365(c).
`
`116. In my opinion the ’351 patent is not entitled to claim priority to the
`
`Provisional Application.
`
`117. I further declare that all statement made herein of my own knowledge
`
`are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be
`
`true; and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful
`
`false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`
`both, under section 1001 of title 18 of the United States Code, and that such willful
`
`false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issued
`
`thereon.
`
`
`- 133 -
`
`00000133
`
`

`
`
`
`Date: September 2?, 2013
`
`
`
`Dr. Richard B. van Breemen
`
`Attachments:
`
`Attachment A —
`
`Curriculum Vitae, Other Cases
`
`
`
`00000134
`
`
`- 134 -
`-134-
`
`00000134
`
`

`
`April 2012
`
`RICHARD BRUCE VAN BREEMEN
`Professor of Medicinal Chemistry
`Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy
`College of Pharmacy
`University of Illinois at Chicago
`833 South Wood Street
`Chicago, Illinois 60612-7231
`EDUCATION
`1980-1985
`Ph.D. 1985, in Pharmacology
`
`Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
`
`Baltimore, Maryland.
`1976-1980
`B.A. 1980, in Chemistry, with honors, German minor
`
`Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio.
`
`
`Telephone: (312) 996-9353
`FAX:
`(312) 996-7107
`email: breemen@uic.edu
`
`PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
`
`
`2000-present Professor of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy
`College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
`2010-present Assistant Head for Curricular Affairs, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and
`Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
`2002-present Academic Director, Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Research Resources
`Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
`2001-present Assistant to the Director of the Research Resources Center, University of Illinois
`at Chicago, Chicago, IL
`2006-present Editorial Board, Biomedical Chromatography
`2010-present Editorial Board, Assay and Drug Development Technologies
`2010-present Editor-in-Chief emeritus, Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput
`Screening
`1997-2010
`Editor-in-Chief, Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening
`1994-2000 Associate Professor of Medicinal Chemistry
`
`
`
`College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
`1986-1993 Assistant Professor of Chemistry, Member of the Biotechnology Faculty
`
`Director of the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory for Biotechnology Research
`
`North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
`1985-1986
`Postdoctoral Fellow. Middle Atlantic Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, NSF
`Regional Instrumentation Facility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
`Baltimore, MD. (Laboratory of Catherine Fenselau and Robert Cotter)
`Visiting Assistant Professor of Chemistry
`North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
`Predoctoral research, Dept. of Pharmacology Johns Hopkins University School
`of Medicine. Baltimore, MD. Dissertation: "Electrophilic Reactions of 1-O-Acyl
`Glucuronides." (Advisor, Catherine Fenselau)
`1
`
`
`
`
`1980-1985
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`00000135
`
`

`
`April 2012
`
`
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`1979-1980 Honors research, Department of Chemistry, Oberlin College
`
`Oberlin, OH. Synthesized spirocyclic lactones as analogs of insect pheromones
`1979
`Research assistant, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology Center, Univ. of
`Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Quantitation of metabolites of diphenylhydantoin in human
`serum using GC/MS. (Laboratory of L.J. Fischer)
`
`
`
`
`HONORS AND AWARDS
`NIH Predoctoral Fellowship, 1980-1984
`Phi Lambda Upsilon (Chemistry Honor Society)
`Award for Outstanding Paper at the Third North American Meeting of the International Society
`for the Study of Xenobiotics. San Diego, CA, October 21-25,1990
`Named by the Editors of Spectroscopy as one of 19 “Bright Young Stars” in analytical
`spectroscopy. (“Perspectives on 10 Years in Spectroscopy,” Spectroscopy, 10, 52-61, 1995)
`Invited speaker, 11th International Carotenoid Conference, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1996
`Invited speaker, International Convention on Pharmaceutical Sciences Commemorating the 50th
`Anniversary of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea. Seoul, Korea, 2001
`Outstanding Paper Award, 88th American Oil Chemists Society Annual Meeting & Expo.
`Seattle, WA, May 11-14, 1997
`Linus Pauling Institute Seminar Series Speaker. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR,
`February 16, 2006
`University Scholar Award. University of Illinois, 2003-2006
`AOAC Presidential Task Force on Dietary Supplements, 2009-2011
`AOAC International Harvey W. Wiley Award, 2008
`AOAC International Outstanding Dietary Supplement Methods Panel Chair, 2010
`
`PUBLICATIONS
`
`1. Papers
`Cotter RJ, van Breemen R, Yergey J, Heller D. Thermal, laser, and fast atom desorption. Int.
`1.
`J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 46, 395-8 (1983).
`van Breemen RB, Snow M, Cotter RJ. Time resolved laser desorption mass spectrometry, I.
`Desorption of preformed ions. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 49, 35-50 (1983).
`Gibson W, van Breemen R, Fields A, LaFemina R, Irmiere A. D,L-α-
`Difluoromethylorinithine inhibits human cytomegalovirus replication. J. Virology. 50, 145-
`54 (1984).
`van Breemen RB, Tabet J-C, Cotter RJ. Characterization of oxygen-linked glucuronides by
`laser desorption mass spectrometry. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 11, 278-83 (1984).
`van Breemen RB, Fenselau C. Acylation of albumin by 1-O-acyl glucuronides. Drug Metab.
`Dispos. 13, 318-20 (1985).
`van Breemen RB, Fenselau CC, Dulik DM. Activated Phase II metabolites: Comparison of
`alkylation by 1-O-acyl glucuronides and acyl sulfates. in Biological Reactive Intermediates
`III, ed. by JJ. Kocsis, DJ. Jollow, CM. Whitmer, JO Nelson, and R. Snyder. pp. 423-9,
`Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1986.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`00000136
`
`

`
`April 2012
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`van Breemen RB, Fenselau C. Reaction of 1-O-acyl glucuronides with 4-p-
`(nitrobenzyl)pyridine. Drug Metab. Dispos. 14, 197-201 (1986).
`van Breemen RB, Fenselau C, Mogilevsky W, Odell GB. Reaction of bilirubin glucuronides
`with serum albumin. J. Chromatogr. 383, 387-92 (1986).
`van Breemen RB, Fenselau C, Cotter RJ, Curtis A.J., Connolly G. Derivatives of
`dicyclopentadiene in ground water. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 14, 97-102 (1987).
`Fenselau C, van Breemen R, Bradow G, Stogniew M. Acyl-linked glucuronides as reactive
`metabolites. Fed. Proc. 46, 2436-9 (1987).
`van Breemen RB, Martin LB, Schreiner AF. Comparison of electron impact, desorption
`chemical ionization, field desorption, and fast atom bombardment mass spectra of nine
`monosubstituted Group VI metal carbonyls. Anal. Chem. 60, 1314-8 (1988).
`van Breemen RB, Stogniew M, Fenselau C. Characterization of acyl-linked glucuronides by
`electron impact and fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. Biomed. Environ. Mass
`Spectrom. 17, 97-103 (1988).
`van Breemen RB. Fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry with B/E linked scanning of
`ether- and thiophenol-linked glucuronides. In Cellular and Molecular Aspects of
`Glucuronidation, ed. by G. Siest, J. Magdalou, B. Burchell, vol. 173, pp. 211-9, Colloque
`INSERM/John Libbey Eurotext Ltd., 1988.
`van Breemen RB, Le JC. Enhanced sensitivity of peptide analysis by fast atom bombardment
`mass spectrometry using nitrocellulose as a substrate. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 3, 20-
`4 (1989).
`van Breemen RB, Martin LB, Schreiner AF. Formation of Negative ions of monosubstituted
`Group VIB pentacarbonyls during fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. Org. Mass
`Spectrom. 25, 3-8 (1990).
`16. Goodlett DR, Armstrong FB, Creech RJ, van Breemen RB. Formylated peptides from
`cyanogen bromide digests identified by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. Anal.
`Biochem. 186, 116-20 (1990).
`van Breemen RB, Wheeler JJ, Boss WF. Identification of carrot inositol phospholipids by
`fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. Lipids, 25, 328-334 (1990).
`Freeman HS, van Breemen RB, Esancy J F, Hao Z, Ukponmwan DO, Hsu WN. Fast atom
`bombardment and desorption chemical ionization mass spectrometry in the analysis of
`involatile textile dyes. Textile Chemist and Colorist, 22, 23-28 (1990).
`
`19. Martin LB, Schreiner AF, van Breemen RB. Characterization of cisplatin adducts of
`oligonucleotides by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 193, 6-15
`(1991).
`van Breemen RB, Martin LB, Le JC. "Continuous-flow fast atom bombardment mass
`spectrometry of oligonucleotides." J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2, 157-163 (1991).
`van Breemen RB, Canjura FL, Schwartz SJ. High-performance liquid chromatography-
`continuous-flow mass spectrometry of chlorophyll derivatives. J. Chromatogr. 542, 373-383
`(1991).
`van Breemen RB, Bartlett MG, Tsou Y, Culver C, Swaisgood H, Unger SE. Degradation of
`peptide drugs by immobilized digestive proteases. Drug Metab. Dispos. 19, 683-690 (1991).
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`00000137
`
`

`
`April 2012
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`van Breemen RB, Canjura FL, Schwartz SJ. Identification of chlorophyll derivatives by mass
`spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39, 1452-1456 (1991).
`Freeman HS, Hao Z, Sokolowska-Gajda J, van Breemen RB. Matrix selection in the FAB
`mass spectrometric analysis of synthetic dyes. Dyes and Pigments, 16, 317-327 (1991).
`van Breemen RB, Huang C-H, Bumgardner CL. Continuous-flow fast atom bombardment
`and field desorption mass spectrometry of oligomers of 3,3,3-trifluorophenylpropyne. Anal.
`Chem. 63, 2577-2580 (1991).
`26. Bumgardner CL, Huang C-H, van Breemen RB. Characterization of oligomers of 3,3,3-
`trifluoro-1-phenylpropyne and 1-phenylpropyne by mass spectrometry. J. Fluor. Chem. 56,
`175-187 (1992).
`Schmitz HH, van Breemen RB, Schwartz SJ. Applications of fast atom bombardment mass
`spectrometry (FAB-MS) and continuous-flow FAB-MS to carotenoid analysis. Methods
`Enzymol. 213, 322-336 (1992).
`van Breemen RB, Davis RG. Rates of peptide proteolysis measured using liquid
`chromatography and continuous-flow fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. Anal.
`Chem. 64, 2233-2237 (1992).
`van Breemen RB, Schmitz HH, Schwartz SJ. Continuous-flow fast atom bombardment
`liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of carotenoids. Anal. Chem. 65, 965-969 (1993).
`Saljoughian M, Williams PG, Morimoto H, Goodlett DR, van Breemen RB. Tritiated
`diimide: A regio- and stereo-selective tritium labeling reagent. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
`Commun. 414-416 (1993).
`31. Oommen TV, Petrie EM, van Breemen RB, Haney CA. Analysis of furanic compounds from
`cellulose aging by GC-MS, and attempts to correlate with degree of polymerization. CIGRE
`Paper 110-02, CIGRE Symposium on Diagnostic and Maintenance Techniques. Berlin,
`Germany, April 19-21. 1993.
`32. Blackburn RK, van Breemen RB. Degradation of the cyclic peptide antibiotic lysobactin by
`immobilized digestive proteases. Drug Metab. Dispos. 21, 573-579 (1993).
`van Breemen RB, Tsou Y, Connolly G. Oxidation of dicyclopentadiene in surface water.
`Biol. Mass Spectrom. 22, 579-584 (1993).
`Spanos GA, Schwartz SJ, van Breemen RB, Huang C-H. High-performance liquid
`chromatography with light-scattering detection and desorption chemical-ionization tandem
`mass spectrometry of milk fat triacylglycerols. Lipids, 30, 85-90 (1995).
`van Breemen RB, Schmitz HH, Schwartz SJ. Fast atom bombardment tandem mass
`spectrometry of carotenoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43, 384-389 (1995).
`van Breemen RB, Jiang O, Tidwell RR, Hall JE, Brewer TG. Fast atom bombardment
`tandem mass spectrometry of the anti-parasitic agent pentamidine and its oxygenated
`metabolites. J. Mass Spectrom. 30, 549-556 (1995).
`van Breemen RB. Electrospray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of carotenoids.
`Anal. Chem. 67, 2004-2009 (1995).
`38. Thomas VR, Schreiner AF, van Breemen R, Xie TY, Chen CL, Gratzl JS. Photolytic
`dechlorination of 4-chlorophenol using an ArF* excimer laser. Holzforschung, 49, 139-145
`(1995).
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`00000138
`
`

`
`April 2012
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`45.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`van Breemen RB. Advances in carotenoid analysis: Electrospray liquid chromatography-
`mass spectrometry using C30 reversed phase HPLC. Carotenoid News, 5, 8-9 (1995).
`van Breemen RB, Huang CH, Lu ZZ, Rimando A, Fong HHS, Fitzloff JF. Electrospray
`liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of ginsenosides. Anal. Chem. 67, 3985-3989
`(1995).
`van Breemen RB. Innovations in carotenoid analysis using liquid chromatography/mass
`spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 68, 299A-304A (1996). *This paper was featured on the cover
`page of this issue of Analytical Chemistry.
`van Breemen RB, Huang C-H. High performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass
`spectrometry of retinoids. FASEB J. 10, 1098-1101 (1996).
`van Breemen RB, Huang C-H, Tan Y, Sander LC, Schilling AB. Liquid
`chromatography/mass spectrometry of carotenoids using atmospheric pressure chemical
`ionization. J. Mass Spectrom. 31, 975-981 (1996).
`Shen L, Pisha E, Huang Z, Pezzuto JM, Krol E, Alam Z, van Breemen RB, Bolton JL.
`Bioreductive activation of catechol estrogen-ortho-quinones: Aromatization of the B ring in
`4-hydroxyequilenin markedly alters quinoid formation and reactivity. Carcinogenesis, 18,
`1093-1101 (1997).
`van Breemen RB, Huang C-H, Nikolic D, Woodbury CP, Zhao YZ, Venton DL. Pulsed
`ultrafiltration electrospray mass spectrometry: A new method for screening combinatorial
`libraries. Anal. Chem. 69, 2159-2164 (1997).
`46. Zhao YZ, van Breemen RB, Nikolic D, Huang C-R, Woodbury CP, Schilling A, Venton DL.
`Screening solution-phase combinatorial libraries using pulsed ultrafiltration/ electrospray
`mass spectrometry. J. Med. Chem. 40, 4006-4012 (1997).
`Shen L, Qiu S, van Breemen RB, Zhang F, Chen Y, Bolton JL. Reaction of the Premarin
`metabolite 4-hydroxyequilenin semiquinone radical with 2’-deoxyguanosine: Formation of
`unusual cyclic adducts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 11126-11127 (1997).
`van Breemen RB. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of carotenoids. Pure Appl.
`Chem. 69, 2061-2066 (1997).
`49. Zhang HQ, Dixon RP, Marletta MA, Nikolic D, van Breemen R, Silverman RB. Mechanism
`of inactivation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase by Nω-allyl-L-arginine. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
`119, 10888-10902 (1997).
`50. Bolton J

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket