throbber
Original Research
`
`Evaluation of the Effects of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`on Chronic Inflammation and Arthritic Symptoms
`
`Luisa Deutsch M.D., M.Sc.
`
`D8p£ll’l|‘ilel‘Il ofBehaviora| Science and Health Research, University Health Network Toronto,
`
`Sciopsis inc Evidence Based NutrL1Mcdicinc, Richmond Hill, Ontario, CANADA
`
`Journal oflhe American College oi'Nulrition, Vol. 26, No. 1, 39-48 (2007)
`Published by the American College of Nutrition
`
`Page 1
`
`NEPN Ex. 2057
`
`Aker v. Neptune
`IPR2014-00003
`
`

`
`Original Research
`
`Evaluation of the Effect of Neptune Krill Oil on Chronic
`Inflammation and Arthritic Symptoms
`
`Luisa Deutscli,
`
`MD, MSc
`
`Department ofBehm'iorr1I .S'('ic11(.'c and Health Rcscarrli. University Health Network Toronto. Sr'iap.sis l1l('. Evidcnrc Based
`NuImi'lIedm'ne,
`Rrchnrorzd Hill, Umano, (.'ANAI)A
`
`Key words: C-reactive protein, inflanimation, omega-3, phospholipirls, Neptune Krill Oil. NKOT”, antioxidants
`
`Objectives: at To evaluate the effect of Neptune Krill Oil (NK()TMl on (‘-reactive protein (CRP) on patients
`with chronic inflamnration and bl to evaluate the eft'ectivene.ss of NKOW on arthritic symptoms.
`Methods: Randomized. double blind. placebo controlled study. Ninety patients were rccruitctl with con-
`firmed diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and/or rheumatoid arthritis and/or osteoarthritis and with increased
`lcvcls of CRP t_> l .0 mgldl) upon [hrcc consecutive Wcckly blood analysis. Group A rcccivrd NKOW (300 mg
`daily) and Group B received a placebo. CRP and \Vestc1n Ontario and McMaster Universities (\\’OMAC’l
`osteoarthritis score were measured at baseline and days 7, I4 and 30.
`Results: After 7 days of treatment NKOT“ reduced CRP by 19.3% compared to an increase by lS.7‘.‘"o
`observed in the placebo group (p = 0.0491. After 14 and 30 days of treatment NKOT“ further dccrcascd CRP
`by 29.7% and 30.9% respectively (p <. 0.00! I. The CRP levels of the placebo group increased to 32.l% after
`14 days and their decreased to 25.1% at day 30. The between group difference was statistically significant; p =
`0.004 at day l4 and p — 0.008 at day 30. NKOW showed a significant reduction in all three WOMAC scores.
`After 7 days of treatment NKUT“, reduced pain scores by 28.9% (p = 0.0501, reduced stiffness by 20.3% (p =
`0.001] and reduced functional impaimtent by 22.8% (p = 04008).
`Conclus’on: The results of the present study clearly indicate that NKOW at a daily dose of 300 mg
`significantly inhibits inflammation and reduces arthritic symptoms within a short treatment period of 7 and I4
`days.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Inflammation is closely linked to the pathogenesis of ath-
`erosclerosis and joint disease and may be provoked by nonin-
`fectious (c.g.,
`injury. smoking, diabetes, obesity) as well as
`infectious sources. C—reactive protein (CRP), which is one of
`the most useful biomarkcrs of inflammation, appears to be a
`central player in the hannful effects of systemic inflammation
`and an easy and inexpensive screening test to assess inflam-
`mation-associatcd risk [1]. Unlike other markers of inflamma-
`tion, CRP levels are stable over long periods, have no diurnal
`variation and can be measured inexpensively.
`Current studies suggest that CRP is a strong predictor of
`future cardiovascular events [C‘.—5]. At all levels of estimated
`l0-year risk for events according to the Framingham risk score
`and at all levels of LDL cholesterol, CRP remained a strong
`
`predictor of future cardiovascular risk [6]. CRP has been shown
`in several prospective, nested case-control studies to be asso-
`ciated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction [7—l2],
`stroke [73,] 3.14], sudden death from cardiac causes [I5], and
`peripheral arterial disease [16].
`In arthritic joints CRP production reflects the release of
`proinflarnmatory cytokrncs, such as intcrlcukms-l and -6 (IL-l
`and IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-oi). which are
`essential in the mechanism of cartilage degeneration [17—22].
`CRP is significantly increased in patients with rheumatoid
`arthritis and slightly but significantly higher in patients with
`osteoarthritis than in matched controls [1,23—29J. CRP was also
`found to increase in patients with knee osteoarthritis showing
`disease progression as well as in patients with rapidly destructive
`hip osteoarthritis [24-29]. Contrary to erythrocyte sedimentation
`rate (ESR). evidence has provcn a strong association between CRP
`
`Address reprint requests to: Dr. Luisa Deuisclr. Sciopsis lnc. F.vi<lence Based NutraMedicine. I8 Corso Court, Richmond llill_ Ontario l,-SS lll4. C-\NAl)A. F.-marl:
`lt.L~t;iop.~is @' yahr I(l.l."d
`
`Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 26, No. 1, 39-48 (2007)
`Publishcd by the American College of Nutrition
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Eflerl of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`and level of clinical severity in patients with osteoarthritis of the
`knee or hip [24,26].
`The results of human studies on the anti-inflammatory
`properties of omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids are contro-
`versial, varying from no effect to a beneficial effect [30—34].
`A proposed competition between omega-3 and omega-6
`fatty acids may be the reason for the observed discrepancies
`of the effects of n—3 fatty acids on cytoltines [35]. Both
`omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids are substrates for the
`production of human eicosztnoids and share the same en-
`zymes for the synthesis of prostaglandins and leukotrienes.
`Omega-3 fatty acids produce eicosanoids with fewer inflam-
`matory properties than those derived from omega-6 fatty
`acids [36-38]. Hence, a dominant ratio of dietary intake of
`omega-3 versus omega-6 fatty acids is critical to inflamma-
`tory processes.
`
`Neptune Krill Oil is extracted from Antarctic Krill (Epitaxi-
`sin Superba), a zooplankton at the bottom of the food chain.
`Even though krill is the main food source for whales it remains
`the most abundant biomass on earth because of its high regen-
`eration properties. The krill used for Neptune Krill Oil
`is
`harvested in the Antarctic Ocean where the worldwide harvest
`
`is less than 0.1% the allowed fishing quota. Being at the bottom
`of the food chain, having a very short lifespan of l—’.’. years and
`living in the clean waters of the Antarctic Ocean, makes the
`krill and thus Neptune Krill Oil naturally pure of heavy metals,
`dioxins and pesticides.
`The oil is extracted by a patented cold vactulrn extraction
`process that protects the biomass from exposure to heat. light or
`oxygen. This protects the oil
`through-out its production and
`maintains the original nuuients of krill intact. The result is a
`concentrate of novel marine phosplrolipid carriers of eicosa-
`pcntemoic (EPA) and docosahexanoic (DHA) fatty acids and
`potent antioxidants. The main antioxidants, astaxanthin and a
`novel flavonoid, similar to the 6,8-Di-C‘.-glucosylluteolin, es-
`terify the EPA and DHA respectively. This provides a signif-
`icant stability and antioxidant potency to the oil.
`Anecdotal data suggests that Neptune Krill Oil may be
`effective for the management of arthritic symptoms. Evidence
`has shown that phospholipids, omega-3 fatty acids and astax-
`anthiu have direct or indirect anti-ittflamnratory properties
`[9—l3.30—53]. Phospholipids protect the cell membrane for
`toxic injury [39]. Multiple studies have proven EPA and DHA
`to trigger secretion of anti—inflammatory prostaglandins of
`the 3 series (PE3, P13 and thromboxane A3) and interleukin-6
`resulting in a decrease CRP and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
`[30—38,40—53]. Astaxanthin inhibits
`the production of
`proinflammalory prostaglandins tPGE2‘I and TNF [9—l 3.4]-
`43]. A dietary supplement that contains a natural combina-
`tion of phospholipids. EPA, DHA and astaxanthin may offer
`an alternative regimen for the management of chronic in-
`flammatory conditions.
`
`Considering the continuously increasing evidence of ad-
`verse events related to the chronic use of non-steroidal anti-
`
`inflamrnatory drugs (NSAIDs). which represent the gold starr-
`dard for the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions. it is
`imperative to research for more innovative and safer treatments
`[54—bl]. The current study addresses the need for safer alter-
`natives in the management of inflammation and arthritic dis-
`ease and evaluates the hypotheses that Neptune Krill Oil is safe
`and effective for the reduction of inflammation as measured by
`serum CRP and the management of pain in patients with
`arthritic disease. The objectives of the present study were a) to
`evaluate the effect of NKOTM on CRP in patients with chronic
`inflammation and h) to evaluate the effect of NKOW on the
`quality of life of patients with arthritic disease.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Patients
`
`Adult patients between 30 and 75 years with a confirmed
`diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and/or rheumatoid arthritis
`and/or osteoarthritis and with increased CRP levels at l.0 rug/dl
`or more and a standard deviation not higher than 0.05 in three
`consecutive weekly tests, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria
`and signed an informed consent form, were included in the
`study. Excluded from the study were patients who could not
`restrain from consuming alcohol for the duration of the study,
`with a history of gastrointestinal perforation or hemorrhage or
`symptomatic peptic ulcer. Patients with seafood allergy, diabe-
`tes or concurrent medical disease or concomitant treatments
`
`(including postmenopausal hormones) that could confound or
`interfere with the outcome measures. as well as those taking
`concomitzmt anticoagulants were not eligible for enrollment.
`Also excluded were patients with moderate or severe depres-
`sion or who were unable to respond to the study questionnaire.
`Women of childbearing age were required to have confirmed
`use of adequate contraception since their last menses and to
`agree to continue this practice during the study.
`
`Study Design
`
`In this prospective randomized double blind clinical trial 90
`patients who fulfilled the study criteria were recruited from the
`practices of primary care physicians in Ontario, Canada. Pa-
`tients were randomly assigned by a computer-generated sched-
`ule into one of two groups. The first group (Group A) received
`NKOW at a daily moming dose of 300 mg; the second group
`(Group B) received a neutral placebo. The NKO“‘ contained
`17% EPA, 10% DHA and an omega-3 versus omega-6 ratio of
`15 to l. The placebo used was microcrystalline cellulose. Both
`the NKOT“ and the placebo were administered in non-distin-
`guishable glycerirr softgels. Compliance was tested by a count
`of softgels at each visit after 7, 14 and 30 days. All blood tests
`were taken at a central lab in the morning. between 7:00 and
`
`40
`
`VOL. 26. NO.
`
`1
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`10:00 am under fasting conditions for 8 hours. Blood sampling
`and testing occurred weekly during the 3 week screening pe-
`riod, at baseline after the 1 week wash-out and at each fol-
`
`low-up visit after 7. 14 and 30 days of treatment.
`Patients were asked to stop use of all dietary supplements.
`especially those containing omega-6, foods containing a high
`content of omega-6 (corn, soy, safflower and sunflower oils
`and sunflower seeds) and all analgesics (except acetamino-
`phen) and anti-inflammatory medications for two weeks prior
`to initiation of the trial for washout purposes. Patients were
`allowed to take acetaminophen (650 mg caplets) as a rescue
`analgesic medication. for severe pain throughout the trial. The
`maximum dose of acetaminophen allowed was as recom-
`mended by the manufacturer; 1-2 capsules every 8 hours. All
`patients were instructed to keep a diary of their acetaminophen
`consumption and report it at their next scheduled visit.
`Ninety patients were recruited. 45 per group, of whom 44
`patients in the NKOW group and 43 patients in the placebo
`group completed 30 days of treatment. Two patients withdrew
`from the study, one per group, after a minor accident
`that
`required additional analgesic treatment. One patient on placebo
`withdrew for personal reasons. The mean age of patients in the
`NKOT” group was 54.6 (14.8) years and 55.3 (14.3) years in
`the placebo group. There were 25 (55.6%) male patients in the
`NKOT“ group and 22 (48.9%) in the placebo group.
`In Group A and B respectively, 5 and 7 patients were
`diagnosed only with atherosclerosis, 18 and 16 patients only
`with osteoarthritis, 10 and 12 patients only with rheumatoid
`arthritis and I2 and 10 patients with cardiovascular disease and
`osteoarthritis. Overall, in the NKOW and placebo group re-
`spectively. l7 and 17 patients were diagnosed with cardiovas-
`cular disease, 30 and 26 with osteoarthritis and 10 and 12 with
`rheumatoid arthritis.
`
`Outcome Measures
`
`During the screening period, in order to an oid the inclusion
`of patients with acute inflammation, the primary efficacy pa-
`rameter, C-reactive protein, was measured weekly for three
`consecutive weeks. Patients who maintained :1 CRP of at least
`
`1 mg/dl, without fluctuations higher than 0.05 mg, were blindly
`randomized in their group and after the washout period initiated
`their respective treatment, either NKOTM or placebo. CRP was
`further tested after 7, 14 and 30 days of treatment.
`At baseline as well as at each of the three follow-up visits.
`patients with arthritic disease were asked to complete the
`Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ar-
`thritic pain asscssmcnt questionnaire. The Western Ontario and
`McMaster (WOMAC) University osteoarthritis score is a 24-
`item questionnaire completed by the patient and focusing on
`joint pain, stiffness and loss of function related to osteoarthritis
`of the knee and hip [62—77]. The WOMAC is used extensively
`in clinical trials for the evaluation of the effect of investiga-
`tional products on the treatment of osteoarthritis. Even though
`
`Eflert of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`it was initially developed for the assessment of pain, stiffness
`and function of daily living in the elderly with osteoarthritis it
`has recently been revised for younger and./or more active pa-
`tients with knee injury and/or knee or hip osteoarthritis. It
`provides a validated assessment of the patient's functional
`capacity. specifically joint pain, stiffness and functional impair-
`ment [62—77]. The WOMAC osteoarthritis score has 3 sub-
`scales with 24 items: 5 items assessing pain. 2 items for
`stiffness. and 17 items measuring physical function. It can be
`self-administered in less than 5 minutes. The WOMAC can be
`
`both scored separately for each subscale and together to give a
`composite score. The scale employed in this study to quantify
`patient global assessment of disease activity was the Likert
`scale; a 5-point scale in which 0 represents the best outcome
`and 4 the worst. Minimal clinically significant change is con-
`sidered a decrease of 0.4 mm on each item in the three sub-
`
`scales [7I—77]. In order to avoid environmental or other bias,
`all patients responded to the WOMAC in the physician’s office
`before their examination.
`
`Statistical Design
`
`A sample size of 90 patients (45 patients per group) pro-
`vided 80% power to detect a CRP reduction of 10% from
`baseline to 14 days. Within group differences reflecting
`changes over time for the same patient were assessed for
`statistical significance with the Paired Studcnt’s t-test. Between
`group differences were assessed with planned comparisons of
`one way analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at
`p < 0.05. Values are presented as mean i standard deviation.
`
`RESULTS
`
`At baseline, there was no significant difference between
`groups with regards to concomitant medications (p — 0.987).
`CRP levels ([2 = 0.087) and the three WOMAC scores (pain -
`p = 0.539. stiffness — p = 0.104, functional impairment - p =
`0.105). Patients on NKOT“ reduced their consumption of res-
`cue medieations between baseline and 30 days by 31.6% and
`significantly less consumption than patients on placebo, who
`reduced their acetaminophen intake by 5.9% (p = 0.012).
`After 7 days of treatment NKOT“ reduced mean (SD) CRP
`by 19.3% (1.1) compared to an increase by 15.7% (1.9) ob-
`served in the placebo group. The difference between the two
`groups was statistically significant (p = 0.049). NKOT“ further
`decreased CRP after 14 and 30 days of treatment by 29.7%
`(0.9) and 30.9% (l.0_) respectively. The CRP levels of the
`placebo group increased by 32.1% (1.9) after 14 days and then
`decreased to 25.1% (I .l) at day 30. The within group decrease
`of mean (SD) CRP by NKO“-‘ through the three testing periods
`was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Contrary the CRP in
`the within placebo group increased significantly (p = 0.028).
`The between group difference in all three testing days was
`
`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION
`
`41
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Eflert of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`Table 1. C-Reactive Protein (CR?) mg/dl by Group and Visit
`
`Visit
`
`Baseline
`
`7 Days
`
`I4 Days
`
`30 Days
`
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`
`% Change (Bascline—7 days)
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mm“
`% (‘I-range (‘Baseline—l4 days!
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`96 Change (Basclinc~30 days)
`Std Deviation
`Median
`
`P-value (Within Groups iullnteraction
`
`Table 2. WOMAC Pain Scoies by Group and Visit*
`
`Baseline
`
`7 Days
`
`Mean
`Std De\-‘iation
`Median
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P value (Within Groups}/Interaction
`* 0 represents the best outcome and 4 the worst.
`
`Visit
`
`14 Days
`
`30 Days
`
`Placebo
`2.87
`
`L25
`2.83
`3.32
`
`15.7
`1.92
`3.26
`3.79
`
`32.1
`1.88
`4.02
`3.59
`
`L05
`3.44
`0.028
`
`NKUW
`300 mg/day
`2.49
`
`L85
`2.28
`2.01
`
`- 19.3
`1.08
`I .95
`l.75
`
`— 29.7
`0.88
`1.86
`1.72
`
`l.0
`L69
`0.00!
`
`Gm“?
`
`(1:30
`3.39
`
`.91
`3. I 9
`2.4!
`
`.90
`2.19
`2.52
`
`.79
`2.39
`2.04)
`
`.85
`2.02
`0.002
`
`Placebo
`3.07
`
`.60
`3.00
`2.78
`
`.61
`2.71
`3.26
`
`.67
`3.21
`3.05
`
`.59
`3.00
`0.138
`
`P value
`b
`
`0087
`
`0049
`
`0.004
`
`P value
`(Between
`Groups)
`
`0539
`
`0052
`
`0003
`
`0009
`
`statistically significant; p - 0.049 at 7 days, p — 0.004 at day
`14 and p = 0.008 at day 30 tTable 1).
`Tables 2-7 present
`the effects of NKOT” on the 3
`WOMAC osteoarthritis scores compared to placebo, from
`baseline to 30 days. NKOW showed a significant reduction
`in all
`three WOMAC scores. NKOT“ reduced pain signifi-
`cantly more than placebo in all three follow-up visits: p =
`0.()50 at visit 1 (day 7), p = 0.049 at visit 2 (day 14) andp =
`0.011 at visit 7» (day 7:0) Similar effects were observed with
`the stiffness and functional impairment scores. In all three
`follow—up visits the between group differences in change of
`stiffness (p = 0.001) and functional impairment (p = 0.005)
`were statistically significant
`(Tables 4-7). No adverse
`events were reported during the 30 days of treatment with
`Neptune Krill Oil.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS) are the
`most commonly prescribed agents for inflammatory conditions.
`NSAIDS are drugs with analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inf|am-
`matory effects. Most NSAIDs, such as aspirin, ibuprofen and
`naproxen act as non-selective inhibitors of cyclnoxyge.nase—
`they inhibit both the cycl0oxygenase—l (COX-1) and cyclo0x-
`ygenase-2 (COX-2) isnenzymes, whereas COX-2 inhibitors
`selectively inhibit the cyclooxygenase—2 isoenzyme. The main
`advantage of NSAIDS is that, unlike opioids,
`they do not
`produce sedation, respiratory depression, or addiction. Certain
`NSAIDS have become accepted as relatively safe, resulting in
`the rescheduling of these agents, e.g. ibuprofen, to allow avail-
`ability over-the-counter. However, recent evidence suggests an
`
`Page 5
`
`VOL. 26. NO.
`
`1
`
`

`
`Table 3. Change in WOMAC Pain Scores! 100 by Group and Visit‘
`
`Eflert of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`Visit
`
`7 Days
`
`14 Days
`
`30 Days
`
`Mean
`
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P-Value (Visit)
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P—Va|iie lVisitl
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P-Value (Visit)
`
`" (J represents the best outcome and 4 the worst.
`
`Table 4. WOMAC Stiffness Scores by Group and Visit‘
`
`Baseline
`
`7 Days
`
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P value (Within Groups l/Interaction
`“ ll represents the best outcome and 4 the worst.
`
`Visit
`
`14 Days
`
`30 Days
`
`Group
`
`-0
`N13:gl(1:30
`-2891
`
`is.7n
`-25.00
`0.001
`-25.66
`
`l5.27
`—?_i_0t'l
`0,022
`-38.35
`
`-30.00
`0.001
`
`Group
`
`3
`Nfigdago
`3.45
`
`.95
`3 48
`...75
`
`.84
`_ 43
`2.55
`.79
`2.50
`2.10
`
`.85
`2.00
`0.002
`
`Placebo
`-9.44
`
`26.98
`-10.00
`0.290
`6.18
`
`13.54
`.00
`0.208
`-0.6
`
`.00
`0.610
`
`Placebo
`2.85
`
`.85
`3.02
`3.35
`
`.53
`3.10
`2.83
`.99
`3.00
`2.97
`
`.72
`3.01
`0.324
`
`P value
`
`(Between
`Groups]
`
`0050
`
`0019
`
`P value
`
`(‘Between
`Gmups)
`
`0. I 04
`
`0030
`
`0.056
`
`0043
`
`association between COX-2 inhibitor exposure and cardiovas-
`cular risk. Considering that small increases in ambulatory and
`clinic systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension and
`type 11 diabetes are associated with substantial increases in the
`risk of cardiovziscular morbidity, the use of these medications
`has been restricted to the lowest effective dose for the shortest
`
`possible duration of treatment [54—6l].
`Neptune Krill Oil is a rich source or unique phospholipid
`carriers of nmeg:i—3 fatty acids, eicosapentanoic acid (EPA) and
`docosahexanoic acid (DHA), esterified on antioxidants, as
`astaxaiithin and a novel flavonoid. Phospholipids are important
`in protecting membranes from toxic injury and free radical
`attack [39]. The. composition of phospholipids in Neptune Krill
`Oil appears to be optimal to offer such protection. The unrav-
`eling of the exact mechanism of action is a multifactnrial
`project which is still ongoing. We speculate that it is based on
`the blockage of leukotriene formation by interfering at the level
`
`of the lipoxygcnasc pathways. The significantly dominant ome-
`ga-3 to omega-6 ratio (1521) in Neptune Krill Oil may partially
`explain the anti-inflaminatory effects observed in this trial. The
`balance or polyuiisaturated (essential) fatty acids in the body is
`critical for the maintenance of healthy cell membranes and
`hormone regulation. During the last decades. the American diet
`has shifted to much higher levels of omega-6 and less omega-3
`fatty acid intake. Lon g-chain omega-o such as arachidonic acid,
`predominating in the phospholipids of cell membranes can
`encourage the production of pro—infl2tmmatoi'y type-2 prosta-
`glandins (PGE2), while omega-3 fatty acids promote the pro-
`duction of anti-inflammatory prostaglandins [1,2]. An addi-
`tional factor is the. naturally occumng zistaitanthin in NKOTM
`which may also actively contribute in its anti-inflammatory
`potency. A recent study by Ohgami K. et al demonstrates that
`astaxanthiii inhibits nitric oxide production through inhibiting
`the activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and
`
`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION
`
`43
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`Eflert of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`Table 5. Change in WOMAC Stiffness Scores/100 by Group and Visit"‘
`
`Vim
`
`7 Days
`
`14 Days
`
`39 Days
`
`" (J represents the best outcome and 4 the worst.
`
`Mean
`
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P-Value (Visit)
`
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P-Value (Visit)
`Mean
`
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P-Value (Visit)
`
`Table 6. WOMAC Functional Impairment Scores by Group and Visit“
`
`4
`,
`V5“
`
`Baseline
`
`7 Da
`
`Y5
`
`H Days
`
`Mean
`
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`Mean
`
`Std 1')e\‘1at1on
`Median
`Mean
`
`Std Deviation
`30 Days
`Median
`P value (Wid1in Gmupst/Interaction
`“ 0 represents the best outcome and 4 the Worst.
`
`Group
`
`NKO 300
`mglday
`-20.29
`
`24.3!
`-25.00
`0.004
`
`- 26.09
`27.05
`-3135
`0002
`-39.13
`
`27.67
`-31.25
`0.003
`
`Group
`
`NKO 300
`
`mg/day
`3.34
`
`9|
`3.41
`2.58
`.58
`2.3:
`2.36
`
`.31
`2.56
`3.14
`
`.68
`2.66
`0.018
`
`Table 7. Change 111 WOMAC Functional Impairment Scores/100 by Group and Visit*
`
`Visit
`
`7 Days
`
`I4 Days
`
`30 Days
`
`" 0 represents the best outcome and 4 the worst.
`
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P-Value (Visit)
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P—Value (Visit)
`Mean
`Std Deviation
`Median
`P-Value (Visit)
`
`Group
`
`NKO 300
`mglday
`— 22.75
`10.59
`- 2.53
`0.005
`- 29.34
`14.07
`- 14.02
`0.016
`— 35 .93
`9.69
`- 20.47
`0.08
`
`Pl acebo
`
`-17.54
`29.88
`25.00
`0.127
`-0.70
`20.55
`L00
`0.820
`4.2!
`26.74
`12.50
`0.879
`
`2.63
`1.78
`
`2.9|
`0.138
`
`Placebo
`
`-1.34
`5.86
`1.55
`0.750
`-11.07
`13.06
`-0.15
`11.094
`-5.71
`7.34
`-3.1 I
`0.269
`
`P value
`(Between
`Groups}
`
`0.001
`
`0.018
`
`0 023
`
`P value
`(Between
`Groups)
`
`0.105
`
`0.023
`
`0.021
`
`0.135
`
`P value
`t Between
`Groups)
`
`0 008
`
`0.040
`
`0.005
`
`44
`
`VOL. 26. NO.
`
`1
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`production of PGE2 and TNF-. This study suggests that astax—
`anthin may have an anti-inflammatory effect and may be a
`promising agent for the treatment of inflammation [43].
`The present study confirms the results of previous research
`demonstrating the anti—inflarnmatory effects of EPA and DHA and
`of a dominant omega-3 versus omega-6 ratio [30—38,40,44 -53].
`Simopoulos has shown that omega-3 fatty acids lower CRP more
`so than arty other nutrient, which accounts for decreasing the risk
`for coronary heart disease [45]. Human and animal studies have
`provided evidence that dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids mod-
`ifies inflammatory and immune reactions. This makes making
`omega-3 fatty acids potential therapeutic agents for inflammatory
`diseases [30—38.40,4-1-53].
`A possible explanation for the increase of CRP observed in
`the placebo group is the interruption of all anti-inflammatory
`regimens one week prior and for the duration of the trial. Since
`the patients enrolled suffered from a chronic inflammatory
`condition with chronically high CRP, the cessation of all anti-
`inflannnatory treatment may have triggered the increased pro-
`duction of CRP.
`
`The significant reduction of pain shown in the WOMAC
`pain score is also demonstrated the significantly lower con-
`sumption of NSAIDs by the group of patients treated with
`NKOT“. This finding becomes even more significant
`if we
`consider the nephrotoxicity of NSAIDs mainly among patients
`with chronic inflammatory diseases.
`The results of the present study validate the potent anti-
`inflainmatory properties of NKOT“ and reinforce the potential
`mechanism of action. The CRP reduction induced by NKOT“
`demonstrates that NKO"“ is 21 safe and effective alternative for
`
`the treatment of inflammation, particularly with all the recently
`proven adverse events of the most widely used NSAIDS. Fur-
`thermore, this study demonstrates a significant improvement in
`all 3 WOMAC scores among the 30 and I0 patients on NKOT“
`as compared to the 26 and 12 patients on placebo who were
`diagnosed with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. No ad-
`verse events were reported making NKOW safe for human
`consumption.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`The rcsults of the present study indicate that NKO” at a
`daily dose of 300 mg may within a short time to reaction (7-14
`days) significantly inhibit inflammation by reducing CRP as
`well as significantly alleviate symptoms caused by osteoarthri-
`tis and rheumatoid arthritis. Further research is required to
`better understand the mechzmism of action and to compare the
`effects of NKO with other anti-inflammatory agents prcscntly
`used as standard care.
`
`Eflert of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`REFERENCES
`
`!—)
`
`1. Johansen IS. Stoltenberg M, Hansen M, Florescu A, Horslev-
`Petersen K. Lorenzen I, Price PA: Serum YKL-40 concentrations
`in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: relation to disease activity.
`Rheumatology 38:618-626. 1999.
`Roberts WL, Moulton L, Law TC. Farrow G. Cooper-Anderson M.
`Savory J, Rifai N: Evaluation of nine automated high-sensitivity
`C-reactive protein methods; implications for clinical and epidemi-
`nlogical applications Clin Chem 47‘4l 8-425. 2001
`3. Ockene IS, Matthews CE. Rifai N. Ridker PM. Reed G, Stanek E:
`
`I.»
`
`Variability and classification accuracy of serial high-sensitivity
`C-reactive protein measurements in healthy adults. Clin Chem
`47:444-450. 2001.
`4. Meier-Ewen HK, Ridker PM, Rifai N, Price N. hinges DF. Mull-
`ington I'M: Absence of diurnal variation of C-reactive protein
`levels in healthy human subjects. Clirt Chem 47;426—-£30, 2001.
`Rifai N. Buring IE. Lee IM. Manson IE, Ridker PM: Is C-reactive
`protein specific for vascular disease in wolrlen? Ann Intern Med
`l3b:529—533, 2002.
`6. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L. Buring IE, Cook NR: Comparison of
`C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in
`the prediction of first cardiovascular events. New Engl I Med
`347: I557-I565, 2002.
`
`7. Ridker PM, Cuslrman M, Stampfer MJ. Tracy RP, Hennekens CH:
`Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in
`apparently healthy men. New Engl I Med 336973-979, 1997.
`8, Tracy RP, Lemaitre RN, Psaty BM, Ives DG, Evans RW. Cushman
`M, Meilahn EN. Kuller Ll-I: Relationship of C-reactive protein to
`risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: results from the
`Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rural Health Promotion
`Project. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
`|7:l Ill-l I27, I997.
`9. Ridker PM. Hennckens CH. Euring IF., Rifai N: C-reactive protein
`and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovas-
`cular disease in women. N Engl J Med 341836-843, 2000.
`I0. Koenig W, Suntl M, Frohlich M, Fischer HG, Luwcl H, During A,
`Hutchinson WL, Pepys MB: C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker
`of imlammation. predicts futurc risk of coronary hczm discasc in
`initially healthy middlc-aged men:
`results from the MONICA
`(Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease)
`Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to I992, Circulation 99:237-242.
`1999.
`
`l l. Danesh J. Whincup P. Walker M. Lennon L. Thomson A. Applehy
`P, Gallimorc JR, Pepys MB: Low grade inflammation and coro-
`nary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses.
`BM] 3ll:l9'~)-204, 2000
`ll. Mcudall MA, Sttuchttu DP, Bullaud BK, Ballutu L, Morris J.
`Sweetnam PM, Ewood PC: C-reactive protein: relation to total
`mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular risk factors
`in men. Eur Heart J 211584-1590. 2000.
`I3. Rost NS, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Kelly-Hayes M, Silbershatz H,
`Massaro IM, D'Agostino RB, Franzblau C, Wilson PW: Plasma
`concentration ot'C-reactive protein and risk of ischemic stroke and
`transient ischemic attack: the Framingham Study. Stroke 3222575-
`1579, 2100!.
`
`14. Ford ES. Giles WH: Serum (.'-reactive protein and self-reported
`stroke: findings from the Third National Health illld Nutrition
`
`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION
`
`45
`
`Page 8
`
`

`
`Eflert of Neptune Krill Oil
`
`I5.
`
`Examination Surve . Arterinscler Tltromh Vasc Biol 2021052-
`l056. 2000.
`Albert CM, Ma 1, Rifai N, Stampfer MI. Ridlter PM: Prospective
`study of C-reactive protein, ltomocysteine. and plasma lipid levels
`as predictors of sudden cardiac death. Circulation |05:2595—2599,
`2002.
`
`I6.
`
`I7.
`
`I8.
`
`19.
`
`21.
`
`24.
`
`Rtdker PM, St-ampfer MJ, Rtfat N: Novel risk factors for systemic
`atherosclerosis: a comparison of C-reactive protein. fihrinogen,
`homocysteinc-. lipoprotcintal. and standard cholesterol screening
`as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA 285224-8l—2485,
`200l.
`Ottcrncss IG. Bliverl ML. Do\vns IT. Natoli El, Hanson DC:
`Inhibition of interleukin-I synthesis by tenidap:
`ct new drug for
`arthritis. Cytokine 32227-228, l99l.
`Sipe ID, Bartle VIN, Loose II): Modification of the proinflamm:t-
`tory cytokine production by the antirheuntatic agents tenidap and
`naproxen. I lntntunnl
`I48:-lll0—48-l, I993.
`Loose LD, dc Olivcita R, Sipe JD, Frattzblau C, Shattahan WR: A
`possible systctttic cotttponcnt of ostcoztrthritisz clcyatcd concentra-
`tions (by ELISA) of C reactive. protein in serum of OA patients and
`tnodulation by tenidap. Arthritis Rheum 39(Suppl):Sl66. 1996.
`. Loose LD. Sipe JD. Kirby DS. Kraska AR. Weiner ES. Shanahaa
`WR, Leeming MR. Farrow P. Stack CB, Ting N‘ Reduction of
`acute-phase proteins with tenidap. a cytokine modulzttittg antirheu-
`matic drug. Br J Rheumatol 32(Suppl 3):19—25, 1993.
`Johansen IS, Baslund B, Garbasch C, Hansen M, Lorenzen 1, Price
`PA. YKL-40 in giant cells and macrophages from patients with
`giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 421624-2630, 1999.
`. Johansen JS. Moller S. Price PA. Bendtsen F. Jung: J. Garbarsch
`C, Henriksen JH: Plasma YKL-40: a new potential marker of
`fibrosis in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis‘? Scand J Gastrocnterol
`32:582-590. 1997.
`. Spcctor TD, Hart DJ, Nandra D, Doyle DV, Macktllop N, Galli-
`more IR. Pepys MB: Low-level
`increases in serum C reactive
`protein are present in early osteoarthritis of the knee and predict
`progressive disease. Arthritis Rheum 40:123—727, 1997.
`Conrozier Th. Carkier M-C. Mathieu P: Serum levels of YKL-40
`
`and C reactive protein in patients with hip osteoarthritis and
`healthy subjects: a cross sectional study. Ann Rheum Dis 59:828-
`83-I. 2000.
`Conrozier T, Cltappuis-Collier C, Richard M, Mathieu P, Richard
`S, Vignon E: Increased seruttr-C-reactive Plotein levels by immu-
`nonephelornetry in patients with rapidly destructive osteoarthritis.
`Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65:759 765, I998.
`Wolfe F: The C reactive protein but not erythrocyte sedimentatim
`rate is associated with clinical severity in patients with osteoar-
`thritis of the knee or hip. I Rheumatol 24:|-186-1488, I997.
`Johansen JS. Jensen HS. Price PA: A new biochemical marker for
`joint injury. Analysis of Y

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket