`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`BROADCOM CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`WI-FI ONE, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00636
`U.S. Patent No. 6,424,625
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF STIPULATED MODIFICATION OF DUE DATES 4-5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 137586852v.2
`
`
`
`
`
`Broadcom Corporation and Wi-Fi One, LLC, by and through their respective
`
`counsel of record, have stipulated as follows:
`
`1.
`
`On March 10, 2014, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper No. 26) in the Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,424,625 (Trial No. IPR2013-00636) setting forth due dates “for the parties to
`
`take action in this trial.”
`
`2.
`
`On August 29, 2014, the above-identified parties stipulated to modify
`
`DUE DATES 2-3 as follows:
`
`DUE DATE 2:
`
`October 1, 2014
`
`DUE DATE 3:
`
`November 3, 2014
`
`3.
`
`The Scheduling Order states that the “parties may not stipulate to an
`
`extension of DUE DATES 4-7.” Therefore on October 27, 2014 Broadcom sent an
`
`unopposed request to trials@USPTO.GOV to request permission to extend DUE
`
`DATES 4 and 5.
`
`4.
`
`On October 28, 2014, Ms. Maria Vignone, Paralegal Operations
`
`Manager at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, authorized the above-identified
`
`parties to stipulate to DUE DATES 4-5 as follows:
`
`DUE DATE 4:
`
`November 12, 2014
`
`DUE DATE 5:
`
`November 19, 2014
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 137586852v.2
`
`1
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Broadcom requested extending DUE DATES 4 and 5 because under
`
`the current schedule, Owner Wi-Fi One’s reply for its motion to amend (DUE
`
`DATE 3) is due on the same day as Broadcom’s (a) motion for observation, and
`
`(b) motion to exclude evidence (DUE DATE 4). However, Broadcom would need
`
`to depose Wi-Fi One’s expert (if necessary) and review Wi-Fi One’s replies prior
`
`to filing either (a) or (b).
`
`6.
`
`Extending DUE DATE 4 to November 12, 2014 gives Broadcom
`
`seven business days to review Wi-Fi One’s submissions for DUE DATE 3, depose
`
`Wi-Fi One’s expert, and receive a final transcript of the deposition to use for
`
`observations. Further, extending DUE DATE 5 to November 19, 2014 gives Wi-Fi
`
`One a full calendar week to respond to Broadcom’s response to observation, and
`
`gives both parties a calendar week to prepare oppositions to motions to exclude.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 29, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Michael A. Diener/
`
`Michael A. Diener, Reg. No. 37,122
`
`60 State St.
`
`Boston, MA 02109
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 137586852v.2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, on October 29, 2014, I caused a true and correct copy
`
`of the foregoing NOTICE OF STIPULATED MODIFICATION OF DUE DATES
`
`4-5 to be served via email on the attorneys identified in Wi-Fi One’s Updated
`
`Mandatory Notice and Notice of Appearance for John Shumaker, whom consented
`
`to electronic service:
`
`Lead Counsel:
`Back-up Counsel:
`Email Address:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 137586852v.2
`
`Peter J. Ayers
`J. Christopher Lynch, John Shumaker
`EricssonIPR2013-636@leehayes.com
`
`/Michael A. Diener/
`Michael A. Diener
`Registration No. 37,122
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
