`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 36
`Entered: November 25, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`DELL INC., HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, and NETAPP, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH
`INSTITUTE,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-00635
`Patent 6,978,346 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`Before BRIAN J. McNAMARA, MIRIAM L. QUINN, and
`GREGG I. ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`QUINN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10)
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00635
`Patent 6,978,346 B2
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner requested a hearing in each of the above
`proceedings pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). See Papers 3435. The
`requests are granted.
`Each party will have forty-five (45) minutes of time to present
`arguments. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the challenged
`claims are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will proceed first to present
`its case as to the challenged claims, and may reserve rebuttal time. Patent
`Owner then will respond to Petitioner’s case. After that, Petitioner may use
`the rest of its time to respond to Patent Owner’s presentation.
`The hearing will commence at 1 PM Eastern Time, December 18,
`2014, and will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the ninth
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first come, first served
`basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearings, and the
`reporter’s transcripts will constitute the official record of the hearings.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`five business days prior to the hearings. The parties shall confer with each
`other regarding any objections to demonstrative exhibits in each proceeding,
`and file demonstrative exhibits with the Board at least two business days
`prior to the hearing. For any issue that cannot be resolved after conferring
`with the opposing party, the parties may file jointly a one-page list of
`objections at least two business days prior to the hearing. The list should
`identify with particularity which demonstrative exhibits are subject to
`objection and include a short statement (no more than one sentence) of the
`reason for each objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted.
`We will consider the objections and schedule a conference call if necessary.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00635
`Patent 6,978,346 B2
`
`Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the objections until after the hearing.
`Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be
`considered waived.
`The parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent
`Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033, slip op. (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper
`118), regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. The
`parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced
`during the hearings to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s
`transcripts. The parties also should note that at least one member of the
`panel will be attending the hearings from a remote location, and that if a
`demonstrative is not filed or otherwise made fully available or visible to the
`judge(s) presiding over the hearing remotely, that demonstrative will not be
`considered.
`The Board expects lead counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner to be
`present at the hearings, although any back-up counsel may make the actual
`presentation, in whole or in part. If lead counsel for either party will not be
`in attendance at the hearings, the Board should be notified via a joint
`conference call no later than two days prior to the hearings to discuss the
`matter.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearings are to be made
`five days in advance of the hearing date. The requests must be sent to
`Trials@uspto.gov. If the requests are not received timely, equipment may
`not be available on the day of the hearings. Furthermore, if the parties have
`questions as to whether demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00635
`Patent 6,978,346 B2
`
`and available to all of the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board
`at 571-272-9797.
`
`FOR PETITIONERS:
`
`Lead Counsel
`David McCombs
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Andrew S. Ehmke
`andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`Thomas W. Kelton
`Thomas.kelton.ipr@haynesboone.com
`John Russell Emerson
`Russell.emerson.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Lead Counsel
`Mathew Phillips
`matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Derek Meeker
`derek.meeker@renaissanceiplaw.com
`Alexander Giza
`agiza@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`