throbber

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2013
`EXHIBIT 201 3
`
`

`

`Lauren Van Winkle
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`JFeldhaus@foley.com
`Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:23 AM
`Justin Nemunaitis
`Ericsson_D-Link; ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson@foley.com
`RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`Justin,
`
`
`As I have now made clear several times, Toshiba’s position is that Ericsson’s issues should be addressed to Broadcom
`and through the appropriate procedures at the PTAB.
`
`
`Respectfully,
`
`
`John J. Feldhaus
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`3000 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20007
`(202) 672-5403
`
`
`
`From: Justin Nemunaitis [mailto:jnemunaitis@McKoolSmith.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:38 PM
`To: Feldhaus, John J.
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link; ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`John,
`
`
`Following up on my email below. If Toshiba is unwilling to redact the document, is Toshiba willing to provide Ericsson’s
`IPR counsel and the PTAB access to the document if a suitable protective order can be obtained from the PTAB?
`
`
`Regards,
`Justin
`
`
`From: Justin Nemunaitis
`Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:31 PM
`To: 'JFeldhaus@foley.com'
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link; ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson@foley.com
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`John,
`
`Is Toshiba willing to provide a redacted version of this document that is non-confidential or is it your position that the
`document cannot be redacted?
`
`
`Regards,
`Justin
`
`
`From: JFeldhaus@foley.com [mailto:JFeldhaus@foley.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:51 PM
`
`1
`
`

`

`To: Justin Nemunaitis
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link; ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson@foley.com
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`Justin,
`
`
`The confidentiality designation for TOSH-0384297 is proper under the Protective Order. Again, Ericsson’s issues should
`addressed to Broadcom and in the appropriate forum.
`
`
`Regards,
`
`John
`
`
`From: Justin Nemunaitis [mailto:jnemunaitis@McKoolSmith.com]
`Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 3:07 PM
`To: Feldhaus, John J.
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link; ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`John,
`
`
`We intend to raise these issues with Broadcom. However, we also request that Toshiba remove the confidentiality
`designation for TOSH-0384297. If Toshiba will not agree to do so, please let me know why.
`
`
`Regards,
`Justin
`
`
`From: JFeldhaus@foley.com [mailto:JFeldhaus@foley.com]
`Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 12:55 PM
`To: Justin Nemunaitis
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link; ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson@foley.com
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`
`Dear Justin,
`
`
`This is in response to your emails, below, relating to petitions for inter partes review of patents involved in the Ericsson
`v. D-Link case. The issues you raise relate to Broadcom and should be addressed to counsel for Broadcom.
`
`
`Respectfully,
`
`
`John J. Feldhaus
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`3000 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20007
`(202) 672-5403
`
`
`
`From: Justin Nemunaitis [mailto:jnemunaitis@McKoolSmith.com]
`Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 5:17 PM
`To: ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`
`Counsel for Toshiba,
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Following up on my emails below. Ericsson also requests that you provide a non-confidential version of the following
`document:
`
`
`TOSH-0384297
`
`
`Regards,
`Justin
`
`
`
`From: Justin Nemunaitis
`Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 4:15 PM
`To: Morgan, Christine (CMorgan@ReedSmith.com); ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson@foley.com; Dell-Ericsson@alston.com
`(Alston) (Dell-Ericsson@alston.com)
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`Following up on my email below, please let me know if Defendants will be providing the requested information in a form
`that may be shared with the PTAB and with Ericsson’s IPR counsel.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Justin
`
`
`From: Justin Nemunaitis
`Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 4:38 PM
`To: Morgan, Christine (CMorgan@ReedSmith.com); ToshibaDefendants-Ericsson@foley.com; Dell-Ericsson@alston.com
`(Alston) (Dell-Ericsson@alston.com)
`Cc: Ericsson_D-Link
`Subject: RE: Ericsson v. D-Link - Broadcom IPR
`
`
`Dear Counsel,
`
`I write in regard to Broadcom’s petitions for inter partes review of the patents found infringed in Ericsson v. D-Link.
`Ericsson believes that those petitions should be barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) because at least one of the defendants
`in this case is the privy of Broadcom. To assist the PTAB in evaluating that issue, we request that Defendants allow the
`PTAB access to relevant documents. Specifically, Ericsson requests that Defendants provide non-confidential versions of
`the documents below that can be shared with the PTAB and with Ericsson’s IPR counsel:
`
`
`• All indemnity agreements between Defendants and Broadcom related to the products at issue in the lawsuit.
`• All joint defense agreements related to Ericsson v. D-Link signed by Broadcom and any of the defendants in this
`case.
`
`
`If Defendants will not agree to Ericsson’s requests, please let me know why.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Justin
`
`
`
`Justin Nemunaitis | McKool Smith
`300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201
`tel: 214.978.4213 fax: 214.978.4044
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
`
`
`The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT and ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE and is
`CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or
`reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee designated above by the sender is
`unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to
`you should be immediately destroyed.
`The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. It is not intended
`for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in error, please
`(i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the
`message. Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP
`client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be
`relied upon by any other party. Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written advice
`include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless
`expressly stated otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient
`or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties, and was not written to support the
`promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter discussed herein.
`The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. It is not intended
`for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in error, please
`(i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the
`message. Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP
`client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be
`relied upon by any other party. Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written advice
`include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless
`expressly stated otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient
`or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties, and was not written to support the
`promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter discussed herein.
`The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. It is not intended
`for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in error, please
`(i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the
`message. Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP
`client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be
`relied upon by any other party. Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written advice
`include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless
`expressly stated otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient
`or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties, and was not written to support the
`promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter discussed herein.
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket