Paper No. __
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`BROADCOM CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`WI-FI ONE, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00601
`U.S. Patent No. 6,772,215
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 138432004v.1
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`BROADCOM CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`WI-FI ONE, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2013-00601
`U.S. Patent No. 6,772,215
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 138432004v.1
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
`
`Inter Partes Review Nos. 2013‐00601, 2013‐00602, and 2013‐00636
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,772,215, 6,466,568, and 6,424,625
`
`PETITIONER’S ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`1
`
`
`
`Overview for ’215 Patent
`
`Descrip(cid:415)on of ʼ215 patent
`
`Overview of Applied Seo Prior Art
`Reference & Anticipation of Claims
`
`Issues Raised by Patent Owner
`
`2
`
`
`
`The ’215 Patent
`
`ʼ215 Patent, Claim 1 (Ex. 1001)
`
`’215 Patent (Ex. 1001)
`
`3
`
`
`
`The ʼ215 Patent Prior Art
`
`ʼ215 Patent, FIG. 1 (Ex. 1001)
`
`4
`
`
`
`The ʼ215 Patent Prior Art
`
`ʼ215 Patent, FIGS. 2‐3 (Ex. 1001)
`
`5
`
`
`
`The ʼ215 Patent Alleged Inven(cid:415)on
`
`ʼ215 Patent, FIG. 4 (Ex. 1001)
`
`ʼ215 Patent, FIG. 5 (Ex. 1001)
`
`6
`
`
`
`The ʼ215 Patent – Claim 1
`
`ʼ215 Patent, Claim 1 (Ex. 1001)
`
`7
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`
`’215 Institution Decision, at 12
`
`8
`
`
`
`Institution
`
`’215 Institution Decision, at 22
`
`9
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Seo
`
`Seo ʼ176 Patent, Col. 5:54‐57 (Ex. 1002)
`
`Seo ʼ176 Patent, Col. 6:18‐22 (Ex. 1002)
`
`10
`
`Seo ʼ176 Patent, FIG. 4 (Ex. 1002)
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`’215 Patent Owner’s Response, p. 9
`
`11
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Seo
`
`Seo ʼ176 Patent, Col. 6:18‐22 (Ex. 1002)
`
`Seo ʼ176 Patent, FIG. 4 (Ex. 1002)
`
`12
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Seo
`
`’215 Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response, p. 9
`
`13
`
`
`
`’215 Patent
`
`’215 Petitioner’s
`Reply to Patent
`Owner’s
`Response, p. 10
`
`ʼ215 Patent, FIG.
`4 (Ex. 1001)
`
`ʼ215 Patent, FIG. 5
`(Ex. 1001)
`
`14
`
`
`
`’215 Patent: File History
`
`Petitioner Reply at 11‐12
`
`15
`
`
`
`The ʼ215 Patent – Claim 15
`
`15. A method for minimizing feedback responses in an
`ARQ protocol, comprising the steps of:
`sending a plurality of first data units over a communica-
`tion link;
`receiving said plurality of first data units; and
`responsive to the receiving step, constructing a message
`field for a second data unit, said message field including
`a type identifier field and at least one of, [i] a length field,
`[ii] a plurality of erroneous sequence number-fields, and a
`[iii] plurality of erroneous sequence number length fields,
`each of said plurality of erroneous sequence number
`fields associated with a respective one of said plurality
`of erroneous sequence number length fields.
`
`ʼ215 Patent, Claim 15 (Ex. 1001)
`
`16
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Seo
`
`’215 Petition, at 25
`
`’215 Institution Decision, at 22
`
`17
`
`
`
`Overview for ’568 Patent
`
`Descrip(cid:415)on of ʼ568 patent
`
`Overview of Applied Prior Art &
`Invalidity of Claims
`
`Issues Raised by Patent Owner
`
`18
`
`
`
`The ’568 Patent
`
`ʼ568 Patent, Claim 1 (Ex. 1001)
`
`19
`
`
`
`The ’568 Patent
`
`ʼ568 Patent, Fig 6 (Ex. 1001)
`
`20
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`
`’568 Decision,
`at p. 9
`
`ʼ568 Patent,
`Claim 1 (Ex. 1001)
`
`21
`
`
`
`Claim Construction
`
`Morley ʼ610 Patent, Col. 2:17‐32 (Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ568 Patent, Col. 2:17‐30 (Ex. 1001)
`
`22
`
`
`
`Institution
`
`Claims 1‐6 are anticipated by Morley
`
`Claims 1‐6 would have been obvious
`over Adams
`
`23
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Morley
`
`Morley ʼ610 Patent, Figs. 5A‐5C (Ex. 1002)
`
`Morley ʼ610 Patent, Col. 7:1‐17 (Ex. 1002)
`
`24
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Adams
`
`Adams ’662 Patent, Fig. 5 (Ex. 1006)
`
`25
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Adams
`
`Adams ’662 Patent, Fig. 5 (Ex. 1006)
`
`26
`
`
`
`Overview for ’625 Patent
`
`Descrip(cid:415)on of ʼ625 patent
`
`Overview of Applied Prior Art &
`Invalidity of Claims
`
`Issues Raised by Patent Owner
`
`27
`
`
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`’625 Patent (Ex. 1001)
`
`ʼ625 Patent, Claims 1, 2 (Ex. 1001)
`28
`
`
`
`The ʼ625 Patent
`
`’625 Background
`
`ʼ625 Patent, 1:23‐33 (Ex. 1001)
`
`29
`
`
`
`The ʼ625 Patent
`
`
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`In summar ,
`
`ʼ625 Patent, 4:9‐13 (Ex. 1001)
`
`’625 Patent, 4:9-13 (EX. 1001)
`
`30
`
`
`
`Garrabrant
`
`’625 Petition, p. 24
`
`Garrabrant Abstract (Ex. 1002)
`
`31
`
`
`
`Hettich and Walke
`
`’625 Petition, p. 24
`
`Hettich Translation, p. 34 (Ex. 1002)
`
`’625 Petition, p. 25
`
`* * *
`
`Walke Translation,
`col. 11, ¶ 2.2
`(Ex. 1008)
`
`32
`
`
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`ʼ625 Patent, Claims 1, 2 (Ex. 1001)
`
`33
`
`
`
`The ʼ625 Patent
`
`ʼ625 Patent, FIG. 10B (Ex. 1001)
`
`34
`
`
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`1
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`6. The method of claim 1, wherein the method pertains to
`a selective repeat automatic repeat request scheme and
`further comprises the steps of:
`
`constraining a bottom sequence number BSN indicating a
`sequence number of an oldest packet stored in a trans-
`mit buffer of a transmitter in the data network, and atop
`sequence number TSN according to the rules
`(DSNEBSNETSNETSNMAX), Where DSN is a
`sequence number indicating that all packets having
`sequence numbers previous to DSN have been
`acknowledged by a receiver in the data network as
`havin
`
`been received,
`
`’625 claim 6 (Ex. 1001)
`
`35
`
`
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`ʼ625 Patent, Claim 8 (Ex. 1001)
`
`36
`
`
`
`Institution
`
`Claim 1 anticipated by Garrabrant
`
`Claim 1 anticipated by Hettich
`
`Claim 1 would have been obvious
`in view of Walke
`
`37
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Garrabrant
`
`ʼ595 Patent, FIG 8A (Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ595 Patent, FIG 8B (Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ595 Patent, Col. 10:18‐23 (Ex. 1002)
`
`38
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Garrabrant
`
`ʼ595 Patent, FIG 8A (Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ595 Patent, FIG 8B (Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ595 Patent,
`Col. 10:27‐37
`(Ex. 1002)
`
`39
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Garrabrant
`
`ʼ595 Patent, FIG 8A (Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ595 Patent, FIG 8B (Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ595 Patent, Col. 10:16‐23(Ex. 1002)
`
`ʼ595 Patent, Col. 10:36‐42 (Ex. 1002)
`
`40
`
`
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`‘625 Patent, Col. 6:30‐36 (Ex. 1001)
`
`‘625 Patent, Col. 5:58‐63 (Ex. 1001)
`
`41
`
`
`
`The ’625 Patent
`
`’625 claim 4 (Ex. 1001)
`
`’625 claim 6 (Ex. 1001)
`
`42
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Garrabrant
`
`ʼ595 Patent, Col. 11:57‐67 (Ex. 1002)
`
`43
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Hettich
`
`N ‐ 2
`
`N ‐ 1
`
`N
`
`N + 1
`
`N + 2
`
`Hettich Translation (Ex. 1007)
`
`44
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Walke
`
`Walke, FIG. 9 (Ex. 1008)
`
`Walke, Col. 13 (Ex. 1008)
`
`45
`
`
`
`Rebuttals to Motions to Amend
`
`Motion to
`Amend ’568
`
`Motion to
`Amend ’625
`
`46
`
`
`
`’568 Motion to Amend
`
`1. A communication station comprising:
`a processor for arranging information for transmission
`including providing at least one first field in which
`payload information is disposed and providing at least
`one second field, separate from said first field, which
`includes a service type identifier which identifies
`transmission characteristics of a service and a type of
`payload information provided in said at least one first
`field; and
`a transmitter for transmitting information received from
`said processor including said at least one first field and
`said at least one second field.
`
`ʼ568 Patent, Claim 1 modified (Ex. 1001)
`
`47
`
`
`
`’568 Motion to Amend
`
`ʼ568 Patent, Col. 9:29‐38 (Ex. 1001)
`
`48
`
`
`
`’568 Motion to Amend
`
`Invalid based on ’568 patent’s use of the term
`“service”
`
`ʼ568 Petitioner Response to Motion to Amend, pp. 6‐7
`
`49
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Morley
`
`Morley ʼ610 Patent, Col. 10:23‐25 (Ex. 1002)
`
`Morley ʼ610 Patent, Col. 7:1‐17 (Ex. 1002)
`
`50
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Morley and Raith
`
`Raith ʼ813 Patent, Col. 11:54‐59 (Ex. 1024)
`
`Raith ʼ813 Patent, Col. 12:6‐16 (Ex. 1024)
`
`51
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Morley and Raith
`
`* * *
`
`Petitioner’s Opposition to Motion to Amend, at pp. 8‐9
`
`52
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Tiernan
`
`Tiernan ʼ988 Patent, Col. 5:48‐55 (Ex. 1025)
`
`Petitioner’s Opposition to Motion to Amend, at p. 12
`
`53
`
`
`
`’625 Motion to Amend
`
`’625 PO Motion to Amend, pp. 1‐2
`
`54
`
`
`
`’625 Motion to Amend
`
`’625 Patent, Col. 6:32‐36 (Ex. 1001)
`
`’625 Patent, Col. 7:17‐21 (Ex. 1001)
`
`55
`
`
`
`’625 Motion to Amend
`
`’625 Patent, Col. 2:61‐65 (Ex. 1001)
`
`56
`
`
`
`Applied Prior Art: Vornefeld
`
`Vornefield Fig. 5.3
`
`57
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits for Oral Argument
`Case No. IPR2013-00601/U.S. Pat. No. 6,772,215
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 4, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Michael A. Diener/
`Michael A. Diener, Reg. No. 37,122
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
`AND DORR LLP
`60 State St.
`Boston, MA 02109
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 138432004v.1
`
`1
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits for Oral Argument
`Case No. IPR2013-00601/U.S. Pat. No. 6,772,215
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, on December 4, 2014, I caused a true and correct copy
`
`of the foregoing PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT to be served via email on the attorneys identified in Wi-Fi One’s
`
`Updated Mandatory Notice and Notice of Appearance for John Shumaker, whom
`
`consented to electronic service:
`
`Lead Counsel:
`Back-up Counsel:
`Email Address:
`
`
`Peter J. Ayers
`J. Christopher Lynch, John Shumaker
`EricssonIPR2013-636@leehayes.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Michael A. Diener/
`Michael A. Diener
`Registration No. 37,122
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`60 State St.
`Boston, MA 02109
`
`
`ActiveUS 138432004v.1
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
