throbber
Broadcom Corporation,
`Petitioner
`v.
`Wi-Fi One, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR2013-00601
`
`Trial Hearing: December 8, 2014
`Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`Wi‐Fi One Exhibit 2024
`Broadcom v. Wi‐Fi One
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`IPR2013 – 00601
`Exhibit 2024‐1
`
`

`

`The Petitions Are Barred Under 315(b)
`
`“(b) Patent Owner's Action.—An inter partes review
`may not be instituted if the petition requesting the
`proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date
`on which the petitioner, real party in interest, or
`privy of the petitioner is served with a complaint
`alleging infringement of the patent.”
`
`Paper No. 40 at 5‐6
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐2
`
`

`

`The Petitions Are Barred Under 315(b)
`
`Ex. 2016 at 1
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐3
`
`

`

`The Petitions Are Barred Under 315(b)
`
`Ex. 2017 at 2‐4
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐4
`
`

`

`’215 Patent: Instituted Grounds
`
`Board instituted an inter partes review of 
`claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 15, 22, 25, 26, 29, 32, 34, 
`45, 46, 49, 52, and 54 of the ’215 patent 
`based solely on Seo
`
`Paper No. 29 at 22
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐5
`
`

`

`’215 Patent
`
`Exhibit 1001
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐6
`
`

`

`’215 Patent Claim 1
`
`Exhibit 1001
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐7
`
`

`

`Problem: Efficient Encoding of Messages
`
`Exhibit 1001
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐8
`
`

`

`Prior Art: S-PDU
`
`Exhibit 2020 at 8‐9
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐9
`
`

`

`Prior Art: Problems with ARQ
`
`Exhibit 1001 at 3:46‐50
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐10
`
`

`

`‘215 Patent: Encoding Method
`
`Exhibit 2020 at 12
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐11
`
`

`

`‘215 Patent: Encoding Method
`
`Exhibit 2020 at 13
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐12
`
`

`

`’215 Patent: Claim 1
`
`Exhibit 1001
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐13
`
`

`

`’215 Patent: Claim Construction
`
`Term
`
`Responsive to the 
`receiving step, 
`constructing a 
`message field for a 
`second data unit, said 
`message field 
`including a type 
`identifier field
`
`Wi‐Fi One’s 
`Proposal
`Responsive to the 
`receiving step, 
`generating a message 
`field including a field 
`that identifies a 
`message type of the 
`feedback response 
`message from a 
`number of different 
`message types
`
`Broadcom’s 
`Proposal
`Responsive to the 
`receiving step, 
`generating a message 
`field including a field 
`that identifies the
`message type of the 
`feedback response 
`message from a 
`number of different 
`message types
`
`Board’s 
`Construction
`A field of a message 
`that identifies the 
`type of the message
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐14
`
`

`

`Seo Patent
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐15
`
`

`

`Seo: Background
`
`Exhibit 2020 at 19
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐16
`
`

`

`Seo: Figure 2
`
`Header
`
`Payload
`
`Exhibit 2020 at 20 (“header (in red)…payload (in blue)”)
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐17
`
`

`

`Seo: Figure 4
`
`Header
`
`Message
`
`Exhibit  2020 at 22 (“header (shown in red) … 
`fixed length message field (shown in blue)”) 
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐18
`
`

`

`Seo: “Padding Bits … Required to Fill”
`
`Exhibit 1002 at 6:1‐6
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐19
`
`

`

`Seo: Not Anticipatory
`
`Ex. 2020 at 24
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐20
`
`

`

`Claim 15: Seo Not Anticipatory
`
`Ex. 1001
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐21
`
`

`

`’215 Patent: Printed Matter Doctrine
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐22
`
`

`

`’215 Patent: Printed Matter Doctrine
`
`“Here there is a new and unobvious functional
`relationship
`between
`a measuring
`receptacle,
`volumetric indicia thereon indicating a certain ratio to
`actual volume, and a legend indicating the ratio, and
`in our judgment the appealed claims properly define
`this relationship.”
`
`Paper No. 40 at 27 (citing In re Miller, 418 F.2d 1392, 1396 (CCPA 1969)).
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐23
`
`

`

`’215 Patent: Printed Matter Doctrine
`
`“If there is a functional relationship between the printed 
`matter and its substrate, the printed matter may serve to 
`distinguish the invention from the prior art.”  
`
`Paper No. 40 at 29 (AstraZeneca LP v. Apotex, Inc., 633 F.3d 1042, 1064 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐24
`
`

`

`’215 Patent: Printed Matter Doctrine
`
`The data structures “contain both information used by
`application programs and information regarding their
`physical
`interrelationships within a memory” and
`therefore “define[d] functional characteristics of the
`memory.”
`
`Paper No. 40 at 31 (citing In re Edward S. Lowry, 32 F.3d 1579, 1583 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
`
`Wi‐Fi One, LLC
`Exhibit 2024‐25
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket