throbber
PRIVITY, Black's Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009), privity
`
`Black's Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009), privity
`
`PRIVITY
`
`privity (priv-<<schwa>>-tee). (16c) 1. The connection or relationship between two parties, each having a legally recognized
`interest in the same subject matter (such as a transaction, proceeding, or piece of property); mutuality of interest <privity of
`contract>. [Cases: Contracts
`186; Judgment
` 678(2).]
`horizontal privity. (1968) Commercial law. The legal relationship between a party and a nonparty who is related to the party
`(such as a buyer and a member of the buyer's family). [Cases: Sales
`255.]
`privity of blood. (16c) 1. Privity between an heir and an ancestor. 2. Privity between coparceners.
`privity of contract. (17c) The relationship between the parties to a contract, allowing them to sue each other but preventing a
`third party from doing so. • The requirement of privity has been relaxed under modern laws and doctrines of implied warranty
`and strict liability, which allow a third-party beneficiary or other foreseeable user to sue the seller of a defective product. [Cases:
`Contracts
`186; Sales
`255.]
`“To many students and practitioners of the common law privity of contract became a fetish. As such, it operated to deprive
`many a claimant of a remedy in cases where according to the mores of the time the claim was just. It has made many learned
`men believe that a chose in action could not be assigned. Even now, it is gravely asserted that a man cannot be made the
`debtor of another against his will. But the common law was gradually influenced by equity and by the law merchant, so that
`by assignment a debtor could become bound to pay a perfect stranger to himself, although until the legislature stepped in, the
`common-law courts characteristically made use of a fiction and pretended that they were not doing that which they really were
`doing.” William R. Anson, Principles of the Law of Contract 335 (Arthur L. Corbin ed., 3d Am. ed. 1919).
`“It is an elementary principle of English law — known as the doctrine of ‘Privity of Contract’ — that contractual rights and
`duties only affect the parties to a contract, and this principle is the distinguishing feature between the law of contract and the law
`of property. True proprietary rights are ‘binding on the world’ in the lawyer's traditional phrase. Contractual rights, on the other
`hand, are only binding on, and enforceable by, the immediate parties to the contract. But this distinction, fundamental though
`it be, wears a little thin at times. On the one hand, there has been a constant tendency for contractual rights to be extended in
`their scope so as to affect more and more persons who cannot be regarded as parties to the transaction. On the other hand, few
`proprietary rights are literally ‘binding on the world’.” P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract 265 (3d ed. 1981).
`“The doctrine of privity means that a person cannot acquire rights or be subject to liabilities arising under a contract to which
`he is not a party. It does not mean that a contract between A and B cannot affect the legal rights of C indirectly.” G.H. Treitel,
`The Law of Contract 538 (8th ed. 1991).
`privity of estate. (17c) A mutual or successive relationship to the same right in property, as between grantor and grantee or
`landlord and tenant. — Also termed privity of title; privity in estate. [Cases: Landlord and Tenant
`20, 53.]
`privity of possession. (1818) Privity between parties in successive possession of real property. • The existence of this type of
`privity is often at issue in adverse-possession claims. [Cases: Adverse Possession
`43.]
`privity of title. See privity of estate.
`vertical privity. (1968) 1. Commercial law. The legal relationship between parties in a product's chain of distribution (such as a
`255.] 2. Privity between one who signs a contract containing a restrictive covenant
`manufacturer and a seller). [Cases: Sales
`and one who acquires the property burdened by it.
`2. Joint knowledge or awareness of something private or secret, esp. as implying concurrence or consent <privity to a crime>.
`
`© 2009 Thomson Reuters
`
`Bryan A. Garner, Editor in Chief
`
`End of Document
`
`© 2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
` © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
`1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket