`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`ERICSSON. INC., ET AL.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`vs.
`
`D-LINK CORPORATION. ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CASE NO. 6:10-CV-473
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b)
`
`On September 14, 2010, Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“Ericsson”)
`
`filed this action against D-Link Corporation1 and D-Link Systems, Inc. (“D-Link”), Netgear, Inc.
`
`(“Netgear”), Acer, Inc. and Acer America Corporation (“Acer”) and Gateway, Inc. (“Gateway”).
`
`Ericsson filed an amended complaint on June 8, 2011. The amended complaint added the
`
`following defendants: Dell, Inc. (“Dell”); Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc.,2 Toshiba
`
`America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC (“Toshiba”);
`
`and Belkin International, Inc. (“Belkin”). Intel Corporation (“Intel”) intervened in this action on
`
`June 22, 2012, and Ericsson brought a counterclaim against Intel on July 3, 2012. The Court
`
`conducted an eight day trial beginning June 3, 2013. Final judgment is now appropriate because
`
`all issues between Ericsson and the Defendants have been finally resolved by either the jury or
`
`the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket No. 615).
`
`
`1 The Court dismissed D-Link Corporation on January 31, 2011. Docket No. 54.
`2 The Court dismissed Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC on August 16, 2011.
`Docket No. 120.
`
`Broadcom v. Ericsson
`IPR2013-00601
`Ericsson Ex. 2018
`
`
`
`Case 6:10-cv-00473-LED-KFG Document 616 Filed 08/08/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 26060
`
`Therefore, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, consistent with
`
`the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, and the Court having expressly determined that
`
`there is no just cause for delay, the Court ORDERS AND ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT as
`
`follows:
`
` Defendants D-Link, Netgear, and Belkin are found to infringe Claims 1 and 5 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,466,568. Defendants Acer/Gateway, Dell, Toshiba, and Intel
`
`are found to infringe Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,466,568.
`
` Defendants D-Link, Netgear, Belkin, Acer/Gateway, Dell, Toshiba, and Intel are
`
`found to infringe Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,424,625.
`
` Defendants D-Link, Netgear, Belkin, Acer/Gateway, Dell, Toshiba, and Intel are
`
`found to not infringe Claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 6,330,435.
`
` Defendants D-Link, Netgear, Belkin, Acer/Gateway, Dell, Toshiba, and Intel are
`
`found to infringe Claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 6,772,215.
`
` Defendants Acer/Gateway, Dell, Toshiba, and Intel are found to not infringe
`
`Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,519,223.
`
` The Asserted Claims are valid.
`
` Defendants’ infringement was not willful.
`
` The Court awards the following in damages to Ericsson for Defendants’
`
`infringement of the claims found infringed: $435,000 for D-Link; $3,555,000 for
`
`Netgear; $1,170,000 for Acer/Gateway; $1,920,000 for Dell; $2,445,000 for
`
`Toshiba; and $600,000 for Belkin.
`
` Ericsson is further awarded pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, and an
`
`ongoing royalty as detailed in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:10-cv-00473-LED-KFG Document 616 Filed 08/08/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 26061
`
`
`
`All relief not specifically granted herein is DENIED. All pending motions not previously
`
`resolved are DENIED.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`__________________________________
`LEONARD DAVIS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8th day of August, 2013.
`
`