throbber
Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`Resorbable bioceramics based on stabilized calcium phosphates.
`Part II: evaluation of biological response
`S. Langsta! *, M. Sayer, T.J.N. Smith , S.M. Pugh
`Department of Physics, Queen+s University, Stirling Hall, Rm 206A, Kingston, Ont., Canada K7L 3N6
` Millenium Biologix Inc., 785 Midpark Drive, Suite 200, Kingston, Ont., Canada K7M 7G3
`Received 4 December 1998; received in revised form 28 January 2000; accepted 13 April 2000
`
`Abstract
`
`Synthetic materials capable of being remodelled in vivo by the same processes responsible for natural bone turnover have long been
`sought for use as an arti"cial bone substitute. These materials must ideally combine osteoinductive capacity with the ability to
`withstand random dissolution at normal physiological pH, while being resorbed by natural cell-mediated processes. Resorbable
`calcium phosphate based coatings and bulk ceramics have been developed which promote the uniform deposition of new mineralized
`bone matrix thus enabling rapid integration with the surrounding host bone tissue in vivo. Furthermore, a critical result of this study
`is the determination that the silicon-stabilized calcium phosphate ceramics are essentially insoluble in biological media but are
`resorbed when acted upon by osteoclasts. In vitro biological testing and preliminary in vivo testing show that the important features
`of this new biomaterial are a characteristic calcium phosphate phase composition and a unique microporous morphology.  2000
`Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Bioceramic; Resorbable; Orthopedics; Hydroxyapatite; Tricalcium phosphate; Osteoclast
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The development of new bone biomaterials continues
`to attract considerable academic and commercial interest
`due in part to the need for a synthetic bone replacement
`that addresses the limitations of current orthopedic tech-
`niques. In fact, a diverse and large number of roles exist
`for bone biomaterials that are capable of incorporation
`into the natural process of bone remodeling. These in-
`clude in vitro bone cell assays [1}3], in vivo resorbable
`bone cements [4,5], implantable coatings which enhance
`the bonding of natural bone to the implant [6], implant-
`able prostheses, bone grafts and bone repair agents [7,8].
`Inherent in each of these applications is the need to
`promote both osteoblastic activity, and complementary
`osteoclastic resorption inherent in bone remodeling. In
`order to avoid the problems associated with random
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.:#1-613-533-600074793; fax:#1-613-
`533-6463.
`E-mail address: sarah@physics.queensu.ca (S. Langsta!).
`
`dissolution which include uncontrolled physical degrada-
`tion, particulate release and long-term durability, the
`materials need to remain essentially insoluble only to be
`removed by speci"c cell activity.
`Silicon-stabilized calcium phosphate based coat-
`ings and bulk ceramics have been developed that
`not only act as suitable substrates for bone mineraliz-
`ation by osteoblasts but are essentially insoluble in
`biological media and are resorbed when acted upon
`by osteoclasts [9]. This paper describes the in vitro
`and in vivo biological response elicited by silicon-
`modi"ed calcium phosphate bone biomaterials. An
`analysis of dissolution data as compared with established
`calcium phosphate compounds provides further evidence
`for the unique behaviour observed in vitro and in
`vivo. By examination of thin "lms made using a number
`of di!erent sintering conditions and bulk ceramics
`made from commercial powders, the biological activity
`can be related to two unique characteristics of the
`colloidal powders: the presence of a mixture of sili-
`con stabilized ♡-TCP (Si-♡TCP) and HA, and a micro-
`porous morphology based on interconnected particles
`[10}12].
`
`0142-9612/01/$ - see front matter  2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
`(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`PII: S 0 1 4 2 - 9 6 1 2 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 1 3 9 - 3
`
`MILLENIUM EXHIBIT 2051
`Baxter Healthcare Corp. et al. v. Millenium Biologix, LLC
`IPR2013-00582, -00590
`
`

`

`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`136
`
`2. Experimental
`
`2.1. Materials preparation
`
`(1)
`
`Microporous calcium phosphate (mHA) thin "lms
`were prepared by dip coating quartz discs in an alkaline
`colloidal suspension of HA created according to the
`following chemical reaction [13]:
`#3NHHPO
`#7NHOH
`5Ca(NO)
`#10NHNO
`#6HO
`B Ca(OH)(PO)
`The mHA thin "lms were allowed to air dry and then
`sintered in an air atmosphere for 1 h forming an Si}mHA
`thin "lm. Samples were created at a variety of sintering
`temperatures and environments to produce "lms with
`a variety of material properties [13]. Biological testing
`was performed in an attempt to correlate biological act-
`ivity with material properties. The "rst set of samples
`were sintered at 800, 850, 900, 950 and 10003C for 1 h and
`10003C for 5 min to create a set of samples with di!erent
`surface morphologies and phase compositions. A second
`set of samples examined in more detail the e!ect of
`sintering duration on surface morphology and biological
`activity. These samples were sintered at 10003C for 1,
`60 min and 8 h. All samples were sintered in a Lindberg
`Model 894 box furnace. For each sintering temperature
`under consideration, 20 identical samples were produced:
`1 for GA-XRD and SEM analysis, 1 for TEM analysis, 16
`for biological testing with cells, 1 for a a &no cell' control
`and 1 as a retained sample.
`To create an mHA powder from the colloidal suspen-
`sion, the centrifuged and decanted precipitate was dried
`for approximately 5 h at 1003C and sintered for 1 h in an
`open alumina crucible in air at a temperature of 10003C.
`The resultant product was ground to a "ne powder.
`Ceramic pellets were formed from previously sintered
`powders using a small amount of 2.5% solution of poly-
`vinyl alcohol mixed into the sintered powder as a binding
`agent. The powders were uniaxially pressed into pellets
`with a pressure of 1;10 N/m [15 000 psi]. The "nal
`pellets were "red in air at 5503C for 1 h to remove the
`binder and then sintered at 10003C for 1 h to create
`ceramic components with the desired characteristics. The
`pellet density was approximately 1.5 g/cm and the pellet
`exhibited uniform microporosity throughout the struc-
`ture.
`The role of silicon in promoting the unique bioactive
`properties was also investigated. Following the proced-
`ures for the formation and aging of the colloidal suspen-
`sion of HA outlined above, the colloid was processed to
`the stage of reducing the volume by centrifugation. In
`order to retain the colloidal sol characteristics of the
`reaction, silicon was introduced as a sol}gel metal}
`organic precursor,
`either
`tetrapropyl orthosilicate
`(Si(OCH) or TPOS) or
`tetraethyl orthosilicate
`
`Table 1
`List of materials used for experimental samples and reference standards
`
`Materials
`
`Source/preparation technique
`
`Commercial HA
`♡-TCP
`♢-TCP
`
`Calcium silicate
`
`cHA
`♡-TCP
`♢-TCP
`
`CaSiO
`
`Aldrich C28 939-6 LotC04302TQ
`Supelco Inc C3-3910 LotC200792
`Fluka C21218 AnalysisC357352/1
`14996
`Aldrich C37 266-8 LotC00714LN
`
`Microporous HA
`
`mHA
`
`Si-TCP#mHA
`
`Si}mHA
`
`Powder prepared from the thermal
`processing of the colloid in Eq. (1)
`Powder prepared from the thermal
`processing of the colloid in Eq. (1),
`where Si is the introduced additive
`
`Isotonic saline
`solution
`
`ISS
`
`Celline2+*CS203-10D
`
`♡-MEM Gibco C12571-048
`
`♡-minimal essential
`medium
`Fetal bovine serum FBS
`Penicillin G
`Gentamicin
`Fungizone
`AA
`Ascorbic acid
`♢-Glycerophosphate ♢GP
`
`Gibco C26140-079
`Sigma-Aldrich CP-3032
`Sigma-Aldrich CG-1397
`Sigma-Aldrich CA-9528
`Sigma-Aldrich CA-4544
`Sigma-Aldrich CC-9891
`
`(Si(OCH) or TEOS), in an organic carrier, either
`2-methoxyethanol (CHOCHCHOH or 2Me) or 2-4
`pentanedione (CHCOCHCOCH or ACAC). The ef-
`fect of metal-organic precursor and organic carrier are
`discussed thoroughly in Part I of this series [14]. The
`precipitates with introduced additives were dried and
`"red as discussed to form a silicon doped microporous
`calcium phosphate compound (Si}mHA). Si}mHA pow-
`ders and pellets were subsequently prepared in the same
`manner as the undoped ceramics.
`In order to make a comparison with materials pre-
`pared using previously recognized processing methods,
`bulk ceramics were created by physical mixing and sub-
`sequent "ring of commercial powders [14]. Table 1 out-
`lines the commercial products utilized during the course
`of this work.
`
`2.2. Materials analysis
`
`X-ray di!raction (XRD) spectra of thin "lm ceramics
`were acquired using a glancing angle (GA-XRD) tech-
`nique with an angle of incidence ♫"23, whereas powders
`were examined using a conventional ♫}2♫ geometry. The
`source was a 12 kW Rigaku rotating anode XRD gene-
`rator "tted with a Cr target for improved peak resolu-
`tion. The glancing angle geometry signi"cantly reduced
`interference from the substrate. The percent phase com-
`position for each material was calculated using integ-
`rated intensities of peaks distinguishable as HA, ♡-TCP
`or ♢-TCP (see Part 1 of this series [14]). Scanning
`
`(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`

`

`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`137
`
`electron microscopy (SEM) was performed, using
`a JEOL JSM 840 with a 10 kV accelerating voltage, to
`assess the surface and bulk morphology [13,15]. Trans-
`mission electron microscopy results are published else-
`where [14,16].
`Dissolution studies were performed to determine the
`solubility of the various calcium phosphate ceramics in
`a physiological environment. Calcium release from ce-
`ramic pellets into a solution of isotonic saline solution
`(ISS) incubated at 373C for times up to and including 10
`days was studied. Comparisons were made between
`Si}mHA, mHA, cHA, ♡-TCP, and ♢-TCP ceramics. Ce-
`ramic pellets, 12 mm OD;1 mm, were created, dried
`and "red as described above. Post-sintering mass for
`each pellet was recorded. Eleven incubation times were
`chosen for this study: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 days.
`Twenty-two pellets were created for each powder type to
`provide duplicate samples for each incubation time.
`Each pellet was placed in a clean, dry vial and immer-
`sed in 20 ml of ISS and incubated at 373C. The samples
`were agitated twice daily by shaking the sample tray
`containing the individual vials. At the speci"ed incuba-
`tion time, 19 ml of the solution were extracted from the
`sample vial and "ltered through a 0.2 ♯m syringe "lter to
`remove any particulate matter. Each sample was diluted
`to a total volume of 39 ml with ISS and sent for atomic
`absorption spectroscopy (AAS) calcium analysis. A nega-
`tive control (ISS only) was processed for the duration of
`the 10 days in the same manner.
`AAS provided a calcium concentration (in mg/l) for
`each sample vial. As no calcium was detectable in any of
`the negative controls, the concentration of calcium in
`solution was determined directly from the average of the
`reported calcium concentration values (each sample was
`run in duplicate). The total mass of calcium dissolved in
`solution was calculated and normalized to the initial
`mass of the ceramic.
`
`2.3. In vitro biological assessment
`
`Both thin "lm and bulk ceramic samples were sterili-
`zed in an ethylene oxide (EtO) environment prior to
`initiating osteoclast (!DEX) resorption and osteoblast
`(#DEX) bone mineral deposition studies.
`Supplemented medium (SM) refers to ♡-MEM supple-
`mented with 15% FBS, 0.1 mg/ml Penicillin G, 50 ♯g/ml
`Gentamicin, and 0.3 ♯g/ml Fungizone. Fully supple-
`mented medium (FSM) refers to SM supplemented with
`50 ♯g/ml AA, and 5 mM ♢GP. Fully supplemented me-
`dium with dexamethasone (FSM#DEX) refers to FSM
`supplemented with 10\ M dexamethasone. A standard
`antibiotic stock solution (10;AB) was created by dis-
`solving the following products in ♡-MEM to produce
`concentrations of: 1.0 mg/ml Penicillin G, 500 ♯g/ml
`Gentamicin, 3.0 ♯g/ml Fungizone, 50 ♯g/ml AA, and
`5 mM ♢GP.
`
`On day 0, the femurs were excised from young adult
`male Wistar rats (115}135 g) after cervical dislocation.
`Following four 10 min washes in 10;AB and one rinse
`in SM, the epiphyses were removed and the marrow
`#ushed into test tubes using 10 ml of FSM (for osteoclast
`cultures) or FSM#DEX (for osteoblast cultures) per
`femur. This #ushing was repeated, from the other end of
`the diaphysis, using the "rst 10 ml washout. After the
`second washout, 5 ml of FSM or FSM#DEX were
`added, producing 15 ml of available cell explant suspen-
`sion per femur (30 ml per animal).
`All osteoclast cultures were performed using the pri-
`mary cell culture suspension. Each culture substrate con-
`tained within a single well of a 24-well tissue culture tray
`was directly inoculated with 1 ml of the cell explant
`suspension. Both the thin "lm samples and the bulk
`ceramic pellets were 12.7 mm in diameter and provided
`the same surface area, thus minimizing variations in
`cell-seeding density. Cultures were incubated at 373C, in
`100% humidity and 7.5% CO in air. Incubation was
`continued for the following ten days with a re-feed (1 ml
`FSM/substrate) occurring on days 1, 4, 6, and 8. Cultures
`were terminated on day 11 by either cell "xation followed
`by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining
`or cell removal. Cell removal was accomplished by the
`addition of 1 ml 6% NaOCl with 5.2% NaCl in DDHO
`to each well followed by extensive rinsing with DDH0.
`This termination procedure preserved the surface mor-
`phology of the thin "lm and served to e$ciently remove
`organic debris, thus permitting easy visualization and
`measurement of resorption events. Osteoclast culture "x-
`ation was accomplished using Karnovsky's "xative.
`&No-cell' control samples, cultured in FSM, were per-
`formed in the same tray to identify any e!ects inherent in
`the cell culture system that were not directly attributable
`to the presence of cells. TRAP staining was not per-
`formed on the no-cell control samples.
`Resorption was identi"ed by characteristic three-di-
`mensional pits visible in the surface of the ceramic. For
`thin "lm samples, these resorption events were assessed
`as being essentially two-dimensional due to the thickness
`of the "lm ((1.0 ♯m). The amount of resorption was
`approximated by calculating the surface area of the re-
`sorption pits and normalizing it to the surface area of the
`disk. This function was performed by the Microst instru-
`ment (a computer controlled image analysis system de-
`signed by Millenium Biologix Inc.). Resorption on bulk
`ceramics was identi"ed and graded using SEM analysis.
`For cell staining, fresh TRAP stain was prepared as
`follows. A solution (C1) was created through the addi-
`tion of 2.5 ml veronal bu!er (3.09 g of sodium veronal
`mixed with 2.04 g of sodium acetate in 115 ml of pre-
`boiled distilled water), 6.25 ml pre-boiled distilled water,
`and 0.5 ml of substrate solution (10 mg of naphthol AS-
`BI phosphate in 1 ml N, N-dimethyl formamide). A sec-
`ond solution (C2) was created through the addition of
`
`(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`

`

`138
`
`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`17.5 mg of sodium nitrate into 0.4 ml of pararolsarilin-
`HCl stock solution (1g of pararosanilin gently heated in
`20 ml of pre-boiled distilled water and 5 ml of concen-
`trated HCl to below 703C and then cooled to room
`temperature prior to "ltering). Solutions C1 and C2
`were then mixed together to create a straw coloured,
`cloudy mixture. Tartaric acid (14.3 mg) was added and
`the "nal solution allowed to sit for 5 min. This "nal
`solution was "ltered, and the pH adjusted to 5.0 using 1 N
`NaOH.
`Prior to TRAP staining, the "xed cultures were rinsed
`once with non-phosphate-bu!ered saline and twice with
`distilled water. The cultures were then rinsed with the
`TRAP stain and then incubated for 50 min at 373C in the
`TRAP stain. After incubation, the cell cultures were rin-
`sed in distilled water and stored in 70% ethanol. The
`cultures were then analysed using a light microscope.
`Osteoclasts appear as red, multi-nucleate cells whereas
`activated macrophages appear as red mononucleate cells.
`Osteoblast cultures were performed using cells derived
`from the young adult male Wistar rats and cultured as
`previously described by Maniatopoulos et al. [17]. On
`Day 0, the cell explant suspension in FSM#DEX was
`obtained as described above and 15 ml of the suspension
`was pipetted into a T75 #ask with a vented cap. The
`culture was incubated at 373C, in 100% humidity and
`7.5% CO in air. The cells were re-fed using 15 ml of
`SM#DEX per #ask on days 1 and 4. On day 5 the
`adherent cells were removed from the culture #ask using
`a trypsinization procedure and were resuspended in
`FSM#DEX to create a cell suspension with a concen-
`tration of 5;10 cells/ml. The samples were then in-
`noculated with 1 ml/well of this cell suspension. The cells
`were subsequently re-fed with 1 ml/well of FSM#DEX
`on days 6, 8, 11, 13, 15 and 18. On day 19, the cell cultures
`were "xed using Karnorvsky's "xative and stored at 43C
`in 0.1 M cacodylate bu!er until critical-point drying for
`SEM analysis.
`
`2.4. In vivo biological assessment
`
`Male Wistar rats, weighing 100}125 g, were anaesthet-
`ized and the lateral aspect of the thigh shaved and scrub-
`bed with iodine and alcohol. An incision was made in the
`lateral aspect of the knee, exposing the muscles vastus
`lateralis and adductor. These muscles were moved aside
`using a blunt probe. The lateral cortex of the femur was
`exposed and the periosteum was scraped. A round dental
`burr, with continuous saline irrigation, was used to create
`a cylindrical hole perpendicular to the long axis of the
`femur. The cylindrical implants (1.5 mm O.D.;2.0 mm
`length) were tapped into the drilled hole and "t #ush with
`the cortical surface of the femur. After implantation, the
`muscles were allowed to return to their natural arrange-
`ment and the skin was sutured closed. A single implant
`was placed in each femur.
`
`Implants were left in place for three and six weeks, after
`which termination was performed by cardiac perfusion
`with Karnovsky's "xative. The femora were dissected to
`reveal the implant site and subsequently remained in
`Karnovsky's "xative for another 5 days. One femur from
`each animal was then freeze fractured by immersion in
`liquid nitrogen and examined in the scanning electron
`microscope (SEM). In this procedure, the femur was
`notched by cutting with a rotating abrasive diamond
`disk (61T from Shofu Inc., Japan) on a dental hand piece
`(Emesco Dental Corp., NY, USA). The minimal notches
`removed anterior, posterior and medial bone in the plane
`of the implant site, but did not remove bone adjacent to
`the implant itself. The purpose of the notches was to
`create a stress riser on immersion in liquid nitrogen.
`Immersion resulted in the preferential fracture of the
`sample across the plane of the implant. Additionally,
`a second fracture line bisected the proximal portion of
`the sample along the mid-femoral long axis. In this way,
`"ve fractured implant faces were created. Following de-
`hydration,
`stub
`critical point drying from CO,
`mounting and gold coating, the sample was observed by
`Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM-Hitachi Model
`S-570).
`The second femur was decalci"ed in a solution of 1%
`formic acid and 10% sodium citrate (pH"5). The
`sample was then dehydrated in a graded ethanol: twice
`for 1 h in 70%, twice for 1 h in 80%, three times for 1 h in
`95%,
`three times for 1 h in 100%, 1 h in 100%
`ethanol/toluene (1 : 1), overnight in cedarwood oil, three
`times
`for 1 h in methyl salicylate, 1 h in methyl
`salicylate/wax (1 : 1), and "nally wax 1, wax 2, and wax
`3 under vacuum. The sample was oriented, embedded
`and the block cooled. Six micron thick serial sections
`were cut on an AOmicrotome and stained for histologi-
`cal evaluation under light microscopy.
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Calcium phosphate thin xlms on quartz
`
`Six di!erent sintering temperatures were evaluated
`during the course of this work: 800, 850, 900, 950 and
`10003C for 1 h and 10003C for 5 min. The resultant phase
`composition was analyzed using GA-XRD and quanti-
`"ed using the method outlined above (see Table 2). Dur-
`ing sintering, the HA thin "lm decomposes according to
`the following reaction, creating a mixture of hydroxyapa-
`tite (HA) and silicon-stabilized tri-calcium phosphate
`(Si}TCP) [14]:
`#CaO#HO
` 3Ca(PO)
`2Ca(OH)(PO)
`It has been previously determined that the phase com-
`position is a function of sintering temperature alone [13].
`sintered at 10003C for 5 min show
`The samples
`
`(2)
`
`(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`

`

`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`139
`
`Table 2
`Summary of sintering study biological results
`
`Temp (3C)
`
`% HA ($5%)
`
`% Si-TCP ($5%)
`
`Particle size range (♯m)
`
`8003C for 60 min
`8503C for 60 min
`9003C for 60 min
`9503C for 60 min
`10003C for 60 min
`(10003C for 5 min
`
`94.0
`97.0
`62.2
`39.6
`33.7
`56.9
`
`6.0
`3.0
`37.8
`60.4
`66.3
`43.1
`
`(0.1
`0.1}0.3
`0.2}0.5
`0.3}0.8
`0.3}1.1
`0.3}0.8
`
`Average Microst
`(!NC control)
`
`NA
`1.1$0.6
`1.2$0.5
`1.5$0.7
`4.1$2.6
`0.7$0.4
`
`Fig. 1. Summary of SEM micrographs of thin "lms sintered at (a) 8003C for 1 h, (b) 8503C for 1 h, (c) 9003C for 1 h, (d) 9503C for 1 h, (e) 10003C for 1 h
`and (f) 10003C for 5 min.
`
`a 43.1$5% conversion level, which suggests that the
`samples did not completely attain the required 10003C
`processing. As indicated above, the surface morphology
`of the thin "lms samples was determined at high magni"-
`cation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
`Fig. 1 illustrates the e!ect of sintering temperature on
`"lm surface morphology. The unique surface morpho-
`logy can be described as an interconnected microstruc-
`ture composed of granules. As the sintering temperature
`is increased from 800 to 10003C, the size of the granules
`increases. The micrograph of the sample sintered at
`9003C appears to be a combination of the 850 and 9503C
`"lms. This is interesting as the transformation from HA
`to Si}TCP begins to occur at 9003C (Table 2).
`It appears that increasing sintering time increases
`granule size uniformity. The sample sintered at 10003C
`
`for 5 min shows areas of large, well-connected granules
`(smaller than those observed in the sample sintered at
`10003C for 60 min) as well as some areas of smaller, more
`separated granules. It is important to note that, accord-
`ing to the GA-XRD results (Table 2), the samples did not
`completely attain the required 10003C processing and
`therefore, these smaller, more separated granules may be
`a result of a decreased sintering temperature as well as
`a decreased sintering time.
`During cell culture, samples were examined using
`a light microscope equipped with phase optics. Multinuc-
`leate giant cells were identi"ed on the surface of these
`mHA thin "lms (Fig. 2(a)). TRAP staining of these sam-
`ples reveals that these cells are TRAP#, multinucleate
`giant cells (osteoclasts) (Fig. 2(b)). The standard Si}mHA
`thin "lms on quartz (sintered at 10003C for 60 min) have
`
`(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`

`

`140
`
`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`Fig. 2. Light micrographs of cultured Si}mHA thin "lms: (a) during cell culture illustrating a multinucleated giant cell and (b) after "xation and TRAP
`staining illustrating the presence of TRAP#multinucleated giant cells.
`
`Fig. 3. Summary of samples sintered at 10003C for 60 min: (a) pre-biotest, (b) after acellular biotest, (c) after biotest illustrating areas of resorption and
`(d) a higher magni"cation of the resorption area. Arrow denotes an area of partial resorption at the periphery of the resorption pit.
`
`a unique interconnected surface morphology as deter-
`mined by SEM (Fig. 1 and Fig. 3(a)). The microstructure
`of these ceramics is discussed in part one of this series
`[14]. Changes in surface morphology that occur during
`biological testing both in the presence and absence of
`cells are shown in Fig. 3(b)}(d) [1,2,18]. The arrow in
`Fig. 3(d) points to a region where partial resorption has
`occurred around the edges of the resorption pit. Random
`dissolution, arising from the presence of an acellular
`culture medium, is not observed (Fig. 3(b))*while mul-
`
`tiple discrete surface resorption events, identi"able as
`resorption pits, occur only in the presence of osteoclasts
`(Fig. 3(c) and (d)) [15]. The regular margins of these
`resorption pits correspond closely to the size and shape
`of the ru%ed borders normally produced by osteoclasts
`in the resorptive phase. Activated macrophage resorp-
`tion events, characterized by punctate pits, were also
`visible but in small numbers [19]. Resorption levels were
`quanti"ed using a Microst2+ image analysis system [20]
`and found to increase with the concentration of the
`
`(cid:25)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`

`

`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`141
`
`Table 3
`Newman}Keuls range test results to determine which samples possessed di!erent mean resorption values
`
`Samples being
`compared
`
`1000(60), (1000(5)
`1000(60), 850(60)
`1000(60), 900(60)
`1000(60), 950(60)
`950(60), (1000(5)
`950(60), 850(60)
`950(60), 900(60)
`900(60), (1000(5)
`900(60), 850(60)
`850(60), (1000(5)
`
`Mean di!erence
`
`Critical value (5%)
`
`Signi"cance (S/NS)
`
`Critical value (1%)
`
`Signi"cance (S/NS)
`
`3.43
`3.23
`2.95
`2.62
`0.82
`0.62
`0.33
`0.48
`0.28
`0.20
`
`2.36
`2.26
`2.11
`1.91
`2.11
`1.91
`1.59
`1.91
`1.59
`1.59
`
`S
`S
`S
`S
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`2.88
`2.77
`2.64
`2.44
`2.64
`2.44
`2.14
`2.44
`2.14
`2.14
`
`S
`S
`S
`S
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`S*signi"cant, NS*not signi"cant.
`
`Si}TCP phase. Table 2 summarizes the sintering pro"le,
`the phase composition, the range of particle sizes com-
`prising the surface morphology and the average amount
`of resorption determined using the Microst system. It
`should be noted that samples sintered at 8003C for
`60 min possessed a di!erent optical opacity than the
`other samples, which precludes the use of Microst for
`these samples.
`ANOVA statistical analysis was performed to deter-
`mine if these means were statistically di!erent [21,22].
`ANOVA results indicate that there is a statistical di!er-
`ence between the means [22]. The Newman}Keuls
`Range Test was then used to determine which samples
`produced statistically di!erent results [21]. These results
`are summarized in Table 3.
`Scanning and transmission electron microscopy in-
`dicated that the "lm morphology continues to evolve
`during sintering. From the results summarized in Tables
`2 and 3 above, evidence appeared indicating that both
`the phase composition and surface morphology may be
`important factors in determining osteoclastic response.
`As the samples sintered for only 5 min at 10003C did not
`represent the same phase composition as the samples
`sintered for 60 min at 10003C and since only samples
`sintered at 10003C showed signi"cant levels of resorp-
`tion, further analysis on samples sintered for di!erent
`times at 10003C was performed.
`To further analyse the e!ect of surface morphology,
`a set of three sample types was created by sintering at
`10003C for 1, 60 and 480 min. In particular, the 1 min
`exposure was created with speci"c attention to attaining
`the required thermal pro"le. Twenty samples were cre-
`ated for each sample type, with 16 samples being sent for
`biological testing to determine osteoclastic resorption.
`All three sample types had equivalent phase composition
`(approximately 75$5% Si}TCP and 25$5% HA). As
`each sample type exhibited di!erent thin "lm optical
`properties, the use of Microst to analyze resorption levels
`was precluded for these samples. SEM micrographs were
`
`taken of the "lms prior to biotest, after acellular biotest
`and after biotest (Figs. 3}5).
`While all of the "lms had the same phase composition
`within the stated 5% uncertainty, distinct di!erences in
`surface morphology were observed. The samples sintered
`at 10003C for only 1 min had most of the resorption
`occurring as partial resorption with a substantial amount
`of partial resorption around the periphery of the resorp-
`tion events. As indicated by the cross-sectional TEM
`analysis (Fig. 6), "lms sintered for short times develop an
`elaborate bilayer structure composed of a microporous
`upper layer of large grains and a more dense underlying
`layer of small grains. The underlying interfacial layer
`appears to be di$cult for cells to resorb. This results in
`partial resorption, where a layer of material remains at
`the bottom of the resorption pit either covering the entire
`base or in areas of the periphery of the resorption pit. It is
`possible that the di!erent chemistry present in the inter-
`facial layer limits osteoclastic activity in this "ne grained
`region [13].
`Osteoblast cultures (#DEX) were performed to deter-
`mine if the thin "lms provided a suitable substrate for
`bone mineralization. Fig. 7(a) illustrates the surface of the
`thin "lm after osteoblast bone mineral deposition. A col-
`lagen sheet has been deposited on the surface of the "lm
`and preliminary mineralization has begun. Fig. 7(b) is
`a high magni"cation micrograph of a section where the
`overlying bone mineral deposit has been pulled away
`from the surface of the substrate. A dense mineral layer
`(see arrow) can be seen between the substrate and the
`overlying collagen sheet.
`
`3.2. Materials analysis of silicon-modixed calcium
`phosphate bulk ceramics
`
`Dissolution studies were performed to determine the
`solubility properties of di!erent calcium phosphate
`ceramics in a simulated acellular, physiological environ-
`ment. The average rate of dissolution (illustrated in Fig. 8),
`
`(cid:26)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`

`

`142
`
`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`Fig. 4. Summary of samples sintered at 10003C for 1 min: (a) pre-biotest, (b) after acellular biotest, (c) after biotest illustrating areas of resorption and
`(d) a higher magni"cation of the partial resorption area. Arrow denotes an area of partial resorption.
`
`Fig. 5. Summary of samples sintered at 10003C for 480 min: (a) pre-biotest, (b) after acellular biotest, (c) after biotest illustrating areas of resorption and
`(d) a higher magni"cation of the resorption edge. Arrow denotes an area of partial resorption at the periphery of the resorption pit.
`
`(cid:27)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`

`

`S. Langstaw et al. / Biomaterials 22 (2001) 135}150
`
`143
`
`Fig. 6. Cross-sectional TEM image of an Si}mHA thin "lm sintered at
`(10003C for 5 min.
`
`Fig. 7. SEM micrograph illustrating the surface of a Si}mHA thin "lm
`after osteoblast cell culture. The arrow indicates a dense mineral layer
`between the substrate and the overlying collagen sheet.
`
`was determined by the slope of a linear least-squares "t
`to the cumulative calcium dissolution vs. dissolution time
`graph. After a one day stabilization period Si}mHA, ♢-
`TCP, mHA and cHA showed less than 0.02% calcium
`dissolution per day over the 10 day period. Although the
`dissolution rate of ♡-TCP was initially quite low, it quick-
`ly rose. This resulted in a dissolution rate of &0.03% per
`
`Fig. 8. Dissolution rate of calcium phosphate ceramic pellets as deter-
`mined by the slope of a linear least-squares "t to the cumulative calcium
`dissolution Vs. dissolution time graph.
`
`day. In contrast, the dissolution of Si}mHA was unique
`with an initial release of calcium upon introduction
`into the ISS and essentially no further dissolution
`over the remainder of the 10 day period. This re-
`sulted in an on-going average dissolution rate of
`&0.006% per day.
`The surface morphology of the pellets was assessed by
`comparing SEM micrograph results with that obtained
`for the thin "lm samples. The uniformity of the morpho-
`logy throughout the pellet interior was assessed by imag-
`ing a fracture surface. Pellets made from mHA or
`Si}mHA powders possessed a morphology similar to the
`interconnected, microporous surface morphology of the
`standard thin "lms (Fig. 1(e)) with the microporosity
`continuing throughout the ceramic (Fig. 9). The pellets
`were comprised of particles approximately 0.2}1.0 ♯m
`in size.
`Pellets created using cHA powder mixed with TPOS,
`to e!ect Si addition, had a signi"cantly di!erent surface
`morphology (Fig. 10(a) and (b)). These pellets appear to
`be aggregates of very large particles (1}10 ♯m) with jagged
`edges and little or no inter-connectivity present. At high-
`er magni"cations where the characteristic surface mor-
`phology of the standard thin "lms is best identi"ed, the
`large irregular particles exhibit little or no undulations in
`their surface (Fig. 10(b)). When cHA, ♢-TCP and CaSiO
`were mixed at pH"10, the resultant pellets appeared to
`be aggregates of particles. The particle size varied be-
`tween 0.1 and 2.0 ♯m with no apparent interconnected-
`ness (Fig. 10(c) and (d)). Furthermore, pellets created
`from a mixture of cHA and ♢-TCP appeared to have the
`characteristi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket