`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.
`SAP AMERICA INC.
`Petitioners
`v.
`CLOUDING IP, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013-000586
`Case IPR2014-00306
`Patent 6,738,799
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Patent Owner respectfully requests oral
`
`argument on the issues set forth below at a place and time set by the Board. Oral
`
`argument is presently scheduled for October 16, 2014 (Paper No. 10, Scheduling
`
`Order). To allow for a complete review of the issues presented in this proceeding,
`
`Patent Owner requests one hour of argument time.
`
`
`
`ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED DURING ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`A.
`
`Claims 1, 12, 23, 24, 30, 31, 37, and 42 are patentable over Williams under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e);
`
`B.
`
`Claims 5-10 and 16-21 are patentable over Williams and Miller under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`C. Claims 37 and 42 are patentable over Balcha under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e);
`
`D. Claims 1, 5, 9, 10, 12, 16, 20, 21, 23, 24, 30, and 31 are patentable over
`
`Balcha and Miller under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`E.
`
`Claims 6-8 and 17-19 are patentable over Balcha, Miller, and Freivald
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a); and
`
`F.
`
`Claims 37 and 42 are patentable over Balcha and Freivald under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a);
`
`G.
`
`Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to Amend, if necessary, should be
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`granted and Proposed Substitute Claim 47, as presented therein, deemed
`
`patentable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 11, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`ASCENDA LAW GROUP, PC
`84 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 550
`San Jose, CA 95113
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`Tarek N. Fahmi, Reg. No. 41,402
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`was served on September 11, 2014, by filing this document though the Patent Review
`Processing System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail directed to the
`attorneys of record for the Petitioners at the following addresses:
`For Petitioner Unified Patents, Inc.
` For Petitioner SAP America Inc.
`Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
`Michael Kiklis
`
`Megan S. Woodworth
`Scott McKeown
`S. Gregory Herrman
`Oblon Spivak
`DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
`1940 Duke Street
`1825 Eye Street, NW
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`Washington, DC 20006-5403
`cpdocketkiklis@oblon.com
`
`cpdocketmckeown@oblon.com
`ciminof@dicksteinshapiro.com,
`herrmang@dicksteinshapiro.com
`IPDocketing-
`DC@dicksteinshapiro.com
`
`
`The parties have agreed to electronic service in this matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`Dated: September 11, 2014
`
`
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi, Reg. No. 41,402
`ASCENDA LAW GROUP, PC
`84 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 550
`San Jose, CA 95113
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`