throbber
Case IPR2O 13-00571
`
`(Joined with IPR2014-00557)
`
`Docket Nos.: 6521-0104L
`
`6521-O107L
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,135,398
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`VIRGINIA INNOVATION SCIENCES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPRZOI3-005711
`
`Patent 8,135,398
`
`PATENT OWNER REQUEST FOR ADVERSE JUDGMENT
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. 42.73(b)(2)
`
`1 Case IPR2014-00557 has been joined With this proceeding.
`
`1
`
`DRA/GSD/vd
`
`

`
`Case IPR2013-00571
`
`(Joined with IPR20l4—O0557)
`
`Docket Nos.: 652l—0104L
`
`6521—0107L
`A
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,135,398
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`IPR20l3-00571 and IPR2014—0O557 (which is joined with this proceeding)
`
`are two of six proceedings (IPR2013—00569, —OO570, —OO57l, —O0572, -00573, and
`
`IPR2014—00557) requested by Petitioner against Patent Owner’s patents.
`
`In the
`
`interest of streamlining the proceedings and focusing its resources, Patent Owner has
`
`decided to cancel claims 15, 55, 57, 58 and 60-63 of U.S. Patent No. 8,135,398 (“the
`
`‘398 patent”), on which 1PR20l3-00571 and IPR20l4—O0557 were instituted.
`
`Patent Owner’s decision to cancel the claims is no_t an admission regarding
`
`the merits of Petitioner’s position that the claims are invalid and/or that the asserted
`
`references taken alone or in combination, teach or suggest all of the limitations of
`
`these claims.
`
`Pursuant to the PTAB’s Joinder Decision and Order (IPR2014—005 57, Paper
`
`10) at 19, this request is being filed only in IPR2013-00571 with the case caption
`
`modified as ordered by the PTAB.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`In View of the requested cancellation of all claims of the ‘398 patent upon
`
`which trial was instituted, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the PTAB enter an
`
`adverse judgment against Patent Owner in these two proceedings pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. 42.73(b)(2).
`
`DRA/GSD/vd
`
`

`
`Docket Nos.: 6521-O104L
`
`6521-0107L
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,135,398
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`-1
`
`
`
`/
`
`
`D Rich rd ,4 derson (Lead Counsel)
`Registrtio No.: 40,439
`
`‘
`
`
`
`George Dolina (Backup Counsel)
`Registration No.: 63,654
`
`BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH &
`
`BIRCH, LLP
`8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 100 East
`Falls Church, VA 22042
`703-205-8000
`
`DRA/GSD/vd
`
`Case IPR2013-005 71
`
`(Joined with IPR2014—O0557)
`
`Dated:
`
`September 11, 2014
`
`

`
`Case IPR2013-005 71
`
`'
`
`Docket No. 6521-0104L
`
`(Joined with IPR2014-00557)
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,135,398
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 11, 2014, a copy of the Request for
`
`Adverse Judgment was served upon the below-listed parties/counsel as follows:
`
`VIA E-MAIL TRANSMISSION
`
`Joseph S. Presta, Reg. No. 35,329
`j sp@niXonVan. com
`Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.
`901 North Glebe Road,
`11”‘ Floor,
`Arlington, VA 22203
`Telephone: 703-816-4000
`Fax: 703-816-4100
`
`Updeep S. Gill, Reg. No. 37,334
`usg@nixonvan.com
`Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.
`901 North Glebe Road,
`1 1th Floor,
`Arlington, VA 22203
`Telephone: 703-816-4000
`Fax: 703-816-4100
`
`Date: September11,2014
`
`j mi
`
`Vincent Duran
`
`"
`
`DRA/GSD/Vd

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket