throbber
Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page2 of 41
`
`TPK 2018
`Wintek v. TPK Touch Solutions
`IPR2013-00568
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page3 of 41
`
`Daiwa »
`Capital mm ' '
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`"I'ublc ofcrmlcnls
`
`Touch-panel displays made easy...................................................................................................... 3
`
`Adding touch to a mobile device ...................................................................................................... 4
`
`Many technologies available within P-cap ....................................................................................... 7
`
`Types of integrated touch panel ..................................................................................................... 12
`
`TPM selection in a nutshell ............................................................................................................. 17
`
`Best touch solutions are G/G, G/F/F for now, but TOC in a year or two...................................... 18
`
`In-cell touch panel is not ideal for non-Apple brands ................................................................... 19
`
`Frequently asked questions ............................................................................................................ 20
`
`Appendix A: alternative touch solutions ........................................................................................ 23
`
`Appendix B: touch-panel supply chains ........................................................................................ 26
`
`Appendix C: major touch-panel technologies ................................................................................ 27
`
`Glossary .......................................................................................................................................... 28
`
`Please also see:
`
`Taiwan Touch Panel Sector:
`Cook's speech triggers more demand for touch panels
`8 March 2012
`
`Korea Touch Screen Sector:
`We foresee robust growth In addressable market
`8 March 2012
`
`cm Lln (886) 2 8158 5251 (an;W.mtw)
`
`Jan H. Lee (32) 2787 9173 mm.m)
`Joshua on. cm (82) 2 787 3116 Mm.mr.mn.m)
`
`"' 5....
`
`chllt'a spa-I'll 2.1.1537." m3.“
`triggers more “aha—d ..a..._._.._
`demand for mew—E 53:22:15.2:-
`tam-h purl!
`’- _"" h"
`
`\i'z- [um-2e
`rnlmsl mum":
`lu IMn-uablr
`market
`
`I
`ll
`Ffit
`
`.1
`555.“:32.
`
`non-wann-
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page4 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Markets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`Touch-panel displays made easy
`This is the first report in Daiwa's new series, Made Easy, in which we set out to
`explain an industry from top to bottom, and the ongoing developments and drivers
`within it, in layman's terms.
`
`In this report, we put you in the role of procurement executive at a hypothetical global
`smartphone manufacturer. Against the backdrop of constantly evolving technologies
`and emerging new solutions. you are tasked with determining the key criteria.
`balancing each technology’s strengths and weaknesses, and choosing the right
`solution for the job.
`
`Our decision to kick off the Made Easy series with touch panels follows on from our
`recent reports on the sector in both Korea (In touch with new market opportunities.
`published on 7 February 2012) and Taiwan (Threats become opportunities, published
`on 31 January 2012).
`
`We believe the outlook for the touch-panel space remains bright. As we see it, the
`market is likely to continue to boom in 2012 as smartphone, tablet-PC, automobile,
`and notebook makers move to make their products more user-friendly by adopting
`touch-panel displays (TPD), allowing for touch-driven command inputs.
`
`In Taiwan, our top pick is TPK (3673 TT, NT$483, Buy [1]), which we expect to remain
`the major touch-panel/lamination supplier for Apple (AAPL US, US$530.69,
`Outperform [2]). We forecast TPK's small-sized and mid-sized touch pane shipments
`for Apple to rise by 28% YoY and 36% YoY, respectively, for 2012. We have a six-
`month target price of NT$630, based on a target PER of 9.5x applied to our fully
`diluted 2012 EPS forecast. Risks to our call would be slower-than-expected iPad 3
`panel yield rate improvement, and pricing pressure from Vlfintek (2384 TT, NT$25.35.
`Outperform [2]) and CW (3481 TT. NT$15.15, Hold [3]).
`
`In Korea, our top pick is lljin Display (020760 KS, W13,450, Buy [1]), as we expect the
`company to continue to gain share in Korea’s touch-panel market and forecast robust
`revenue growth of 63% YoY for 2012. We have a six-month target price of W18,000,
`based on a mid-cycle PBR of 3.3x applied to our 2012 BVPS forecast. The risk to our
`call would be a slowdown in touch-screen orders from its main customer.
`
`I Touch Panel Sector. Darwa key stock calls
`
`.TPK.
`.
`__.
`367311
`_. __.
`.
`...
`.,
`__.
`._._. o..... .
`.
`.
`.
`......
`ertek
`2384 W
`"$25.35
`1.42
`
`mm.
`
`Wilt???
`020760 KS
`LEM
`__Wléfl
`.932.
`096660 KS
`Mata:
`WZA 500
`0 37
`000
`Source. Datwa
`Note.- (1) Our M32940 target price[or Wintel is based on our 20121-3 BVPS a M3243: and a target PER ofr .2013 in the middle ofitspast-
`PER a 3.2: (assuming a long—term ROE elm) on our 2012 BVPSforecast: the risk to our call luau
`be a Mount in touch-saver: and
`thrce
`range, the 71:1 to our view would be a delay in the launch of Win . (2) Our W52.ooo tar
`priest/yr Melfas is based on a target
`toad: sensor chip ordersfrnm its main customer.
`
`_M
`
`We trust that you find this first Made Easy report a useful introduction to the touch-
`panel space. and look forward to receiving your feedback.
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page5 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Markets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`Adding touch to a mobile device
`You are a new procurement executive at Five Star Mobile, a hypothetical smartphone
`maker in Asia seeking to expand its presence in the global market. You know that the
`smartphone market is extremely competitive, with the high end dominated by
`Samsung Electronics (SEC) (005930 KS, W1,172,000, Outperform [2]) and Apple,
`while the mid-to low-end segment is increasingly crowded, and it is hard to distinguish
`one product from another.
`
`You believe that Five Star Mobile can leverage its design team hired recently from a
`European automaker to differentiate the basic ‘Iook' of the smartphone from its
`competitors. But you think that another important feature to consider is the ‘feel’ of the
`handset. Keen to adopt the best touch-panel technology for this new smartphone, you
`have contacted several touch-panel makers in the region (Taiwan and Korea).
`
`So, what is a touch-panel display?
`
`TPD comes in various forms, depending on the type of touch solution adopted, but
`simply, it provides not only visual output with information, but detects the presence
`and location of touch point(s) to input instructions with a finger(s) and/or a stylus. One
`advantage of a touch panel is that it removes the need for a physical button (keyboard)
`on an electronic device. This is because a 'soft’ keyboard can be displayed on-screen
`and the user interface can be designed with much more user-friendly functions, such
`as zooming in and out of the content using two or more fingers.
`
`I Architecture of multi-touch technology
`
`Touch sensor
`
`Able to sense multiple points
`
`Touch sensor
`controllar 8* 5'1""
`
`Able to deliver sets of simultaneous
`points to the operating system
`
`OPOI’
`
`II
`
`lawn",
`
`Able to forward multiple streams of
`moving points
`
`moving points and taking action Source. 045mm. Daiwa
`
`Able to decode multiple streams of
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page6 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Markets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`How much do TPMs for smartphone use cost?
`
`Five Star Mobile plans to launch a smartphone in the US$200-300 price segment, and
`the following table presents a bill-of-materials (BOM) cost analysis prepared by your
`procurement team. Since the mainstream touch solution is not yet built into the TFT-
`LCD display, an add-on component called a touch-panel module (TPM) is laminated
`on top of the TFT—LCD display. The cost of the TPM is about US$10, or about 5% of
`the smartphone’s total manufacturing cost.
`
`-- 80M cost estimate for a smartphone
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: Daiwc
`
`Choosing the right touch-panel module
`
`You know you have to keep manufacturing costs below US$200 per smartphone, and
`have met several major touch-panel companies in Taiwan and Korea with a view to
`determine the best touch-panel solution for your new smartphone. The TPM makers
`have told you that although there are many different types of touch panels available
`and new ones continue to emerge, there is no perfect solution - each touch
`technology has its own strengths and weaknesses.
`
`The touch-panel makers have given you the following ideas.
`
`There are various competing technologies. Resistive touch was once the most widely
`adopted technology until Apple introduced the iPhone, using projected capacitive (P-
`cap) touch. which has gone on to become today’s mainstream solution. Other
`technologies include optical imaging, infrared, surface acoustic wave, and
`electromagnetic.
`
`Resistive-type
`
`The early generation of touch-panel technology was based on resistive technology. It
`is usually composed of two flexible sheets coated with indium-tin oxide (ITO), a
`transparent, conductive material, and separated by an air gap with spacers. When the
`human finger (or anything else, as the contact does not necessarily need to be
`conductive) presses the outer-layer film (with ITO on the x-axis voltage), it creates a
`depression leading to the film coming into contact with the inner-layer film (with ITO on
`the y-axis voltage), the two sheets are pressed together to create the X and Y
`coordinates, then processed by the controller lC to locate the touch point(s).
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page7 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital mm' '
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`I Resistivetype touch panel
`
`I Resrstlve touch Nokia Asha 300 feature phone
`
`
`
`Source: 510 TaudrSysiems
`
`Source. Noun
`
`Although the resistive-type touch panel is inexpensive, it is not recommended for
`smartphones for the following reasons: 1) the thin plastic outer layer makes the screen
`less durable, and 2) manual recalibration is required periodically.
`
`Projected-capacitive (P-cap)
`Adoption of the P-cap touch panel increased with the launch of Apple's iPhone in 2007.
`A projected capacitive sensor is made of two layers of lTO deposited at the x-axis and
`y-axis to produce a charged electric field or capacitance. When the human finger
`(which is also conductive) touches the surface of the sensor, the change in electric
`capacitance at the location touched is detected by the touch controller lC in order to
`locate the touch point(s).
`
`I P-cap touch panel brie! model
`
`fiOS-sorths'l —'
`
`I Apple's P-cap touch panel. cross-sectional View
`cutawa-
`“1}me
`Mm \
`
`Fan-mu
`
`Why projected: electric-filed lines are "projected" beyond
`the touch surface when a finger (conductor) I: present
`Source: Danna
`
`Source: Dm'wa
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page8 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Markets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`Many technologies available
`within P-cap
`There are various types of P-cap touch panels, which can be categorised broadly as
`glass-type and film-type.
`
`For the glass-type, there are two solutions: glassto—glass (GIG), and a single-glass
`solution called touch-on-cover (T00), also known as sensor-on-cover (SOC) or
`sensor-on-lens (SOL). For the film-type, there is the glass-to-film-film (GIFIF) and
`glassone-film (G1F). Comparing the two technologies, glass-type has advantages in
`optical performance and durability, and has narrow bezel; the film-type has
`advantages in cost, thinness and lightness. and ease of production.
`
`We provide below detailed descriptions of the touch solutions for P-cap TPMs.
`
`Glass-to-glass (GIG): cover glass and sensor glass
`In 2007, the iPhone became the first mobile device to use a GIG touch panel with ITO,
`a transparent conductor, deposited onto a glass to become a sensor glass. The cover
`glass is used to protect the sensor glass underneath, and the sensor glass is used to
`sense the touch points. The sensor glass is coated with two conductive layers of ITO:
`one for the x-axis, another for the y-axis. As the sensor glass is charged, an electric
`field is formed. The electronic field waits for another conductive material, such as a
`finger(s), to create a disturbance by touching the field, which then allows the chip (or
`controller lC) locating the X and Y coordinates of the touch points to execute the touch
`commands.
`
`There are two types of GIG solutions: double-sided indium-tin oxide (DlTO), patented
`by Apple, and single-sided ITO (SlTO) for non-Apple devices.
`
`I Glass-to-glass (GIG) P-cap touch solution
`
`Glesuo—Glass (Out-cell)
`
`GlasaIGlus: Dl'l'O Sensor Crss Sectional View
`HOSerwot-adsP—o
`.
`mam ..———O:
`flOSamrtY-uhic'”. — _ -
`
`GlassIGlass: SWO Sensor Crm Sectional View
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WWWNH .—__....
`
`
`Samara:
`
`no Senortxm no Senora-axis)
` Scum: Daiwa
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page9 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Marlmts
`
`Display Teclmology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`I GIG touch example: Apple iPhone 45
`
`II GIG touch example: Apple 3 New iPad
`
`--'Iflfllr‘
`
`DDBDDDDDDD
`condemned
`-uuauunou
`
`Sam: Apple
`
`Source Apple
`
`Glass-to-fllm-to-film (GIFIF): cover glass and two layers of films
`There are several film-type TPM makers, such as Young Fast (Not rated) and J-Touch
`(Not rated) in Taiwan and lljin Display and Melfas in Korea. In this solution, the cover
`glass is used to protect the two layers of film underneath. The first layer of film is
`coated with ITO deposited at the x-axis, and the second layer of film is coated with
`ITO deposited at the y-axis. This structure is much slimmer than the 6/6 solution as
`the two layers of film are still much thinner than the sensor glass; however, films are
`more prone to defects as they tend to become deformed upon substantial changes in
`temperature and humidity.
`
`I Glass-to-film-tofilm (GIF/F) P-cap touch solution
`
`ITO “BUN-Ill!)
`
`“OS-WM)
`
`Source: Damn
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page10 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital mm
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`I GIFIF touch example HTC Sensation XL
`
`
`
`Source: HTC
`
`GIass-to-one-fllm (61 F): cover glass and one layer of film
`G1F provides a hybrid solution. One axis of ITO sensors is printed on the cover glass
`and another axis of lTO sensors is attached to the film. As G1F uses one less film
`than the GIFIF solution, it is slightly thinner and has better transparency and optical
`quality. One drawback of the G1 F solution is that it tends to have a low production
`yield, and so we believe TOC will be more widely used by TPM makers in 2012.
`
`II G1F touch panel
`/Cmum
`
`”kappa”umwmm
`‘5‘ —'—fl08lwafis)
`“mm,
`ra- mm WM“
`
`“mm dim-y
`
`I G1F touch example. Samsung Galaxy 8 9-inch tablet
`-
`....__._ ..
`.
`,........
`
`
`
`Sam. Daiqu
`
`Source Mtlfus
`
`Touch on cover (TOC): coating ITO onto the back of the cover glass
`
`The main purpose of this solution is to reduce material costs (by roughly 15-20%) by
`reducing the thickness (0.3-0.4mm) of the sensor glass. There are various types of
`TOC solution, each with a different name by various suppliers:
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page11 of 41
`
`
`3 §Cap
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`-TOC touch solution
`
`Emil-u
`
`Gastroaunah:___u_ ______-______‘______‘__
`
`usuao:—J -
`
`
`Condumve «Inger/v
`
`rro Sensor ot-asds
`rro Samar (Vacs)
`
`
`Touch on Cover
`
`
`
`Sauna: Datum
`
`I TOC various types and mass-production schedule
`
`
`
`AU
`ironic:
`OnoGiaasSold'mnOGS
`
`9mm 13“"! WWWWW_
`
`M 13059") __
`WGdeWIOGSJ
`.
`Mela:
`osesaoxsa
`DiredP
`' w-m
`TPK
`31mm
`TwohOans 01.)
`Source: Companies Datum
`
`
`
`Sheet
`1012
`E
`&
`m
`M
`Sheet
`4011
`Piece
`2012
`
`While each TOC solution has a different name depending on the supplier, they all
`have a similar production method (sheet-type) except for TPK's touch-on-lens (T0L),
`which is produced using the piece-type method. The major difference between the two
`production methods is that the sheet-type is geared to low-to-mid-end mobile devices
`that still require a second chemical strengthening on the borders after cutting, while
`the piece-type is not. The piece-type method is much more difficult to manufacture
`and is geared to mid-range and high-end mobile devices.
`
`I TOC solution production methods sheet-type and piece-type
`Toc: Shoot Typo
`
`TOC: Piece Type
`
`Forming
`
`" Cum.
`
`cm;
`forming
`
`,,
`
`Wuhzistmrgthadng: glassissubmerydina bath mowingpomm'wnrdmhmdmm Thiserrmsafiwn mmvmgbmmfmrrobemphmdbypormmmfiwnmwhwhrrbu
`" Inkprintingfor colouring and coatingfor more glass treatments; such as, AG emriglare, an anti-reflectiw. and AS antismudge
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page12 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Markets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`I Example of TOC touch: HTC Wildfire smartphone
`
`I Example of TOC ‘ouch HTC Cha Cha smartphone
`
`
`
`Source; HTC
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page13 of 41
`
`Rallying
`
`DisplayTechnologyMggchhgfg
`
`Types of integrated touch panel
`All of the touch-panel technologies discussed in the previous section fall into one
`major category: the add-on (out-cell) category, in which the TPM is attached to the top
`of the TFT-LCD display. But another touch-panel technology is emerging, in which the
`touch panel is integrated into the main display. This is being led by LCD-panel makers
`and competes with the add-on technologies of conventional TPM makers.
`
`Integrated-type technologies, such as on-cell and in-cell touch panels. are currently
`being developed by the major LCD-panel makers. However, these technologies still
`need verifying for mass production, as defective touch panels would result in the entire
`TFT-LCD being scrapped since the touch panel cannot be separated from the main
`display.
`
`For the integrated technologies, while the touch feature is built within the TFT-LCD
`display, TFT-LCD makers still require the conventional touch-panel makers’ core
`competence in laminating the cover glass onto the in-cell-touch-enabled TFT-LCD
`display.
`
`I Comparison of conventional and Integrated touch-panel technologies
`
`ammllurmmmplmmoduh
`
`Kev'l‘echnology
`
`
`
`trump-oi
`
`
`KeySuppller
`Source: DisplaySmmh, Daiwa
`
`“-14.00 miles. but Magi-reclamation servicefromlouch
`Wm
`Touchpmelms
`
`
`On-coll touch panel for TFT-LCD displays
`For on-cell touch panels, the touch sensor is deposited on the top of the colour filter
`and one layer of glass is eliminated, resulting in a thinner module with lower
`production costs (theoretically) compared with the add-on solutions. The major
`challenges for on-cell technology include the following: 1) it requires additional photo
`masks in the production process of TFT-LCD to create the touch sensors on the top
`surface of the colour filter substrate, and this effectively lowers the overall production
`yield, and 2) potential defects on the touch sensor could result in the whole colour filter
`having to be scrapped.
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page14 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`W
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8March2012
`
`
`
`I 0n~cell touch panel for TFT-LCD
`
`m—CIII Touch for TFT-LCD
`
` Glm smnm—>
`
`GREEN
`
`Anaylayerotfi‘r-LCOx
`mountain‘s-g”
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`ammmawim
`
`Source: Datum
`
`On-cell touch panel for AMOLED
`SEC launched its own touch-panel technology for active matrix organic light-emitting
`diode (AMOLED) in 2010, and this is currently used in its high-end smartphones, such
`as the Galaxy Sll and Galaxy Nexus. The company integrated touch sensors on the
`top glass layer of AMOLED for encapsulation. The production of the touch sensor is
`outsourced to HannsTouch (Not rated) and CPT (Not rated).
`
`I On-cell touch panel for AMOLED
`
`On-Clll Touchfor AMOLED
`
`
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page15 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`capital mm
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`II On-cell AMOLED example Samsung Galaxy SII smartphone
`
`
`
`Soum: Sanmmg Electronic
`
`ln-cell touch panel for TFT-LCD
`
`For in-cell touch panels, the touch sensor is located inside the LCD cell. The touch
`sensor can comprise light-sensing elements, micro switches (voltage-sensing), or
`capacitive electrodes (charge-sensing).
`
`ln light-sensing, the photo sensor is placed in each pixel or group of pixels and the
`visible-light sensor recognises 1) the shadow of a finger under a bright light, 2) the
`reflection of the backlight on the finger in a dark environment, or 3) the lighting from
`stylus and/or eraser (please refer to the picture on the next page demonstrated by AU
`Optronics).
`
`For voltage-sensing, pressing the LCD surface closes micro-switches in each pixel to
`detect the location touched. it works with any touch objects, such as a finger or stylus.
`However, durability is an issue as it requires the LCD surface to be touched and the
`cover glass cannot be added.
`
`In charge-sensing, pressing the LCD surface changes the dielectric constant of the
`liquid crystal, which alters the capacitance between the electrodes. This type of in»cel|
`is being developed by Sharp, Toshiba Mobile Display (TMD) (Not listed), and LG
`Display (LGD) (034220 KS, W27,600, Hold [3]).
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page16 of 41
`
`'
`Dalwa
`
`
`CapitalMafltsts
`
`Disl T1 1 MdE
`pay ecmo ogy
`:34;th
`
`
`
`I ln-cell touch panel with light-sensing elements
`
`h-eon Light-sensing Touch
`
`
`
`Soumr AU Optrunirs
`Nome: Light—sensing in-ceIl touch panel is not yet waflable cemmem‘nlly
`
`II ln-cell touch panel with charge-sensing elements
`
`hall cmmmhg‘l'ouch
`
`
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page17 of 41
`
`'
`Dalwa
`
`
`Capital mm
`
`D'
`1 T 11111 MdE
`1sp ay cc oogy gab/{$1123
`
`
`
`‘- ln-cell touch panel WIth charge-sensmg example: TMD portable navigation device
`
` 7 (L. m TH) I100 MIG pllnHW-VGM
`
`Source: Tbshz'ba Mobil: Display
`Note: Charge-smslng mum-(ouch fiz-aell touch panel is not yet commercially available
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page18 of 41
`
`'
`Da'wa
`
`
`Capital Mariam
`
`D'
`1 T1 1 MdE
`lspay ecmo ogy
`:Maerchgfg
`
`
`
`TPM selection in a nutshell
`
`We summarise the various types of touch technology in the table below.
`
`I Summary of touch technologies and their features
`
`TFr-l.CD Ollt~cell(Add-On)
`
`'
`
`GIGDfiOfl'Fr-LCD Yes_
`
`_ Mh'fi lsedinlheiPhone arLPai
`Am“!
`-,-
`thmwmmmm. 15-20%2v‘wirllrlalaricostsaslhewmglmisnotnemam
`Mmmhmmmmwmwmm
`Waldfiyltiiealfamu-b-bwenddeviolu
`
`
`W? PW_"*!L_°°_9‘___
`
`OM0§wnemiswz u-igidealtorlaqo-mdeviaesihlorflm. AlOPCs hosts}
`'medlgosmxmvaxee; Bedhwmgms NOPCs kiosks!
`Soundsemusblfltmborders, notpopuhr
`
`
`
`
`'
`-
`-.. lorAs'm
`"
`'ldeala'r
`nommmwdwmwmdmmmwmmmmm
`
`'nmaudmmdeloovmmmymwwalm mummdevelupedbysua'rp mo
`
`andLGD
`"ldeallulxgumdevlaee- mwmhuermmmmmmifiw
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page19 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Mallets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`Best touch solutions are GIG, GlF/F
`for now, but TOC in a year or two
`The most important factors for touch panels are cost competitiveness and the
`customer's acceptance of different touch-panel technologies. Although there could be
`new emerging technologies, if they are not verified for mass production, this could
`pose a potential procurement risk for smartphone makers.
`
` OJ";
`
`mum _
`Prodmflmfi *
`m.“
`Mailv
`
`Scum:Dalwa
`
`._L l
`, 33.1
`*‘k‘k
`11 ‘
`- 1 4
`int
`x
`fit
`*_*
`***
`N
`
`4
`.
`
`_
`.11.
`***
`*
`.1:
`i
`“or
`*1"!
`**
`11
`
`If we were in your shoes as procurement manager for Five Star Mobile, we would see
`6/6 or G/F/F as the best touch-panel solutions for the job at hand and conclude that
`TOC could become a strong contender in the next year or two.
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page20 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capital Mallets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`In-cell touch panels are not ideal
`for non-Apple brands
`While Apple is working hard with Sharp, TMD. and LGD on in-cell touch-panel
`solutions, it is only of use for the iPhone, and not yet for the iPad or other brand
`makers.
`
`The main reasons are as follows.
`
`1)
`
`In-cell touch panels are ideal for large-volume, single-model smartphones, such as
`the iPhone. it is not economical for other brand makers and the panel makers to
`make a new set of photo masks for each smartphone (as these are not in
`standard sizes such as TVs, monitors, and notebooks) that does not have a
`volume shipment of more than 2.5m units.
`
`2)
`
`It is still too costly to use in-cell touch panels for tablets, as the total cost is high
`due to a low yield rate, and it is quite costly to scrap those that are not up to
`standard.
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page21 of 41
`
`'
`
`gglwa
`
`D'
`
`lsp ay cc
`
`1 T hnl MdE
`
`oogy 3154;112:131:
`
`Frequently asked questions
`
`1. What are the types of projected capacitive (P-cap) touch solutions
`and which supplier offers what?
`
`@ Answer
`I Types of projected capacrtive (P-cap) touch solution
`
`
`
`"I"? .-k
`
`
`mm mamm_ "8933199654939 .mmm WMWE 914mm
`
`mow amused
`Auomosrn
`smgmm
`9W_l3‘_5_1..TD. _&Mflm
`Gilli-“film.
`iQESZLKfl.
`to
`cm
`
`331610277114?)
`WW "3}
`690K
`
`Source. Company, Daiwn estimates
`
`2. What type of touch solution is adopted by each major brand maker
`for various price segments?
`
`@ Answer
`I Touch solutions by brand maker
`
`
`
`mm
`'nE.
`'GIF/Forsoc
`TOLorSOG
`TOLorSOC_
`maid
`he
`GHF.61F.G2
`(5le
`800
`Source: Dahua record:
`
`6 3. Which touch solutions have the best performance vs. cost?
`
`.
`.
`., Answer
`@ The 6/6 and GFF solutions offer the best performance for their cost. Although
`G/G provides greater sensitivity and transparency (saves more power) with
`economies of scale, GFF is easier to produce and production costs are lower.
`G/G has the advantage of producing a single product in high volume, whereas
`GFF has advantages in a variety of low-volume products with a quick time to
`market.
`
`-
`
`-
`
`--
`0
`
`4. How come Taiwan touch-panel companies are much larger than
`Korea touch-panel companies?
`-. Answer
`Taiwan TPM makers have been riding on the success of Apple in mobile
`devices. And a few companies dominate the touch-panel market for both the
`iPhone and the iPad. However, the Korea TPM makers have been competing
`more fiercely in a much smaller and fragmented domestic market, supplying
`touch panels mainly to SEC and LG Electronics (LGE) (Not rated).
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page22 of 41
`
`D I————-—
`CapitaIMarkets
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`0 5. Does profitability vary with the degree of vertical integration?
`
`Answer
`
`@
`
`Although there are many TPM companies, not all of them are vertically
`integrated. One of the important components in TPMs is touch sensors, and
`normally, a company that can produce touch sensors in-house has higher
`profitability. However, given the complicated manufacturing process, another
`important variable is production efficiency.
`
`I Vertical integration of TPM companies
`
`
`
`Source. Commits Daiwa estimate-
`
`6. Would TPK and Wintek go out of business if Apple adopted in-cell
`touch panels?
`Answer
`
`@
`
`No. because TPK and Wintek’s core competence is not making sensor glass,
`but laminating the materials together and providing touch solutions at a lower
`cost through vertical integration.
`
`Even if Apple adopts in-cell touch panels for the iPhone, it would not have a
`completely negative impact on TPK and Wintek, as Apple would still rely on
`touch-panel makers to provide full lamination (direct bonding) services between
`the cover glass and the in-cell-touch display.
`
`While iPads, other iPhones, non-Apple tablets and smartphones would
`continue to adopt the GIG solution, the extra capacity left from only laminating
`once would open up business opportunities for other brands doing business
`with non-Apple brand names and result in them enjoying a better gross margin.
`
`@Q
`
`7. Would the dollar profit of lamination services be cut by half if the
`iPhone adopted in-cell touch panels?
`Answer
`
`No, because the yield rate for lamination would improve to 95-96% from the
`current 92% when laminating twice (once between the cover glass and sensor
`glass to form the touch-panel module, and the other between the touch-panel
`module and TFT-LCD display); as such, cost of goods sold would be lowered.
`Besides, touch-panel makers should charge a higher dollar profit as laminating
`between the cover glass and sensor glass should be much harder than
`laminating between the cover glass and the expensive in-cell-touch display.
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page23 of 41
`
`Capitalfilarlmts
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`Again, iPhone does not comprise all of the touch-panel makers’ revenue
`sources; and besides, top-line growth should be higher than expected as the
`ASP/unit for in-cell touch display business should be higher than the regular
`display with TPM on top.
`
`co
`
`@®-
`
`8. What’s the difference between full lamination and edge lamination?
`
`Answer
`
`Full lamination is also called direct bonding and edge lamination is also called
`air-bonding and. Basically, the former is more difficult with a lower yield rate
`because it requires the entire surface to be laminated onto another surface
`using optical clear adhesive (OCA), and the latter is much easier as it only
`requires the border to be laminated with double-sided adhesives.
`
`9.
`
`if Apple adopted in-cell touch panels for the iPhone 5, would other
`brands also adopt them quickly?
`Answer
`
`No, because it's costly, as each smartphone—size is not a standard-size like a
`TV, monitor or notebook; as such, a new set of photo masks needs to be made
`and the process cost of in-cell solution is significantly higher than that of the
`GIG solution (especially when the yield is not good, because the entire display
`cannot be reworked, but has to be scrapped).
`
`In other words, it’s not economical to adopt the in-cell solution if a model can't
`sell more than 2.5m sets (according to industry experts).
`
`Moreover, the in-cell touch panel is currently patented by Apple, and the
`technology itself could face a bottleneck due to insufficient capacity for other
`brands. Currently, there are Toshiba Mobile Display, Sharp, and LG Display in
`plan for mass production on a fairly small scale designed to be engaged for
`Apple only.
`
`9 ,_
`
`10. How long does it take to design and manufacture a touch panel for a
`new smartphone model?
`Answer
`
`The design and qualification process for a GIG touch solution for a new
`smartphone model usually takes 6-9 months depending on different customers
`(the process used to take 9-12 months for Apple). Once the spec and design
`parameters are qualified by the customer, the ramping up for production to an
`acceptable yield rate for the first shipment can be done within 1-2 months.
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page24 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`Capitalm
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`Appendix A: alternative touch
`solutions
`
`Optical Imaging
`
`The optical touch sensor uses imaging sensors (like a camera) installed in the top-
`right-hand and top-left-hand comers to see if there is any interference of the sensing
`area. If anything interferes by forming shadow(s) in the light reflecting back to the
`camera, the position of the touch is then detected. This is ideal for large-size displays;
`such as TVs, but it could be bulky as it needs room to hide to cameras.
`
`I Optical imaging touch
`
`I Optical touch example HP All-in-one PC
`
`
`
`Source: Touch Panel Middle East. Inc
`
`Source: HP
`
`Infrared touch
`
`The infrared touch sensor is implemented by infrared LEDs and light detectors
`installed in the front of the display on both vertical and horizontal bezels. When
`anything touches the screen, it also disrupts the infrared beams and causes a drop in
`the signal received by the light detectors. The X and Y coordinates of the touched
`area is then located. This is ideal for monitor-size applications; however, it’s not easy
`to calibrate between the signal senders and signal receivers.
`
`

`

`Case3:13-cv-02218-JST Document45-5 Filed09/26/13 Page25 of 41
`
`Daiwa
`W
`
`Display Technology MadeEasy
`8 March 2012
`
`
`
`I Infrared touch
`
`I- Infrared touch example: Kindle Touch
`
`
` I‘L-ll
`
`-.
`
`-
`
`,_.I
`_‘
`.,‘ '5
`1-‘5
`'.P.
`r5
`...I.
`I
`25?:
`Liv-ammo "j -_
`H‘
`acco-
`I’d
`0’;
`
`..
`
`I" .
`
`.
`
`-
`
`\
`
`‘
`
`Source: www louchuserfnfa'facacom
`
`Scum. Amwnmm
`
`Electromagnetlc/dlgltiser touch
`The electromagnetic touch panel has a sensor board in the back of the display. These
`sensor boards are positioned to sense the electromagnetic radiation (or radio
`frequency) generated by electromagnetic pen. When the specially designe

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket