throbber
Case IPR 2013-00567
`Case IPR 2014-00541
`U.S. Patent No. 8,217,902
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`WINTEK CORPORATION
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`TPK TOUCH SOLUTIONS INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR 2013-00567
`Case IPR 2014-00541
`U.S. Patent No. 8,217,902
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF DEREK TANG
`
`TPK 2027
`Wintek v. TPK
`
`

`
`Case IPR 2013-00567
`Case IPR 2014-00541
`U.S. Patent No. 8,217,902
`
`1.
`
`I, Derek J. Tang, am more than twenty-one years of age, am
`
`competent to present this affidavit, and have personal knowledge of the facts set
`
`forth herein.
`
`2.
`
`This affidavit is given in support of Patent Owner TPK Touch
`
`Solutions, Inc.'s ("TPK") Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Derek Tang.
`
`3.
`
`I am an associate at the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
`
`LLP. I am an experienced litigating attorney and have been litigating cases
`
`for more than seven years. I have also been litigating patent cases for four years.
`
`4.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bars of California and
`
`New York. I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. No court or administrative body has ever denied my
`
`application for admission to practice before it. No court or administrative body has
`
`ever imposed sanctions or contempt citations on me.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board's Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code
`
`of Federal Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I understand that I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`1
`
`

`
`Case IPR 2013-00567
`Case IPR 2014-00541
`U.S. Patent No. 8,217,902
`
`7.
`
`I am concurrently seeking pro hac vice admission to appear in a co-
`
`pending, related matter brought by Petitioner against Patent Owner, Case No.
`
`IPR2013-00568, in which Petitioner is also challenging claims of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,217,902. I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other proceedings
`
`before the Office in the last three (3) years.
`
`8.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding. I have litigated patent cases in the area of electrical engineering and
`
`electronic devices since 2010. I began representing and advising Patent Owner
`
`TPK in matters relating to patent strategy no later than 2013. In that time, I have
`
`become very familiar with U.S. Patent No. 8,217,902 ("the '902 Patent") and with
`
`its prosecution file history. In particular, I have assisted TPK in preparing its
`
`responses to the above-referenced petitions, as well as in the co-pending ex parte
`
`reexamination of the '902 Patent, Reexam Control No. 90/012,869.
`
`Sworn to and subscribed before me
`this 2') 4''day of August, 2014
`
`Not
`
`NORMAN MADDEN
`1,
`COMM # 1931701 (cid:9)
`SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY )),
`NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA Z
`MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
`APR. 07, 2015
`
`2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket