throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`WINTEK CORPORATION,
` Petitioner,
` Case IPR2013-00567
` vs. IPR2013-00568
`TPK SOLUTIONS INC.,
` Patent Owner.
`----------------------------------
`
` DEPOSITION OF DR. VIVEK SUBRAMANIAN
` Palo Alto, California
` Wednesday, June 11, 2014
`
`REPORTED BY:
`CYNTHIA MANNING, CSR No. 7645, CLR, CCRR
`JOB NO. 80920
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`25
`
`TPK 2009
`Wintek v. TPK Touch Solutions
`IPR2013-00567
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` June 11, 2014
` 9:00 a.m.
`
`Deposition of DR. VIVEK SUBRAMANIAN, held at
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett &
`Dunner, 3300 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto,
`California, before Cynthia Manning, Certified
`Shorthand Reporter No. 7645, Certified LiveNote
`Reporter, California Certified Realtime Reporter.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2 3
`
`4
`
`5 6 7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
` QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN
` BY: DAVID BILSKER, ESQ.
` 50 California Street
` San Francisco, CA 94111
`
`FOR PATENT HOLDER:
` FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT &
` DUNNER
` BY: JOSEPH PALYS, ESQ.
` ABHAY WATWE, ESQ., Ph.D.
` Two Freedom Square
` 11955 Freedom Drive
` Reston, VA 20190
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`Also present:
` Gokalp Bayramoglu, AWQ Consulting Inc.
` Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu, TPK Solutions Inc.
` Huanyi Linm TPK Solutions Inc.
` Alan Diaz, Videographer
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

` PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA;
` WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 2014; 9:00 A.M.
`
`Page 5
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning.
` My name is Alan Dias from TSG Reporting.
`This is a matter pending before the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office, before the Patent Trial
`and Appeal Board. Case number IPR2013-568,
`IPR2013-567.
` We are located today at 3300 Hillview
`Avenue, in the City of Palo Alto, California. Today
`is June 11, 2014. The time is 9:00 a.m.
` Here with me is Cynthia Manning, also from
`TSG Reporting.
` Counsel, will you please identify yourself
`for the record?
` MR. BILSKER: This is David Bilsker, from
`Quinn Emanuel, representing the Patent Owner, TPK.
` And with me is Alp Bayramoglu and Nihat
`Bayramoglu from TPK. And that's
`B-A-Y-R-A-M-O-G-L-U.
` MR. PALYS: Joseph Palys, with Finnegan,
`representing Petitioner Wintek Corporation. And
`with me is Abhay Watwe, also from Finnegan.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4 5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 6
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter
`please swear in the witness.
`
` VIVEK SUBRAMANIAN,
` having first been duly sworn, testified as
` follows:
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: You may proceed.
` MR. PALYS: David, before you begin, I want
`to put something on the record.
` MR. BILSKER: Sure.
` MR. PALYS: I just want to put on the
`record that in addition to IPR2013-567 and
`IPR2013-568, that this deposition is also relating
`to IPR2014-00541.
` MR. BILSKER: Yeah. And I agree with you
`that it's 567 and 568. I think it may be a little
`bit up in the air as to whether it's for 541 as well
`since no IPR has actually been declared on 541 yet.
` So I think that's a little bit ambiguous as
`to whether it's actually taking place with respect
`to that IPR as well.
`//
`//
`//
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

` EXAMINATION
`
`Page 7
`
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Subramanian.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. I might not have got a correct
`pronunciation that time.
` You have submitted declarations in three
`IPRs against TPK's United States Patent, the '902
`patent; correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And you consider yourself to be an expert
`in touchscreen technology?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Let me pass you a copy of your CV, which
`was marked as Exhibit Number 1013 in the 547 IPR.
` A. I have it in front of me.
` Q. Do you recognize that document?
` A. Yes. This is my curriculum vitae, along
`with a list of patents, publications, and
`representations.
` Q. And there is a rather large list of patents
`and publications here, aren't there?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you prepared this list?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Correct.
` Q. Now, in this long list of patents and
`publications, none of them deal with touchscreen --
`with touchscreens; correct?
` A. That's not true.
` Q. Which ones deal with touchscreens?
` A. A large number of them deal with the
`materials and underlying process for touchscreens.
` Q. Do any of them deal with an actual creation
`of a touchscreen?
` A. A complete functional touchscreen?
` Q. Yes.
` A. No.
` Q. Which ones do you believe relate to the
`underlying processes and components of touchscreens?
` A. There is a large number of publications and
`presentations dealing with transparent electronic
`systems, which deals with the underlying materials
`for touchscreens, transparent conductive oxide
`systems.
` Additionally, there are several
`publications and presentations associated with large
`area flexible electronic systems, again dealing with
`touchscreen process technologies.
` Q. So transparent conductors are used in --
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`for electronics components that are not
`touchscreens; correct?
` A. That's true.
` Q. And transparent conductors would be
`materials like indium oxide?
` A. Indium oxide, zinc oxide, indium tin oxide.
`There are several materials that are transparent
`conductors.
` Q. Any transparent insulators that you dealt
`with?
` A. Certainly.
` Q. Which ones?
` A. There is a large number: silicon dioxide,
`alumina, hafnia, zirconia. There is a large number
`of transparent insulators.
` Q. And the other publications that you said
`had something to do with touchscreens would be the
`publications relating to flexible substrates?
` A. Flexible electronics technology.
` Q. Flexible electronics technology.
` So how would flexible electronics
`technology relate to touchscreens?
` A. A lot of the work I have been doing on what
`I call flexible electronics technology is focused on
`developing technologies for fabrication of large
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 10
`area systems, which may or may not be flexible but
`include flexible systems.
` Large areas, for the purposes of this
`definition, would be something that is larger than,
`for example, a typical silicon chip, going from a
`several centimeters on a side to even feet or meters
`on a side.
` Q. And the flexible electronics you believe
`are things that are used in touchscreens?
` A. In some touchscreens, yes. In large area,
`in general, yes. I mean, a touchscreen is, in many
`cases, a large area system.
` Q. You may want to slow down just a little bit
`because the court reporter does have to take down
`what you are saying and you are speaking a little
`bit quickly. So it will probably burn her out if we
`don't slow down a little, just a touch.
` A. I understand. I'll do my best.
` Q. You said that you dealt with processes that
`could be used for making touchscreens; is that
`right?
` A. Correct.
` Q. So in dealing with the processes, that is
`the actual fabrication but not the design of a
`touchscreen; correct?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 11
` A. I would need you to clarify what you mean
`by "design" versus "fabrication."
` Q. Sure.
` The design would be exactly what the, for
`example, sensors are going to look like, where they
`are going to be placed, where the conduction lines
`are going to be, where the processing circuitry is
`going to be.
` You don't actually design -- you never
`designed the actual layout of how the touchscreen is
`going to be created; correct?
` A. With respect to these publications, that's
`true. That's not true with respect to my
`experience. Your original question was with respect
`to these publications.
` Q. So you don't have any publications in which
`you describe or talk about the actual
`design/creation of the layout of a touchscreen;
`correct?
` A. That's true.
` Q. Now, you said that that's true with respect
`to all of your patents and all of your publications.
` In what situations have you designed the
`layout of a touchscreen?
` A. In my academic work, we actually have
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`projects which we run with the students where we
`actually do make touchscreens for the purposes of
`showing how human-user interfaces work.
` Q. And when was that? When have you done
`that?
` A. Well, I think the first time that I ran a
`class project where students had to deal with touch
`interfaces was probably five or six years ago.
` Q. And what was the nature of the project that
`you were having the students deal with?
` A. There were two aspects to it. The first
`was, we were using the project to illustrate
`concepts associated with circuits that would deduce
`charge; in other words, charge counting circuits.
` The other aspect to it was showing the
`influence of resistor capacitor delays on circuit
`speeds.
` Q. And how did you come up with the -- well,
`did you actually come up with the design for the
`touchscreens or you just left that to your students
`to do?
` A. It's both. I had to come up with a design
`and then assign it as a project to the students, but
`I wouldn't be a very effective teacher if I didn't
`solve the problem first.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 13
` Q. So what problem were you actually solving
`with respect to the creation of the touchscreen that
`you were assigning to students in class?
` A. I don't understand what you mean by that.
` Q. Well, you said you wouldn't have been a
`very effective teacher if you haven't actually
`solved the problem yourself. So I was inquiring as
`to what problem you were actually referring to.
` A. I understand.
` With respect to that, it was essentially
`developing the layout of the touchscreen and, more
`importantly, developing a circuit to count charge.
` Q. And did you consult any references to
`educate yourself about how to create the layout of
`the touchscreen and how to implement a circuit to
`count charge?
` A. Not specifically for that because I was
`already familiar with the work, but, I mean, in
`general, with respect to my knowledge, yes, I read
`publications all the time.
` Q. So when you sat down to create the
`touchscreen that you assigned as a project for
`students, you didn't have to actually consult any
`materials, you just did it from the top of your
`head?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. Tell me what type of touchscreen you
`actually -- describe the layout of the touchscreen
`that you actually designed for the student project.
` And this was five or six years ago, so that
`would have been like 2009, 2008, 2009?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And that's while you were a professor at
`Berkeley?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Okay. So describe for me the layout of
`that touchscreen.
` A. It had rows and columns of wires and we
`essentially measured capacitive coupling --
`actually, we did charge counting on the columns. We
`drove on the rows and counted on the columns.
` Q. And when you drove on the rows, did you
`drive each row one at a -- serially and then measure
`the charge on the columns serially?
` A. No.
` Q. What did you do?
` A. We drove them simultaneously.
` Q. You drove all the rows simultaneously?
` A. Well, we applied voltages to all the rows,
`yes. We obviously scanned them for purposes of the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`measurement.
` Q. But when you drove all the rows, you drove
`all the rows at the same time, so you applied
`voltage to all the rows at the same time?
` A. There were no rows that were floating, so
`yes, that's true. Every row had a voltage applied
`to it.
` Q. And it had the same voltage applied to it?
` A. No.
` Q. Why did it have different voltages applied
`to it?
` A. That was part of the project, was to
`show -- was to look at crosstalk effect.
` Q. Describe for me what you mean by that was
`part of the project, to look at crosstalk effects.
` A. There are multiple ways you can drive rows
`in a matrix system. You could, for example, select
`one row, apply a voltage on it while all the other
`rows float, or you can apply specific voltages to
`different rows. So this was to look at the effects
`of those, because depending on what you're adjacent
`rows have, you can impact the parasitics that you
`see in your measurement.
` Q. And when you say the other rows were
`floating, does that mean they were grounded?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. No.
` Q. When they were floating, what does that
`mean?
` A. They were not floating in our system. But
`if they are floating, that means they are
`electrically at a high impedance state with respect
`to an applied potential.
` Q. Can you put that in layman's terms a little
`bit more?
` A. Sure. What that means is, you are not
`trying to apply a voltage on those rows.
` Q. So you're not specifically trying to apply
`a voltage, but there might be some voltage leaking
`from the row that you actually apply to that makes
`it to those?
` A. Unlikely to have significant leakage
`because these are fairly far apart in a touchscreen.
`But, more importantly, because they are floating you
`don't know what their potential is unless you have
`pre-charged them to a particular potential.
` Q. And what was the -- the physical structure
`of the rows and columns? Where were they positioned
`with respect to a substrate?
` A. As I said, they were wires laid over the
`substrate.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 17
` Q. So they were wires. What was the geometry
`of the wires?
` A. They were rows and columns.
` Q. So just straight rows, straight columns,
`just a wire of uniform thick -- or width or
`thickness?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Were they insulated from one another in any
`manner, the rows and columns?
` A. Yes.
` Q. How were they insulated with one another?
` A. With a polymer.
` Q. So there was a set of rows and then a layer
`of polymer over that set of rows and then another
`set of columns or something such as that?
` A. Conceptually, yes.
` Q. Why did you create a touchscreen system in
`which you had the rows and columns separated by a
`layer of insulation?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope
`the scope.
` THE WITNESS: I don't understand what you
`mean by "wire."
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Why did you pick a design in which you had
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`insulation separating the rows and columns?
` MR. PALYS: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: I still don't understand. As
`opposed to what?
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. As opposed to putting them all in the same
`surface and just having them crossing each other.
` MR. PALYS: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: No particular reason. It was
`easy to do using the parts we had.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Was that a standard way of creating a
`touchscreen, having an insulation layer between the
`rows and the columns?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope of
`direct.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know what you mean by
`"standard way." As I told you, our choice was based
`purely on the parts we had on hand.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. What was the fabrication process that you
`used to create that touchscreen? Did you just take
`a board and/or a some substrate and lay wires down
`in one direction and then put this polymer material
`over that set of wires and then lay wires orthogonal
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`to those?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope of
`direct, relevance.
` THE WITNESS: To be honest, I don't
`remember with respect to that what was the -- how we
`started. That is certainly something that is a
`relatively easy way to prototype a touchscreen, is
`literally by laying wires on it. That's certainly a
`reasonable way to start.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Now, you said that one of the things that
`you were testing was the cross capacitance or
`parasitic capacitance when you applied different
`voltages to different rows; correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Can you describe for me what you meant by
`that exactly?
` A. Certainly. Depending on how you drive --
`so if you drive a particular row and you are
`measuring or counting charge, for example, on a
`particular column, the charge that you count depends
`on the overall capacitive network formed by that
`system. The overall capacitive network formed by
`that system depends on other rows and columns as
`well.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 20
` Q. When you designed this system, did you know
`what the effect on the -- the charge counting or
`the, I guess, the capacitance sensing would be by
`charging different rows at different voltages?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope of
`direct.
` THE WITNESS: Well, at a conceptual level,
`yes, I had an expectation. I had not measured or
`precalculated what it would be before we did it.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And what was your conception of what would
`happen when you charge different rows to different
`voltages as far as the measuring the capacitance?
` MR. PALYS: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Since the charge stored on
`parasitic capacitors depends on the voltage between
`the terminals of the capacitor, that affects the
`overall charge balance in the system.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Did you think it would make an accurate
`touchscreen device to charge all the rows at
`different voltages?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, relevance.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know what you mean by
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`"accurate touchscreen."
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Well, an accurate touchscreen is one that
`is capable of accurately measuring where an object
`is touched on a screen; correct?
` A. You mean it can detect, for example, a
`touch?
` Q. Yes.
` MR. PALYS: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: If you mean an accurate
`touchscreen for your definition is I can detect
`where a finger is touched, yes. The answer is I
`knew we could design a system that would do that.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And you thought you could design a system
`that would do that in a situation where you were
`charging all the rows to different voltages?
` MR. PALYS: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Did you have to take anything specific into
`account when you charged all the rows to different
`voltages?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope of
`direct, relevance.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 22
` THE WITNESS: I don't know what you mean by
`"anything specific into account."
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. When you measured -- so, for example, when
`you measured the charge at each -- you were charging
`the rows or measuring the columns, let's say. When
`you measured the charge at each column, did you have
`to take into account in any fashion what the voltage
`that was on each of those rows?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope of
`direct, and relevance.
` THE WITNESS: If your question is on the
`charge counting circuits, in the charge counting
`circuits -- the charge counting circuits were
`designed with the knowledge of what the voltage
`would be on the stimulus.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And one of the things that you said was in
`the charge counting circuit where you're measuring
`capacitance, you have to take into account the
`overall electrical characteristics of the network
`that you charged; correct?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope --
` THE WITNESS: I didn't --
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. PALYS: -- of direct.
` THE WITNESS: -- say what you just said I
`said.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Did you have to take into account the
`overall system in any way as far as the measurement?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct.
` THE WITNESS: I still don't understand what
`you mean by that question.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. So in a system where you're charging all
`the rows at the same time to different voltages,
`there are different considerations than when you're
`charging one row at a time to the same voltage;
`right?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, relevance.
` THE WITNESS: It depends on the context.
`In some situations, that may be true. In others it,
`may not.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Well, in this situation where you were
`designing a touchscreen where you charged all the
`rows to different voltages, there was a
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`consideration as to how one row would affect the
`capacitance of another row; correct?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope of
`direct, relevance.
` THE WITNESS: Actually, it turned out in
`this particular system the rows were far enough part
`that there was essentially no effect.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. So -- so you have -- there is a
`consideration as to how far apart the rows are when
`you're charging them -- when you're charging all at
`the same time?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, relevance.
` THE WITNESS: No, that's not quite what I
`said. What I said is, more generally, the
`capacitance -- parasitic capacitance row to row that
`you see depends on the spacing of the rows.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And what is parasitic capacitance?
` A. For the purposes of this discussion where
`we're talking about rows, the parasitic capacitance
`I was referring to was if you are trying to look at
`a particular row, parasitic capacitance would be
`unintended capacitances to other structures. With
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`respect to your question, it would have been with
`respect to other rows.
` Q. And was parasitic capacitance considered a
`good thing, a bad thing, neutral?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct.
` THE WITNESS: It depends on the context.
`It's -- if it's something that's unintended, as long
`as it's manageable, it's relatively neutral. You
`can deal with it, but you have to either deal with
`it or make sure that it doesn't affect you.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Well, what do you mean you either deal with
`it or make sure it doesn't affect you?
` I understand the deal with it part, but
`what's the make sure it doesn't affect you part?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct.
` THE WITNESS: In an arbitrary system, if
`there are parasitics that are of a low enough
`magnitude that they have no impact on performance,
`then you can largely ignore them.
` On the other hand, if the parasitics are
`significant, you can account for them and design
`systems that can deal with the parasitics.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And how do you know whether they are going
`to be significant or not significant, the
`parasitics?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, relevance.
` THE WITNESS: It depends on the context.
`You could, for example, take advantage of geometry
`to ensure that they just physically will be small
`enough that you can ignore them. You can take
`advantage of material properties or be aware of
`material properties and use that to drive
`calculations that will then allow you to derive
`values. You can perform electromagnetic or
`electrostatic simulations to calculate approximately
`what those values will be or you can do physical
`measurements.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. So you've got to do some experimentation to
`know whether the parasitics are going to adversely
`affect your measuring system?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct relation.
` THE WITNESS: No, that's not necessarily
`true.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. In situations is it not true?
` MR. PALYS: Same objections.
` THE WITNESS: It's the situation I gave you
`to start. In other words, in a situation where you
`know just based on your layout that the -- and the
`material properties that the parasitics will be
`small enough that you can ignore them.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And that's a situation where you have the
`rows spaced far apart?
` MR. PALYS: Same objections.
` THE WITNESS: That is one situation. It's
`not the only situation.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. What other situation?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, and relevance.
` THE WITNESS: Any situation where the
`parasitic capacitances are small enough that they
`don't affect your ability to localize finger
`position.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And how are you going to know when they're
`small enough without doing some form of
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`experimentation?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, and relevance.
` THE WITNESS: You don't need to necessarily
`do experiments to -- it depends on the context. In
`some cases, you may need to do experiments. In
`other cases, just based on the physical layout
`and the -- sorry.
` In some cases, you may need to do
`experiments. In other cases, based on the physical
`layout and material properties, you may be able to
`just calculate with a first order of calculation
`that it's not a concern.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. All right. So when I use the word
`"experimentation," I'm including an actual physical
`measurement, as well as a simulation or calculation.
` So in what situations will you not have to
`do either a physical measurement or a calculation to
`determine whether the parasitics are going to
`adversely affect you?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, and relevance.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know how you're
`limiting "calculation." If calculation could be a
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 29
`quick, back-of-the-envelope estimate that you just
`do in your head, well, you always -- as an engineer,
`you're always at least doing sort of
`back-of-the-envelope estimates in your heads. That
`doesn't qualify as experimentation necessarily. It
`depends on the context.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. In what situations do you know that the
`physical layout is going to provide a situation in
`which the parasitics are not going to be a problem?
` Is that, for example, a situation when you
`have the conductor elements that are orthogonal to
`one another insulated by a layer?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct.
` THE WITNESS: I would need more context to
`answer that question.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Well, you said in some situations the
`physical layout of the system will lead you to the
`conclusion that parasitics are not going to be an
`issue. What physical layouts did you have in mind?
` MR. PALYS: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: There are multiple
`possibilities. If -- our discussion was
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 30
`specifically related to capacitance row to row. If
`the rows are far enough apart, then you may be in a
`position where you can say I don't need to worry
`about parasitics.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. And how do you know when the rows are far
`enough apart?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form, outside the
`scope of direct, relevance.
` THE WITNESS: It depends, again, on
`context. For example, if the spacing between the
`rows is large enough that you can estimate that any
`capacitance that exists row to row does not perturb
`your ability to count charge on the columns, that
`would be a situation where you may say: I can
`ignore the parasitics.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. But how do you know that they're far enough
`apart?
` MR. PALYS: Same objections.
` THE WITNESS: Again, it depends -- as I
`just said, it depends on the geometry and it depends
`on what you estimate, and it depends on material
`properties, obviously.
`//
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. In the system that you designed, did you
`know that the rows were far enough apart that the
`parasitics would not be a problem?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; outside the scope of
`direct, and relevance.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, I believe so. This was
`a big system with widely spread rows.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. When you say "widely spread," what do you
`mean?
` MR. PALYS: Same objections.
` THE WITNESS: Widely spread in that
`situation was several millimeters apart.
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Aside from this one system that you
`assigned to your students in 2008, 2009, what other
`touchscreens had you designed?
` A. Again, you mean complete touchscreen
`systems?
` Q. Yes.
` A. I have not.
` Q. And this system that you designed in 2008
`or 2009, that was a multilayer touchscreen system;
`correct?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Could you define what you
`mean by "multilayer" for me, please?
`BY MR. BILSKER:
` Q. Sure. The rows and columns were in
`different planes.
` A. Yes, that's true.
` Q. Did you ever design a system in which the
`rows and columns of conductors were in the same
`plane?
` A. A touchscreen system?
` Q. Yes.
` A. And a complete touchscreen system?
` Q. Yes.
` A. No, I have not.
` Q. So you've never encountered on your own any
`of the particular problems that may arise in
`creating a touchscreen where the rows and the
`columns are on the same plane; correct?
` MR. PALYS: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: No, that's not

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket