`
`571-272-7822
`Date Entered: May 6, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`WINTEK CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`TPK TOUCH SOLUTIONS INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2013-00567
`Case IPR2013-00568
`Case IPR2014-005411
`Patent 8,217,902
`____________
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, RICHARD E. RICE, and ADAM V. FLOYD
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`
`Joint Motion to Modify Schedule
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This Decision addresses matters pertaining to all three identified cases.
`Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one Decision to be filed in each case.
`The parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2013-00567; IPR2013-00568; IPR2014-00541
`Patent 8,217,902
`
`
`
`The parties2 have filed a joint motion to modify the schedule of the
`
`IPR2013-00567 and IPR2013-00568 proceedings.3 As a part of the motion, the
`
`parties agree that the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response in related proceeding
`
`IPR2014-00541 will be due on May 23, 2014. See, e.g., IPR2013-00567, Paper
`
`20, 2.
`
`
`
`The parties request the following scheduling for the IPR2013-00567 and
`
`IPR2013-00568 proceedings:
`
`Due Date 1: June 20, 2014
`Due Date 2: September 5, 2014
`Due Date 3: October 10, 2014
`Due Date 4: October 31, 2014
`Due Date 5: November 14, 2014
`Due Date 6: November 21, 2014
`Due Date 7: December 12, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`See, e.g., id. The parties also indicate that should the Board institute trial in
`
`IPR2014-00541, the parties will follow the above-noted schedule in that
`
`proceeding, and that TPK will not oppose Wintek’s motion for joinder (IPR2014-
`
`00541, Paper 3). See, e.g., id.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties’ motion is granted.
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ “Joint Motion to Modify Schedule” is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the schedule for the IPR2013-00567 and
`
`IPR2013-00568 proceedings is now reflected in the “Revised Due Date Appendix”
`
`that is attached to this Decision; and
`
`
`2 Patent Owner, TPK Touch Solutions Inc. (“TPK), and Petitioner, Wintek
`Corporation (“Wintek”).
`
` 3
`
` “Joint Motion to Modify Schedule” IPR2013-00567, Paper 20; IPR2013-00568,
`Paper 22; IPR2014-00541, Paper 10.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2013-00567; IPR2013-00568; IPR2014-00541
`Patent 8,217,902
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the due date for the Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response in IPR2014-00541 is May 23, 2014.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to Patent Owner’s motion to amend
`
`REVISED DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1………………………………………………………June 20, 2014
`
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 2………………………………………………....…September 5, 2014
`
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 3……………………………………………. .…….October 10, 2014
`
`Patent Owner’s reply to Petitioner’s opposition
`
`to Patent Owner’s motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4……………………………………………. …..…October 31, 2014
`
`Petitioner’s motion for observation regarding
`
`cross-examination of reply witness
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 5………………………………………….……….November 14, 2014
`
`Patent Owner’s response to observation
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 6…………………………………………….……November 21, 2014
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 7…………………………………………..…..…December 12, 2014
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude evidence
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2013-00567; IPR2013-00568; IPR2014-00541
`Patent 8,217,902
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Naveen Modi
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW
`GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`joseph.palys@finnegan.com
`naveen.modi@finnegan.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph J. Richetti
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`David Bilsker
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
