`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`——————————————————————————————
`WINTEK CORPORATION |
` Petitioner, |
` v. | Case IPR2013-00567
`TPK TOUCH SOLUTIONS | Patent 8,217,902
` Patent Owner. |
`——————————————————————————————
`WINTEK CORPORATION |
` Petitioner, |
` v. | Case IPR2013-00568
`TPK TOUCH SOLUTIONS | Patent 8,217,902
` Patent Owner. |
`——————————————————————————————
`
` Thursday, March 27, 2014
` 2:00 p.m. EST
`
` Teleconference before the Patent Trial and Appeals
`Board, Judge Josiah C. Cocks presiding, the proceedings
`being recorded stenographically by Jonathan Wonnell, a
`Registered Professional Court Reporter (NCRA #835577)
`and Notary Public of the State of Minnesota, and
`transcribed under his direction.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Wintek Exhibit 1014
`Wintek v. TPK Touch Solutions
`IPR2013-00567
`
`Page 1 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`2
` A P P E A R A N C E S O F C O U N S E L
` (All participants appearing by phone)
`
` On behalf of the Patent Trial and Appeal
` Board:
` JOSIAH C. COCKS, ESQ., Administrative
` Patent Judge
`
` On behalf of TPK Touch Solutions:
` JOSEPH RICHETTI, ESQ.
` Bryan Cave LLP
` 1290 Avenue of the Americas
` New York, New York 10104-3300
` (212) 541-2000
` joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 2 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S (Cont'd)
`
` On behalf of Wintek Corporation.:
` JOSEPH E. PALYS, ESQ.
` Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
` Dunner, LLP
` Two Freedom Square
` 11955 Freedom Drive
` Reston, Virginia 20190-5675
` (571) 203-2700
` joseph.palys@finnegan.com
` -- and --
` NAVEEN MODI, ESQ.
` Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
` Dunner, LLP
` 901 New York Avenue, N.W.
` Washington, D.C. 20005
` (202) 408-4000
` naveen.modi@finnegan.com
`
` ALSO PRESENT:
` JONATHAN WONNELL, Court Reporter
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 3 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
` (2:00 p.m. EST)
` JUDGE COCKS: Good morning. This is
`Judge Cocks. May I ask who else is on the call,
`starting with the Petitioner, please?
` MR. PALYS: Hi, Your Honor. This is
`Joseph Palys with Finnegan Henderson and with me is
`Naveen Modi.
` JUDGE COCKS: All right. Thank you.
`And for the patent owner?
` MR. RICHETTI: Good afternoon, Your
`Honor. It's Joseph Richetti for TPK Touch
`Solutions, Inc.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Very good. Thank
`you. And do we have a court reporter on the call?
` MR. PALYS: We do, Your Honor.
` THE REPORTER: Yes, sir. Jon Wonnell.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Thank you. All
`right. This is the initial conference call for
`Inter Partes Review proceedings 2013-00567 and 568.
`The purposes of the call is to discuss any issues
`with the scheduling order that the parties might
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 4 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`have and to discuss any motions that are
`contemplated.
` Now, prior to the call the petitioners
`filed a paper indicating that they do not
`contemplate filing any motions at this time. Is
`that correct?
` MR. PALYS: That's correct, Your Honor.
`At this time that's correct.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. And the patent
`owner has filed a paper indicating they may be
`contemplating a motion to amend. Is that correct?
` MR. RICHETTI: That's correct, Your
`Honor.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Well, let me just
`before we get into that briefly ask do you have any
`concrete thoughts about a motion to amend or was
`that more of a placeholder comment, which is not
`necessary but just let's characterize it that way?
` MR. RICHETTI: Yes. I do believe, Your
`Honor, it was more of a placeholder. We haven't
`made a final decision. We're still reviewing it.
`And we appreciate that if we do decide to move for
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 5 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`6
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`a motion to amend, we will reach out to the board
`to ask for -- to have a conference call before
`submitting one.
` JUDGE COCKS: Yes. Good. Very good.
`That's the point of my comment, so I'm glad you are
`aware. So this conference call will not count as
`the conference that is specified by the rules.
` MR. PALYS: That's correct, Your Honor.
` JUDGE COCKS: All right. Thank you. So
`I'd actually like to speak briefly before we get to
`the scheduling order a matter -- related matters.
`The board is aware of the ex parte reexamination
`with respect to the involved payment, the
`8,217,902, and the district court litigation.
` Now, the board is also aware that the
`parties have filed a joint motion to stay the ex
`parte reexamination and that motion has not yet
`been decided but it will be decided in a separate
`order. I'd like to ask about the status of the
`district court litigation. Either party.
` MR. PALYS: Sure, Your Honor. This is
`Joseph Palys for Wintek. Just a couple points.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 6 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Regarding the litigation right now the case is
`still pending. Discovery has begun and we're just
`starting the claim construction preliminary phase
`of the case.
` JUDGE COCKS: All right. Thank you.
` MR. PALYS: And I don't know if this is
`a good time to bring this up. I was going to wait
`till the schedule. But I just want to make sure
`the board is aware that yesterday Wintek had filed
`a new petition on the '902 that addressed four
`claims.
` We can -- I guess it would be probably
`be better to talk about that in the context of the
`scheduling order but I wanted to make sure the
`board was aware of that because it might have some
`adjustments. And we also have a motion for a
`joinder with that one.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. All right. Let's
`get into the scheduling order then. So it sounds
`like there -- at first blush is there any issue
`before we get into any other matter?
` MR. RICHETTI: Well, Your Honor -- this
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 7 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`8
`is Joseph Richetti for patent owner. There was one
`other issue that if I could raise before we
`actually get into the scheduling order and the
`dates, I would just request permission to do so.
` JUDGE COCKS: All right. Go ahead,
`please.
` MR. RICHETTI: Sure. While we didn't
`put down a motion for additional discovery on our
`list of motions, there has come to our attention
`that Wintek's expert has provided testimony in an
`ITC investigation. And it appears very relevant to
`some of the positions that, you know, if -- from
`what we can see from the public record it appears
`to be potentially inconsistent with statements that
`he's made in this IPR in his declaration.
` And so we weren't sure whether or not
`that would just fall under routine discovery as
`part of petitioner's burden or if it's something
`that we would need to request like additional
`discovery. And so we're really just seeking the
`Court's guidance on how to move forward with trying
`to obtain this information.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 8 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` I mean, we do have more specifics
`because, you know, we know the ITC investigation
`number and the particulars of the public documents
`that we were able to pull and why we believe
`they're relevant. But we were just -- I didn't
`know how to position it.
` It didn't seem like additional discovery
`because it seems like it falls under the routine
`discovery that the parties have to provide. But I
`just really was looking for some guidance on this
`issue.
` JUDGE COCKS: Well, so is this
`information -- have the parties discussed, whatever
`discovery is characterized as, exchanging it
`between themselves without the board's enforcement?
` MR. RICHETTI: Right. We had not, Your
`Honor. I had learned of this very recently and I
`have not had an opportunity to reach out to
`petitioner's counsel. And if the suggestion is to
`do that first, I'd be more than happy to. But I
`just didn't know -- I just didn't want it to seem
`like if there really is a need for additional
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 9 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`discovery that we failed to put it down.
` JUDGE COCKS: No. I understand. You
`are not at this time prejudiced from seeking
`authorization at some later time. But, yes, having
`been through a number of these proceedings, it is
`almost universally the best approach for the
`parties to discuss prior to entering into some sort
`of motion for the discovery.
` MR. RICHETTI: Understood, Your Honor,
`and we will reach out to petitioner's counsel to
`discuss this further.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Thank you. We
`would appreciate that.
` Okay. I guess now on to the dates and I
`guess the influence of this additional petition.
`We will go -- well, let's start with the petitioner
`about that issue I suppose.
` MR. PALYS: Sure, Your Honor. As far as
`the schedule is concerned for these two matters,
`the 00567 and 00568 matters, the schedules as is
`for these matters, we don't have any changes or
`edits or suggestions for that. But given the new
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 10 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`petition and the motion for joinder that I just
`mentioned, that may have an effect on it and that's
`why I wanted to take some time and talk about that
`with the board.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. It may very well,
`but I'm sure you can appreciate that right now is
`too preliminary to really get into adjustments of
`the schedule certainly here and in connection with
`a new petition that has not yet been -- no trial
`has yet been instituted.
` MR. PALYS: Right.
` JUDGE COCKS: So we can't really speak
`to that issue. Certainly a joinder at this point
`is premature at this point because there is nothing
`to join right now. There is nothing to join at
`this particular time. So it is unfortunately
`premature for this conversation.
` MR. PALYS: I certainly appreciate that,
`Your Honor. I just wanted to make sure that the
`board was aware of it.
` JUDGE COCKS: Well, thank you for making
`us aware. But at this point I think that's enough
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 11 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`for the purposes of this conference call.
` MR. PALYS: Okay.
` JUDGE COCKS: But as it stands now the
`parties don't have an issue with the scheduling
`order, and with the caveat that the parties may
`stipulate to changes to due dates 1 to 3 without
`any more board involvement? Just provide notice if
`that's the case.
` All right. Moving on then, I'd like the
`parties to be aware that at this time there is no
`protective order that has been entered into the
`case. Do the parties anticipate at this time a
`need for a protective order?
` MR. RICHETTI: I'm sorry. This is
`Joseph Richetti for patent owner. I guess, Your
`Honor, there could arise situations with some
`evidence potentially for secondary considerations
`where there could be a need for a protective order.
`We'd be more than happy to use the standard
`protective order through the IPR proceedings.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. Well, so -- and
`using the default -- by "standard" I take it you
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 12 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`mean the default standing protective order that
`appears in the practice guide, appendix B, I
`believe?
` MR. RICHETTI: Yup. Right.
` JUDGE COCKS: That generally is
`preferable from the board's standpoint because it
`will almost certainly be -- any protective order is
`entered provisionally, but it would almost
`certainly be entered without any difficulty. But
`should the parties need to propose some sort of
`deviation, they should file a red-lined version and
`let us know what the deviation -- agreed-to
`deviation is. So this may be a tad preliminary,
`but just letting the parties know.
` I guess as far as discovery issues go if
`the parties would please -- we spoke of that
`briefly, if they could get together initially and
`then hopefully resolve any disputes in that regard
`between themselves, but if they can't then schedule
`a call with the board and we will proceed based on
`that call.
` And a question I guess. Have the
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 13 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`parties discussed settlement at this point? Have
`there been any discussions at all?
` MR. PALYS: This is Joseph Palys, Your
`Honor. Not that I am aware of.
` JUDGE COCKS: And just for completeness,
`Mr. Richetti?
` MR. RICHETTI: Well, I'm not involved in
`the litigation, Your Honor. My understanding is
`that there may have been some very early on or
`initial settlement conference or -- you know, but
`nothing substantial. You know, I think the parties
`are still working on that, hopefully. But, again,
`I'm not involved in that side of the case.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. I understand.
`Well, that's all I have at this time. Is there any
`other questions or issues from the parties? Let's
`start with the petitioner.
` MR. PALYS: No, Your Honor.
` JUDGE COCKS: And Mr. Richetti for the
`patent owner?
` MR. RICHETTI: Nothing else, Your Honor.
`We appreciate your time and insight on some of
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 14 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`these issues. Appreciate it.
` JUDGE COCKS: Well, you are welcome.
`Because there is a court reporter and we are going
`to have a transcript of this call -- I believe this
`was the petitioner's court reporter. Is that
`correct?
` MR. PALYS: That right, Your Honor.
` JUDGE COCKS: If you would please have a
`copy of this transcript filed into the proceedings,
`both proceedings, using your -- the latest exhibit
`number in your series, the thousand series. Is
`that understood?
` MR. PALYS: Yes, sir. We will.
` JUDGE COCKS: Okay. All right. If
`that's everything, I have nothing more and I thank
`the parties for their time and the call is
`concluded.
` MR. RICHETTI: Thank you, Your Honor.
` JUDGE COCKS: All right. Thank you.
` (Whereupon, at 2:13 p.m. EST the
`teleconference was adjourned.)
` * * * * *
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 15 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`
`16
`
` CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
` I, Jonathan Wonnell, a Registered
`Professional Court Reporter (NCRA #835577) and
`Notary Public of the State of Minnesota, County of
`Hennepin, do hereby certify that the foregoing
`transcript is a true and accurate record of these
`proceedings; that said proceedings were taken in
`Stenotype note by me on the 27th day of March,
`2014, commencing at 2:00 p.m. EST and ending at
`2:13 p.m. EST.
` I further certify that present on behalf
`of Party Wintek Corporation were Joseph Palys,
`Esq., and Naveen Modi, Esq., of Finnegan,
`Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP; and on
`behalf of Party TPK Touch Solutions, Inc., was
`Joseph Richetti, Esq., of Bryan Cave LLP.
` I further certify that I am not related
`to, nor associated with any of the parties or their
`attorneys, nor do I have any disqualifying
`interest, personal or financial, in the actions
`within.
` Dated this 27th day of March, 2014, in
`Hennepin County, Minnesota.
`
`_________________________________________
`Jonathan Wonnell
`Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota
`My Commission expires January 31, 2017
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`
`20
`21
`22
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 16 of 20
`
`
`
`
`
`Conference CallConference Call
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014March 27, 2014
`
`1
`
`A
`able 9:4
`accurate 16:4
`actions 16:12
`additional 8:8
`8:19 9:7,22
`10:15
`addressed 7:10
`adjourned
`15:21
`adjustments
`7:16 11:7
`administrative
`2:6
`afternoon 4:11
`agreedto 13:12
`ahead 8:5
`amend 5:11,16
`6:1
`americas 2:12
`anticipate 12:12
`appeal 1:1 2:4
`appeals 1:13
`appearing 2:2
`appears 8:11,13
`13:2
`appendix 13:2
`appreciate 5:22
`10:13 11:6,18
`14:22 15:1
`approach 10:6
`associated 16:11
`attention 8:9
`attorneys 16:11
`authorization
`10:4
`avenue 2:12
`3:16
`aware 6:6,12,15
`7:9,15 11:20
`11:22 12:10
`14:4
`
`B
`
`b 13:2
`based 13:20
`begun 7:2
`behalf 2:4,9 3:3
`16:7,9
`believe 5:19 9:4
`13:3 15:4
`best 10:6
`better 7:13
`blush 7:20
`board 1:1,14 2:5
`6:1,12,15 7:9
`7:15 11:4,20
`12:7 13:20
`boards 9:15
`13:6
`briefly 5:15 6:10
`13:17
`bring 7:7
`bryan 2:11 16:9
`bryancave 2:15
`burden 8:18
`C
`c 1:14 2:1,1,6
`3:1,17 4:1
`call 4:4,15,19,21
`5:3 6:2,6 12:1
`13:20,21 15:4
`15:16
`cant 11:12 13:19
`case 1:4,7 7:1,4
`12:8,12 14:13
`cave 2:11 16:9
`caveat 12:5
`certainly 11:8
`11:13,18 13:7
`13:9
`certificate 16:1
`certify 16:3,7,10
`changes 10:21
`
`12:6
`characterize
`5:18
`characterized
`9:14
`claim 7:3
`claims 7:11
`cocks 1:14 2:6
`4:3,4,9,14,18
`5:9,14 6:4,9
`7:5,18 8:5 9:12
`10:2,12 11:5
`11:12,21 12:3
`12:21 13:5
`14:5,14,19
`15:2,8,14,19
`com 2:15 3:11
`3:19
`come 8:9
`commencing
`16:5
`comment 5:17
`6:5
`commission
`16:20
`completeness
`14:5
`concerned 10:19
`concluded 15:17
`concrete 5:16
`conference 4:19
`6:2,6,7 12:1
`14:10
`connection 11:8
`considerations
`12:17
`construction 7:3
`contd 3:1
`contemplate 5:5
`contemplated
`5:2
`contemplating
`
`5:11
`context 7:13
`conversation
`11:17
`copy 15:9
`corporation 1:3
`1:6 3:3 16:7
`correct 5:6,7,8
`5:11,12 6:8
`15:6
`counsel 9:19
`10:10
`count 6:6
`county 16:3,14
`16:19
`couple 6:22
`court 1:16 3:22
`4:15 6:14,20
`15:3,5 16:2
`courts 8:21
`D
`d 3:17 4:1
`dated 16:13
`dates 8:4 10:14
`12:6
`day 16:5,13
`decide 5:22
`decided 6:18,18
`decision 5:21
`declaration 8:15
`default 12:22
`13:1
`deviation 13:11
`13:12,13
`didnt 8:7 9:5,7
`9:21,21
`difficulty 13:9
`direction 1:18
`discovery 7:2
`8:8,17,20 9:7,9
`9:14 10:1,8
`
`13:15
`discuss 4:21 5:1
`10:7,11
`discussed 9:13
`14:1
`discussions 14:2
`disputes 13:18
`disqualifying
`16:11
`district 6:14,20
`documents 9:3
`dont 7:6 10:21
`12:4
`drive 3:8
`due 12:6
`dunner 3:6,15
`16:8
`
`E
`e 2:1,1,1 3:1,1,4
`4:1,1
`early 14:9
`edits 10:22
`effect 11:2
`either 6:20
`enforcement
`9:15
`entered 12:11
`13:8,9
`entering 10:7
`esq 2:6,10 3:4
`3:13 16:8,8,9
`est 1:11 4:2
`15:20 16:5,6
`evidence 12:17
`ex 6:12,16
`exchanging 9:14
`exhibit 15:10
`expert 8:10
`expires 16:20
`F
`
`f 2:1
`
`
`
`202-220-4158202-220-4158
`
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`
`www.hendersonlegalservices.comwww.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 17 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`2
`
`failed 10:1
`fall 8:17
`falls 9:8
`far 10:18 13:15
`farabow 3:5,14
`16:8
`file 13:11
`filed 5:4,10 6:16
`7:9 15:9
`filing 5:5
`final 5:21
`financial 16:12
`finnegan 3:5,11
`3:14,19 4:7
`16:8
`first 7:20 9:20
`foregoing 16:3
`forward 8:21
`four 7:10
`freedom 3:7,8
`further 10:11
`16:7,10
`G
`
`g 4:1
`garrett 3:5,14
`16:8
`generally 13:5
`given 10:22
`glad 6:5
`go 8:5 10:16
`13:15
`going 7:7 15:3
`good 4:3,11,14
`6:4,4 7:7
`guess 7:12 10:14
`10:15 12:15
`13:15,22
`guidance 8:21
`9:10
`guide 13:2
`H
`
`happy 9:20
`12:19
`havent 5:20
`henderson 3:5
`3:14 4:7 16:8
`hennepin 16:3
`16:14,19
`hes 8:15
`hi 4:6
`honor 4:6,12,16
`5:7,13,20 6:8
`6:21 7:22 9:17
`10:9,18 11:19
`12:16 14:4,8
`14:18,21 15:7
`15:18
`hopefully 13:18
`14:12
`
`I
`id 6:10,19 9:20
`12:9
`im 6:5 11:6
`12:14 14:7,13
`inconsistent
`8:14
`indicating 5:4
`5:10
`influence 10:15
`information
`8:22 9:13
`initial 4:19
`14:10
`initially 13:17
`insight 14:22
`instituted 11:10
`inter 4:20
`interest 16:12
`investigation
`8:11 9:2
`involved 6:13
`14:7,13
`
`involvement
`12:7
`ipr 8:15 12:20
`ipr201300567
`1:4
`ipr201300568
`1:7
`issue 7:20 8:2
`9:11 10:17
`11:13 12:4
`issues 4:21
`13:15 14:16
`15:1
`itc 8:11 9:2
`J
`january 16:20
`joe 2:15
`join 11:15,15
`joinder 7:17
`11:1,13
`joint 6:16
`jon 4:17
`jonathan 1:15
`3:22 16:2,19
`joseph 2:10 3:4
`3:11 4:7,12
`6:22 8:1 12:15
`14:3 16:7,9
`josiah 1:14 2:6
`judge 1:14 2:7
`4:3,4,9,14,18
`5:9,14 6:4,9
`7:5,18 8:5 9:12
`10:2,12 11:5
`11:12,21 12:3
`12:21 13:5
`14:5,14,19
`15:2,8,14,19
`K
`know 7:6 8:12
`9:2,2,6,21
`
`13:12,14 14:10
`14:11
`
`L
`
`l 2:1
`latest 15:10
`learned 9:17
`letting 13:14
`list 8:9
`litigation 6:14
`6:20 7:1 14:8
`llp 2:11 3:6,15
`16:8,9
`looking 9:10
`M
`m 1:11 4:2 15:20
`16:5,6
`making 11:21
`march 1:10 16:5
`16:13
`matter 6:11 7:21
`matters 6:11
`10:19,20,21
`mean 9:1 13:1
`mentioned 11:2
`minnesota 1:17
`16:3,14,19
`modi 3:13,19
`4:8 16:8
`morning 4:3
`motion 5:11,16
`6:1,16,17 7:16
`8:8 10:8 11:1
`motions 5:1,5
`8:9
`move 5:22 8:21
`moving 12:9
`N
`n 2:1,1 3:1,16
`4:1
`naveen 3:13,19
`
`4:8 16:8
`ncra 1:16 16:2
`necessary 5:18
`need 8:19 9:22
`12:13,18 13:10
`new 2:13,13
`3:16 7:10
`10:22 11:9
`notary 1:17 16:3
`16:19
`note 16:5
`notice 12:7
`number 9:3
`10:5 15:11
`O
`o 2:1,1 4:1
`obtain 8:22
`office 1:1
`okay 4:14,18 5:9
`5:14 7:18
`10:12,14 11:5
`12:2,21 14:14
`15:14
`opportunity
`9:18
`order 4:22 6:11
`6:19 7:14,19
`8:3 12:5,11,13
`12:18,20 13:1
`13:7
`owner 1:5,8
`4:10 5:10 8:1
`12:15 14:20
`P
`p 1:11 2:1,1 3:1
`3:1 4:1,2 15:20
`16:5,6
`palys 3:4,11 4:6
`4:7,16 5:7 6:8
`6:21,22 7:6
`10:18 11:11,18
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 18 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`3
`
`12:2 14:3,3,18
`15:7,13 16:7
`paper 5:4,10
`part 8:18
`parte 6:12,17
`partes 4:20
`participants 2:2
`particular 11:16
`particulars 9:3
`parties 4:22
`6:16 9:9,13
`10:7 12:4,5,10
`12:12 13:10,14
`13:16 14:1,11
`14:16 15:16
`16:11
`party 6:20 16:7
`16:9
`patent 1:1,1,4,5
`1:7,8,13 2:4,7
`4:10 5:9 8:1
`12:15 14:20
`payment 6:13
`pending 7:2
`permission 8:4
`personal 16:12
`petition 7:10
`10:15 11:1,9
`petitioner 1:3,6
`4:5 10:16
`14:17
`petitioners 5:3
`8:18 9:19
`10:10 15:5
`phase 7:3
`phone 2:2
`placeholder
`5:17,20
`please 4:5 8:6
`13:16 15:8
`point 6:5 11:13
`11:14,22 14:1
`
`points 6:22
`position 9:6
`positions 8:12
`potentially 8:14
`12:17
`practice 13:2
`preferable 13:6
`prejudiced 10:3
`preliminary 7:3
`11:7 13:13
`premature
`11:14,17
`present 3:21
`16:7
`presiding 1:14
`prior 5:3 10:7
`probably 7:12
`proceed 13:20
`proceedings
`1:14 4:20 10:5
`12:20 15:9,10
`16:4,4
`professional
`1:16 16:2
`propose 13:10
`protective 12:11
`12:13,18,20
`13:1,7
`provide 9:9 12:7
`provided 8:10
`provisionally
`13:8
`public 1:17 8:13
`9:3 16:3,19
`pull 9:4
`purposes 4:21
`12:1
`put 8:8 10:1
`Q
`question 13:22
`questions 14:16
`
`R
`r 2:1 3:1 4:1
`raise 8:2
`reach 6:1 9:18
`10:10
`really 8:20 9:10
`9:22 11:7,12
`record 8:13 16:4
`recorded 1:15
`redlined 13:11
`reexamination
`6:12,17
`regard 13:18
`regarding 7:1
`registered 1:16
`16:2
`related 6:11
`16:10
`relevant 8:11
`9:5
`reporter 1:16
`3:22 4:15,17
`15:3,5 16:1,2
`request 8:4,19
`resolve 13:18
`respect 6:13
`reston 3:9
`review 4:20
`reviewing 5:21
`richetti 2:10,15
`4:11,12 5:12
`5:19 7:22 8:1,7
`9:16 10:9
`12:14,15 13:4
`14:6,7,19,21
`15:18 16:9
`right 4:9,19 6:9
`7:1,5,18 8:5
`9:16 11:6,11
`11:15 12:9
`13:4 15:7,14
`15:19
`
`routine 8:17 9:8
`rules 6:7
`S
`s 2:1,1 3:1 4:1
`schedule 7:8
`10:19 11:8
`13:19
`schedules 10:20
`scheduling 4:22
`6:11 7:14,19
`8:3 12:4
`secondary 12:17
`see 8:13
`seeking 8:20
`10:3
`separate 6:18
`series 15:11,11
`settlement 14:1
`14:10
`side 14:13
`sir 4:17 15:13
`situations 12:16
`solutions 1:4,7
`2:9 4:13 16:9
`sorry 12:14
`sort 10:7 13:10
`sounds 7:19
`speak 6:10
`11:12
`specifics 9:1
`specified 6:7
`spoke 13:16
`square 3:7
`standard 12:19
`12:22
`standing 13:1
`standpoint 13:6
`stands 12:3
`start 10:16
`14:17
`starting 4:5 7:3
`
`state 1:17 16:3
`statements 8:14
`states 1:1
`status 6:19
`stay 6:16
`stenographica...
`1:15
`stenotype 16:5
`stipulate 12:6
`submitting 6:3
`substantial
`14:11
`suggestion 9:19
`suggestions
`10:22
`suppose 10:17
`sure 6:21 7:8,14
`8:7,16 10:18
`11:6,19
`T
`tad 13:13
`take 11:3 12:22
`taken 16:4
`talk 7:13 11:3
`teleconference
`1:13 15:21
`testimony 8:10
`thank 4:9,14,18
`6:9 7:5 10:12
`11:21 15:15,18
`15:19
`thats 5:7,8,12
`6:5,8 11:2,22
`12:8 14:15
`15:15
`theyre 9:5
`think 11:22
`14:11
`thoughts 5:16
`thousand 15:11
`thursday 1:10
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 19 of 20
`
`
`
`Conference Call
`
`IPR2013-00567 / IPR2013-00568
`
`March 27, 2014
`4
`
`16:13
`2017 16:20
`201905675 3:9
`202 3:18
`2032700 3:10
`212 2:14
`217 1:4,7 6:14
`27 1:10
`27th 16:5,13
`3
`
`3 12:6
`31 16:20
`4
`4084000 3:18
`5
`5412000 2:14
`568 4:20
`571 3:10
`
`6 7 8
`
`8 1:4,7 6:14
`835577 1:16
`16:2
`
`9
`901 3:16
`902 1:4,7 6:14
`7:10
`
`wanted 7:14
`11:3,19
`washington
`3:17
`way 5:18
`wed 12:19
`welcome 15:2
`wintek 1:3,6 3:3
`6:22 7:9 16:7
`winteks 8:10
`wonnell 1:15
`3:22 4:17 16:2
`16:19
`working 14:12
`
`X Y
`
`yesterday 7:9
`york 2:13,13
`3:16
`yup 13:4
`
`Z 0
`
`00 1:11 4:2 16:5
`00567 10:20
`00568 10:20
`1
`
`1 12:6
`101043300 2:13
`11955 3:8
`1290 2:12
`13 15:20 16:6
`2
`2 1:11 4:2 15:20
`16:5,6
`20005 3:17
`201300567 4:20
`2014 1:10 16:5
`
`till 7:8
`time 5:5,8 7:7
`10:3,4 11:3,16
`12:10,12 14:15
`14:22 15:16
`touch 1:4,7 2:9
`4:12 16:9
`tpk 1:4,7 2:9
`4:12 16:9
`trademark 1:1
`transcribed
`1:18
`transcript 15:4
`15:9 16:4
`trial 1:1,13 2:4
`11:9
`true 16:4
`trying 8:21
`two 3:7 10:19
`U
`
`u 2:1
`understand
`10:2 14:14
`understanding
`14:8
`understood 10:9
`15:12
`unfortunately
`11:16
`united 1:1
`universally 10:6
`use 12:19
`V
`
`v 1:4,7
`version 13:11
`virginia 3:9
`W
`
`w 3:16
`wait 7:7
`want 7:8 9:21
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 20 of 20
`
`