throbber
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 284, NO. 30, pp. LVL"l~-·"JLVL,
`© 2009 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
`
`Both Php4 Function and Subcellular Localization Are
`Regulated by Iron via a Multistep Mechanism Involving the
`Glutaredoxin Grx4 and the Export in Crm 1 *~
`
`Received for publication,April16, 2009, and in revised form, May 21,2009 Published,JBC Papers in Press, June 5, 2009, DOI10.1074/jbc.M109.009563
`Alexandre Mercier 1 and Simon Labbe 1
`2
`'
`From the Departement de Biochimie, Faculte de Medecine et des Sciences de Ia Sante, Universite de Sherbrooke,
`Sherbrooke, Quebec J7 H 5N4, Canada
`
`In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the CCAA T -binding factor is
`a multislibunit complex that contains the proteins Php2, Php3,
`Php4, and Php5. Under low iron conditions, Php4 acts as a neg(cid:173)
`ative regulatory subunit of the CCAAT-binding factor and fos(cid:173)
`ters repression of genes encoding iron-using proteins. Under
`conditions of iron excess, Php4 expression is turned off by the
`iron-dependent transcriptional repressor Fepl. In this study, we
`developed a biological system that allows us to unlink iron-de(cid:173)
`pendent behavior of Php4 protein from its transcriptional reg(cid:173)
`ulation by Fepl. Microscopic analyses revealed that a functional
`GFP-Php4 protein accumulates in the nucleus under conditions
`of iron starvation. Conversely, in cells undergoing a transition
`from low to high iron, GFP-Php4 is exported from the nucleus to
`the cytoplasm. We mapped a leucine-rich nuclear export signal
`that is necessary for nuclear exclusion of Php4. This latter proc(cid:173)
`ess was blocked by leptomycin B. By using coimmunoprecipita(cid:173)
`tion analysis, we showed that Php4 and Crml physically interact
`with each other. Although we determined that nuclear retention
`of Php4 per se is not sufficient to cause a constitutive repression
`of iron-using genes, we found that deletion of the grx4+ -en(cid:173)
`coded glutaredoxin-4 renders Php4 constitutively active and
`invariably localized in the nucleus. Further analysis by bimolec(cid:173)
`ular fluorescence complementation assay and by two-hybrid
`assays showed that Php4 and Grx4 are physically associated in
`vivo. Taken together, our findings indicate that Grx4 and Crml
`are novel components involved in the mechanism by which
`Php4 is inactivated by iron in a Fepl-independent manner.
`
`Iron is essential to the growth of the vast majority of orga(cid:173)
`nisms. Because of its capacity to act as both an electron acceptor
`and donor, iron has become an indispensable catalytic cofactor
`for a multitude of enzymes involved in several biological pro(cid:173)
`cesses ranging from respiration, to the tricarboxylic acid cycle,
`to DNA synthesis (1). Paradoxically, excess iron is toxic because
`of its ability to generate hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton chem(cid:173)
`istry reaction (2). High levels of hydroxyl radicals can produce
`
`*This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering
`Research Council of Canada Grant MOP-238238-01 (to S. L.).
`lilThe on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains
`supplemental Fig. 51.
`1 Recipient of scholarships from the Fonds de Ia Recherche en Sante du
`Quebec.
`2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: 3001, 12e Ave. Nord, Sher(cid:173)
`brooke, Quebec J 1 H 5N4, Canada. Tel.: 819-820-6868 (Ext. 15460); Fax: 819-
`564-5340; E-mail: Simon.Labbe@USherbrooke.ca.
`
`cellular damage, including direct protein or enzyme inactiva(cid:173)
`tion, membrane impairment because of lipid peroxidation, and
`oxidative DNA damage (3). These two facets of iron require
`that cells must establish fine-tuned mechanisms to maintain
`sufficient but not excessive concentrations of iron, thereby
`keeping the delicate balance between essential and toxic levels
`of iron.
`In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, iron homeostasis is con(cid:173)
`trolled by two iron-regulated proteins, the GATA-type tran(cid:173)
`scription factor Fep1 and the CCAAT-binding factor Php4 (4,
`5). When iron levels are high, Fep1 binds to GATA cis-acting
`elements found in the promoter regions of genes involved in
`iron acquisition (e.g.fipl+,fiol+,frpl+, and strl+ 12+ /3+) and
`shuts down their expression to avoid deleterious consequences
`of iron overload ( 6, 7). When iron levels are low, Fep 1 is unable
`to bind DNA, resulting in the transcriptional induction of genes
`involved in iron acquisition (6, 8, 9). Analogous to S. pombe,
`other fungi use Fep 1 orthologs to repress transcription of target
`genes in response to high iron. Examples include Urbs1 in Usti(cid:173)
`lago maydis (10, 11), SRE in Neurospora crassa (12), SreA in
`Aspergillus nidulans (13, 14), Sfu1 in Candida albicans (15),
`and Cir1 in Cryptococcus neoformans (16).
`In the fission yeast S. pombe, one gene that is regulated in a
`Fep1-dependent manner is php4+. php4+ encodes a subunit of
`the CCAA T -binding protein complex, which includes three
`other subunits, denoted Php2, Php3, and Php5 (17, 18). Genes
`encoding Php2, Php3, and Php5 are constitutively expressed,
`whereas transcript levels of php4+ are induced under condi(cid:173)
`tions of iron starvation and repressed under iron-replete
`conditions (18). Php4 is responsible for the transcriptional
`repression capability of the Php complex and is not required
`for the DNA binding activity of the complex. A genome-wide
`microarray analysis revealed that Php4 is capable of coordi- ·
`nating the repression of 86 genes in response to iron starva(cid:173)
`tion (19). Among these ·genes, several encode proteins
`involved in iron-dependent metabolic pathways, such as the
`tricarboxylic acid cycle, mitochondrial respiration, heme
`biosynthesis, and
`iron-sulfur cluster assembly. DNA
`microarray analysis also showed that the gene encoding the
`iron-responsive transcriptional repressor Fep1 is down-reg(cid:173)
`ulated in response to iron deficiency in a Php4-dependent
`fashion. Based on these data, we proposed a model wherein
`tight regulation of intracellular iron levels is controlled by
`the interplay between Php4 and Fepl through mutual con(cid:173)
`trol of each other's expression (19).
`
`JULY 24, 2009·VOLUME 284·NUMBER 30
`
`JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 20249
`
`

`

`Iron Inhibition of Php4 Function
`
`Down-regulation of iron-dependent pathways to optimize
`the utilization of limited available iron has previously been
`described in other organisms. When iron is limiting in Esche(cid:173)
`richia coli, the transcriptional repressor Fur is inactivated, lead(cid:173)
`ing to increased levels of RyhB, a small noncoding RNA (20).
`RyhB hybridizes to mRNAs encoding iron-using proteins and
`triggers their degradation through an RNase £-dependent
`process (21). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, iron deprivation
`leads to the activation of the iron-responsive transcription fac(cid:173)
`tors Aft1 and Aft2 (22-27). Once activated, these two regula(cid:173)
`tors induce the expression of several genes, including those
`encoding proteins that function in iron uptake. Additional
`genes are also positively regulated by Aft1 and Aft2, including
`CTHl anQ.,,_CTH2, which encode two CCCH-type zinc finger
`mRNA-binding proteins that bind AU-rich elements within the
`3' -untranslated region of transcripts (28, 29). Among the tran(cid:173)
`scripts that Cth1 and Cth2 can bind and down-regulate in
`response to iron starvation, several encode iron-using proteins
`or enzymes that participate in biochemical pathways that use
`iron as cofactor (29).
`As for Aft1 and Aft2, iron-responsive Cth1- and Cth2-like
`proteins are found mainly in Saccharomycotina fungal species
`(1). The other fungal species such as Pezizomycotina, Taphri(cid:173)
`nomycotina, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota appear to have a
`distinct pair of iron-responsive regulatory proteins that include
`a negative GAT A-type transcriptional regulator (e.g. Fep1 and
`SreA) and a negative regulatory subunit of the CCAA T -binding
`complex (e.g. Php4 and HapX) (1).
`In A. nidulans, a Php4 ortholog, denoted Hap X, can trigger
`down-regulation of genes encoding iron-using proteins during
`iron deficiency (30). Interestingly, both Php4 and HapX have
`been shown to be regulated post-translationally by iron (19, 30).
`Experiments have shown that Hap X dissociates from the HapE
`subunit of the CCAAT-binding complex (HapB-C-E) when
`iron is abundant (30). Using a one-hybrid approach in fission
`yeast, a constitutively expressed Gal4-Php4 fusion protein was
`shown to repress transcription as a function of iron availability
`when brought to a DNA promoter, revealing that Php4 has the
`ability to sense iron at the protein level (19). Recent data have
`provided additional clues with respect to iron sensing. One
`aspect is the requirement of GSH to allow Php4 to sense iron
`excess (19). InS. pombe, mutant cells defective in GSH biogen(cid:173)
`esis show markedly decreased transcription of genes encoding
`iron-using proteins as a result of constitutively active Php4.
`GSH has also been associated with cellular iron sensing in S.
`cerevisiae (31). As for Php4, Aft1 is constitutively active during
`GSH deficiency (31). Elegant studies have also determined that
`S. cerevisiae monothiol glutaredoxins Grx3 and Grx4 are key
`regulators of Aft1 (32, 33). When cells undergo a transition
`from iron-limiting to iron-sufficient conditions, it has been
`proposed that Grx3 and Grx4, with the aid of Fra1 and Fra2,
`transmit an as-yet-unidentified mitochondrial inhibitory sig(cid:173)
`nal, which contributes to inactivate Aft1 (32-34).
`In this study, we first expressed a functional GFP-php4+
`allele under the control of a constitutive GAT A-less php4+ pro(cid:173)
`moter. By use of this system, we ensured that any effects of iron
`on GFP-Php4 were independent of potential changes in GFP(cid:173)
`php4+ expression. Under low iron conditions, GFP-Php4 accu-
`
`mula ted in the nucleus, whereas the protein was exported to the
`cytoplasm within 60 min of the addition of iron. We identified a
`functional leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) 3 within the
`region of amino acids 93-100 of Php4. We showed that Php4
`binds to Crml and is sensitive to leptomycin B (LMB), abolish(cid:173)
`ing its nuclear export behavior. In the presence of LMB,
`although the GFP-Php4 fusion protein was localized in the
`nucleus under conditions of both low and high levels of iron, we
`observed that the protein can still be inactivated by iron, result(cid:173)
`ing in the derepression of isal + transcription in response to
`iron. Deletion of grx4+, on the other hand, led to permanent
`Php4 nuclear accumulation and constitutive repression of
`isal +. Further analysis by bimolecular fluorescence comple(cid:173)
`mentation assay and by two-hybrid assays revealed that Grx4 is
`a binding partner of Php4. In summary, these results demon(cid:173)
`strate that the Php4 subunit of the S. pombe CCAA T -binding
`complex translocates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in an
`iron-, Grx4-, and Crm1-dependent manner.
`
`EXPERIMENTAl PROCEDURES
`Yeast Strains and Growth Conditions-The S. pombe strains
`used in this study were the wild-type FY435 (h+ his7-366
`leu1-32 ura4-b.18 ade6-M210) and four isogenic mutant
`strains, feplb. (h+ his7-366 leul-32 ura4-b.18 ade6-M210
`fepl.D..::ura4+), php4b. (h+ his7-366 leul-32 ura4-b.18 ade6-
`M210 php4.D..::KAN), grx4b. (h+ his7-366 leul-32 ura4-1118
`ade6-M210 grx4b.::KAN), and php411 grx411 (h+ his7-366
`leul-32 ura4-1118 ade6-M210 php4.D..::loxP grx4.D..::KAN} All
`five strains were grown in yeast extract medium containing
`0.5% yeast extract and 3% glucose that was further supple(cid:173)
`mented with 225 mg/liter of adenine, histidine, leucine, uracil,
`and lysine, unless otherwise stated. Strains for which plasmid
`transformation was required were grown in synthetic Edin(cid:173)
`burgh minimal medium lacking specific nutrients required for
`plasmid selection and maintenance. Cells were seeded to an
`A 600 of 0.5, grown to exponential phase (A 600 of~ 1.0), and then
`treated with 250 J.LM 2,2' -dipyridyl (Dip) or 100 MM FeS04 , or
`left untreated for 90 min, unless otherwise indicated. S. pombe
`grx411 and php411 grx411 disruption strains, as well as control
`strains, were cultivated in culture jars under microaerobic con(cid:173)
`ditions using the GazPack EZ system (BD Biosciences). For
`two-hybrid experiments, S. cerevisiae strain L40 (Mata
`his3.D..200 trpl-901 leu2-3, 112 ade2 LYS2::(lexAop) 4-HIS3
`URA3::(lexAop) 8-lacZ) (35) was grown in synthetic minimal
`medium containing 83 mg/liter histidine, adenine, uracil, and
`lysine, 2% dextrose, 50 mM MES buffer (pH 6.1), and 0.67% yeast
`nitrogen base minus copper and iron (MP Biomedicals, Solon,
`OH).
`Plasmids-The pJK-194'·'promphp4+ plasmid contains a
`194-bp DNA segment of the php4+ promoter harboring multi(cid:173)
`ple point mutations in the two iron-responsive GATA
`sequences (positions -188 to 133 and -165 to 160) found
`
`3 The abbreviations used are: NES, nuclear export signal; BiFC, bimolecular
`fluorescence complementation; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole;
`Dip, 2, 2'-dipyridyl; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GSH, glutathione; LMB,
`leptomycin B; ORF, open reading frame; WT, wild type; MES, 2-(N-morpho(cid:173)
`lino)ethanesulfonic acid; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen.
`
`20250 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`
`VOLUME 284·NUMBER 30·JULY 24,2009
`
`

`

`in the php4+ promoter (19). The open reading frame (ORF)
`encoding GFP was PCR-amplified from the pSF-GP1 plasmid
`(36) and inserted into the Sail and Asp718 restriction sites of
`pJK-194*promphp4+
`to create pJK-194*promphp4+ -GFP.
`pJK-194*promphp4+ -GFP-php4+ was constructed through a
`three-piece ligation by simultaneously introducing a BamHI(cid:173)
`Sali PCR-amplified fragment containing the GFP gene and a
`Sall-Asp718 PCR-amplified fragment bearing the php4+ ORF
`into a BamHI-Asp718-digested pJK-194'~promphp4+ plasmid.
`The nmtl + promoter up to position -1178 from the start
`codon of the nmtl +gene was amplified by PCR from pREP-41X
`(37). Once generated, the promoter DNA fragment was
`inserted into the integrative vector pJK148 (38) at the Sacll and
`BamHI site~:,}'he construct was denoted pJKnmt41X. A DNA
`fragment encoding the GFP-php4+ allele was isolated from
`pJK-194*promphp4+ -GFP-php4+ and then inserted into the
`BamHI and Asp718 restriction sites of pJKnmt41X to create
`pJKnmt41X-GFP-php4+. To generate the php4 NES mutant
`allele (L93A, L94A, 197 A, and L100A), the plasmid pJK-
`194*promphp4+ -GFP-php4+ was used in conjunction with the
`overlap extension method (39) and the oligonucleotides 5'(cid:173)
`CGAGGCAGCTGAGCAGGCAGAGATGGCTCAGGCTC(cid:173)
`AGTTGAAGAATTCTACTTTGG-3' and 5'-GCCTGAGC(cid:173)
`CATCTCTGCCTGCTCAGCTGCCTCGTTGTTCTCCT(cid:173)
`TCTGTAACTTTCCG-3'
`(underlined
`letters
`represent
`nucleotide substitutions that gave rise to mutations) and two
`oligonucleotides corresponding to the start and stop codons of
`the ORF of php4+. The resulting PCR-amplified fragment was
`digested with Sail and Asp718 and cloned into pJKnmt41X-GFP,
`which was previously engineered by inserting the GFP gene into
`pJKnmt41X. The resulting construct was designated pJK(cid:173)
`nmt41X-GFP-php4NESmut. All nucleotide changes were con(cid:173)
`firmed by DNA sequencing. Plasmids pSP-1178nmt-GST-GFP
`and pSP-1178nmt-GST-GFP-Pap1 515NES533 were constructed
`by a strategy described previously (40). Plasmid pSP-1178nmt(cid:173)
`GST -GFP was digested with Spel and Sstl restriction enzymes
`and used to receive annealed synthetic DNA fragments encod(cid:173)
`ing wild-type and mutant versions of Php4 NES. Resulting plas(cid:173)
`mids were denoted pSP-1178nmt-GST-GFP-Php473NES122
`and pSP-1178nmt-GST -GFP-Php473NES 122mut, respectively.
`Plasmid pJK-194'~promphp4+-TAP-php4+ was constructed by
`replacing the GFPORF in pJK-194*promphp4+ -GFP-php4+ by
`a PCR-amplified TAP fragment isolated from pREP1-NTAP
`(41). The purified TAP fragment was also cloned into pJK-
`194*promphp4+ to create pJK-194*promphp4+-TAP. Both
`pJK-194'~promphp4+-TAP-php4+ and pJK-194'~promphp4+­
`TAP were subsequently used as templates to subclone their
`DNA inserts into the pEA500 plasmid (42), creating pEA500-
`194'~promphp4+ -TAP-php4+ and pEA500-194*promphp4+(cid:173)
`TAP, respectively. The S. pombe crml+ promoter up to -1000
`from the start codon of the crml + gene was isolated by PCR
`and then inserted into the pSP1 vector (43) at the Apal and
`Pstl sites. The resulting plasmid was denoted pSP1-
`1000crml+prom. The full-length coding region of crml+ was
`isolated by PCR, using primers that corresponded to the initia(cid:173)
`tor and stop codons of the ORF. Because the primers contained
`Pstl and Xmal restriction sites, the purified DNA fragment was
`digested with these enzymes and cloned into the corresponding
`
`. Iron Inhibition of Php4 Function
`
`sites of pSP1-1000crml+prom. The resulting plasmid was
`named pSP1crml+. The Myc12 epitope, obtained from the
`pctr4+ -X-myc12 plasmid (44) using Xmal and Sstl restriction
`enzymes, was subsequently inserted 3' to the crml + gene in
`pSP1crml+. For two-hybrid interaction assay, the complete or
`truncated versions of the php4+ gene were inserted down(cid:173)
`stream of and in-frame to the VP16 coding sequence using
`BamHI and Asp718 restriction sites found in p VP16 (35). The
`bait plasmid pLexA-grx4+ was created by cloning a 747-bp
`BamHI-Pstl DNA fragment containing the full-length coding
`region of grx4+ into the same sites of pLexNA (35).
`RNA Isolation and Analysis-Total RNA was extracted by a
`hot phenol method as described previously (45). RNA samples
`were quantified spectrophotometrically, and 15 /Lg of RNA per
`sample were used for the RNase protection assay, which was
`carried out as described previously (19). To detect grx4+
`mRNA levels, plasmid pSKgrx4+ was created by inserting a
`191-bp BamHI-EcoRI fragment from the grx4+ gene into the
`same restriction sites of pBluescript SK (Stratagene, La Jolla,
`CA). The antisense RNA hybridizes to the region between posi(cid:173)
`tions +327 and +518 downstream from the A of the initiator
`codon ofgrx4+. To generate pSKVP 16, a 201-bp fragment from
`the VP 16 gene was amplified and cloned into the BamHI-EcoRI
`sites of pBluescript SK. Plasmids pSKisal +, pSKphp4+, and
`pSKactl+ (18) were used to produce antisense RNA probes,
`allowing the detection of steady-state levels of isal+, php4+,
`and actl + mRNAs, respectively. A riboprobe derived from the
`plasmid pKSACTl (46) was used to monitor the steady-state
`levels of ACTl mRNAs in experiments using the bakers' yeast
`strain 140.
`Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting-Total celllysates
`were prepared as described previously (18). Celllysates were
`quantitated using the Bradford assay ( 47), and equal amounts of
`each sample were subjected to electrophoresis on 9% SDS-poly(cid:173)
`acrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, protein samples were
`electroblotted as described previously (9). The following pri(cid:173)
`mary antisera were used for immunodetection: monoclonal
`anti-GFP antibody (B-2; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and mono(cid:173)
`clonal anti-PCNA antibody (PC10; Sigma). After incubation
`with the primary antibodies, membranes were washed, then
`incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conju(cid:173)
`gated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West
`Grove, P A), developed with ECL reagents (Amersham Bio(cid:173)
`sciences), and visualized by chemiluminescence.
`Fluorescence Microscopy-To analyze the cellular localiza(cid:173)
`tion of GFP-Php4, an integrative plasmid expressing its corre(cid:173)
`sponding allele under the control of the php4+ promoter was
`transformed into a php4D. strain. Liquid cultures were seeded to
`an A 600 of 0.5 and then grown to exponential phase. At log
`phase (A 600 of~ 1.0), cells were treated with either 250 fLM Dip
`or 100 fLM FeS04 • After treatment, direct fluorescence micros(cid:173)
`copy was conducted as described previously (48). php4D. or
`php4D. grx4D. cells expressing the wild-type or mutant version
`of Php4 NES under the control of the nmtl + promoter were
`precultivated in the presence of thiamine (15 fLM) to an A 600 of
`~ 1.0. At this growth point, cells were washed twice to remove
`thiamine and seeded to anA 600 of0.1 prior to a 16-h incubation
`at 30 oc. After this growth period, cells (A 600 of ~0.75) were
`
`JULY 24, 2009•VOLUME 284·NUMBER 30
`
`JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 20251
`
`

`

`Iron Inhibition of Php4 Function
`
`treated 3 h with 250 f.LM Dip, thereby allowing nuclear targeting
`of GFP-Php4. At log phase (A 600 of ~LO), cells were washed
`twice to remove Dip and then grown in the presence of 15 f.LM
`thiamine to stop nmtl +-dependent gene expression. At this
`point, the nuclear pool of GFP-Php4 was analyzed under con(cid:173)
`ditions of low or high iron for 0, 15, 30, and 60 min. For treat(cid:173)
`ment with LMB (L-2913; Sigma), cells were divided in half and
`treated with either 100 ng/ml LMB (in 1.4% methanol) or left
`untreated (with 1.4% methanol as a control), and allowed to
`continue growing at 30 oc in the presence of 100 p.,M FeS04 • At
`relevant time points, aliquots of cells were removed from each
`half (with or without LMB) and viewed by direct fluorescence
`microscopy. Cell fields shown in this study are representative of
`experimellts repeated at least five times.
`BiFC A~;;,lysis-The coding region of VC was amplified by
`PCR from the template pFA6a-VC-kanMX6 ( 49) using primers
`that added unique Sall and Asp718 restriction sites. The PCR
`product was digested with Sall and Asp718 and cloned into
`pGEM-7Zf (Promega, Madison, WI). Subsequently, the full(cid:173)
`length coding region of grx4+ was isolated by PCR and placed
`in-frame with the VC coding region using the BamHI and Sall
`restriction sites. The resulting plasmid was designated pGEM(cid:173)
`grx4+-vc. To generate pJK-194*promphp4+-grx4+-vc and
`pSP1-194*promphp4+ -grx4+-VC plasmids, the BamHI-Xhoi
`DNA restriction fragment containing the grx4+- VC cassette
`(from plasmid pGEM-grx4+-VC) was subcloned into the
`plasmids pJK-194*promphp4+ and pSP1-194;~promphp4+,
`respectively. The coding regions of VN and php4+ were gener(cid:173)
`ated by PCR amplification with pFA6a-VN-kanMX6 (49) and
`pJK-194*promphp4+ -GFP-php4+ as templates, respectively. A
`first pair of primers that incorporates unique 5 1 and 3 1 BamHI
`and Sall restriction sites, respectively, was used for VN. With
`respect to php4+, we used a set of primers that introduces
`unique Sall and Asp718 sites at the 5 1 and 3 1 ends, respectively.
`The VN-php4+ allele was constructed by three-piece ligation
`by simultaneously introducing the BamHI-Sall PCR-amplified
`fragment containing VN and the Sall-Asp718 PCR-amplified
`fragment harboring php4+ into the BamHI-Asp718-digested
`pEA500-194*promphp4+ vector. Subsequently, the Sacii(cid:173)
`Asp718 DNA fragment containing the VN-php4+ allele under
`the control of a GAT A-less php4+ promoter was cloned into
`the integrative plasmid pJK210 (38). Microscopic images for
`BiFC were taken using a magnification of X 1000 with a trans(cid:173)
`mission window at 465-495 nm.
`Coimmunoprecipitation-For coimmunoprecipitation ex(cid:173)
`periments, php4!::. cells were cotransformed with pEA500-
`194*promphp4+ -TAP and pSPl-crml+ -myc12 or pEA500-
`194*promphp4+ -TAP-php4+ and pSPl-crml+ -myc12. Cells
`were grown to an A 600 of 0.75 and then incubated in the pres(cid:173)
`ence of 250 p.,M Dip for 3 h. After this growth period, cells were
`washed twice and then re-incubated in the presence of 100 p.,M
`FeS04 for 15 min. Total celllysates were obtained by glass bead
`disruption in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 0.1% Triton
`X-100, 0.5 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM phen(cid:173)
`ylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) containing a mixture of protease
`inhibitors (P -8340; Sigma). Typically, 8 -10 mg of total protein
`were added to a 15-p.,l bed volume of IgG-Sepharose 6 Fast(cid:173)
`Flow beads (GE Healthcare), and the mixture was tumbled for
`
`30 min at 4 oc. Beads were washed four times with 1 ml of lysis
`buffer, with the beads transferred to a fresh microtube before
`the last wash. The immunoprecipitates were resuspended in 60
`p.,l of SDS loading buffer, incubated for 5 min at 95 oc, and
`resolved by electrophoresis on a 9% SDS-polyacrylamide gel.
`For protein analysis of Crml-myc 12, TAP-Php4, and PCNA,
`the following primary antisera were used: monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`Myc antibody 9E10 (Roche Applied Science); polyclonal anti(cid:173)
`mouse IgG antibody (ICN Biomedicals, Aurora, OH); and
`monoclonal anti-PCNA antibody PClO (Sigma).
`Two-hybrid Analysis-Pre-cultures of each L40 cotransfor(cid:173)
`mant strain harboring the indicated bait and prey plasmids
`were grown to anA 600 of 0.5. Samples were withdrawn from the
`cultures, and quantitative measurements of J3-galactosidase
`activity were assayed using buffers and the substrate o-nitro(cid:173)
`phenyl-f3-D-galactopyranoside as described previously (50).
`Levels of J3-galactosidase activity were measured within the lin(cid:173)
`ear response range and expressed in standard units (51). Values
`shown are the average of triplicate assays of three independent
`cotransformants. For protein expression analysis, the antibod(cid:173)
`ies used were the monoclonal anti-LexA 2-12 directed against
`the LexA DNA binding domain and anti-VP16 1-21 directed
`against the VP16 activation domain (both from Santa Cruz Bio(cid:173)
`technology). A monoclonal anti-3-phosphoglycerate kinase
`antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was used to detect
`the phosphoglycerate kinase protein as an internal control.
`
`RESULTS
`Inactivation ofPhp4 by a Fepl-independent Mechanism-As
`we have previously shown (18, 19) inactivation of Php4 in
`response to iron is regulated at two distinct levels. First, in the
`presence of iron, Fepl associates with GATA elements in the
`php4+ promoter to repress transcription, ensuring the extinc(cid:173)
`tion of most php4+ transcripts. Second, we observed that in the
`absence of Fepl, although php4+ mRNA levels are constitutive
`and unresponsive to iron for repression, the gene product
`(Php4) can still be inactivated by iron. Iron-mediated inhibition
`of Php4 results in transcriptional induction of the regulon of
`genes controlled by Php4 (19). To begin to characterize the
`mechanism by which Php4 activity is regulated by iron in a
`Fepl-independent manner, we developed a biological system in
`which php4+ and GFP-php4+ alleles were expressed under the
`control of a GAT A-less php4+ promoter. By use of this system,
`we determined that php4!::. mutant cells expressing php4+ or
`GFP-php4+ exhibited php4+ mRNA levels that were constitu(cid:173)
`tively expressed under both low and high iron concentrations
`(Fig. lA). As control for normal transcriptional regulation, the
`steady-state levels of php4+ were down-regulated when wild(cid:173)
`type cells were grown under basal and iron-replete conditions
`(Fig. lA, WI). As controls for signal specificity, cells harboring
`an inactivatedfepl+ gene (jepl!::.) exhibited a constitutive tran(cid:173)
`scription of php4+, and php4+ mRNA was absent in php4!::. null
`cells (Fig. lA). Subsequently, we examined the effect of a sus(cid:173)
`tained php4+ or GFP-php4+ expression on the transcriptional
`profile of isal+, a Php4-regulated target gene (Fig. lB). When
`Php4 was constitutively expressed, we observed that the repres(cid:173)
`sion of isal + occurs only under low iron conditions, suggesting
`
`20252 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`
`VOLUME 284·NUMBER 30·JULY 24,2009
`
`

`

`WT
`
`php4tJ
`
`(epltJ
`
`phpr
`
`GFP-php4+
`
`GAT A-less
`
`A
`
`B
`
`GAT A-less
`+
`+
`Dip -=- ~ Dip -=- ...!::._ Dip -=- ..!::__ Dip -=- ...!::._ Dip -=- ..!::__
`
`act]+-+--·-··----------
`
`wr
`
`php4tJ
`
`(epltJ
`
`GAT A-less
`
`+
`
`php4+
`
`GAT A-less
`+
`
`GFP-php4'
`
`c
`
`vector
`alone
`
`WT GATA
`
`GATA-less
`
`Dip
`
`M
`
`72-
`55-
`
`43- -
`
`Fe Dip
`
`-
`
`Fe
`
`............ ..-GFP-Php4
`
`34- ______ _ . -reNA
`
`26-
`
`FIGURE 1. Php4 is inactivated in a Fep1-independent manner.A, logarith(cid:173)
`mic phase cultures ofisogenic strains FY 435 (wn, AMY15 (php41l), and BPY1 0
`(fep 7/l) were untreated (-) or treated in the presence of Dip (250 f.LM) or
`Fe504 (Fe) (1 00 f.LM) for90 min. After treatment, total RNA was prepared from
`each sample and analyzed by RNase protection assays. Steady-state levels of
`php4+ and actl + mRNAs (indicated with arrows) were analyzed in the wild(cid:173)
`type strain and strains lacking the php4+ or fep7+ allele. When indicated,
`php41l cells were
`transformed with
`the
`integrative plasmids pJK-
`194*promphp4+ -php4+ (GAT A-less + php4+) and pJK-194*promphp4+ -GFP(cid:173)
`php4+ (GAT A-less + GFP-php4+). 8, aliquots of the cultures described for A
`were examined by RNase protection assays for steady-state levels of isa 7 +
`mRNA. The arrows indicate signals corresponding to isa7+ and act7+ tran(cid:173)
`scripts. RNase protection data shown in A and B are representative of three
`independent experiments. C, cells carrying a disrupted php41l allele were
`transformed with an empty plasmid (vector alone), or plasmids expressing
`GFP-php4+ under the control of the wild-type php4+ promoter (WT GATA), or
`under the regulation of a GATA-Iess php4+ promoter (GATA-/ess). Trans(cid:173)
`formed cells were grown under basal (-)or iron-deficient conditions (250 f.LM
`Dip) or with excess iron (1 00 f.LM Fe504 ) (Fe). Whole-cell extracts were pre(cid:173)
`pared and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GFP or anti-PCNA (as an
`internal control) antibody. M, the positions of the molecular weight standards
`are indicated to the left.
`
`that in the absence of Fep1 or its iron-responsive cis-acting
`elements iron can still trigger the inactivation ofPhp4 (Fig. 1B).
`To ensure that fusion of GFP to theN terminus of Php4 did
`not interfere with its function, we analyzed if iron limitation(cid:173)
`dependent down-regulationof isal+ gene expression was cor(cid:173)
`rected by integrating a GFP-php4+ allele expressed from both
`the wild-type php4+ promoter (data not shown) and its deriv(cid:173)
`ative version containing mutated GAT A elements. As shown in
`Fig. 1B, GFP-php4+ repressed isal + mRNA levels under iron(cid:173)
`limiting conditions in a manner similar to that of the wild-type
`php4+ allele. Furthermore, the ability of GFP-Php4 to repress
`isal + transcript levels occurred with both types of php4+ pro(cid:173)
`moter, native and GAT A-less. To further investigate the effect
`of iron on Php4 itself, we analyzed steady-state levels of GFP-
`
`Iron Inhibition of Php4 Function
`
`Php4 (predicted mass of 59.8 kDa) when expressed under the
`control of the GATA-less promoter. Immunoblot analyses
`revealed that GFP-Php4 is stable and present in similar relative
`amounts in iron-deficient and iron-replete cells, suggesting
`that the mechanism of Php4 inactivation was not operated
`through iron-regulated changes in protein synthesis or stability
`(Fig. 1C). On the other hand, we observed that steady-state
`levels of GFP-Php4 were dramatically reduced in cells grown in
`the presence of iron (or left untreated) when the fusion allele
`was under the control of the wild-type php4+ promoter (Fig.
`1C). Therefore, despite a constitutively expressed GFP-Php4,
`either from afepl!J. strain or a GAT A-less promoter, the Php4
`target gene isal + was only repressed under low iron conditions.
`These results strongly suggest that iron can trigger the inacti(cid:173)
`vation of Php4 function through an additional mechanism that
`is independent of Fep1-mediated transcriptional repression.
`Iron Starvation Induces Nuclear Accumulation of GFP-Php4-
`T o further investigate the mechanism by which Php4 activity is
`regulated, we examined the localization of Php4 in response to
`changes in iron levels. To perform these experiments, we used a
`php4/J. mutant strain where expression of the GFP-php4+ allele
`was under the control of a GAT A-less php4+ promoter. Cells
`were grown in minimal medium (under basal conditions) to
`exponential phase and then treated with the iron chelator Dip
`(250 J.LM) or FeS04 (100 J.LM) for 3 h. Following treatment with
`Dip, GFP-Php4localized to the nucleus (Fig. 2). Consistent with
`this observation, GFP-Php4 fluorescence colocalized with the
`DNA-staining dye DAPI, which was -used as a marker for
`nuclear staining. When cells were treated with FeS04 , GFP(cid:173)
`Php4 was viewed primarily in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). Before
`treatment (at the zero time point; minimal medium contained
`74 nM iron), GFP-Php4 displayed a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket