throbber
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, June 2002, p. 2814–2821
`0099-2240/02/$04.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2814–2821.2002
`Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
`
`Vol. 68, No. 6
`
`Metabolic Engineering of Glycerol Production in
`Saccharomyces cerevisiae
`Karin M. Overkamp,1 Barbara M. Bakker,2 Peter Kötter,3 Marijke A. H. Luttik,1
`Johannes P. van Dijken,1 and Jack T. Pronk1*
`Kluyver Laboratory of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, NL-2628 BC Delft,1 and Molecular Cell Physiology,
`Free University Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam,2 The Netherlands, and Institut für Mikrobiologie,
`J. W. Goethe Universität Frankfurt, 60439 Frankfurt, Germany3
`
`Received 22 January 2002/Accepted 1 April 2002
`
`Inactivation of TPI1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae structural gene encoding triose phosphate isomerase,
`completely eliminates growth on glucose as the sole carbon source. In tpi1-null mutants, intracellular accu-
`mulation of dihydroxyacetone phosphate might be prevented if the cytosolic NADH generated in glycolysis by
`glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were quantitatively used to reduce dihydroxyacetone phosphate to
`glycerol. We hypothesize that the growth defect of tpi1-null mutants is caused by mitochondrial reoxidation of
`cytosolic NADH, thus rendering it unavailable for dihydroxyacetone-phosphate reduction. To test this hypoth-
`esis, a tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ quadruple mutant was constructed. NDE1 and NDE2 encode isoenzymes of
`mitochondrial external NADH dehydrogenase; GUT2 encodes a key enzyme of the glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle.
`It has recently been demonstrated that these two systems are primarily responsible for mitochondrial oxidation
`of cytosolic NADH in S. cerevisiae. Consistent with the hypothesis, the quadruple mutant grew on glucose as the
`sole carbon source. The growth on glucose, which was accompanied by glycerol production, was inhibited at
`high-glucose concentrations. This inhibition was attributed to glucose repression of respiratory enzymes as, in
`the quadruple mutant, respiratory pyruvate dissimilation is essential for ATP synthesis and growth. Serial
`transfer of the quadruple mutant on high-glucose media yielded a spontaneous mutant with much higher
`specific growth rates in high-glucose media (up to 0.10 hⴚ1 at 100 g of glucose · literⴚ1). In aerated batch
`cultures grown on 400 g of glucose · literⴚ1, this engineered S. cerevisiae strain produced over 200 g of
`glycerol · literⴚ1, corresponding to a molar yield of glycerol on glucose close to unity.
`
`Glycerol is used to synthesize many products, ranging from
`cosmetics to lubricants. Its current annual production of ca.
`600,000 tonnes is mainly recovered as a by-product of soap
`manufacturing or produced from propylene (55). Alterna-
`tively, glycerol can be produced by microbial fermentation,
`using sustainable carbohydrate feedstocks. Although this may
`involve a wide range of microorganisms, including algae and
`bacteria, research has mostly focused on yeasts (1, 55; M. J.
`Taherzadeh, L. Adler, and G. Lidén, submitted for publica-
`tion). In yeasts, glycerol is produced by the reduction of dihy-
`droxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) to glycerol-3-phosphate
`(G3P), a reaction catalyzed by cytosolic NAD⫹-dependent
`G3P dehydrogenase. G3P is subsequently dephosphorylated by
`a glycerol-3-phosphatase (1). Especially during anaerobic
`growth, glycerol production serves as a redox sink to maintain
`the cytosolic redox balance (5, 50). Glycerol also functions as
`an osmolyte, thus enabling yeast growth at high osmolarity (1,
`36). Consistent with the latter role, the highest glycerol yields
`reported to date have been achieved with osmotolerant yeast
`strains (Table 1).
`The amounts of glycerol that are naturally produced by
`Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a response to anaerobiosis and/or
`osmotic stress are relatively small (42, 44, 51). Much effort has
`been invested in attempts to redirect sugar metabolism in this
`
`* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Kluyver Laboratory of
`Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, NL-
`2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 15 278 3214. Fax: 31 15
`278 2355. E-mail: j.t.pronk@tnw.tudelft.nl.
`
`yeast towards glycerol production. The first successful attempt
`was the sulfite process, devised by Neuberg and Reinfurth (34).
`In this process, sulfite added to fermenting S. cerevisiae cul-
`tures forms an adduct with acetaldehyde, thus making the
`latter compound unavailable as an electron acceptor for the
`reoxidation of glycolytic NADH. Instead, NADH is reoxidized
`by glycerol production. This early example of redirection of
`metabolic fluxes has been called metabolic engineering avant
`la lettre (13). Theoretically, the sulfite process can lead to the
`formation of equimolar amounts of glycerol, carbon dioxide,
`and sulfite-acetaldehyde adduct. However, the theoretical yield
`of glycerol on glucose of 0.51 g · g⫺1 has not been achieved, not
`even in modern adaptations of the sulfite process (Table 1).
`Moreover, the presence of by-products (ethanol, acetate, sul-
`fite-acetaldehyde adduct, and biomass) poses problems during
`glycerol recovery (1).
`Over the past decade, research on glycerol production by S.
`cerevisiae has shifted to true metabolic engineering, i.e., the
`application of recombinant DNA technology for a rational
`reprogramming of cellular metabolism (4). Several approaches
`were aimed at minimizing the reduction of acetaldehyde to
`ethanol, thus mimicking the sulfite process. Indeed, reduced
`expression of pyruvate decarboxylase (35) and deletion of al-
`cohol dehydrogenase genes (12) led to an increased production
`of glycerol, but the glycerol concentration did not exceed 5
`g · liter⫺1 (Table 1). Other strategies focused on overexpres-
`sion of the key enzymes of the glycerol pathway in S. cerevisiae
`(33, 39, 44). Overproduction of the GPD1-encoded cytosolic
`G3P dehydrogenase led to an increased production of glycerol
`
`2814
`
`

`

`VOL. 68, 2002
`
`GLYCEROL PRODUCTION IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE
`
`2815
`
`TABLE 1. Some representative yeast processes used for glycerol production
`
`Strain and process
`
`Glycerol concn in
`broth (g · l⫺1)
`
`Yield of glycerol on
`glucose (g · g⫺1)
`
`Avg productivity
`(g · liter⫺1 · day⫺1)
`
`Reference
`or source
`
`S. cerevisiae
`Sulfite batch
`Sulfite; fed batch under vacuum
`GPD1 overproduction; batch
`ADH deletion; shake flask
`pdc2⌬ mutant; shake flask
`tpi1⌬ mutant; shake flask (0–24 h)
`with extra glucose (24–56 h)
`tpi1⌬ mutant; as above (0–44 h)
`tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ mutant, aerated batch
`
`Osmotolerant yeasts
`Candida magnoliae I2B; batch
`Saccharomyces strain LORRE Y8; fed batch
`Pichia farinosa; fed batch with solid glucose
`Candida glycerinogenes; batch
`
`a Total polyol concentration.
`
`45
`82
`25
`4.6
`2.9
`36
`43
`63
`219
`
`80a
`260
`300a
`127
`
`0.23
`0.25
`0.12
`0.26
`0.16
`0.46
`0.20
`0.44
`0.50
`
`0.32
`0.47
`0.46
`0.64
`
`9.0
`32.5
`4.3
`2.5
`2.1
`36
`5.3
`35
`57.6
`
`15.6
`29.8
`37.5
`40.6
`
`15
`27
`44
`12
`35
`9
`
`10
`This study
`
`46
`19
`53
`56
`
`(33, 44) (Table 1), whereas overproduction of glycerol phos-
`phatase had no effect on glycerol production (39, 44). Increas-
`ing glycerol export by deregulation of the Fps1p channel pro-
`tein increased glycerol production but, in combination with
`overproduction of G3P dehydrogenase, negatively affected
`growth (44).
`The highest glycerol yield and productivity reported to date
`for metabolically engineered S. cerevisiae were observed with a
`tpi1⌬ deletion mutant (9, 10) (Table 1). Apparently, in tpi1⌬
`mutants, which lack the glycolytic enzyme triose phosphate
`
`isomerase, accumulation of DHAP is prevented by its conver-
`sion to glycerol (Fig. 1). The maximum theoretical yield of this
`process is 1 mol of glycerol · mol of glucose⫺1 if all glucose is
`metabolized via glycolysis. However, S. cerevisiae tpi1⌬ mutants
`are unable to grow on glucose as the sole carbon source (9–11).
`Therefore, biomass was pregrown on glucose-ethanol mix-
`tures, followed by a bioconversion of glucose to glycerol (9,
`10). During the bioconversion phase, glycerol productivity de-
`creased strongly with time (Table 1).
`The biochemical mechanism responsible for the inability of
`
`FIG. 1. Hypothetical pathway (solid lines) for glucose dissimilation by triose phosphate isomerase-negative (tpi1⌬) S. cerevisiae. DHAP is
`detoxified by its reduction to G3P and subsequent dephosphorylation to glycerol. This requires that all NADH generated in the glyceraldehyde-
`3-phosphate dehydrogenase reaction be available for DHAP reduction. Oxidation of either cytosolic G3P or cytosolic NADH by other processes
`(dotted lines) will lead to accumulation of DHAP. Abbreviations: GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; FBA, fructose-1,6-biphosphate aldolase;
`GPD, cytosolic G3P dehydrogenase; GPP, glycerol phosphatase; GUT, mitochondrial flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent G3P dehydrogenase;
`NDE, external mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase; PDC, pyruvate decarboxylase; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase.
`
`

`

`2816
`
`OVERKAMP ET AL.
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`Strain
`
`CEN.PK113-7D
`CEN.PK122
`CEN.PK167-2B
`CEN.PK225-2C
`CEN.PK536-5B
`
`CEN.PK530-1B
`CEN.PK530-1C
`CEN.PK546-12B
`
`CEN.PK546-AHG
`
`TABLE 2. S. cerevisiae strains used in this study
`
`Genotypea
`
`Source or reference
`
`MATa
`MATa/MAT␣
`MATa nde1 (41–1659)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP nde2(51–100)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP
`MATa gut2(41–2010)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP
`MAT␣ tpi1(41–707)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP nde1(41–1659)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP nde2
`(51–100)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP
`MAT␣ tpi1(41–707)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP
`MATa tpi1(41–707)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP
`MATa tpi1 (41–707)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP nde1 (41–1659)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP
`nde2(51–100)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP gut2(41–2010)::loxP-kanMX4-loxP
`Spontaneous mutant of CEN.PK546-12B, selected for AHG concn
`
`31
`31
`31
`37
`This study
`
`This study
`This study
`This study
`
`This study
`
`a The numbers in parentheses indicate the deleted nucleotides (ATG ⫽ 1).
`
`S. cerevisiae tpi1⌬ mutants to grow on glucose as the sole
`carbon source is unknown. Since conversion of glucose to
`equimolar amounts of pyruvate and glycerol is neutral in terms
`of ATP (Fig. 1), growth of tpi1⌬ mutants should depend on the
`respiratory dissimilation of pyruvate. Glucose repression of the
`synthesis of key enzymes of respiratory glucose dissimilation
`(16, 50) may therefore prevent growth of tpi1⌬ mutants on
`glucose in batch cultures. However, tpi1⌬ mutants also failed
`to grow in aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures,
`in
`which glucose repression is alleviated (11). As in batch cul-
`tures, growth on glucose in chemostat cultures required the
`inclusion of ethanol in the medium feed (11). This indicated
`that glucose repression of respiration is not the only factor that
`prevents growth of tpi1⌬ mutants on glucose as the sole carbon
`source.
`Complete conversion of DHAP to glycerol in a tpi1⌬ mutant
`requires that all NADH generated in the glyceraldehyde-3-
`phosphate dehydrogenase reaction be used to reduce DHAP
`to glycerol (Fig. 1). If other reactions were to compete for
`NADH with glycerol production, this would lead to accumu-
`lation of DHAP, which in turn can be converted to methylg-
`lyoxal, a cytotoxic compound that can inhibit growth (25, 32).
`We hypothesize that oxidation of cytosolic NADH by the mi-
`tochondrial respiratory chain is such a competing mechanism
`and thus contributes to the inability of tpi1⌬ mutants to grow
`on glucose as the sole carbon source (Fig. 1). Two mechanisms
`are involved in the mitochondrial oxidation of cytosolic NADH
`in S. cerevisiae: mitochondrial external NADH dehydrogenase
`and a G3P shuttle (29, 31, 37, 48). At low specific growth rates,
`either of these two systems is sufficient to sustain respiratory
`growth (37). The NDE1 and NDE2 genes encode two isoen-
`zymes of the external NADH dehydrogenase (31, 48), whereas
`the GUT2 gene encodes a mitochondrial respiratory-chain-
`linked G3P dehydrogenase, a key enzyme of the G3P shuttle
`(29, 45). The latter enzyme might also directly affect growth of
`tpi1⌬ mutants by reoxidizing G3P to DHAP (Fig. 1).
`The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that mitochon-
`drial reoxidation of cytosolic NADH and/or G3P plays a role in
`the phenotype of tpi1⌬ mutants and to investigate whether
`metabolic engineering of mitochondrial respiration can be
`used to improve glycerol production by S. cerevisiae.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Yeast strains and maintenance. The S. cerevisiae strains used and constructed
`in this study (Table 2) are prototrophic strains belonging to the CEN.PK family
`(49). Stock cultures were grown at 30°C in shake flasks on YPED medium (10 g
`
`of Bacto yeast extract · liter⫺1, 20 g of peptone · liter⫺1, 10 ml of ethanol · liter⫺1,
`and 0.5 g of glucose · liter⫺1) except the adaptation to high glucose concentration
`(AHG) strain, which was grown on 100 g of glucose · liter⫺1 in MMU medium
`(3.0 g of K2SO4 · liter⫺1, 3.0 g of KH2PO4 · liter⫺1, 3.0 g of urea · liter⫺1, 0.5 g of
`MgSO4 · 7H2O · per liter) with trace elements and vitamins prepared and ster-
`ilized as described previously (52). Urea was added to the medium after separate
`filter sterilization. When stationary phase was reached, 30% (vol/vol) sterile
`glycerol was added, and 2-ml aliquots were stored in sterile vials at ⫺80°C.
`Construction of null mutants. Standard techniques and media for genetic
`modification of S. cerevisiae were used (3). Deletions in TPI1 were obtained by
`the short flanking homology method (54), using pUG6 as a template (21). PCR
`amplification, yeast transformation, and verification of the correct gene deletion,
`as well as determination of the mating type, were carried out as described by
`Luttik et al. (31). The loxP-kanMX4-loxP cassette amplified by PCR was used to
`transform diploid strain CEN.PK122. After tetrad analysis, the G418R segregants
`were checked by diagnostic PCR for the correct integration of the kanMX
`cassette (Table 3).
`All further double, triple, or quadruple deletion strains were constructed by
`crossing of the corresponding single, double, or triple deletion strains. The
`resulting diploid strains were subsequently analyzed by tetrad analysis to obtain
`the respective segregants and further analyzed by diagnostic PCR to confirm the
`correct deletion of the corresponding genes. Strain CEN.PK536-5B (nde1⌬
`nde2⌬ tpi1⌬) resulted from crossing of strains CEN.PK167-2B (nde1⌬ nde2⌬)
`and CEN.PK530-1B (tpi1⌬). To obtain the quadruple deletion strain
`CEN.PK546-12B (nde1⌬ nde2⌬ tpi1⌬ gut2⌬), the strains CEN.PK536-5B (nde1⌬
`nde2⌬ tpi1⌬) and CEN.PK225-2C (gut2⌬), respectively, were crossed.
`Shake flask cultivation. Shake flask cultures were grown in an orbital incuba-
`tor (200 rpm, 30°C) in spherical flat-bottom flasks (500 ml) containing 100 ml of
`medium. Precultures were grown on MMU medium supplemented with 5 ml of
`ethanol · liter⫺1 and 1 g of glucose · liter⫺1. During the exponential growth
`phase, the optical density at 660 nm (OD660) was measured with an Amersham
`Pharmacia Novaspec II spectrophotometer. Exponential-phase cultures were
`used as the inoculum for further shake flask experiments. Prior to inoculation,
`cells were centrifuged (4,500 ⫻ g; 3 min) and washed aseptically with sterile
`
`TABLE 3. Oligonucleotides used for construction of the TPI1
`deletion cassette (S1/S2) and for diagnostic PCR (A1/K1) and (K2/
`A4) of the deletion strains.a
`Oligonucleotide
`DNA sequence
`TPII-S1................5⬘-ATG GCT AGA ACT TTC TTT GTC GGT
`GGT AAC TTT AAA TTA ACA GCT GAA
`GCT TCG TAC GC-3⬘
`TPII-S2................5⬘-TTA GTT TCT AGA GTT GAT GAT ATC
`AAC AAA TTC TGG CTT CGC ATA GGC
`CAC TAG TGG ATC TG-3⬘
`TPII-A1...............5⬘-CTT CTG CGG TAT CAC CCT AC-3⬘
`TPII-A4...............5⬘-CAA TGC AGT CTT CGG TAC AC-3⬘
`K1........................5⬘-GGA TGT ATG GGC TAA ATG TAC G-3⬘
`K2........................5⬘-GTT TCA TTT GAT GCT CGA TGA G-3⬘
`
`a Oligonucleotides used for the construction of the deletion cassettes and for
`diagnostic PCR of the strains deleted in NDE1, NDE2, and GUT2, respectively,
`were described previously (31, 37). Sequences complementary to the loxP-
`KanMX4-loxP cassette (pUG6) are underlined.
`
`

`

`VOL. 68, 2002
`
`GLYCEROL PRODUCTION IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE
`
`2817
`
`FIG. 2. Growth on glucose of tpi1⌬ S. cerevisiae (E) and an isogenic
`tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain (F). Both strains were grown in shake
`flasks on MMU medium with 5 g of glucose · liter⫺1 as the sole carbon
`source. Three independent replicate cultures gave the same results.
`
`medium to remove residual substrates and metabolites. The washed cells were
`used to inoculate (initial OD660 of 0.1) fresh shake flasks containing MMU
`medium with 5 ml of ethanol · liter⫺1 and 1 g of glucose · liter⫺1. During the
`exponential growth phase, cells were harvested as described above, washed, and
`resuspended in the medium used for the final shake flask cultivation, which was
`MMU medium with glucose as the sole carbon source at a concentration of 1, 5,
`10, 50, or 100 g · liter⫺1. Growth was monitored by regular OD660 measurements.
`When OD660 was above 0.3, samples were diluted in MMU medium containing
`the same glucose concentration as the culture, to avoid changes in OD660 due to
`osmotic effects.
`Chemostat cultivation. Chemostat cultures were grown in 1-liter working-
`volume laboratory fermentors as described previously (31). This reference also
`describes procedures for gas analysis and determination of biomass dry weight.
`One-hundred-milliliter precultures in shake flasks, inoculated with 2 ml of a
`frozen stock culture, were grown to stationary phase on YPED medium. These
`precultures were used to inoculate a fermentor containing 1 liter of MMA
`medium [5.0 g of (NH4)2SO4 · liter⫺1, 3.0 g of KH2PO4 · liter⫺1, 0.5 g of
`MgSO4 · 7H2O per liter, vitamins, and trace elements as in the MMU medium
`described above] supplemented with 1 g of glucose · liter⫺1 and 10 ml of
`ethanol · liter⫺1. The continuous medium supply was initiated when a steep
`increase of the dissolved-oxygen concentration indicated depletion of the carbon
`source. The synthetic medium used for continuous cultivation was MMA me-
`dium supplemented with 7.5 g of glucose · liter⫺1 (60% of total carbon) and 83
`mM ethanol (40% of total carbon). The dilution rate was set at 0.05 h⫺1. For
`growth on glucose as a sole carbon source, the feed of the chemostat culture
`growing on the glucose-ethanol mixture was switched to the same medium
`without ethanol.
`Batch cultivation in fermentors. One milliliter of frozen stock culture of the
`glucose-adapted CEN.PK546-12B strain (CEN.PK546-AHG, where AHG is a
`designation for adapted to high glucose; see Results) was inoculated in shake
`flasks with double-strength MMU medium supplemented with 400 g of
`glucose · liter⫺1. After 4 days of incubation, 150 ml of this culture was transferred
`to a 2-liter laboratory fermentor (Applikon, Schiedam, The Netherlands). The
`fermentor was previously autoclaved (20 min at 110°C) while containing 1.2 liters
`of demineralized water with 600 g of glucose and 100 ␮l of silicone antifoam
`(BDH). Together with the inoculum, 45 ml of a solution containing 9 g of urea
`and 100 ml of 30-fold concentrated MM medium (MMU without urea) was
`added. This yielded an initial culture volume of 1.5 liters consisting of double-
`strength MMU medium and an initial glucose concentration of 400 g·liter⫺1. The
`
`FIG. 3. Effect of glucose concentration on the specific growth rate
`of isogenic S. cerevisiae tpi1⌬ (䊐) and tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ (E)
`strains and a tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬-AHG (adapted to high glucose)
`strain (F) in shake flask cultures. All cultures were grown on MMU
`medium supplemented with different initial glucose concentrations.
`Data are presented as the average ⫾ mean deviation of at least two
`independent replicate cultures for each glucose concentration.
`
`pH was kept at 5.0 by an Applikon ADI 1030 biocontroller, via the automatic
`addition of 4 M KOH or 4 M H2SO4. The fermentor was aerated (0.75
`liter · min⫺1) and stirred at 900 rpm. Additional antifoam was added manually
`when foaming occurred. Biomass growth was monitored by OD660 measure-
`ments (when necessary, diluted in a 400-g 䡠 liter⫺1 glucose solution) and via
`biomass dry-weight measurements (31). Metabolite concentrations were deter-
`mined by high-performance liquid chromatography (30). High-biomass-density
`cultures were performed in the same way, but were inoculated with 200 ml of a
`stationary-phase fermentor culture grown as described above.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Growth on glucose in shake flask cultures. Previously pub-
`lished reports state that tpi1⌬ mutants of S. cerevisiae are
`unable to grow on glucose as the sole carbon source, both in
`shake flasks (9, 38) and in chemostat cultures (11). This was
`confirmed in shake flask cultures
`containing 5 g of
`glucose · liter⫺1, in which the specific growth rate was below
`0.01 h⫺1 (Fig. 2). To investigate whether this inability to grow
`on glucose was due to mitochondrial reoxidation of cytosolic
`NADH and/or G3P (Fig. 1), thus preventing the complete
`reduction of dihydroxyacetone phosphate, a tpi1⌬ nde1⌬
`nde2⌬ gut2⌬ mutant was constructed. Indeed, this quadruple
`deletion mutant was able to grow on glucose with a specific
`growth rate of 0.045 h⫺1 (Fig. 2). Yet, this specific growth rate
`is still substantially lower than that of the isogenic wild-type
`strain CEN.PK113-7D, which under these conditions exhibits a
`ca. eightfold-higher specific growth rate (data not shown).
`Specific growth rates of the tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain
`on glucose strongly depended on the glucose concentration in
`the medium (Fig. 3). At glucose concentrations of 50 g · liter⫺1
`and higher, the specific growth rate of the quadruple deletion
`
`

`

`2818
`
`OVERKAMP ET AL.
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`TABLE 4. Growth of the reference strain S. cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D and the isogenic tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ mutant CEN.PK546-12B.a
`
`Strain (relevant genotype)
`
`qO2
`
`qCO2
`
`Glycerol yield
`Biomass yield
`(mol·mol glucose⫺1)
`(g·g glucose⫺1)
`1.4 ⫾ 0.1
`1.3 ⫾ 0.1
`⬍0.01
`0.47 ⫾ 0.01
`CEN PK113-7D (TPI1 NDE1 NDE2 GUT2)
`2.7 ⫾ 0.3
`2.2 ⫾ 0.2
`0.83 ⫾ 0.01
`0.20 ⫾ 0.02
`CEN.PK546-12B (tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬)
`a Strains were grown in aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures (30°C, pH 5.0, dilution rate ⫽ 0.05 h⫺1, 7.5 g of glucose·liter⫺1 in feed). Data are presented as
`the average ⫾ mean deviation of two independent chemostat experiments for each strain. Values for qO2 and qCO2 are in millimoles per gram per hour.
`
`Carbon recovery
`(%)
`
`95
`98
`
`strain was very low and similar to that of the tpi1⌬ single
`mutant. Conversion of glucose into equimolar amounts of glyc-
`erol and pyruvate is neutral in terms of ATP and redox me-
`tabolism. Therefore, growth of the tpi1⌬ mutants on glucose
`critically depends on respiration for ATP production. The syn-
`thesis of many enzymes involved in the respiratory dissimila-
`tion of pyruvate is subject to glucose catabolite repression (16,
`50), which may explain the glucose sensitivity of the tpi1⌬
`nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain.
`Glucose-limited chemostat cultivation. Analysis of fermen-
`tation products in glucose-grown shake flask cultures sug-
`gested that the tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain produced large
`amounts of glycerol. For a quantitative analysis of biomass and
`product yields, the tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain and the
`reference strain CEN.PK113-7D were grown in aerobic, glu-
`cose-limited chemostat cultures. In such cultures, glucose ca-
`tabolite repression can be alleviated by the low-residual-glu-
`cose concentrations. The biomass yield of the tpi1⌬ nde1⌬
`nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain was more than twofold lower than the
`reference strain during growth at a dilution rate of 0.05 h⫺1
`(Table 4). This was partly due to the conversion of glucose into
`glycerol. The molar yield of glycerol on glucose was 0.83
`mol · mol⫺1. Under the same cultivation conditions, the iso-
`genic reference strain CEN.PK113-7D did not produce detect-
`able amounts of glycerol. The extensive production of glycerol
`is consistent with the metabolic scheme proposed in Fig. 1.
`This scheme predicts a glycerol yield of 1 mol · mol⫺1. The
`lower glycerol yield in the glucose-limited chemostat cultures
`can be explained from the assimilation of glucose-6-phosphate
`via metabolic pathways other than glycolysis, such as the pen-
`tose phosphate pathway, cell wall biosynthesis, and storage
`carbohydrate biosynthesis.
`Selection of a strain adapted to high-glucose concentra-
`tions. The glycerol yield (0.83 mol · mol glucose⫺1, i.e., 0.42
`g · g of glucose⫺1) in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of the
`tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain is among the highest reported
`for a growing, metabolically engineered S. cerevisiae strain,
`although it is matched by a bioconversion process with the
`nongrowing tpi1⌬ strain (Table 1). However, the glucose sen-
`sitivity of the quadruple mutant is a drawback for any large-
`scale application in glycerol production. The tpi1⌬ nde1⌬
`nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain (CEN.PK 546-12B) was adapted to growth
`at high-glucose concentrations by serial transfer. This was
`started by transferring 10 ml of a steady-state glucose-limited
`chemostat culture to a shake flask containing MMA medium
`with 100 g of glucose · liter⫺1 (555 mM). This culture showed
`extremely slow growth accompanied by acetate production and
`a decrease of the culture pH to ca. 3. After 2 days, growth and
`acetate production ceased. After another 4 days, acetate con-
`sumption occurred and growth resumed. Eventually the low
`
`pH (ca. 2.5) caused by ammonia consumption abolished
`growth altogether, despite the presence of approximately 350
`mM residual glucose. From this culture, 1 ml was transferred
`to a new shake flask with the same medium. No acetate pro-
`duction was observed, but acidification again prevented com-
`plete consumption of glucose. Use of urea instead of ammo-
`nium salts as the sole nitrogen source can sometimes prevent
`acidification of yeast cultures (24). Therefore, 1 ml of culture
`was transferred to a shake flask with MMU medium containing
`100 g of glucose · liter⫺1. This indeed led to complete con-
`sumption of glucose. A total of 0.5 ml of culture was trans-
`ferred to the next flask with the same medium. After two
`further transfers, the culture was streaked onto agar plates
`with MMU medium containing 50 g of glucose · liter⫺1. The
`culture was purified by three subsequent transfers of a single
`colony to a new plate. Finally, a single colony was transferred
`to a shake flask with MMU medium containing 100 g of
`glucose · liter⫺1. This glucose-adapted culture of the tpi1⌬
`nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain was called CEN.PK546-AHG. Es-
`pecially at high-glucose concentrations, the selected mutant
`exhibited much higher specific growth rates than the original,
`nonadapted tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain (Fig. 3).
`Production of glycerol by engineered S. cerevisiae. Glycerol
`production by S. cerevisiae CEN.PK546-AHG was investigated
`in aerated batch cultures with 400 g of glucose · liter⫺1, which
`were inoculated from glucose-grown shake flasks at 0.3 g (dry
`weight) · liter⫺1. Despite the high initial glucose concentration,
`these batch cultures exhibited exponential growth (␮ ⫽ 0.027
`h⫺1). The slow growth was accompanied by the accumulation
`of glycerol to a final concentration of over 200 g · liter⫺1 (data
`not shown). Glycerol was the major fermentation product.
`Concentrations of acetate and ethanol remained below 1.5 and
`4 g · liter⫺1, respectively, and were completely consumed to-
`wards the end of fermentation (data not shown). Throughout
`the fermentation process, the glycerol yield on glucose was 1.0
`mol · mol⫺1. Due to the low initial biomass concentration and
`the long start-up period, the overall glycerol production rate
`was 1.0 g glycerol · liter⫺1·h⫺1. When the experiment was re-
`peated with an initial biomass dry weight of 3.9 g · liter⫺1 (Fig.
`4A), all glucose was consumed in 80 h and the final concen-
`tration of glycerol was 219 g · liter⫺1. The molar ratio of glyc-
`erol produced per glucose consumed was 0.99 mol · mol⫺1
`(Fig. 4B), and the overall glycerol production rate was 2.4 g
`glycerol · liter⫺1 · h⫺1. Glycerol consumption did not occur,
`even after glucose depletion. Most wild-type S. cerevisiae
`strains can consume glycerol, although it is a very poor carbon
`and energy source (43, 49). However, in the quadruple mutant,
`glycerol dissimilation is not possible as the deletion of the
`GUT2 gene and the absence of triose phosphate isomerase
`block the oxidation pathway.
`
`

`

`VOL. 68, 2002
`
`GLYCEROL PRODUCTION IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE
`
`2819
`
`served for other glycolytic mutants of S. cerevisiae and K. lactis
`(17, 22). This has been attributed to the ability of K. lactis, but
`not S. cerevisiae, to couple the oxidation of cytosolic NADPH
`to the mitochondrial respiratory chain (20). This coupling en-
`ables glycolytic null mutants of K. lactis to use the pentose
`phosphate pathway, with its NADP⫹-linked dehydrogenases,
`as an alternative dissimilatory pathway (20, 26). In tpi1⌬ mu-
`tants, this partial bypass of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase
`(6) generates sufficient NADH to prevent the accumulation of
`DHAP.
`Even when glucose dissimilation cannot be rerouted via the
`pentose phosphate pathway, the metabolic network of S. cer-
`evisiae should, at least in theory, be sufficiently flexible to allow
`for growth on glucose in the absence of an active triose phos-
`phate isomerase. However, this demands that all NADH pro-
`duced in the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase reac-
`tion be used for reduction of DHAP to glycerol (Fig. 1). The
`inability of the tpi1⌬ mutant to grow on glucose as a sole
`carbon source and the partial restoration of growth in a qua-
`druple tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ strain (Fig. 2), indicates that
`mitochondrial oxidation of NADH and/or G3P competes for
`the NADH formed in glycolysis and thus contributes to the
`phenotype of tpi1⌬ mutants. This also provides an explanation
`for the restoration of growth by cofeeding ethanol or ethanol-
`formate mixtures to aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cul-
`tures of tpi1⌬ mutants (11). In these cultures, the cytosolic,
`NAD⫹-dependent alcohol and formate dehydrogenases can
`provide sufficient NADH for complete reduction of DHAP,
`even in the presence of an active mitochondrial respiratory
`chain. Interestingly, it has recently been proposed that the
`nonviability of a tpi⌬ mutant of the bloodstream form of the
`parasite Trypanosoma brucei is due to a similar redox problem,
`caused in this case by the activity of a mitochondrial G3P
`oxidase (23).
`Özcan et al. (38) and Schulte et al. (47) isolated and char-
`acterized suppressor mutants of a S. cerevisiae tpi1⌬ mutant
`which had regained the ability to grow on glucose. Some of the
`suppressor mutants exhibited a strongly reduced activity of
`phosphoglycerate kinase. Reduced activity of phosphoglycer-
`ate kinase will cause a reduced flux through glyceraldehyde-3-
`phosphate dehydrogenase, which in turn affects the cytosolic
`NADH/NAD⫹ ratio. As a result of the different affinities of
`isolated mitochondria and NAD⫹-dependent G3P dehydroge-
`nases for NADH (2, 40), a changed cytosolic NADH/NAD⫹
`ratio may suppress the interference of mitochondrial respira-
`tion with redox metabolism in tpi1⌬ mutants (Fig. 1). Another
`class of suppressor mutants exhibited reduced glucose uptake
`and reduced glucose repression of respiratory enzymes (38,
`47). This appears to be more difficult to reconcile with our
`hypothesis. However, isolation of the suppressor mutants was
`done with glucose-containing complex medium (38). With such
`a medium, it is difficult to assess whether growth is due solely
`to glucose consumption or to consumption of other carbon
`sources present in the complex medium (14). To further study
`the phenotype of tpi1⌬ mutants, it would be of interest to
`isolate and characterize tpi1⌬ suppressor mutants that grow on
`glucose-containing synthetic medium.
`Although the additional deletion of the NDE1, NDE2, and
`GUT2 genes restored growth of tpi1⌬ S. cerevisiae (Fig. 2), the
`specific growth rate of the resulting quadruple mutant re-
`
`FIG. 4. Glycerol production in an aerated fermentor culture with
`an initial glucose concentration of 400 g · liter⫺1 by a spontaneous
`mutant of the tpi1⌬ nde1⌬ nde2⌬ gut2⌬ S. cerevisiae strain, isolated by
`serial transfer in high-glucose medium (AHG strain). An independent
`duplicate experiment gave identical results. (A) Concentrations of
`biomass (䊐), glucose (E), and glycerol (F). (B) The molar ratio be-
`tween glucose consumed and glycerol produced during the fermenta-
`tion.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Phenotype of tpi1⌬ mutants. In many organisms, null muta-
`tions in the structural gene encoding triose phosphate isomer-
`ase or mutations that lead to severely reduced activities of this
`enzyme result in growth deficiencies (7, 8, 23, 41). The com-
`plete inability of tpi⌬ mutants to grow on glucose as the sole
`carbon source, as found with S. cerevisiae (9, 11) (Fig. 2), is not
`representative for all yeasts. A Klu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket