Paper No. 69
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`TARGET CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case No. IPR2013-00533
`(U.S. Patent No. RE43,531)
`_____________
`
`Dated: September 26, 2014
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY TO SEAL
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.54
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`TARGET CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case No. IPR2013-00533
`(U.S. Patent No. RE43,531)
`_____________
`
`Dated: September 26, 2014
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY TO SEAL
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.54
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board's September 12, 2014 Order and 37 C.F.R. § 42.14,
`
`Patent Owner Destination Maternity Corporation ("Patent Owner") and Petitioner
`
`Target Corporation ("Petitioner") jointly move to seal the following: (1) Belly
`
`Panel Notes, Ex. 1068; (2) Transcript of 7-16-2014 Brookstein Deposition, Ex.
`
`1078; (3) Transcript of 7-8-2014 Green Deposition, Ex. 1079; (4) 3/16/2011
`
`Letter from Taufer to Hinrichs, Ex. 1080; (5) Claim Chart: DMC-Target Liz
`
`Lange Pants, Ex. 1081; (6) 3/10/2011 Email from Taufer to Budow re Salsa Jeans,
`
`Ex. 1082; (7) Claim Chart: DMC-Salsa Jeans, Ex. 1083; (8) 4/6/2009 Email from
`
`K. Scarduzio to L. Hendrickson, Ex. 1089; (9) 1/16/2007 Email from L.
`
`Hendrickson re Belly Panel Notes, Ex. 1092; (10) Rebecca Piccone Deposition
`
`Transcript (10-18-13), Ex. 1093; (11) Motherhood Weekly ABT, Ex. 1095; (12)
`
`DMC Strategic Planning 5-15-2009, Ex. 1096; (13) DMAT ParallelPath, Ex.
`
`1097; (14) Macy's Pea In The Pod Promotion, Ex. 1098; (15) Babies R Us
`
`Checklist 10-10-12, Ex. 1099; (16) Babies R Us Checklist 5-2-12, Ex. 1100; (17)
`
`Macy's Re-branding package, Ex. 1101; (18) Promotion Sign List 10-17-12, Ex.
`
`1102; (19) Promotion Sign List 10-24-12, Ex. 1103; (20) Maternity bottoms
`
`spreadsheet, Ex. 1104; (21) Sales spreadsheet, Ex. 1105; (22) Confidential
`
`Information Memorandum, Ex. 1106; (23) Traffic Analysis, Ex. 1107; (24)
`
`Weekly Visual Update 7/23 - 7/27, Ex. 1108; (25) A Pea In The Pod Floorset
`
`1109; (26) Declaration of Vincent A. Thomas, Ex. 1110; (27) Sales and profits
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`2
`
`
`
`exhibit, Ex. 1113; (28) Brookstein SKUs, Ex. 1114; (29) Additional SKUs, Ex.
`
`1115; (30) Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response; and (31) Petitioner's
`
`Motion to Exclude Evidence (collectively, the "Proposed Sealed Documents").
`
`The Proposed Sealed Documents were filed on July 25, 2014 (items 1-30, above)
`
`and September 2, 2014 (item 31, above).
`
`Pursuant to the Board's September 12, 2014 Order, at 4, the Proposed
`
`Sealed Documents are cited in Petitioner's papers filed in this proceeding as
`
`follows:
`
`Exhibit No.
`1068
`1070
`1071
`
`1072
`1078
`
`1079
`
`1080
`1081
`1082
`1083
`1092
`1093
`
`Cited In
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 38 fn. 127, p. 39 fn. 128
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 7
` Ex. 1078, Brookstein Dep., at 272:9-281:12 (dep.
`exhibit)
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 7
` Paper 37, Reply, pp. 3, 5-9, 12-14
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p.17 fn. 43, 44; p. 18 fn. 45
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 13
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p.16 fn. 37-38; p. 17 fn. 43;
`p. 18 fn. 46-49; p. 19, fn. 50-55; p. 26 fn. 71, 73; p. 27
`fn. 74, 78, 79; p. 28 fn. 80, 82; p. 29 fn. 87, 88; p. 30
`fn. 89, 92, 93; p. 31 fn. 95; p. 32-33 fn. 97-107; p. 34
`fn. 109; p. 36, fn. 120; p. 37, fn. 121, 122; p. 39 fn.
`129
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 7
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 7
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 7
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 7
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p.38 fn. 127; p. 39 fn. 128
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 12 fn. 31; p. 26 fn. 72; p.
`34 fn. 110-111; p. 35 fn. 112, 114; p. 36 fn. 117; p. 37
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`3
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`1095
`1096
`1097
`1098
`1099
`1100
`1101
`1102
`1103
`1104
`1105
`1106
`1107
`1108
`1109
`1110
`1113
`
`1114
`1115
`1117
`
`Cited In
`fn. 123; p. 38 fn. 127
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 38 fn. 126
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 36 fn. 117
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 39 fn. 130
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 35 fn. 114
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 35 fn. 114
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 35 fn. 114
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 35 fn. 113
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 35 fn. 114
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 35 fn. 114
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 39 fn. 128
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 38 fn. 128
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 36 fn. 117
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 35 fn. 115
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 12 fn. 32
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 36 fn. 117
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 13
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 12-13 and fn. 34-35; p. 17
`fn. 42;
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 17 fn. 41-42
` Ex. 1110, Thomas Decl. p. 17 fn. 40; p. 38 fn. 125
` Paper 37, Reply, p. 2
`
`Petitioner initially moved to seal Exhibits 1070, 1071, 1072 on July 25,
`
`2014 because Petitioner recognized that Patent Owner marked Exhibits 1070,
`
`1071, 1072 "confidential". After additional review of these documents, Patent
`
`Owner does not believe that Exhibits 1070, 1071, 1072 should be maintained
`
`confidential and sealed. As such, the parties do not move to seal these documents
`
`here.
`
`Pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this Inter Partes Review, the
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`4
`
`
`
`parties are also filing partially redacted public versions of the Proposed Sealed
`
`Documents. See Protective Order, ¶ 4 (Paper No. 26). Because the Proposed
`
`Sealed Documents contain nonpublic technical, financial, and other commercially
`
`sensitive information,
`
`the Parties jointly move to seal
`
`them for good cause
`
`explained in more detail below.
`
`I.
`
`Good Cause Exists for Sealing Confidential Information
`
`The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide provides that "[t]he rules aim to
`
`strike a balance between the public's interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history and the parties' interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information." 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012). Further, those "rules
`
`identify confidential information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret or
`
`other confidential research, development, or commercial information." Id. (citing
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.54); see also Illumina v. Columbia University, IPR2013-00011,
`
`Paper 66, Aug. 12, 2013 Dec. (granting a motion to seal "technical and business
`
`information" and "product development information").
`
`There is good cause to seal the Proposed Sealed Documents because they
`
`contain nonpublic technical,
`
`financial, and other commercially sensitive
`
`information as described below for each document.
`
`(1) Belly Panel Notes, Ex. 1068:
`
`this document contains nonpublic
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`5
`
`
`
`technical, commercially sensitive information of product research, development,
`
`design, and testing of Patent Owner's products and investigation of third-party
`
`products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation and designated
`
`"Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the
`
`Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause
`
`exists to seal this document.
`
`(2) Transcript of 7-16-2014 Brookstein Deposition, Ex. 1078: this document
`
`contains nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of product
`
`development, design, and testing of Patent Owner's products. This document
`
`discusses Ex. 1068, discussed above, and information related to the declaration of
`
`Philip Green, which has been sealed in this proceeding. The document was also
`
`designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under
`
`the Protective Order in this proceeding. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal
`
`this document.
`
`(3) Transcript of 7-8-2014 Green Deposition, Ex. 1079: this document
`
`contains nonpublic commercially sensitive information of product pricing for
`
`Patent Owner's products. This document also discusses Mr. Green's declaration
`
`and exhibits thereto, which have already been sealed in this proceeding. The
`
`document was also agreed to be designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys'
`
`Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order in this proceeding, but
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`6
`
`
`
`this designation was not on the final copy due to stenographer error. Accordingly,
`
`good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(4-7) 3/16/2011 Letter from Taufer to Hinrichs, Claim Chart: DMC-Target
`
`Liz Lange Pants, 3/10/2011 Email from Taufer to Budow re Salsa Jeans, Claim
`
`Chart: DMC-Salsa Jeans, Exs. 1080-83:
`
`these documents contain nonpublic
`
`sensitive information not readily available to the general public where Patent
`
`Owner was communicating with competitors regarding the Patents-in-Suit. The
`
`documents were produced in the underlying litigation and designated
`
`"Confidential" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the U.S.
`
`District Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal these documents.
`
`(8) 4/6/2009 Email from K. Scarduzio to L. Hendrickson, Ex. 1089: this
`
`document contains nonpublic commercially sensitive information regarding
`
`investigation of third-party products and product research and development for
`
`Patent Owner's products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation
`
`and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner
`
`under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good
`
`cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(9) 1/16/2007 Email from L. Hendrickson re Belly Panel Notes, Ex. 1092:
`
`this document contains nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of
`
`product research, development, design, and testing for Patent Owner's products
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`7
`
`
`
`and investigation of third-party products. The document was produced in the
`
`underlying litigation and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes
`
`Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District
`
`Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(10) Rebecca Piccone Deposition Transcript (10-18-13), Ex. 1093: this
`
`document contains nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of
`
`marketing, sales, product research, development, design, and testing for Patent
`
`Owner's products. The deposition was taken in the underlying litigation and
`
`designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under
`
`the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. The deposition also
`
`discusses confidential documents produced in the underlying litigation, some of
`
`which are included in this Motion, for example, Ex. 1097. Accordingly, good
`
`cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(11) Motherhood Weekly ABT, Ex. 1095: this document contains nonpublic
`
`technical, commercially sensitive information of product research, development,
`
`design, testing and pricing of Patent Owner's products. The document was
`
`produced in the underlying litigation and designated "Highly Confidential --
`
`Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the
`
`U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(12) DMC Strategic Planning 5-15-2009, Ex. 1096: this document contains
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`8
`
`
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of product research,
`
`development, design,
`
`testing and pricing of Patent Owner's products. The
`
`document was produced in the underlying litigation and designated "Highly
`
`Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order
`
`entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this
`
`document.
`
`(13) DMAT ParallelPath, Ex. 1097: this document contains nonpublic
`
`technical, commercially sensitive information of product research, development,
`
`design, testing and pricing of Patent Owner's products. The document was
`
`produced in the underlying litigation and designated "Highly Confidential --
`
`Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the
`
`U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(14) Macy's Pea In The Pod Promotion, Ex. 1098: this document contains
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of product pricing of
`
`Patent Owner's products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation
`
`and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner
`
`under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good
`
`cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(15) Babies R Us Checklist 10-10-12, Ex. 1099: this document contains
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of product pricing of
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`9
`
`
`
`Patent Owner's products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation
`
`and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner
`
`under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good
`
`cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(16) Babies R Us Checklist 5-2-12, Ex. 1100: this document contains
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of product pricing of
`
`Patent Owner's products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation
`
`and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner
`
`under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good
`
`cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(17) Macy's Re-branding package, Ex. 1101:
`
`this document contains
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of marketing strategy and
`
`product pricing of Patent Owner's products. The document was produced in the
`
`underlying litigation and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes
`
`Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District
`
`Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(18) Promotion Sign List 10-17-12, Ex. 1102:
`
`this document contains
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of marketing strategy and
`
`product pricing of Patent Owner's products. The document was produced in the
`
`underlying litigation and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`10
`
`
`
`Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District
`
`Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(19) Promotion Sign List 10-24-12, Ex. 1103:
`
`this document contains
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of marketing strategy and
`
`product pricing of Patent Owner's products. The document was produced in the
`
`underlying litigation and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes
`
`Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District
`
`Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(20) Maternity bottoms spreadsheet, Ex. 1104:
`
`this document contains
`
`nonpublic technical, commercially sensitive information of marketing strategy,
`
`product pricing and competitor pricing and product analysis of Patent Owner's
`
`products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation and designated
`
`"Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the
`
`Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause
`
`exists to seal this document.
`
`(21) Sales spreadsheet, Ex. 1105:
`
`this document contains nonpublic
`
`commercially sensitive information of pricing and product analysis of Patent
`
`Owner's products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation and
`
`designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under
`
`the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`11
`
`
`
`exists to seal this document.
`
`(22) Confidential Information Memorandum, Ex. 1106:
`
`this document
`
`contains nonpublic commercially sensitive information of pricing and product
`
`analysis of Patent Owner's products.
`
`The document was produced in the
`
`underlying litigation and designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes
`
`Only" by Patent Owner under the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District
`
`Court. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal this document.
`
`(23) Traffic Analysis, Ex. 1107:
`
`this document contains nonpublic
`
`commercially sensitive information of marketing analysis for Patent Owner's
`
`products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation and designated
`
`"Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the
`
`Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause
`
`exists to seal this document.
`
`(24) Weekly Visual Update 7/23 - 7/27, Ex. 1108: this document contains
`
`nonpublic commercially sensitive information of marketing strategy for Patent
`
`Owner's products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation and
`
`designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under
`
`the Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause
`
`exists to seal this document.
`
`(25) A Pea In The Pod Floorset 1109: this document contains nonpublic
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`12
`
`
`
`commercially sensitive information of marketing strategy for Patent Owner's
`
`products. The document was produced in the underlying litigation and designated
`
`"Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Patent Owner under the
`
`Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court. Accordingly, good cause
`
`exists to seal this document.
`
`(26-29) The Declaration of Vincent A. Thomas, Ex. 1110, and its exhibits,
`
`Exs. 1113-15, contain nonpublic commercially sensitive information of DMC
`
`product sales of Patent Owner's products. These documents contain information
`
`related to the declaration of Philip Green regarding sales of Patent Owner's
`
`products, which has been sealed in this proceeding. The documents were also
`
`designated "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Petitioner under the
`
`Protective Order in this proceeding. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal these
`
`documents.
`
`(30-31) Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response and Petitioner's
`
`Motion to Exclude Evidence: these documents contain nonpublic commercially
`
`sensitive information from Mr. Green's declaration and exhibits regarding Patent
`
`Owner's product sales. Mr. Green's documents were previously sealed in this
`
`proceeding. Accordingly, good cause exists to seal these documents.
`
`II.
`
`Certification of Non-Publication
`
`The undersigned counsel certify that the information sought to be sealed by
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`13
`
`
`
`this Motion to Seal has not, to their knowledge, been published or otherwise
`
`made public. The Parties have made efforts to maintain the confidentiality of
`
`this information in this proceeding and in a related district court proceeding
`
`between the parties in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
`
`Pennsylvania (CA. No. 2:12-cv05680 AB).
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`Accordingly, the Parties request that the Proposed Sealed Documents be
`
`sealed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.14.
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`14
`
`
`
`Date: September 26, 2014
`
`FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP
`s/ Norman J. Hedges
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`s/ Paul A. Taufer
`
`Norman J. Hedges (Reg. No. 44,151)
`R. Trevor Carter (Reg. No. 40,549)
`Daniel M. Lechleiter (Reg. No. 58,254)
`Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
`300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700
`Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-1750
`norman.hedges@FaegreBD.com
`trevor.carter@FaegreBD.com
`daniel.lechleiter@FaegreBD.com
`Telephone: 317-237-0300
`Facsimile: 317-237-1000
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner, Target
`Corporation
`
`Paul A. Taufer (Reg. No. 35,703)
`Michael L. Burns (Reg. No. 57,593)
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`One Liberty Place
`1650 Market Street, Suite 4900
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Phone: (215) 656-3385
`Facsimile: (215) 606-3385
`paul.taufer@dlapiper.com
`michael.burns@dlapiper.com
`
`Stuart Pollack (Reg. No. 43,862)
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`1251 Avenue of the Americas
`27th Floor
`New York, NY 10020-1104
`Phone: (212) 335-4964
`Facsimile: (212) 884-
`stuart.pollack@dlapiper.com
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner, Destination
`Maternity Corporation
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`15
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on September 26, 2014, a complete and entire
`
`copy of the Joint Motion For Entry To Seal Under 37 C.F.R. §42.54 was provided
`
`via email to the Petitioner by serving the email correspondence address of record
`
`as follows:
`
`Norman J. Hedges
`R. Trevor Carter
`Daniel M. Lechleiter
`Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
`300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700
`Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-1750
`Phone: (317) 237-0300
`Fax: (317) 237-1000
`Norman.Hedges@FaegreBD.com
`trevor.carter@FaegreBD.com
`daniel.lechleiter@FaegreBD.com
`
`/s/ Paul Taufer
`Paul A. Taufer
`
`EAST\83023862.1
`
`16
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
