throbber
be adversely impacted, as we may have difficulty shipping merchandise to our main distribution facility and retail locatio11s, as Well as fulfilling
`catalog and website orders.
`
`The terms ofour debt instruments imposefinancial and operating restrictions.
`
`Our credit facility and tl1c indenture governing the senior notes both contain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities
`that may be in our long term best interests. These covenants limit or restrict, among other things, our ability to:
`0 inc11r additional indebtedness;
`
`opay dividends or make other distributions in respect of our equity securities, or purchase or redeem capital stock, or Inake certain
`investments;
`
`ohave our subsidiaries pay dividends, make loans or transfer assets to us;
`
`osell assets, i11cluding the capital stock of our subsidiaries;
`
`center into any transactions with our affiliates;
`
`otransfer any capital stock of any subsidiary or permit any sub sidiary to issue capital stock;
`ocreate liens;
`
`center into certain sale/leasehack transactions‘, and
`
`Ieffect a consolidation or merger or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets.
`
`These li111itatio11s and restrictions may adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or Capital needs or engage i11 other
`business activities that may be in our best interests. In addition, our ability to borrow under the credit facility is subject to borrowing base
`requirements. If we breach any of the covenants in our credit facility or our indenture, we may be in default under our credit facility or our
`indenture. If we default, the holders of the senior notes or the lender under our credit facility could declare all borrowings owed to them, including
`accrued interest and other fees, to be due and payable.
`
`Our sh are price may be volatile and could decline substantially.
`
`The market price of our common stock has been. and is expected to continue to be, volatile, both because of actual and perceived changes in
`our financial results and prospects and because of general volatility in the stock market. The factors that could cause fluctuations in our share
`price may include, among other factors discussed in this section, the following:
`
`oactual or anticipated variations i11 the financial results and prospects of our business or other companies i11 the retail business;
`
`ochanges in financial estimates by Wall Street research analysts;
`
`oactual or anticipated changes in the U.S. economy or the retailing environment;
`
`ochanges in the market valuations of other specialty apparel or retail companies;
`
`oannouncements by our competitors or us;
`
`oadditions and departures ofkey personnel;
`
`ochanges in accounting principles;
`
`othe passage oflegislation or other developments affecting us or our industry;
`
`othe trading volume of our common stock i11 the public market;
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2006 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_023
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`ochanges in economic conditions;
`ofinancial market conditions;
`
`onatural disasters, terrorist acts, acts of war or periods of civil unrest;
`othe realization of some or all of the risks described in this section entitled “Risk Factors”; and
`
`oany goodwill impairment would require a write down that would likely negatively affect our stock price.
`In addition, the stock markets have experienced significant price and trading volume fluctuations from time to time, and the market prices of
`the equity securities of retailers have been extremely volatile and have recently experienced sharp price and trading volume changes. These broad
`markct fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
`
`Our charter documents contain certain anti-takeover provisions, and we are entitled to certain oth er protective provisions under Delaware
`law.
`
`We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of a third party to
`acquire control of the Company, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. We also l1ave adopted a stockholder
`rights plan, commonly known as a “poison pill,” that entitles our stockholders to acquire additional shares of us, or a potential acquirer of us, at a
`substantial discount to their market value in the event of an attempted takeover. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
`and by-laws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider
`favorable by, among other things:
`
`oauthorizing the issuance of preferred stock, the terms of which maybe determined at the discretion of o11r board of directors;
`
`orestricting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stocklloltlers;
`
`oproviding for a classified board of directors, with staggered three-year terms; and
`
`-establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on
`by stockholders at meetings.
`These provisions may also reduce the market value of our common stock.
`
`We do not expect to pay cash rlividemls in theforeseeablefuture.
`
`We have 11ot paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our initial public offering and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on
`our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our senior notes and our credit facility significantly restrict our ability to
`declare or pay dividends on our common stock. Even if our ability to pay dividends was not restricted under the terms of the indenture governing
`our scnior notcs or our crcdit facility, any future paymcnt ofdividcnds would still bc at thc discretion of our board of directors and would bc bascd
`upon any applicable restrictive financial covenants, earnings, capital requirements and our financial condition, among other factors, at the time any
`such dividend is considered.
`
`Any increase in our sales and marketing efforts that target markets outside the U. S. would expose us to additional risks associated with
`international operations.
`
`We believe that in the future, an opportunity for sales growth may come from the development of international sales. We may not be
`successfiil in these efforts. and other than our existing operations in
`
`24
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2006 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O24
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Canada, we presently have no commitment, agreement or plans relating to any product distribution or the development of selling operations
`outside of\Iorth America. International operations and sales subject us to risks and challenges that We would otherwise not face if we conducted
`our business only in the U.S. For example, we may depend o11 third parties to market our products through foreign sales channels, and we may be
`challenged by laws and business practices favoring local competitors. In addition, our ability to succeed in foreign markets will depend on our
`ability to protect our intellectual property. We must also adopt our pricing structure to address different pricing environments and may face
`difficulty in enforcing revenue collection internationally. To the extent we achieve significant sales outside of the U.S. in the future, we may have
`significant exposure to fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates.
`
`We could havefailures in our system of internal controls.
`
`We maintain a documented system of internal controls which is reviewed and monitored by management, who meet regularly with our audit
`committee of the board of directors. We believe we have a well-designed system to maintain adequate internal controls on the business. We
`ca1111ot assure you that there will 11ot be any co11trol deficiencies in the filture. Should we become aware of any control deficiencies, we would
`report them to the audit committee and recommend prompt remediation. We have devoted significant resources to document, test, monitor and
`improve our internal controls and will continue to do so; however, we cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that our controls are
`adequate iii the future or that adequate controls will be effective in preventing fraud. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls,
`we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. Any failures in the effectiveness of our internal controls could have
`a material adverse effect o11 our financial condition or operating results or cause us to fail to meet reporting obligations.
`
`Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
`
`Not applicable.
`
`Item 2. Properties
`
`We own our principal executive offices and distribution facility, which is located at 456 North Fifth Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, subject
`to a mortgage under the terms of which we owe approximately $2.8 million as of September 30, 2006. This facility consists of approximately 318,000
`square feet, of which approximately 45,000 square feet is dedicated to office space and the remaining square footage is used for finished goods
`warehousing and distribution. 011 August 26, 2002, we entered into a ten-year lease for a facility located at 2001 Kitty Hawk Avenue, Philadelphia,
`Pennsylvania in the Philadelphia Naval Business Center. The area leased at this facility, which we use for raw material cutting, warehousing and
`distribution, consists of approximately 64,000 square feet of space. To facilitate our store growth in Canada, we entered i11to a three-yea.r lease
`commencing November 1, 2002 for approximately 12,000 square feet of finished goods warehouse and distribution space in Mississauga, Ontario in
`Canada. We renewed the lease in Canada through October 31, 2007. We believe that these facilities will be adequate to support our anticipated
`distribution needs for the near term and, potentially, lo11ger. In the event we need additional space to meet our future distribution needs, we believe
`that such space would be readily available. Our facilities are subject to state and local regulations that range from building codes to health and
`safetv.
`
`We lease our store premises for terms averaging from seven to ten years. Certain leases allow us to terminate or reduce o11r obligations at
`specified points in time in the event that the applicable store does not achieve a specified sales volume. Some of our store leases also provide for
`contingent payments based on sales volume, escalations of the base rent, as well as increases in operating costs, marketing costs and real estate
`taxes.
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2006 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O25
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`As ofSepte1nber 30, 2006, the following number of store leases are set to expire as listed in the table below. We do not expect the expiration of
`any leases to have a material adverse impact on our business or operations.
`
`Fiscal Year Lenses
`Expire
`
`2007
`2008
`2009
`2010
`2011
`2012 and later
`Total
`
`Number
`of
`Stores
`88
`l00
`l2l
`H0
`69
`322
`810
`
`In addition to the stores we operate, we have arrangements with department and specialty stores, including Babies ”R” Us, Bloomingdale‘s,
`Macy’s and Sears, to operate maternity departments in their stores. These leased departments typically involve the lease partner collecting all of
`the revenue from the leased department. The revenue is remitted to us, less a fixed percentage of the volume earned by the lease partner as
`stipulated in the agreement. We provide at least some amount of staffing for each of the leased departments, with the amount varying depending
`on the specific airarlgenlent.
`
`Item 3. Legal Proceedings
`
`On January 12, 2005, a purported class action was filed against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The complaint
`alleged that. u11dcr applicable federal and state law, ccrtain former and current employees should have received ovcrtimc compensation. The
`plaintiffs in this case sought unspecified actual damages, penalties and attorneys’ fees. We understand that similar proceedings have been
`brought against otl1er retail companies. In July 2006, the parties settled the outstanding claims and entered into a confidential settlement
`agreement, and on August 1, 2006, the District Court approved the settlement and dismissed the case. The terms of the settlement did not and will
`not have a material adverse effect on our results of operation or financial position.
`In addition, from time to time, we are named as a defendant in legal actions arising from our normal business activities. Litigation is inherently
`unpredictable and although the amount of any liability that could arise with respect to currently pending actions cannot be accurately predicted,
`we do not believe that the resolution of any pending action will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or
`liquidity.
`
`Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
`
`Not applicable.
`
`Source: DESTINATION MAT'ERNITY CORR,
`
`lO~K, 1.?/'14/2086 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O26
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
`
`Our common stock is traded on the ,\1asdaq Global Market under the symbol “MWRK.” The following table sets forth for the periods
`indicated below the reported high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the ,\1asdaq Global Market:
`
`PART II.
`
`Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2005:
`Quarter ended December 31, 2004
`Quaiter ended March 31, 2005
`Quarter ended June 30, 2005
`Quarter ended September 30, 2005
`Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2006:
`Quarter ended December 31, 2005
`Quarter ended March 31, 2006
`Quarter ended June 30, 2006
`Quarter ended September 30, 2006
`
`High
`
`Low
`
`$ 1866
`15.59
`15.00
`13.66
`
`$ 13.19
`26.21
`35.20
`50.83
`
`T19
`
`119
`
`1 1.75
`12.43
`11.58
`10.00
`
`6.72
`12.79
`20.12
`30.26
`
`As of December 4, 2006, there were 917 holders of record and 2,695 estimated beneficial holders of our common stock.
`
`We have not paid any cash dividends on our con1mon stock since our initial public offering and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on
`our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our 11'/4% senior notes due 2010 (the “Senior Notes”) and our credit facility
`significantly restrict our ability to dec1 are or pay dividends on our common stock. Even ifwe were not restricted under the terms of our Senior
`Notes or our credit facility from being able to pay dividends, any future payment of dividends would still be at the discretion ofour Board of
`Directors and would be based upon certain restrictive financial covenants, earnings, capital requirements a11d our financial condition, among other
`factors, at the time any such dividend is considered.
`Up to a total of 1,975,000 options may be issued under our 1987 Stock Option Plan. Under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”),
`awards may be granted in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or restricted stock units. Up to 500,000 shares of our
`common stock may be issued in respect of awards under our 2005 Plan, with no more than 250.000 ofthose shares permitted to be issued in respect
`of restricted stock or restiioted stock units granted under the 2005 Plan.
`
`Source: DESTINATION MAT'ERNITY CORR,
`
`‘lO~K, 1.?/'14/2086 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O27
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data
`
`The following tables set forth selected data pertaining to the consolidated statement of operations, operating, cash flow and other, and
`balance sheet as of and for the periods indicated. The selected consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet data for each of the five
`fiscal years presented below are derived from our consolidated financial statements. You should read this information in conjunction with
`‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition a11d Results of Operations” a11d our consolidated financial statements a11d the
`related notes included elsewhere in this report.
`
`Statement of Operations Data:
`Net sales
`Cost of goods sold (2)
`Gross profit
`Selling, general and administrative expenses (2)
`Operating income
`Interest expense, net (2)
`Loss on exlinguishmenl ofdebl (1)(2)
`Income (loss) before income taxes
`Income tax provision (benefit)
`Net income (loss)
`Dividends on preferred stock (1)
`Net income (loss) available to common
`st0(;kh01ders
`
`Net income (loss) per share—Basic
`Average shares outstanding—Basic
`
`Net income (loss) per share—Di1uted
`Average shares ontstanding—Diluted
`
`2006
`
`Year Ended September 30,
`2005
`2004
`2003
`(in thousands, except per share amounts)
`
`$ 602,744
`288,082
`314,662
`284,334
`30,328
`14,534
`873
`14,921
`5,819
`9,102
`—
`
`$
`
`$
`
`‘,5
`
`9,102
`
`1_70
`5,348
`
`L63
`5,591
`
`S 561,627
`277,453
`284,174
`269,936
`14,238
`15,293
`—
`(1,055 )
`(880 )
`(175 )
`—
`
`$ 518,051
`242,751
`275,300
`252,030
`23.270
`14,765
`—
`8,505
`3,466
`5,039
`—
`
`S
`
`S
`
`S
`
`(175 ) $
`
`(0_03 ) $
`5,242
`
`(0_03 ) $
`5,242
`
`5,039
`
`0_97
`5,212
`
`092
`5,501
`
`$ 492,447
`227.961
`264,486
`228,466
`36.020
`14,469
`—
`21,551
`8,337
`13,214
`—
`
`$
`
`$
`
`$
`
`13,214
`
`2_52
`5,236
`
`234
`5,646
`
`2002 (1)
`
`$ 453.159
`214,659
`238,500
`205,355
`33,145
`13,961
`2515
`16,669
`6.269
`10,400
`3,942
`
`$
`
`$
`
`$
`
`6,458
`
`1_65
`3,914
`
`1_52
`4,261
`
`(1)In August 2002, as part of a refinancing, we repurchased our existing 125/8% senior notes and Series A and Series C Preferred Stock and, in
`connection therewith, incurred $3.0 million of after—tax one—time charges, including approximately $2.6 million of non—cash charges.
`(2)Fiscal 2002 has been reclassified from amounts previously reported to conform to the current year presentation.
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORR,
`
`‘lO~K, 12/'14/2086 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O28
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Operating Data:
`Comparable store sales increase (decrease) ( 1)
`Average net sales per gross square foot (2)
`
`Average net sales per store (2)
`Gross store sq11are footage at period
`end (3)
`Gross retail location square footage at period
`end (4)
`Number of retail locations at period end:
`Motherhood X/Iaternity stores
`Mimi Maternity stores
`A Pea in the Pod stores
`Destination Maternity superstores
`Total stores
`Leas ed departments
`Total retail locations
`Other Financial Data:
`Adjusted EBITDA (5)
`Ratio of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA
`Ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense
`Cash flows provided by operating activities
`Cash flows used in investing activities
`Cash flows used in financing activities
`Capital expenditures
`Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
`working capital
`Total assets
`Total debt
`Stockholders’ equity
`
`Year Ended September 30,
`2002
`2003
`2005
`2004
`2006
`(unaudited; in thousands, except operating data and ratios)
`
`4.3 %
`
`(2.5 )‘‘/o
`
`(4.9 )%
`
`0.3 "/u
`
`2.2 "/6
`
`$
`$
`
`305
`570,000
`
`$
`$
`
`295
`534,000
`
`$
`$
`
`311
`537,000
`
`$
`$
`
`345
`572,000
`
`$
`$
`
`362
`589.000
`
`1,532,000
`
`1,579,000
`
`1,569,000
`
`1,451,000
`
`1,231,000
`
`1.819.000
`
`1.874.000
`
`1.693.000
`
`1,541.000
`
`1.313.000
`
`659
`106
`33
`12
`810
`731
`1.541
`
`690
`117
`37
`8
`852
`73 9
`1,591
`
`717
`121
`41
`4
`883
`23 2
`1,115
`
`688
`119
`44
`—
`851
`15 5
`1,006
`
`616
`104
`43
`—
`763
`146
`909
`
`$
`
`:8
`
`$
`
`:8
`
`51,715
`2.3x
`3.6x
`42,41 3
`(23,166 )
`(3,380 )
`13,933
`
`83,772
`287,736
`118,349
`80,700
`
`$
`
`$
`
`33,906
`3.8x
`2.2x
`7,324
`(11,414 )
`(1,340 )
`17,644
`
`71,228
`273,317
`128,856
`63,328
`
`$
`
`$
`
`40,579
`3.2x
`2.7x
`1 8,256
`(23,020 )
`(2,500 )
`21.540
`
`67,833
`271,370
`127,917
`62.903
`
`$
`
`$
`
`50,213
`2.6x
`3.5x
`36,139
`(22,169 )
`(4,648 )
`25,344
`
`62,708
`263,536
`128,047
`58,858
`
`45,422
`2.8x
`3.3x
`31 ,056
`(20,219 )
`(14,786 )
`12.242
`
`55,214
`247,139
`128,282
`45.708
`
`(1) Comparable store sales figures represent sales at retail locations that have been in operation by 1VIothers Work for at least twelve full months at the beginning
`of the period for which such data is presented. As used in this Form 10-K, “retail locations" include stores and leased departments, and exclude locations
`where Kohfs sells our products under an exclusive product and license agreement.
`
`(2) Based on stores in operation by Mothers Work during the entire twelve-month period (which does not include leased department or licensed relationships).
`(3) Based on stores in operation by Mothers Work at the end of the period.
`
`(4) Based on all retail locations in operation at the end of the period.
`(5) Adjusted EBITDA represents operating income before deduction for the following non-cash charges: (i) depreciation and amortization expense; (ii) loss on
`impairment of long-lived assets; (iii) (gain) loss on disposal of assets; and (iv) stock-based compensation expense. We have presented Adjusted EBITDA to
`enhance your understanding of our operating results. Adjusted EBITDA is provided because management believes it is an important measure of financial
`performance used in the retail industry to measure operating results, to determine the value of companies within the industry and to define standards for
`borrowing from institutional lenders. We use Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of the performance of the Company. We provide Adjusted EBITDA to
`investors to assist them in performing their analysis of o11r historical operating results. Adjusted EBITDA reflects a measure of o11r operating results before
`consideration of certain non-cash charges and consequently, you should not construe Adjusted EBITDA as an alternative to net income (loss) or operating
`income as an indicator of our
`
`Source: DESTINATION MAT'ERNITY CORR,
`
`‘tO~K, 12/'14-/2006 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O29
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`operating performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, as determined in accordance with generally
`accepted accounting principles. We may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than other companies. Presented below is a reconciliation of net income
`(loss) and operating income (the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP) to Adjusted FBITTD/-\.
`
`Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA
`(in thousands)
`(unaudited)
`
`Net income (loss)
`Add: income tax provision (benefit)
`Add: interest expense, net
`Add: loss on extinguishment of debt
`Operating incomc
`Add: depreciation and amortization expense
`Add: loss on impairment oflong-lived assets
`Add: (gain) loss on disposal of assets
`Add: stock—based compensation expense
`Adjusted EBITDA
`
`$
`
`2006
`9,102
`5,819
`14,534
`873
`30,328
`16,118
`2,612
`(139 )
`2,796
`$ 51,715
`
`$
`
`Year Ended September 30,
`2005
`2004
`2003
`(175 ) $
`5,039
`$ 13,214
`(880 )
`3,466
`8,337
`15,293
`14,765
`14,469
`—
`—
`—
`14,238
`23,270
`36,020
`15,502
`14,270
`12,930
`3,440
`1,816
`616
`726
`1,223
`647
`
`2002
`$ 10,400
`6,269
`13,961
`2,515
`33,145
`11,789
`303
`185
`
`$ 33,906
`
`$ 40,579
`
`$ 50,213
`
`$ 45,422
`
`30
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORR, 10-K, 12/'14/2006 | Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O30
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
`Overview
`
`The following discussion should be read in conjunction with thc consolidated financial statcmcnts and their related notes includcd clscwhcrc
`in this report.
`
`We are the leading designer and retailer ofmaternity apparel in the United States with 1,541 retail locations, including 810 stores in all 50
`states, Puerto Rico and Canada and 731 leased departments. We operate our stores under the Motherhood Maternity, Mimi Matemity, A Pea in
`the Pod and Destination Maternity retail concepts and also sell our merchandise on the Internet at our MaternityMall.com and our bra11d—specific
`websites, as well as through an exclusive product and license agreement with Kohl’s. In addition to our 810 stores, our retail locations include 731
`leased departments within department and specialty stores. We design and contract manufacture approximately 90% of the merchandise we sell.
`
`Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
`
`Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
`These generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
`and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
`net sales and expenses during the reporting period.
`
`Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” We believe that the following
`discussion addresses our critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and
`results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and com plexjudgm ents, often as a result of the need to make estimates
`about the effect ofmatters that are inherently uncertain. lfaclual results were to differ significantly from estimates made, future reported results
`could be materially affected. However, we are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially
`different results.
`
`Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and estimates and the related Management’s Discussion and
`Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
`
`Inventor/'e,r. We value our inventories, which consist primarily of matemity apparel, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined or1 the
`first-in, first-out method (FIFO) a11d includes the cost ofmerchandise, freight, duty and broker fees. A periodic review of inventory quantities on
`hand is performed in order to determine if inventory is properly valued at the lower of cost or market. Factors related to current inventories such as
`future consumer demand and fashion trends. current aging, current analysis ofmerchandise based on receipt date, current and anticipated retail
`markdowns or wholesale discounts, and class or type of inventory are analyzed to determine estimated net realizable values. Criteria utilized by us
`to quantify aging trends include factors such as the amount ofmerchandise received within the past twelve months, merchandise received more
`than one year before with quantities on-hand in excess of 12 months of sales, and merchandise currently selling below cost. A provision is
`recorded to reduce the cost of inventories to its estimated net realizable value, if required. Inventories as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 totaled
`$94.3 million and $105.9 million. respectively, representing 32.8% and 38.8% of total assets, respectively. Given the significance of inventories to
`our consolidated financial statements, the determination of nct rcalizablc values is considered to bc a critical accounting cstimatc. Any significant
`unanticipated changes in the factors noted above could have a significant impact on the value of our inventories and our reported operating
`results.
`
`31
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2006 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_O31
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`L0ng—Lz'vedAssets. Our long—lived assets consist principally of store leasehold improvements (included in the “Property, plant and
`equipment. net” line item in our consolidated balance sheets) and, to a much lesser extent. lease acquisition costs (included in the “Other
`intangible assets, net” line item in our consolidated balance sheets). These long-lived assets are recorded at cost and are amortized using the
`/
`straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or their useful life. Net long-lived assets as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 totaled $72.2
`million and $77.1 million, respectively, representing 25.1% and 28.2% of total assets, respectively.
`
`In assessing potential impairment of these assets, we periodically evaluate the historical and forecasted operating results and cash flows on a
`store-b y-store basis. Newly opened stores may take time to generate positive operating and cash flow results. Factors such as (i) store type. that
`is. company store or leased department, (ii) store concept, that is. Motherhood, Mimi, A Pea i11 the Pod or Destination Maternity, (iii) store
`location, for example, urban area versus suburb, (iv) c11rre11t rrrarketplace awareness of our brands, (v) local custorrrer demographic data, (vi) anchor
`stores within the mall in which our store is located and (vii) current fashion trends are all considered in determining the time frame required for a
`store to achieve positive financial results, which is assumed to be within two years from the date a store location is opened. If economic conditions
`are substantially different from our expectations, the carrying value of certain of our long—lived assets may become impaired. As a result of our
`impairment assessment. we recorded write-downs of long-lived assets of $2.6 million and $3.4 million during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005,
`respectively.
`
`Goodwill. The purchase method of accounting for business combinations requires the use ofestimates and judgments to allocate the
`purchase price paid for acquisitions to the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the
`aggregate purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations and is separately disclosed in our consolidated
`balance sheets. As ofboth September 30, 2006 and 2005, goodwill totaled $50.4 million, representing 17.5% and 18.4% of total assets, respectively.
`In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142,
`“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill no longer be amortized, bL1t instead be tested for impairment at least
`annually or as impairment indicators arise.
`
`The impairment test requires us to compare the fair value of business reporting units to their carrying value, including assigned goodwill. In
`assessing potential impairment of goodwill, we have determined that we have one reporting unit for purposes of applying SFAS No. 142 based on
`our reporting structure. The fair value of our single reporting u11it is detennined based 011 the fair market value of our outstanding common stock
`or1 a control basis and, if necessary, a11 outside independent valuation is obtained to determine the fair value. The carrying value of our single
`reporting unit, expressed on a per share basis, is represented by the book value per share of our outstanding common stock. The results of the
`annual impairment tests performed as of September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 indicated the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value.
`As part of the Company’s impairment analysis as of September 30, 2005, an outside independent valuation was obtained and the fair value of the
`Company’s single reporting unit exceeded the carrying value. As of September 30, 2006, our book value was $14.35 per share of outstanding
`cornrnon stock and the closing trading price of our cornnron stock was $48.12 per share. If the per share fair value of o11r single reporting unit was
`less than the book value per share on September 30, 2006, our goodwill would likely have been impaired.
`
`Accourzzmgfor Income Taxes. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our
`income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires us to estimate our actual current tax exposure together with
`assessing temporary ditferences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation of property and equipment and valuation of
`inventories, for tax and accounting purposes. We determine our provision for income
`
`Source: DESTINATION MATERNITY CORP., 10-K, 12/14/2006 I Powered by Intelligize
`
`DMC Exhibit 2038_032
`
`Target v. DMC
`|PR2013-00530, 531, 532, 533
`
`

`
`taxes based on federal and state tax laws and regulations currently in effect, some of which have been recently revised. Legislation changes
`currently proposed by certain of the states in which we operate, if cnactcd, could increase our transactions or activities subject to tax. Any such
`legislation that becomes law could result in an increase in our state income tax expense and our state income taxes paid, which could have a
`material and adverse effect on our net income or cash flow.
`
`The temporary differences between the book and tax treatment of income and expenses result in deferred tax assets and liabil

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket