throbber
Paper No. 34
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`TARGET CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case No. IPR2013-00532
`(U.S. Patent No. RE43,531)
`_____________
`
`Dated: July 11, 2014
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ENTRY TO SEAL
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.54
`
`

`

`Pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.14, Patent Owner Destination Maternity
`
`Corporation (“Patent Owner”) hereby moves to seal the following: (1) Secret Fit
`
`Belly Historical Sales & GM.xls (Ex. 2056); (2) Belly not Secret Fit 2009_2013
`
`Kohl's.xls (Ex. 2058); (3) Belly not Secret Fit HE,MH,Out.xls (Ex. 2060); (4)
`
`Belly Secret Fit Kohl's 10-18-13.xls (Ex. 2062); (5) Figures 2 and 3 of the Green
`
`Declaration (Ex. 2064); (6) Exhibit C of the Green Declaration (Ex. 2068); (7)
`
`Exhibit D of Green's Declaration (Ex. 2070); and (8) Exhibit D1 of the Green
`
`Declaration (Ex. 2072) (collectively, the “Proposed Sealed Documents”).1 The
`
`Proposed Sealed Documents were filed contemporaneously with this Motion.
`
`Pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this Inter Partes Review, Patent
`
`Owner is also filing partially redacted public versions of the Proposed Sealed
`
`Documents. See Protective Order, ¶ 4 (Paper No. 24).
`
`Because the Proposed Sealed Documents contain proprietary confidential
`
`business information, Patent Owner moves to seal them for good cause explained
`
`in more detail below.
`
`I.
`
`Good Cause Exists for Sealing Confidential Information
`
`The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide provides that “[t]he rules aim to
`
`strike a balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`1 The Board granted Patent Owner permission to file this Motion in an Order
`
`entered on July 8, 2014.
`
`2
`
`

`

`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information.” 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012). Further, those “rules
`
`identify confidential information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret or
`
`other confidential research, development, or commercial information.” Id. (citing
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.54); see also Illumina v. Columbia University, IPR2013-00011,
`
`Paper 66, Aug. 12, 2013 Dec. (granting a motion to seal “technical and business
`
`information” and “product development information”).
`
`The Proposed Sealed Documents contain information that Patent Owner
`
`maintains is proprietary, sensitive, and confidential business, technical, financial,
`
`and/or strategy information further described below.
`
`The Proposed Sealed Documents contain Patent Owner confidential
`
`information, which is highly sensitive, confidential financial information related to
`
`Patent Owner’s sales of maternity products.
`
`These documents have been
`
`designated “Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only” by Patent Owner under
`
`the Protective Order entered in this Inter Partes Review. Moreover, the Board has
`
`already granted a motion to redact portions of the Green Report and its exhibits,
`
`which are being filed separately here. See Order, Paper No. 29.
`
`II.
`
`Certification of Non-Publication
`
`On behalf of Patent Owner, undersigned counsel certifies the information
`
`3
`
`

`

`sought to be sealed by this Motion to Seal has not, to their knowledge, been
`
`published or otherwise made public.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`Accordingly, Patent Owner requests that Exhibits 2056, 2058, 2060, 2062,
`
`2064, 2068, 2070 and 2072 be sealed.
`
`Date: July 11, 2014
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`s/ Paul A. Taufer
`
`Paul A. Taufer (Reg. No. 35,703)
`Michael L. Burns (Reg. No. 57,593)
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`One Liberty Place
`1650 Market Street, Suite 4900
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Phone: (215) 656-3385
`Facsimile: (215) 606-3385
`paul.taufer@dlapiper.com
`michael.burns@dlapiper.com
`
`Stuart Pollack (Reg. No. 43,862)
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`1251 Avenue of the Americas
`27th Floor
`New York, NY 10020-1104
`Phone: (212) 335-4964
`Facsimile: (212) 884-
`stuart.pollack@dlapiper.com
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner, Destination
`Maternity Corporation
`
`4
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on July 11, 2014, a complete and entire copy
`
`of the Patent Owner’s Motion For Entry To Seal Under 37 C.F.R. §42.54 was
`
`provided via email to the Petitioner by serving the email correspondence address
`
`of record as follows:
`
`Norman J. Hedges
`R. Trevor Carter
`Daniel M. Lechleiter
`Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
`300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700
`Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-1750
`Phone: (317) 237-0300
`Fax: (317) 237-1000
`Norman.Hedges@FaegreBD.com
`trevor.carter@FaegreBD.com
`daniel.lechleiter@FaegreBD.com
`
`/s/ Paul Taufer
`Paul A. Taufer
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket